MOTTO
LENR THINKER
Machiavelli was a man of his epoch- and of all epochs- past and coming. For doers and problem solvers he is an example- realist and pragmatist. Probably his moral basis was too broad, but he lived and what was more then, survived, in very interesting times.
See please the two quotations above. Unfortunately we must accept that the RvD conflict is a war and the winning solution is fight.
I think the Part based on the experimental result uses verifiable facts as means, while the other Part consider that their ends are justifying ANY means. A few minutes reading - now say page 208 at
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/4745-rossi-vs-darden-developments-part-2/?postID=56306#post56306
could furnish you lots of examples of people developing negative emotional intelligence not only for Andrea Rossi and his technology, but for his/its supporters and up down to NiH LENR methods. I doubt many of their methods are justified for any ends.
And after April,20 when significant steps at the litigation are possible I will invite them to a direct open confrontation, focused on technical issues. Serious discussion, not chatter.
LENR MONITOR
1) What is the Evidence for the QuarkX?
ANONYMOUS
April 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM
We understand you’re not responding to questions to your blog as sometimes, not saying anything is the best answer. As, silence can never be – misquoted.
Andrea Rossi
April 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM
ANONYMOUS:
Two cathegories of things I do not respond to:
1- stupidities
2- issues related to the litigation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
6) Updated!
12th International Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen Loaded Metals
5-9 June 2017
http://www.iscmns.org/work12/index.htm
LENR THINKER
Machiavelli was a man of his epoch- and of all epochs- past and coming. For doers and problem solvers he is an example- realist and pragmatist. Probably his moral basis was too broad, but he lived and what was more then, survived, in very interesting times.
See please the two quotations above. Unfortunately we must accept that the RvD conflict is a war and the winning solution is fight.
I think the Part based on the experimental result uses verifiable facts as means, while the other Part consider that their ends are justifying ANY means. A few minutes reading - now say page 208 at
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/4745-rossi-vs-darden-developments-part-2/?postID=56306#post56306
could furnish you lots of examples of people developing negative emotional intelligence not only for Andrea Rossi and his technology, but for his/its supporters and up down to NiH LENR methods. I doubt many of their methods are justified for any ends.
And after April,20 when significant steps at the litigation are possible I will invite them to a direct open confrontation, focused on technical issues. Serious discussion, not chatter.
LENR MONITOR
1) What is the Evidence for the QuarkX?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/04/17/what-is-the-evidence-for-the-quarkx/
Program of the day:
2) Attention! The Seminar planed in PFUR Moscow for 27.04.2017 is rescheduled for
25.04.2027 (16.00-18.00)
Внимание!!! Семинар в РУДН, планировавшийся на 27.04.2017, переносится на вторник 25.04.2017 (16:00-18:00). (details, access in the rusian text)
Program of the day:
1. 16-00 – 16-50 , Drd. Phys.sci IZMIRAN ,town Troitsk: "Analysis of the new experiment of A. Rossi and not-nuclear mechanism of the release of the excess energy in the low energy nuclear processes"
2. 16-50 – 17-40 A.N. Vlasov Dr. Phys.mat. sci, town Riazan, State Radiotechnical University:
"Exprimnts for obtaining plasmoids- analogs of ball lightnings"
3. 18-00 – 18-30 Redaction meeting
3) Anatolii Klimov et al: "Heteregenous plasma vortex reactor. On the way to
create chemistry of the internal electronic layers http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/anatolii-klimov-i-dr-geterogennyi-plazmenno-vikhrevoi-reaktor
2. 16-50 – 17-40 A.N. Vlasov Dr. Phys.mat. sci, town Riazan, State Radiotechnical University:
"Exprimnts for obtaining plasmoids- analogs of ball lightnings"
3. 18-00 – 18-30 Redaction meeting
3) Anatolii Klimov et al: "Heteregenous plasma vortex reactor. On the way to
create chemistry of the internal electronic layers http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/anatolii-klimov-i-dr-geterogennyi-plazmenno-vikhrevoi-reaktor
4) Thanks to Sam North for announcing
The Great Energy Transition: Another Milestone for the SunCell
https://fcnp.com/2017/04/14/great-energy-transition-another-milestone-suncell/
5) From ALAN SMITH
AN EVENT COMPRISING LENR SCIENCE
Risk & the Culture of Science (Invitation only workshop)
Alan Smith will speak on April 30 about "Why scientists reject Cold fusion?" One of the organizers is Professor Huw Price, (Bertrand Russel Professor of Logic) wwell known in LENR circles for this paper:
Is the cold fusion egg about to hatch?https://aeon.co/ideas/is-the-cold-fusion-egg-about-to-hatch
6) From Andrea Rossi's JONP
I bet the IH partisans would not like much these messages.
