Wednesday, June 29, 2016



The Rhino Principle.
A rhino is not a particularly subtle or intelligent creature, yet it has managed to dominate the savanna through sheer determination and aim. It takes initiative when it sees something it wants and puts everything into what it does best: charge!

I've always been suspicious of collective truths. (Eugene Ionesco)

It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question. (Eugene Ionesco)


a) Why is IH fabricating so many memes?

More readers have asked why the supporters of IH try to create so many anti-Rossi and again so many pro-IH memes? A first aspect showing they are not good in the art of Memetics is the "optimal density" of memes. Exactly as in agriculture where it is an optimal density of plants at crops, too dense memes start to mutually annihilate each other; just remember the incompatible "the plant is impossible" (people killed by heat not removable) and the other"the plant does not work at all" Indeed is if a list of memes  is done and used according to a plan, or an "everything goes" ineffective mentality rules without control.
 Why do they do this? Because, very probably,  they do not have anything better! If they did, they would not have  made another motion to dismiss The situation is: Rossi wants to go in Court, IH wants to escape. You can guess three causes why is this soo......please! 

b) The stoppable subtleties of Jed Rothwell's personal memes

Admirable hyperactive for his followers< Jed Rothwell has created his own discussion thread serving simultaneously as a meme generator, a guillotine for everything Andrea Rossi and a training camp for his, very specific subtleties.

This it is:
I was wrong about Rossi, but what I fear most is that I might be partly right

Subtle as a rhinoceros, Jed writes here about the very document that has irreversibly convinced him that there was no excess heat in the 1MW experiment- he has received this from Andrea Rossi
Subtle as a rhinoceros he seemingly suggest here: "Andrea Rossi is a collection of sins and evilness, however even he is able to appreciate a genius, a genuine high class expert and this must be the reason that this otherwise very secret document has found me. Unfortunately, contrary to Rossi's expectation the paper has convinced me quasi instantly but beyond any doubt ,that the  plant does not work at all, the Test  is worse than a disaster."  
The text is imagined but this must be the idea. A possible- but morally impossible! alternative is that Jed has invented the ghost document thing as a - again- subtle trap for Rossi who desperate seeing that Jed convinces everybody that no excess heat- will come with is data and Jed will officially mas sacrate and annihilate them- an easy pray for him!. Rossi did not want to comment about Rothwell's calorimetric genius, he knows why?!

I have to confess that I have not searched the rothwellisms thoroughly- surly I will not be one of his biographers however the following statement- a strong pro-IH mme: has an even higher degree of rhinocerian subtlety- it is text and context- not extract:

"Our enemies will put fraud front and center. This will be another blow against cold fusion, thanks to Rossi. By the grace of God we may still have money from I.H., 
without which this field would be dead, dead, dead."

Some critics have found it needs a few definitions, then Jed has never spoken about the grace of God- as far I remember- the message is crystal clear: "IH is the savior of LENR!"    Isn't it too much to say that without money from IH LENR would be 3-times dead; simply dead is not sufficient? Money from SKINR, possible from the ARMY, money outside US as in Japan, India, Russia, China,  EU etc.will not be able to keep LENR  in a half dead  state? For Jed, the idea that LENR needs even more new ideas and young researchers than (micro)-funding is too subtle? He says directly to al LENR researchers: "Be against Rossi, be with IH- otherwise your research will die, die, die!" Further- no comment!

c) Re-read Eugene Ionesco's play- we LENR fighters have to avoid rhinocerization!

It is plenty of absurdity in this process of creating the memes of IH. I well remember this play about people losing their humanity
I am terrified and will not tell more, my readers can decide if the meme-factory has something rhinocerian in it or, if on the contrary it is a congregation of angels?!

However, I will finish in Jed';s NEW style asking:
"For God's sake, IH please go boldly and openly to the Trial!"


1) Is Clueless Jed Rothwell Paid or Played to Slander Penon and the ERV Reports on the MW COP~50 E-Cat Plant?

