Wednesday, February 22, 2017



Image result for bridge quotationsImage result for bridge quotations

Image result for bridge quotationsImage result for bridge quotations


 Architect Rossi could not build a fake bridge.

It was said- the architect wants  fame and his idea was to build a bridge that should become even better known than this one: 
or this:

The plan was simple: to build a fake  bridge- that is one looking exactly as all other bridges-  just no man, no truck, no car no other vehicle or being could pass it from one side to the other or vice-versa  If trying too hard they will fall down and this  will be lethal given it was over the great river Saint Lenrus not less than 352 meters wide.
However the architect's plan failed because he was unable to build the fake bridge alone as he wished,he needed the approvals of the State Authority for Bridges, advised by many experts, got advantageous offers from many building materials companies, helped by the Army, staff, many workers. Eventually he has lead the construction of a perfectly real, fine bridge. Great traffic on it everyday.

About the bridge metaphor- it is for the the 1MW Doral Plant.  The enemies of Rossi 
and of LENR+, stimulated by the publication of the ERV core report with stellar results, taking in account that the existence of the plant is certainty and it was functioning for 352 days continuously- have an unique solution left- to demonstrate that the result were completely fake- the question is how this happened for such a long time unobserved.. The Doral Plant has not appeared and grow up as a tree or as a cabbage
it was built on basis of design, nuclear engineer Penon has contributed to this together with Andrea Rossi and a rather multidisciplinary team including IT and control engineers. The basic rules of engineering and of safety had to be strictly respected- hydrogen is pretty dangerous, it is about high temperatures in the active core etc. Plant erection - many workers participated, engineers authorities had to supervise it.
 Rossi was not alone in that plant, not there all time., IH people also there, visitors not all ignorants in matter of plants - the professional rules had to be respected, safety rules also, Rossi was not ubiquitous , omnipresent and omnipotent there. As alpha as he is, he could not  bewitch a flowmeter unobserved; the scenario imagined by IH supporter(s) is that the flowmeter quadrupled the flow values. Any worker from the plant could easily observe this, report to his both and the Test has to be stopped. It did not happen because it is just ill-willed imagination of an impossible malfunctioning.
And the plant as normal, had problems, as all plants have. I remember a few in which I have worked in 3 shifts too, surprises come all the time according to the rule of Pareto - 80% bad. And the Plant had a normal history of problems.

The architect could not build a fake bridge, the inventor could not build a fake plant
and make it to work for 352 days in normal exploration, specific technological regime.

I wrote this for people able to think, to be objective and realist. 
Those unable to manage their hatred against Rossi and LENR, will do what they are paid and/or programmed for- try to deconstruct, demolish what I wrote.

In comparison with arguing with them, Sisyphus is doing high efficiency work in Hades 


1) From the MIAMI Court Pacermonitor re the Rossi vs Darden litigation

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

151 misc Memorandum Tue 11:02 PM
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re138 MOTION for Protective Order by Andrea Rossi. (Chaiken, Brian)

150 notice Notice of Hearing by ATTORNEY ONLY Tue 8:03 PM
NOTICE of Hearing by ATTORNEY: Discovery Hearing set for2/23/2017 03:00 PM in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan. (Handelson, Erika)

149 answer Answer to Third Party Complaint Tue 5:58 PM
ANSWER to Third Party Complaint by Fulvio Fabiani, United States Quantum Leap, LLC. (Nunez, Rodolfo)

148 order Order Tue 1:51 PM
ORDER on February 21, 2017, informal discovery conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 2/21/2017. (tro)

147 minutes Discovery Hearing Tue 11:52 AM

PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan: Discovery Hearing held on 2/21/2017. Total time in court: 15 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Christopher Rebel Jude Pace, Christopher Martin Lomax, D. Porpoise Evans, Christopher Perre (Digital 10:50:40) (cg1)

146 order Order Tue 11:13 AM
ORDER on February 9, 2017, informal discovery conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 2/21/2017. (tro)
145 order Order Tue 10:17 AM
ORDER on February 7, 2017, informal discovery conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 2/21/2017.

Document 148 is an order for a visit and inspection of the E-Cat plant test site occurring either today or on
March, 2, 2017.

2) Fusion fria- la Voz de Galicia

3)  LENR-DIY video

4) A patent by Francesco Celani
WO2011016014 (A2) ― 2011-02-10

5) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

Frederic Maillard
February 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM

Dear Dr Rossi,

When your E-Cats are on the market for massive distribution :

1) will your company be the sole supplier of the E-Cat manufacturers with the necessary fuel ?

2) will your company be the sole buyer of nickel from nickel producers, in order to prepare the fuel for E-Cats ?

3) will the nickel producers have to do some transformations of characteristics you will request on the nickel you will purchase from them ?

4) do you think the price of nickel per unit bought from the nickel producers will be significantly higher than its standard market price due to the transformations made by them ?

5) do you have any idea to what extent for 4) ?

Thank you in advance for your answers,
Best wishes

Andrea Rossi
February 21, 2017 at 10:06 PM

Frederic Maillard:
1- no
2- no
3- no
4- no
5- no
Warm Regards,


Limitless Energy: Could We Ever Bring Sci-Fi Fusions Reactors to Life?


With thanks to Alan Smith:

Meet design thinking: An approach to problem solving that can increase the probability of breakthrough in innovation


  1. Quote from the third paragraph;-

    " the question is how this happened for such a long time unobserved.. "
    That is a really good question, and part of the answer is;
    It remained unobserved mostly because no-one was allowed access to the 'customer area' to ascertain there was some indication that 1MW heat was being used for anything at all.
    They didn't need all day requiring detailed access to company secrets, only a cursory look though the customer area from time to time to see some sort of energy consuming process under way.
    But no! Strictly no access!
    This leads a critical observer to then wonder; if none was being used was anything being produced?
    Increasingly it seems the answer is no.
    It is now revealed that in all likelihood the supposed customer was in fact, the same entity which was producing the supposed energy, so the probability that there was very little heat being produced and no product being made and is quite plausible.

    Most people would recognize that whatever the claimed results might be, a situation such as where everything is done in complete secrecy and under the control of the selling party, represents a severe risk of fraud.

    Would any regulating authority determining acceptance of any product at all take this situation as being satisfactory as an acceptance test?
    Of course not, and it must be transparently obvious they would not.

    The only argument for it's acceptance is that it apparently satisfies to some degree the test protocol written up in a supposed agreement.
    Whether the supposed results satisfy the previous benchmark conditions or not is made irrelevant by the way the results were arrived at, in almost total secrecy covering all aspects of the procedure.

    As to the involvement of Penon or anyone else who was involved in it's construction, I am sure that nobody else involved from start to finish , have ever had any idea of how the supposed excess heat would be generated.
    They would have been only allowed to be concerned with the aspects of the mechanical construction of an electrically powered water heater, so any reference to their involvement as being proof that the technology is valid is totally baseless.

  2. "Unravelling the atomic and nuclear structure of the heaviest elements"