Newt
April 17, 2017 at 5:49 PM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What do you think of the slenders published against you? Why you never react?
May the Force be with you!
Newt
Andrea Rossi
April 18, 2017 at 7:00 AM
Newt:
Chatters. Not worth to be answered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
C.
April 18, 2017 at 4:29 AM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can the negative comments against you organized in the blogs by your foe influence negatively the Court?
Andrea Rossi
April 18, 2017 at 6:38 AM
C.:
No. The Court decisions are based upon facts and evidence, not upon opinions and chatters. This is what makes us confident of the strength of our case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
6) From Andrea Rossi's JONP
I bet the IH partisans would not like much these messages.
April 17, 2017 at 5:49 PM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What do you think of the slenders published against you? Why you never react?
May the Force be with you!
Newt
Andrea Rossi
April 18, 2017 at 7:00 AM
Newt:
Chatters. Not worth to be answered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
C.
April 18, 2017 at 4:29 AM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can the negative comments against you organized in the blogs by your foe influence negatively the Court?
Andrea Rossi
April 18, 2017 at 6:38 AM
C.:
No. The Court decisions are based upon facts and evidence, not upon opinions and chatters. This is what makes us confident of the strength of our case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
ANONYMOUS
April 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM
We understand you’re not responding to questions to your blog as sometimes, not saying anything is the best answer. As, silence can never be – misquoted.
Andrea Rossi
April 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM
ANONYMOUS:
Two cathegories of things I do not respond to:
1- stupidities
2- issues related to the litigation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
12th International Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen Loaded Metals
5-9 June 2017
http://www.iscmns.org/work12/index.htm
LENR INSPIRATION
1) Records For Conversion Of Laser Energy To Nuclear Energy In Exploding Nanostructures
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009261417303597
2) Creating time crystals
Physicists create new form of matter that may hold the key to developing quantum machines
- School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
- Received 12 January 2017, Accepted 30 March 2017, Available online 12 April 2017
- •
- Table-top nuclear fusion can be generated by high-energy dynamics of Coulomb exploding nanostructures driven by ultraintense, femtosecond laser pulses. The conversion efficiency of laser energy to nuclear energy in the chemical physics laboratory is comparable to that for DT fusion in the ‘big science’ inertial fusion set ups.Abstract
Table-top nuclear fusion reactions in the chemical physics laboratory can be driven by high-energy dynamics of Coulomb exploding, multicharged, deuterium containing nanostructures generated by ultraintense, femtosecond, near-infrared laser pulses. Theoretical-computational studies of table-top laser-driven nuclear fusion of high-energy (up to 15 MeV) deuterons with 7Li, 6Li and D nuclei demonstrate the attainment of high fusion yields within a source-target reaction design, which constitutes the highest table-top fusion efficiencies obtained up to date. The conversion efficiency of laser energy to nuclear energy (0.1-1.0%) for table-top fusion is comparable to that for DT fusion currently accomplished for 'big science' inertial fusion setups.
2) Creating time crystals
Physicists create new form of matter that may hold the key to developing quantum machines
Date:April 17, 2017
Source:Harvard University
Summary:Researchers created a previously-only-theoretical time crystal using a small piece of diamond embedded with millions of atomic-scale impurities known as nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers. They then used microwave pulses to 'kick' the system out of equilibrium, causing the NV center's spins to flip at precisely-timed intervals.
3) Physicists create 'negative mass'
Experimental technique can help probe phenomena in astrophysics and cosmology
Date:April 17, 2017
Source:Washington State University
Summary:
Physicists have created a fluid with negative mass, which is exactly what it sounds like. Push it, and unlike every physical object in the world we know, it doesn't accelerate in the direction it was pushed. It accelerates backwards.
4) Mechanism behind the electric charges generated by photosynthesis
Date:April 17, 2017
Source:Kobe University
Summary:
Photosynthesis requires a mechanism to produce large amounts of chemical energy without losing the oxidative power needed to break down water. A research team has clarified part of this mechanism, marking another step towards the potential development of artificial photosynthesis.
"Milky Way: Hydrogen halo lifts the veil of our galactic home"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170418111504.htm
"New world record for solar hydrogen production"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170418111448.htm
ReplyDeletehttps://futurism.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-dark-matter-in-1-minute/amp/
ReplyDeletehttp://go.newsfusion.com/science-news/item/4855362
http://gizmodo.com/a-trail-of-strange-physics-results-offers-tantalizing-h-1794424098/amp
ReplyDeleteRef point 1 above;-
ReplyDelete"1) What is the Evidence for the QuarkX?"
