tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post6493672145908371377..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: FEB 22, 2017 THE ARCHITECT COULD NOT BUILD A FAKE BRIDGEGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-33218312401861461952017-02-23T06:16:36.246-08:002017-02-23T06:16:36.246-08:00https://www.google.ca/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/scie...https://www.google.ca/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/02/22/nasa-announcement-live/amp/?client=safarisam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-82147703428378059912017-02-23T06:04:57.050-08:002017-02-23T06:04:57.050-08:00https://www.sciencenews.org/article/physics-greats...https://www.sciencenews.org/article/physics-greats-20th-century-mixed-science-and-public-servicesam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-85037518814905368352017-02-23T05:53:42.123-08:002017-02-23T05:53:42.123-08:00"Unravelling the atomic and nuclear structure..."Unravelling the atomic and nuclear structure of the heaviest elements"<br />http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/02/170222102559.htmsam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-61812116961065460302017-02-22T20:27:04.609-08:002017-02-22T20:27:04.609-08:00Quote from the third paragraph;-
" the quest...Quote from the third paragraph;-<br /><br />" the question is how this happened for such a long time unobserved.. "<br />That is a really good question, and part of the answer is;<br />It remained unobserved mostly because no-one was allowed access to the 'customer area' to ascertain there was some indication that 1MW heat was being used for anything at all. <br />They didn't need all day requiring detailed access to company secrets, only a cursory look though the customer area from time to time to see some sort of energy consuming process under way. <br />But no! Strictly no access! <br />This leads a critical observer to then wonder; if none was being used was anything being produced?<br />Increasingly it seems the answer is no.<br />It is now revealed that in all likelihood the supposed customer was in fact, the same entity which was producing the supposed energy, so the probability that there was very little heat being produced and no product being made and is quite plausible.<br /><br />Most people would recognize that whatever the claimed results might be, a situation such as where everything is done in complete secrecy and under the control of the selling party, represents a severe risk of fraud. <br /><br />Would any regulating authority determining acceptance of any product at all take this situation as being satisfactory as an acceptance test? <br />Of course not, and it must be transparently obvious they would not.<br /><br />The only argument for it's acceptance is that it apparently satisfies to some degree the test protocol written up in a supposed agreement. <br />Whether the supposed results satisfy the previous benchmark conditions or not is made irrelevant by the way the results were arrived at, in almost total secrecy covering all aspects of the procedure.<br /><br />As to the involvement of Penon or anyone else who was involved in it's construction, I am sure that nobody else involved from start to finish , have ever had any idea of how the supposed excess heat would be generated. <br />They would have been only allowed to be concerned with the aspects of the mechanical construction of an electrically powered water heater, so any reference to their involvement as being proof that the technology is valid is totally baseless. Pweethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09197878743499245329noreply@blogger.com