Thursday, February 23, 2017

FEB 23, 2017 LENR-3 QUESTIONS 1 GREAT REPORT

MOTTO- instead of a Motto: 

THREE QUESTIONS RE. LENR:

 1- IS LENR GOING IN A GOOD DIRECTION?

 2- IS LENR GOING IN A DIRECTION?

 3- IS LENR GOING?

 Prum's Second Law:

 " The opposite of Progress is NOT Stagnation, it is Decay."


It is interesting that report 2b) has arrived as kind of immediate answer to the 3 Questions. It was a pleasant surprise (20% of the surprises are so)

 DAILY NOTES

 Ed Storms' Answer.

For the questions I got an answer from Ed Storms- he gives a global answer. Thanks!
The direction in your question is important. Two directions are posible. One is toward basic scientific understanding of the phenomenon and the other is toward technology and application. The direction toward technology has failed and has caused nothing but trouble.  This path was taken much too early in the history of the discovery before the required basic information was available.  

Now, people are gradually taking an interest in the science and trying to understand what causes the LENR process. This path requires understanding of science and great skill, which until recently was denied to the effort.  I predict as this understanding is acquired, the technology direction will flourish, but not until the phenomenon is well understood. We are seeing the consequence of trying to go the technology direction too soon. As result much money has been wasted and many damaged reputations have resulted. 
DAILY NEWS

1) Rossi v. IH — Site Inspection and Depositions Scheduledhttp://www.e-catworld.com/2017/02/22/rossi-v-ih-site-inspection-and-depositions-scheduled/
2a) A New Energy Technology Race Between Europe, Japan and The US That Could Save Us From Climate Collapse

5) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

JPR
February 23, 2017 at 5:14 AM

Update?

Andrea Rossi
February 23, 2017 at 9:50 AM

JPR:
As a matter of fact, today I am in Manchester, NH, for the litigation, but I have been informed the situation is stable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

 and
Miguel
February 23, 2017 at 6:10 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it true that during a day in 2010 you made a test with the NRL in a laboratory of Washington, DC?
A top level officer of the NRL has written recently that the test was impressive ad that if it was a hoax it was a damn good one!
Can you describe?
Cheers,
Miguel
Andrea Rossi
February 23, 2017 at 9:43 AM

Miguel:
Yes, the day you are referring to happened in the Summer of 2011, in a Laboratory connected with NRL. I brought there my E-Cat and they monnted it in a rack of theirs to make their calorimetric measurements. A specialist of NRL measured the electricity consume by means of an oscilloscope of NRL, while several thermocouples set up by them measured the temperature of the water before and after the E-Cat. A flowmeter measured the flow of water. The test during the first day measured a difference of temperature that corresponded to a production of about 1 kWh/h of energy, while after half an hour from the start up ( around 9 A.M.) the system is gone in SSM ( Self Sustained Mode ) and the amount of the input of electricity consumed by the E-Cat has been zero for all the day.
The electricity consumed amount has been measured exclusively by means of the oscilloscope brought there by the specialist of NRL.
This is what happened during that day.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

LENR IN CONTEXT-1
Thanks to Alain Coetmeur
Effect of Stabilizing Agents on the Synthesis of Palladium Nanoparticles
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asp/jnn/2017/00000017/00000004/art00105

New window into the nanoworld
Scientists combine the ultra-fast with the ultra-small to pioneer microscopy at terahertz frequencies
Date:February 21, 2017
Source:University of Alberta
Summary:
For the first time ever, scientists have captured images of terahertz electron dynamics of a semiconductor surface on the atomic scale. The successful experiment indicates a bright future for the new and quickly growing sub-field called terahertz scanning tunneling microscopy (THz-STM). THz-STM allows researchers to image electron behavior at extremely fast timescales and explore how that behavior changes between different atoms.
LENR IN CONTEXT-2

 Don’t sell a product, sell a whole new way of thinking
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dont-sell-product-whole-new-way-thinking-prashant-dedhia

Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. sam northFebruary 23, 2017 at 2:58 PM

    https://www.biv.com/article/2017/1/could-canadian-fusion-power-be-play-2030/

    ReplyDelete
  2. PweetFebruary 23, 2017 at 9:06 PM

    Re point 5) above, the second point 5) after the first point 5).
    Quote
    " The test during the first day measured a difference of temperature that corresponded to a production of about 1 kWh/h of energy, while after half an hour from the start up ( around 9 A.M.) the system is gone in SSM ( Self Sustained Mode ) and the amount of the input of electricity consumed by the E-Cat has been zero for all the day."
    This is very interesting and the 'all day' operation in self sustain mode is very similar to the results claimed for the original 1MW plant test in 2011, where it ran in self sustain mode for most of the test with an output of over 400 kilowatts.
    The fact of anything being able to output energy of any sort with no input power over such a long period surely must be the holy grail of any research in lenr. No input energy applied and 1 kilowatt of energy output.!
    No wonder many people were excited about this at the time, me included.
    If what Mr Rossi claims is true, then he has achieved this in 2011.
    He claims an output of 1 kilowatt for all day with no input energy applied.
    For this process to be reliable enough that he can make it work on command for a whole day in a demonstration to a third party in an arranged demonstration, and also make multiple devices work to produce a combined 400 kilowatts in another test, it must have been operational, or very close to it at that time.
    That performance alone would rightly be classified as monumental and worthy of immediate development into many waiting applications.
    The question is then, why, six years later, has this amounted to nothing and is his research is now drifting off into smaller outputs of only 20 watts on a device which he says will not run in ssm?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)