Wednesday, February 8, 2017



Image result for repetition quotationsImage result for repetition quotations


We could learn that repetition of untrue things, even mixed with true ones, has a dark, destructive side, 

The solo organ grinder who has usurped the ColdFusionCommunity  domain 
continues to write about me, a new over-wordy posting for today. The usual niceties
- louse, paranoia, my friends observe my decay..but today he amazed me with his stupid stubborn insistence that he can measure the diameter of an insulated steel pipe at the height of 3 meters, unobserved, with a screwdriver. 
One of his pearls:
 "From my point of view Peter's focus on technology makes him stupid, because technology  serves life and not the other way around."
Such a repetitive scandal source has to be ignored completely as Mme Ingrid.
advised why promote, give attention to such an individual? His somatic and mental health must be also taken in consideration.
Unfortunately he owns now the domain- that's indistinguishable from a blasphemy, is an offense for the memory and creations of Martin Fleischmann and Gene Mallove and many other real scientists, dead and alive. What became 'Cold Fusion community'!

NOTE. 31 years ago my younger alter-ego YVES-HENRI PRUM was born.
A life changing event for me. 


1)From the Miami Court Pacermonitor re the Rossi vs Darden Trial

Tuesday, February 07, 2017
135 notice Notice of Hearing by ATTORNEY ONLY Tue 5:52 PM
NOTICE of Hearing by ATTORNEY: Discovery Hearing set for2/9/2017 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan. (Annesser, John)
134 minutes Discovery Hearing Tue 11:33 AM
PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan: Discovery Hearing held on 2/7/2017. Total time in court: 1 hour(s) : 10 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Erika Stephanie Handelson, Christopher Martin Lomax, John William Annesser, II, Brian W. Chaiken, Christopher Perre. (Digital 10:02:47/10:12:39) (cg1)

2) Updated
Good prospects for Leonardo Corp./Andrea Rossi lawsuit vs. Cherokee Investment Partners/Thomas Darden

3) Rossi vs. Industrial Heat — How is Boeing Involved?

4) Special Relativity, the Source of Electron Deep Orbits
J.L. Paillet, A. Meulenberg

5) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

February 7, 2017 at 2:13 PM

Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
IH has published reports that say that the data measured by Fabiani are equal to the data measured from the ERV, which gives evidence that the data are fake.
Can you comment?
Andrea Rossi
February 7, 2017 at 5:16 PM

I think everybody has noticed that we do not comment issues to be discussed in Court, while IH- Cherokee Fund Partners try to raise mud in the blogs. Any comment on this fact is useless.
In general, let me say that if you measure data with two certified instrumentations on the same thing in the same point or close, obviously the data are the same, unless one of the instruments is nuts.
I am not referring to the specific case, but in general. The specific case will be discussed upon in Court.
As I said, we have plenty of evidence to confirm the data of the report in Court and I am very optimist about what is emerging in evidence in the proper site.
Warm Regards,

6) Get out of the new road if you can’t lend a hand
It happens to be about me.

7) Rossi Motion for Protective Order


Bohr's quantum theory revised
Date:February 7, 2017
Source:Plataforma SINC
Bohr’s atomic model was utterly revolutionary when it was presented in 1913 but, although it is still taught in schools, it became obsolete decades ago. However, its creator also developed a much wider-ranging and less known quantum theory, the principles of which changed over time. Researchers have now analyzed the development in the Danish physicist’s thought – a real example of how scientific theories are shaped.

Newly Created Helium Compound Could Completely Change Chemistry


Innovation is a social  process-which means collaboration is key.