2) Andrea Rossi answers

Gerard McEk
June 28, 2016 at 8:11 AM

Dear Andrea,
You recently said that the light of the QuarkX has given you an idea how the Rossi-effect may work. (In other words: you may have seen the light).
1. Do you make any progress with the theory and
2. Do you expect it to lead to new patents?
In the past you said that you were preparing many patents.
3. Do you expect some of these to be published soon?
4. Is there any progress in the domestic QuarkX or
5. Do you expect that the lower temperature Ecat to be the most suitable solution?
Thank you for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard

Andrea Rossi
June 28, 2016 at 3:55 PM

Gerard McEk:
1. yes
2. yes
3. no
4. yes
5. I do not know yet
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,

3) Andrea Rossi does not answers and does not comment:

June 28, 2016 at 1:52 PM

Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
sifferkoll link given here

My comment: IH again tries to escape from the litigation. If 1/100 of the slanders and the lies deposited in the blogs by the mad dogs of IH were true, IH would be eager to go in court…the fact that they are trying to delay and to suffocate the litigation makes clear that they are afraid of it.
Evidently they know that you have evidence that will defeat them in Court, where what counts is not the chattering of the mad dogs, but the real evidence.
In fact it appears that you are fighting to go in Court, they are trying to run away.

4) Russian language video: "News re LENR and CNF philosophical storm:
Seminar: "Philosophical Storm"  June 28, 2016 presentation of Igor Iurievich Danilov
First part: QuarkX of Andrea Rossi
Second part: Microbes of Tamara Vladimirovna Sahno and Viktor Mihailovich Kurashov

5) Did Jed Rothwell Admit Being an IH Contracted Spin Doctor with a Freudian Slip?

The correct link to the Calaon paper is this:

Understanding of molecular hydrogen has implications from industry to medicine


  1. The link to Andrea Calaon's "Yet another LENR Theory" page

    Try this ...

    Doug Marker

  2. Direct link to the actual PDF (in the above link you need to go to the bottom of the page to access this link here ... )


  3. Andrea Calon's paper is an excellent read (have said this here before & am saying so again). Andrea is an original and open minded thinker !. Again, highly recommended reading.

    In particular read carefully his comments (and the references to V Dellacasa and N Cook) about rotation of point charges and intrinsic spin (electron ZB). This area of investigation seems an excellent line of reasoning.

    Doug Marker

  4. For additional comments and questions answered by Andrea Calaon, read the posts here - they add further thinking...


  5. Re: The heading of the lead article;-
    "a) Why is IH fabricating so many memes?"
    I'm surprised to see something like that written.

    It is very apparent that IH have said virtually nothing. That's the whole problem with trying to establish the details of their apparent abandonment of the supposed worlds most revolutionary new technology. They have said nothing other than a very succinct comment, they were unable to substantiate the performance claims for the ecat. Apart from that one statement, they have said nothing.
    There is no proof at all that anything which anyone else has said on the matter is at the behest of IH, and from the lack of detail in any of the commentary supplied by others, it is highly unlikely any of it has been propagated at the direction of IH, or even with their approval, implied or otherwise. If it was then I would expect more accurate and specific detail. And yet the heading above accuses IH of "fabricating memes." ?? I find that claim absolutely incredible.
    How much less than nothing does someone need to say to not be accused of fabricating something? Is it even possible to say 'less than nothing'? Of course not.
    Now compare the behavior of IH in saying nothing to the behavior of Mr Rossi, who, although he says he cannot comment on the matter which is subject to the legal action, continues almost daily to post comments on his blog, about how IH have done this and that, and failed to do this and that, and how they are dishonest people, grasping, greedy, scheming, and various other derogatory statements to the detriment of the public perception of IH.
    This is the blog for which Mr Rossi has the sole right to either post the comment to his blog, or delete them. And he deletes many so we know he knows how to delete a derogatory post. And yet he posts them for public display, even though he says he cannot comment on matters relating to the case.
    Really? And posting these comments on his own blog does not constitute making a comment on the case?
    More pointedly, if nobody else posts anything suitable, it is apparent from the grammar and syntax that Mr Rossi fills the gap and authors some of those posts himself.
    At the very least, wouldn't that action fall into the category of "fabricating a meme" against IH?
    Has IH done anything like this? If they have, they have kept it very well hidden.

