Sunday, July 12, 2015


NOTE- due to an PC blunder/accident, this part was lost, I bought a new keyboard- wireless and made an error- lost Blogger drafts are not recoverable.
It was about LENR dramas- you will get it tomorrow. Imagine what could I write...


E-Cat customer happy with energy bills-Rossi

Thi goes so well with this surprise::
Andrea Rossi
July 11th, 2015 at 12:06 PM

Itali R.:
What really interests our Customer is that the E-Cat increases his profit.
Warm Regards

Remember how is quantity of information defined?

Rossi also says interesting things as: 

Andrea Rossi
July 12th, 2015 at 9:04 AM

Pippo Cavalieri:
It is absolutely NOT impossible that the manufacturing will be made ALSO in Italy, where I already have acquaintances with persons and factories with strong experience in mass production of items with affinity with what we want to do in Europe as Leonardo Corporation. Obviously, assuming the results of the tests on course will end up with positive numbers.
Warm Regards,

A.R.Dead cats don't bounce comment by Thomas Clarke


Promoting scientific and rational literacy to create a friendly global ideology that helps humanity

By Soenke Ziesche Ethical Technology



  1. Rossi’s “too cheap to copy” strategy is naive and will break Rossi’s heart in the end. This strategy is based on the assumption that the E-Cat is the best possible form of LENR that can possibly be produced. This assumption is not true. Rossi has quite an ego to even think along those terms. The Solar Hydrogen Trends(SHT) system is a better system for many important LENR based applications. This instant on system does not take ten days to startup and it does not produce much heat. Such an improvement in technology does burn water and auminum as a consumable.There is also direct electrical conversion that would add great value to the LENR reactor concept. Take the auto engine as a very inportant LENR application for example. A instant on car engine is a good application for that mobile type of LENR application. There are train engines and plane engines and ship engines too. The Papp engine is even better than the hydrogen machine based on the kind of power that it produces. The Papp engine may be the best kind of application that LENR can produce for an engine since it generates only mechanical tork.

    When the powerful global big money energy players get their hands on an E-Cat and they allocate unlimited R&D money, armies of quantum mechanics and their high tech analysis equipment, It won’t take long for Rossi’s E-Cat to take on the the time worn antique visage of the Edison light bulb and the Wright brothers flyer in terms of its primitive technology. Rossi will be moved out of the LENR game so fast, it will make his head spin. His fate will be the same as that of Edison, Tesla, and the Wright Brothers. We will always love and respect Rossi as the man who got LENR off the ground, but Rossi will soon lose control of his baby just like Edison and the Wright Brothers lost control of their brain children. No man can keep power indefinitely or even for very long. There is too much competition around this world for any man to do that.

    1. only the people who cooperate with competitors will grow fast enough to capture the huge market.

      imagining you can protect your market share is crazy.
      As you say Axil, quickly there will be better technology, and the secret of the success for Rossi or others will be to help and be helped by competotprs, clients, providers...

      technology is not the main factor for sucess once it works... many competent people having best technology have lost their market share.

      For me rossi is preparing WW2, as france was preparing WW1 in 1939... we had the best technology for WW1 (Ligne Maginot was not won, just passed around and attacked from behind where it was unable to respond - perfect solution for the past is perfect failure for today).

      his strategy to flood the market is a good basis, but withour partnering with the whole LENr community, sharing technology, calling for improvement, licensing others technology in exchange of your own tech, is the key...

  2. Tesla on Edison: "If he had a needle to find in a haystack he would not stop to reason where it was most likely to be, but would proceed at once, with the feverish diligence of a bee, to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search. ... I was almost a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor."

    —New York Times, October 19, 1931 (the day after Edison died)\

    Like Edison, Rossi is a straw counter. His mode of working will get him only so far. He does not take the time to understand the science behind his invention. That is my opinion that few here will agree with. I understand this; QM is not popular. The reverse engineering of the E-Cat will advance QM by a huge amount in science. But the fact that Rossi totally disregards QM as the cause of LENR will seal his fate.

    1. Axil,

      This makes sense to me. Am also of the opinion that AR will be bypassed very quickly. I suspect that AR may only have a partial grasp on QM. I agree with you that what emerges from LENR(+) will greatly expand our understanding od QM.


  3. I see Rossi as having te same issue that Copernicus had, the need to conform to previous ideas in order to avoid his work to be completely ignored, anda that is somehow rescued in Osiander's prelude:" For these hypotheses need not be true nor even probable. On the contrary, if they provide a calculus consistent with the observations, that alone is enough ."