"...not the scientists will decide, but the energy market"This is an arrogant irresponsible sentence.Such a devaluation of scientists and up-valuation of the market! - in which era are you living? Do you know how much damage has been done because the profit-hungry marketeers over-ruled the scientists (but the scientists were later blamed for the bad results)?
Dear Anonymous,You are almost right. But reality is arrogant and irresponsible if it does not accept the decision of those who KNOW.What's the alternative? Say the majority of scientists decide that the E-Cat cannot work, is impossible then it has to be abandoned? The profit hungry marketeers depend on the fact if people buy the energy source and that's a practical problem- the device is heating, your energy bill decreases, no accidents happen, the users' health is not in peril- everybody is contented and the E-cat is widely used. To demonstrate all these advantages is not easy and is a step-by-step process. Science can help a lot to make it faster and more easier.It is very different from selling a medicine based on lying to people. You cannot lie that it is warm in your flat, when the thermometer and your personal heat sensors say otherwise.In which era I am living? In Moneytheism, see please "Stop Koalemos" however the problem of energy is vital for Mankind.It is my pleasure to let you know that other New Energy devices are coming soon, E-cat will have competion. Greed is not good, competition is very good.Peter
The preceding dialog arises from assumptions attached to the generalities "scientists" amd "market". Scientists speaking outside their spealtiers carrya a baggage of opinions like ordinary consumers in the marketplace. Any applied energy technology must pass the tests Peter lists. Despite hype of decades ago, nobody wants a fission reactor in their basement or car. It is far from obvious that the Rossi technology will be more than a useful niche application. Mills'"CIHTY" technology may have better chance, but essentail details are unpublished, as they are with Rossi's.Stay tuned.It willbe interesting.
Thank you Mike, our long collaboration in this field was very inspiring for me. Now, I postponed writing the SWOT analysis due to an unpleasant feeling that my list is not complete. Due to your posting I had a revelation- the energy source also must be INDEPENDENTi.e. working without the contribution of an other energy source. On longer term that means self-sustaining (zero energy input) It is possible, Prof Piantelli had achieved this at the 60-70 W level years ago so it will be possible for the E-cat toowith more advanced methods of control.
Thank dear Lucintel!You have added important characteristics of SWOT.I have continued the analysis explicitly or implicitly as SWOT...it is a very special case, and here special has both positive and negative sensesPlease read and criticise (if the case) the writings, they are under the label NEW ENERGYPeter
Really good post! Hope there will be more good post here!Thanks for sharing valuable information..Free Solar Panels