  1. computing/nasa-creates-computer-that-can-survive-venus/amp/

  2. Lenr forum


    Rossi has claimed self sustained operation from the earliest days of his research. This test seems to be an example of one of his systems performing at high power in self-sustain mode. This was one of his earliest systems, but he continued to assert -- up until the Quark X -- that every one of his reactors were capable of self sustaining without input while producing high levels of output. Continual operation at high power output without input is the Holy Grail of cold fusion research. And, if you can achieve it utilizing a cheap element like nickel (or recycling reverse spillover catalysts like palladium) the paradigm shattering potential goes up even higher. As far as I'm concerned, the whole freaking debate about Andrea Rossi and the validity of his technology should revolve around his technologies ability to self sustain at high power. This is the most central specific claim he's made about his technology. After claiming to be able to achieve self sustain from the start (TEN YEARS AGO) he should certainly be able to produce the same results today with his increased knowledge, experience, know how, and understanding of the Rossi Effect. I personally have no doubt he is capable of making systems self sustain -- although others feel differently. Now, if he would ever be willing to openly and completely share such know how with another party is up for debate. I think the truth is that the so called "secret sauce" isn't too hard to figure out if someone with an obsessive compulsive mindset and a crazy work ethic is willing to run experiments non-stop for a couple months. I think this is how Me356 figured out how to get results.

    Back to what I was speaking about, I think the whole debate about COPs of 1, 1.3, 2, and so on is a total joke. Even higher COPs that may seem more significant (lets say 3-10) are meaningless when self sustained operation is possible. I personally wish that the judge would look at Andrea Rossi and say, "You've been claiming that your reactors can operate for hours at a time without input for ten years. I've reviewed the patents, documents, transcripts, and blog posts where you have repeated this hundreds of times. If this lawsuit is going to continue, I want to see such a reactor operate with my own eyes with my own court appointed engineers taking measurements."

    If Rossi wanted to do so, I am confident he could satisfy such a request from the judge. But I'm not convinced that even under direct threat of life imprisonment that he'd obey an order that he didn't agree with -- even if he lost everything. But I think if some sort of request or push for such a test could be made, it would be far more productive than squabbling and debating about low COP figures. With the so called "hot cats" we're depending on temperature figures from IR cameras that can be debated for months on end. Such never ending arguments have happened on this forum! With such a self sustaining system, a control and an active system (the only difference being one with hydrogen and one with none) would have an equal amounts of power supplied. If after warm up and triggering the self sustaining system operated for hours producing a flow of heat with no input power (AFTER THE CONTROL COOLED DOWN TO NEAR AMBIENT) the evidence would be rock solid. You wouldn't need a freaking IR camera and advanced calculations to see what was taking place!

    I sure hope in the deposition of Andrea Rossi that his claims about self sustained operation of his systems are brought up again and again. His under oath answers about them should be placed on the record. Maybe his description of getting a reactor up and running (with only heat/pressure variations), cutting the power off, and allowing it to run for hours at a time in self sustain mode would entice the judge to ask for proof!

    1. The big problem is, Rossi's e-cats always needed to be connected to a substantial power source while operating in 'self sustain' mode', for safety reasons of course.
      And the connected power source always had to be of similar capacity to the claimed energy output of the e-cat under test. Thus a half megawatt reactor required the permanent connection of a half megawatt power source.
      Apparently, you can quench a runaway reaction producing 1 megawatt of heat with the addition of another megawatt of heat by way of a large electrical input power. And this would have to have been produced by adding all this power to the same heating elements which initiated the original runaway reaction because to add it via some other method, say an RF generator or similar, would require a huge RF generator or other device to absorb that much power, nothing of the like being seen anywhere near any of the demonstration reactors.

      The amazing thing is, apparently this requirement was not adhered to during the recent 'year long' test of the 1MW plant at Doral because the test site was almost certainly not wired for this capacity.

      If it was a one day test I could understand that maybe this safety requirement might be ignored on the basis of probabilities, but for a year long test? Really? I don't think so.

      This might lead the more cynical observer to conclude the output power produced in all the supposed 'self sustain mode' demonstrations was actually coming from the connected power source.

      I notice the claim of operation in 'self sustain mode' has been dumped in the latest version of the e-cat, which is also strange because as noted above, it was the self sustain mode which made the ecat power generation truly great, if it were real.
      But here we are a year later, with all the development effort being directed towards this new 20 watt variant, at the expense of the previously announced further roll-out of the recently tested and proven 1MW plant, with a proven COP of over 100, a truly remarkable achievement. (provided it is real of course.)

  3. Rest of above comment

    Again, I'm not a lawyer. I don't know if there is any realistic situation in which a judge would ask for a demonstration in a case like this. But if I were IH, it would by my number one goal if my lawyers claimed the strategy was viable.

    If I end up reading excerpts from Rossi's deposition where low COPs are debated, I'll probably barf.