Friday, January 29, 2016



Creative activity could be described as a type of learning process where teacher and pupil are located in the same individual. (Arthur Koestler) 


a) I-inspired- matter is learning

The Spirit of Internet has accepted me as a friend and, probably knowing that I am still trying to think sometimes, tries to send me inspirational stuff that can lead me to Ideas.
Today for example- knowing my strong connection to Koestler due to his work on creativity and also the effect of the novel "Darkness on Noon" on me, the Spirit has sent the Motto- an advanced form of learning.
Immediately after that between the new papers re. Problem Solving I discovered the one saying that evolution per se can be considered intelligent. Please find and read it at LENR IN CONTEXT-1. It is about the intelligence and evolvability of Evolution but it it NOT an Intelligent Design paper on the contrary. Living matter is learning.
The next paper, by Calin Plesa young and creative nano-biologists suggests in more ways how this learning could be accomplished in biology.
My natural reaction is to go a step further- or back iif you wish: Matter has the abiility of Learning.
This statement is natural in my philosophy described e.g. here:
The start-point is that Nature (Matter, Energy, Information in endless forms and combinations) exhibits the trend toward maximum Interestingness, the main ambition of Nature is to be interesting. The popularity of the Big Bang has decresaed during the lst few years however matter has evolved from sub nuclear to the conscious in billions of years based on synergies- forms of creative collaboration
between different levels of matter- catalysis overall. The necessary degree of irreversibility of the mega-evolution shows that Matter possesses an abilty to learn, has some forms of inherent memory. This is an experimental fact, coming from an infinite experiment- nothing idealistic or spiritual here. What is, is. What isn't, isn't (K. Duhanov)
The idea matches perfectly what I have said yesterday- the way to Energy is to learn to build better and even better LENR tools. Mother Nature, the mother of all Solutions, teaches us the same.


After learning about new aspects of learning I had the satori that I MUST also learn something very important from Randy Mills' demo. Even before having some fisrt hand, witness information.

My friend Axil wrote this: 

Mills used the XUV black light emissions from the hydrino to base his technology on. But now it is a new day, a new company, a mew type of reactor, and a new type of light: sunlight that he is using to base his technology on. But how can this transition between black light and sunlight be justified, Does Mills need to write another 2000 page tome about the hydrino to explain this transition in the type of light that his reactions are producing?  He is right and also so important is the question what energy- not power can give this brilliant light?

The most relevant info came from a reader:

He has sent this video:

However see this description of the Sun Cell process

The energy released also vaporizers the molten silver into a cloud that is opaque to the UV and EUV- that is, it converts the UV and EUV (which can't be converted directly- yet) into blackbody radiation at 5000K. This in turn heats a tungsten wall/ window such that it becomes a blackbody radiator at 3500K. Concentrator PV cells face this tungsten window and are expressly tuned to the wavelengths produced by a blackbody radiator at 3500K to efficiently convert the energy directly to electricity.

I liked the video aesthetically but not at all technologically. Combined with the text

the effect was :HELL!!!

You can bring Hell on the Earth in many forms and places socially, economically, politically etc. but technologies are (must be) smarter. You cannot work with or in, hellish conditions. Th decades ;long fiasco of Hot Fusion is the best example.
But this Sun Cell with its huge temperatures is not much earthier or promising.
How can these hellish circumstance be conquered, what is the most technological (read human) method to put hellfire to work for us- that is LENR, my friends.!
What it uses is a miraculous trick learned/borrowed from heterogeneous catalysis:
active sites or NAE- if you wish.
Hellfire is dispersed in myriads of nano-fires, hell-heat is diluted, the effct is tamed, the system is brought under control
Many nano-Hells create techno-paradise.

The New Fire is Hellfire dispersed, diluted, tamed and controlled.
Its central secret is good active sites management.


1) Andrea Rossi
January 28th, 2016 at 4:48 PM

Carrol Macksey: yesterday OK
At 04.50 p.m. of Thursday January 28 2016
1 MW E-Cat: stable
E-Cat X: in operation 2, one in examination.
Warm Regards,

Andrea Rossi- today rather bad
January 29th, 2016 at 10:12 AM

René Bergeron:
at 10.10 a.m. of Friday Jan 29 2016:
1 MW E-Cat : troublesome, lowest efficiency, working on it. Not a good night, honestly.
E-Cat X: remade another to continue destructive tests
Warm Regards,

Andrea Rossi- this has to be definition of positive
January 28th, 2016 at 7:41 PM

Italo R.:
If things will go well, there will be a transition to the industrialization.
Warm Regards

January 28th, 2016 at 11:56 AM

Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which is the professional specialization of the expert responsible for validation (ERV) that is directing the measurements of the 1 MW E-Cat in operation in the factory of the customer?

Andrea Rossi- very interesting!
January 28th, 2016 at 4:57 PM

Nuclear power plants, nuclear engineering.
Warm Regards,

2) LENR Is Real

3) Low Energy Nuclear Revolution (English Version)


Why scientists now think biological evolution itself is intelligent
This is also about learning and bio-matter, in more senses. The author is the son of my Canadian friend Vlad Plesa- who edits:

Sun, surfing and proteins
TU researcher Dr. Calin Plesa won an NWO Rubicon grant and went to California. At UCLA, he now learns the art and science of synthesizing genes by the thousands.

1 comment:

  1. I am surprised you feel that way about Brilliant Light Power. The interior of its reactor is of course very very hot. And bright. Would you directly breathe in the fuel exhaust from an internal combustion engine? Would you stand at the focal point of hundreds of solar mirrors? I don't know what Rossi is claiming or how it is supposed to work, but you wouldn't want to be inside his glowing tubes either. Most people don't even spend a large amount of time in the Sun without a hat and sunscreen as the UV could cause skin damage and melanoma.

    We want huge energy production. Mills has offered it to you along with a usable theory. It vindicates all LENR researchers as telling the truth about the observation of excess heat even if the power source is not quite what you expected.

    I respectfully repeat my earlier suggestion. Until LENR acknowledges the formation of hydrinos/dark matter as the predominant source of heat in LENR experiments, clarity will continue to be lacking as to whether fusion/transmutation (via hydrinos) occurs at reaction rates that produce usable energy.

    It may be that Mills is wrong to discount significant fusion/transmutation just as LENR activists are wrong to discount the existence and energy release of hydrinos which may lead to fusion. But how will we know what reaction is producing what energy until the existence of both reactions are accepted>