Thursday, October 27, 2016

OCT 27, 2016 LENR+ CANNOT BE KILLED!

MOTTO

Image result for depression mongering quotationsImage result for desperation mongers quotations

Nothing is more useless than a dispute with depression mongers, merchants of desperation, people paid or volunteering to kill Hope- see below.

DAILY NOTES

About depression mongers

Many threads at the fine LENR Forum are dominated by noisy packs of Rossi detractors/IH supporters who also try to create the standard vision and ideology of the entire LENR field.Actually I do not care much for them, I well know that discussing with Teflon brains is not possible- and all I want to do now is to warn the LENR community how pernicious the ideas of these - nomina odiosa!- individuals
are.
Just take one of their favorite memes- going well beyond the Rossi-Darden conflictL

LENR+ does not exist. It is a figment of Gluck's imagination. Ni-H cold fusion is no stronger or more reproducible Pd-D. It may not even exist.

That means total denial of Rossi's multiplicative excess heat but also of the Piantelli-Focardi NiH, of Parkhomov and many other replicators, of MFMP, Lugano experiment  denial of the role of high temperatures, of catalysis, surfcw dynmica of the vapor-phase systems with clean active surfaces via deep degassing, spell as nothing can be better than PdD- the situation is and will be hopeless technologically speaking. 
It is very depressive to think that it is possible that such people will decide the future of LENR. Regress, FUD, VUCA, desperation- the field will stagnate, hibernate or die.
But I think LENR+ cannot be killed.

DAILY NEWS

1) From Cold Fusion Times
J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. 20 (2016) 29–53
Research Article

Optical Detection of Phonon Gain Distinguishes an Active Cold Fusion/LANR component 
Dr. Mitchell R. Swartz JET Energy, Inc.
Successful cold fusion is heralded by a large, if not quite abnormal, increase in the anti-Stokes to Stokes (aS/S) ratio in coherent multi-wavelength optical reflection volume-enhanced electric-driven spectroscopy (CMORE-spectroscopy). This distinguishing phonon gain is not seen in the “off” state or the avalanche (undesirable) mode. It heralds seven acoustic phonons assisting nuclear reactions and a core peak calculated Stokes temperature of circa 1645 K. ⃝c 2016 ISCMNS. All rights reserved. ISSN 2227-3123 
Keywords: Avalanche mode, CMORE spectroscopy, Excess heat mode, NANOR, Phonon gain 

2) In Italian Andrea Rossi the E-Cat Quark X will initially be used in industrial plants
http://e-catalyzer.it/e-catalyzer/andrea-rossi-le-cat-quarkx-verra-inizialmente-usato-per-la-costruzione-di-impianti-industriali

3) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

Egon
October 26, 2016 at 7:21 PM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
You explained that during the whole year of the 1 MW Ecat test you have been there in the plant from 6 P.M. to 10 A.M., so you spent there the entire nights for one year: an impressive dedication indeed.
God bless you,
Egon
Andrea Rossi
October 26, 2016 at 10:38 PM

Egon:
Yes, that’s what happened.
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
 and 

  Roberto
October 27, 2016 at 4:04 AM

Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The report of the ERV dwarfs all the stupidities said by the corrupted surrogates of Cherokee-IH.
Every expert can understand that the water flowmeter has been put in correct position; you repeatedly said that it was at a lower level respect the source and the point of delivery to the plant, so that it intrinsecally had to be always full, independently from the entity of the flow; the external water reservoir is clearly used only to refill the internal water tank in case of leaks, as well as it is clear that the external reservoir was higher than the internal tank, so that a floating valve maintained a constant level in the internal tank, where water arrives by gravity to compensate the possible leaks. Clearly the external reservoir is not affected by the hydraulic pressure of the live water piping system and it is also logic that the water circulation is forced. As an expert of thermal facilities, I can see all this at a glance. This plant is genial also under the engineering point of view, not just under the scientific content.
The stupidity of IH, who lost your license to pack away 100 millions of their investors, is colossal.
You will win, for the sake of all of us.
May God bless you,
Roberto

Andrea Rossi
October 27, 2016 at 11:18 AM

Roberto:
I cannot comment issues that have to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards
A.R.
4) Cold Fusion – The Salvage From The Energy Crisis?
Posted on October 27, 2016 by SkinPlasty.Com

5) A link for info and graphics for SSICCF20 thanks to David Nagel):
 http://ssiccf-20.xmu.edu.cn/download.asp