    1. A poem for IH and their silence at the death of their LENR dreams

      Do not go gentle into that good night

      Do not go gentle into that good night,
      Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

      Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
      Because their words had forked no lightning they
      Do not go gentle into that good night.

      Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
      Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

      Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
      And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
      Do not go gentle into that good night.

      Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
      Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

      And you, my father, there on the sad height,
      Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
      Do not go gentle into that good night.
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    2. Pweet,
      Apparently you're not familiar with the many Lenr forum ( postings of one Dewey Weaver, who is an IH investor. Also, apparently you're also not familiar with the many postings (in Vortex, lenr forum, here, e-cat world) of Jed Rothwell, regarding information he has been given by IH. These postings (and possibly related postings by others who are in touch with IH as well as several public statements/interviews by Darden et al and the legal documents filed by IH) are the memes and/or the sources of the memes.

    3. Don't forget, IH has contracted services from global public affairs and strategic communications consultancy firm APCO Worldwide. Experts overseeing public communication.

    4. This is how APCO works

    5. At anonymouse above,
      You're right, I don't follow all those forums. From the very few excursions I have done into them it appears most of the postings are just the passing of wind with little substance other than the bad aroma, metaphorically speaking of course. I am aware of some of Weavers views though from repeats on other forums, and I would take some notice of them because he has money on the table and so would probably have better access to more accurate information than we have concerning the real situation, and what I can plainly see from this is, he is not at all happy with the situation as it really is. And I think he would have a much better idea than us of what the real situation is. With this in mind, I note his ire is directed towards Mr Rossi, not IH, which I take to mean he considers whatever falsities he considers to be in play, they are predominately on account of Mr Rossi, not IH. Just my opinion of course, and I accept that everyone else has theirs, and they may differ from mine.

    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    7. Dewey is not IH.
      he talk for himself, and it seems that after some unpleasant surprises to be insulted and name called, seeing his character assassinated, he expressed his antifragility by enjoying the e-catfight battling in mud.

      I won't say it shows his great philosopher's talents, but more his ability to enjoy what could be unpleasant. Probably what make him an entrepreneur and a VC.
      After all, he lost big money, was insulted, so why not at least enjoy some fun of that catastrophe... I won't be that antifragile, respect!

    8. What money did Dewey lose? According to Marianne Macy, Darden put his own money into the deal with Leonardo Corporation.

  6. My comment: The following comment ignores the obvious in drawing conclusions. The obvious is that any company that is sued will seek to have the case dismissed. Dismissal is the lowest cost solution to the law suit. Defending this lawsuit will be expensive and cost IH and its employees a lot of time. That money and time can be more profitably spent elsewhere. "IH again tries to escape from the litigation. If 1/100 of the slanders and the lies deposited in the blogs by the mad dogs of IH were true, IH would be eager to go in court…the fact that they are trying to delay and to suffocate the litigation makes clear that they are afraid of it.
    Evidently they know that you have evidence that will defeat them in Court, where what counts is not the chattering of the mad dogs, but the real evidence.
    In fact it appears that you are fighting to go in Court, they are trying to run away.

    1. A "motion to dismiss" is a delaying legal tactic that is used by a defendant to delay and bankrupt a plaintiff. There are another dozen legal procedural methods that could be employed to cost the plaintiff time and money in an attempt to force the plaintiff to settle out of court.

      Rossi is sueing IH for triple damages or 267 $million. There are no damages assessed in an out of court settlement.

    2. Does Rossi sue IH for US$267 (89x3) ? are you sure ? I never heard about such amount.

    3. Look for triple damages in Rossi's complaint.