I suppose I should reply to these on Ecat World, but some time back when I hopped out for a quick wizz or something, when I went to come back in Frank had changed the locks. :)
Anyway, my answers to the following points are;
"Evidence for the QuarkX, of various weight, includes:
– Gullstrom’s experiment and public paper co-authored with Rossi (duped? co-conspirator?)"
Unfortunately for Gullstrom, I see him as being duped, the same as all his well meaning precedents.
It often happens to young and inexperienced people trying to get ahead in the real world. They find it hard to believe things are not really the way they are being told by an older person with a different agenda. In fact it even happened to some well meaning and well experienced professors and such.
"– Fabiani’s interview with Mats that included eye-witness observations (co-conspirator?)"
No. Just similarly duped. Apparently Fabiani never saw anything wrong with the 1MW ecat test, even though he was intimately involved with it's construction and running for a long period. He has now disappeared rather than face up to some in depth questioning. It looks like he was also lead down the same garden path that Carl-Oscar is now wandering down. Perhaps the two should have a chat so that Carl-Oscar is not too surprised when he gets to the end point. It will undoubtedly be the same end point which all the previous associates, partners and licensees arrived at, in complete surprise apparently. They certainly seemed upset about finding themselves there.
"– Leaked picture of Rossi orienting a team of engineers (?) on operation of the QX, with COP > 1700! (elaborate deception with paid actors?)"
No. Paid actors would be my last assumption. A very long last.
I suppose we could impute similar weight to the earlier ecat technology by publishing photos of all the lettered experts who were photographed at demonstrations of previous versions of the technology. So far none of it has been verified as functionally viable. They were all used as intellectual capital in using their credentials to give validity to the invalid. I can say that because I was one of those who saw their presence as an indication of it's genuineness. It worked. (Yes! Shame on me!)
"– New exhaust pipes on the JMP side, post 1 MW test (why if nothing’s getting really hot?)"
Well, things did get hot, but not one megawatt's worth of hotness. Even 15 kilowatts continuous has to be disposed of somewhere. Specially when it's 30 degrees C outside.
What we were really expecting was one megawatt, or somewhere close. And of course, truckloads of real products from a real customer. Any indications of those yet? If not, a picture of an exhaust pipe is a very poor substitute.
"– The ‘glow’ picture of the QX that Rossi released (ok, doesn’t show much but does hint that Sapphire plays a role)"
ReplyDeleteYes, you're right. It doesn't show much. It certainly doesn't indicate there is anything producing excess energy there, so it really counts for nothing at this stage other than to prove if you heat something up enough it will produce light. But then, everybody already knows that.
What we're all waiting for proof of excess energy, and someone saying it does is a long way short of proof.
"– Rossi’s assertions (history shows we can only note these, as we cannot determine which are sharing and which are feints… but they have been quite detailed in terms of heat/light/electricity observations, pursuit of 5 sigma, etc.)"
More 'Rossi says', and even that changes often.
3 Kilowatts. 1 Kilowatt. Heat and electricity.
Heat light and electricity, in adjustable proportions. Then heat only, because the electricity is used internally to generate more heat. (Really? The direct electrical production is a far more miraculous achievement.) Then 20 watts! Gee! That was a big step down.
Surely after the last six years we should know what all this is worth. Read back over the some of the last six years of the Rossiblog to see how often we have been here before with exactly the same enthusiastic proclamations, only to have them later disposed of or superseded by equally amazing proclamations which also end up going the same way.
Still no products, no customers,. Nothing but disgruntled associates, supporters, partners and licensees. Not a good record so far. (Oh, but that's all about to change, right? Well I would hope so, but I think not.)
"A smelly stew of deception and conspiracy? Is that what you really think or does your gut tell you that maybe, just maybe, something real is going on here?"
(Gosh! I think I was shown the door for suggesting things less odious.)
But yes. My gut tells me you got it right with the first line, so hold that thought and I think you will not be disappointed.
All just my opinion of course, but gee, looking back over some of my old posts going back six years, I haven't be far wrong. Yes, I keep them because on some web sites, (not this site I must add), many of them seemed to just disappear without trace. I have no idea why. Maybe that's why so many people are so surprised when things don't turn out the way they were all talking about.
Anyway, we live in hope, and maybe one day I will turn out to be completely wrong.
Believe it or not, in the event that ever happens on this subject, I will be much happier than being so continually right.
Come on Andrea,.. give us all a big surprise!
Oh,. and make it a pleasant one, then all will be forgiven.
Hi Pweet
ReplyDeleteDr Randal Mills has been working on
his technology for 27 years but it looks
like he is finally going to be successful.
So out of main stream like A.R. and Mills
technologies take a lot of time.
A person sure can get impatient following
them.
Regards
Sam