LENR IN CONTEXT-1

Young, talented and fed-up: scientists tell their stories
Scientists starting labs say that they are under historically high pressure to publish, secure funding and earn permanent positions — leaving precious little time for actual research.
http://www.nature.com/news/young-talented-and-fed-up-scientists-tell-their-stories-1.20872?utm_source=MIT+TR+Newsletters&utm_campaign=a9c0a69f20-The_Download_October_27_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-a9c0a69f20-153886969&goal=0_997ed6f472-a9c0a69f20-153886969&mc_cid=a9c0a69f20&mc_eid=e796b16859

By Cold Fusion's arch-enemy Ethan Siegel
Dark matter rises to its biggest challenge… and succeeds! (Synopsis)

LENR IN CONTEXT-2

Critical Things Smart People Never Say
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/critical-things-smart-people-never-say-dr-travis-bradberry

Learning and Memory in the Brain: How Science Cracked Your Mind's Code

6 comments:

  1. "LENR+ does not exist. It is a figment of Gluck's imagination. Ni-H cold fusion is no stronger or more reproducible Pd-D. It may not even exist.

    That means total denial of Rossi's multiplicative excess heat but also of the Piantelli-Focardi NiH, of Parkhomov and many other replicators, of MFMP, Lugano experiment denial of the role of high temperatures . . ."

    I said it "may not exist." That DOES NOT mean "total denial." It means partial denial, or calling something into question. Specifically:

    Piantelli-Focardi NiH -- not replicated yet.

    Parkhomov -- two major attempts to replicate have been performed, at U. Missouri and elsewhere. They included many individual tests. Both projects failed. Parkhomov's calorimetry is poor, so I expect his results are in error.

    And many other replicators -- there are no other confirmed replicators yet. A few others have tried, but their calorimetry has been very poor. The tests in China failed because the thermocouples overheated and malfunctioned in hydrogen.

    MFMP -- They have not reported any success.

    Lugano experiment -- they did not calibrate, and the temperature of their device did not exceed 800 deg C. We know that because the incandescent color was orange, and because it would have melted. There is no way they saw excess heat.

    Regarding Rossi, Penon's description of his setup, which you quoted here, proves that his results were fraudulent. The pressure could not have been zero (a vacuum) as he claimed. In fact, it was high enough to keep the water from vaporizing. He did not even include an instrument to check steam quality, because he knew damn well there was no steam. That, combined with the problems with the flow meter explain why the heat was 50 times less than he claimed. The only thing in the pretend customer site was a small radiator, which was only capable of cooling ~20 kW.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rupert
    October 27, 2016 at 1:40 AM
    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Congratulations for the solid report of the ERV. Great achievement, a page of history.
    Rupert

    Andrea Rossi
    October 27, 2016 at 11:34 AM
    Rupert:
    I cannot comment, but where did you find the report? it has not been yet deposited in Court and is supposed to be still confidential. I am receiving all these comments about it and I do not understand what is going on!
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Recall, in March I predicted that Rossi would not release the ERV report. When forced into disclosure I predict he will say:"Sorry, my dog ate the report."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. dear Brian,

      which dog? It is a lot of paper if printed. It will not be easy to make the Report edible ven for hungry dog.
      Rossi does not publish documents going to the Court.
      But why IH does not publish it when according to their propagandist any fool looking to the ERV report instantly realizes- the Plan does not work, Zero excess heat. Why?
      peter

      Delete
  4. Robert Dorr
    October 28, 2016 at 2:01 PM
    Andrea,

    I think the report that Rupert was referring to was the court document that was released regarding the “Plant Test Plan” of Fabio Penon. This is just a guess.

    Keep up your great work.

    Sincerely,

    Robert Dorr

    Andrea Rossi
    October 28, 2016 at 2:18 PM
    Robert Dorr:
    Yes, I too discovered you are right. Anyway, my Attorneys strongly demanded to me to ignore any provocation on the matter and never, for any reason, talk in the blogs of issues that have to be discussed in Court. I will comply.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He says;-
    "Anyway, my Attorneys strongly demanded to me to ignore any provocation on the matter and never, for any reason, talk in the blogs of issues that have to be discussed in Court. I will comply."
    And yet almost every day he publishes on his blog comments relating to what he says he cannot comment on.
    Who decides what is published and what is not?
    Does everything which is posted to his blog get published?
    I very much doubt it.

    ReplyDelete