MOTTOs
A perfection of means, and confusion
of aims, seems to be our main problem. (Albert Einstein)_
Both Mottos can be
interpreted as “fallible as we are, we still are much better with means than
with aims.”
You know that my blog is dedicated to problem solving (BTW I
am planning to set up a special new blog only for my 20 Problem Solving Rules)
therefore I am deeply interested in the sources of man-made problems. Step by
step, I have discovered an inexhaustible source of such problems, a very
effective recipe for failure. My satori has happened when I wrote an editorial
about bureaucracy.
“Somewhere a problem, a task, a purpose,
an aim or a problem appears. A solution is sought. An institution, a committee,
political party, group, team is created for working out and implementing the
solution and for creating new improved up-to-dated solutions. Then something
strange and evil happens- the institution etc. has a kind of amnesic shock and
“forgets” its own mission, does care less and less about the general interest
and focuses on its own group’s interest and on the people who support it.
Bureaucracy appears wit its corrupt and egotistical nasty ugliness.
However this process of degradation,
alienation is more general than the damned bureaucracy, in many places the aims
are cannibalizing the aims and take over their status and function.
I had an other illumination moment when I
read years ago that pharmaceutical industry spends more money for advertising
than for research I have read a lot about Big Pharma- the art of making
billions from milligrams and I have understood how it has lost its original
aim- to cure illnesses and make people healthy and has replaced it with maximum
profit obtainable from chronically ill people addicted to some, if possible)
expensive drugs. The aim of Big Pharma is many customers not healthy people. If
you are over 50 you will understand immediately what I want to say.
The most spectacular case of
means-replacing-aims is that of money- not more a means of buying and selling
but a kind of sacred aim, Moneytheism is the dominant religion, consumerism is
a social obligation that moves society, ads are ubiquitous. To be poor is the
most unpardonable sin.
It is now black humor or
outright idiocy to tell that the government has the aims to serve the people.
In practice, everywhere those who have won the power, democratically or not,
try to get rich by all means.
A few short (ened)
remarks:
a) The aims must be in consonance with the
means; good aims using evil means become evil.
The end may justify the means as long as there is something
that justifies the end.” (Leon Trotsky)
b) The aims are always less
clear, less stable, less up-to-dated and well defined and described, less
“real” than the means. Means are now, aims are in the future. In a sense, the
means tend to be more powerful than the aims and this is one of the reasons why
aims are easy prey for means so many times.
What really matters in life are not the goals we set, but the
roads we take to achieve them. (Peter
Bamm)
The Way is always more
than the Purpose. (Heimito von Doderer)
c) During my career in
research I have learned that if I want to create something more important and
lasting, it is better to focus on methods, principles, modes of thinking, more
on the processes than on products. Means – here too are more fertile than aims.
d) Collective
aims are much more vulnerable to the “means eat aims” syndrome than individual,
independent, original aims. The following quotation is, in part half- in part
1.5 relevant:
Brilliance is typically the act of an individual, but
incredible stupidity can usually be traced to an organization. (Jon Bentley)
If you belong to a group
having an aim identical with yours, consider it as your personal aim, it’s
safer and smarter...
The ‘aims replaced by means’
problem is present in my all favorite activity-
research
too. The publications of the scientists
and researchers have the aim to inform peers, colleagues and the world about
their achievements, discoveries, their own contributions to the advancement of
science and technology. However, because there are exclusively quantitative
criteria used for the evaluation of the activity of the scientists,
publications – their number- becomes an aim per se. You have to write and
publish as many as possible books and papers. So you tend to divide your work
in “least publishable units” see e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_publishable_unit This problem
is more serious than believed by the outsiders, quality and newness are very
difficult to define and the very necessary
Scientometrics is under-used.
NOTE During spring-cleaning my blog, I have seen that I
have already published 95 papers re New Energy. Please do not accuse me of
salami publication; there are other reasons for being so over-productive, to
not say, boring. I have written about many events, new ideas and concepts, I am
a slow thinker, my own ideas are not easy to understand for me and are rarely
formulated in a convincing mode; Please also take in consideration that I was
swimming counter-stream. I have made a long journey in complexity, from
thinking that deep degassing and VERY smart nanotechnology and perfect
adjustment of a few critical parameters will solve the problem of commercial
heat energy generation to the New Wave LENR+ a techno-conspiracy of
organized matter multi-sequential and hyper dynamic systems to unite Metal and
Hydrogen in the proper way... More important is that the best people in the
field are generously helping me.
But let’s go back to aims and
means, Read this please:
To forget your aim is
the most common form of stupidity.
(Friedrich Nietzsche)
This is an exaggeration and in the same time, a
euphemism. Losing your aims, replaced by some means, or in other way, is the
best recipe for disaster. If this happens to you, there is no other solution
than to regain your initial aims and to aim to more. Otherwise your cause is
lost.
The lost aims of LENR.
Cold Fusion has appeared unexpectedly as a promise of
infinite energy clean energy, as a creative solution to the huge delays and
great troubles of Hot Fusion. Based on the natural simplicity in thinking
everybody has expected to get a hot fusion reaction that takes place at cold,
due probably to the enormous electro-chemical pressure on the surface of the palladium
cathode. Soon the initial naiveties have disappeared and instead of a golden
rush for more and more energy, the field had to fight desperately enough for
its very survival. The starting aim, Energy became fight for survival;
Enhancement was replaced fast with proving Existence. Prove that you really
exist! The field was under siege for
long years. Pragmatic focus became scientific focus. When it become obvious
that the intensity of the desired heat release cannot be increased the aim was
changed to very sensitive heat measurement and a glorious new chapter was added
to the fine art of calorimetry. Disproportionate efforts but heroic ones.
Milliwatts are less that watts, our bodies are sources of approximately
100Watts heat and we need much powerful sources than ourselves. Minute
quantities of energy generate no enthusiasm, no enthusiasm means no funds, no
funds signifies no creative ideas. Lack of creative ideas is the most
destructive situation possible for research.
Cold Fusion has aimed to be a commercial heat source but
was sentenced to remain a lab curiosity.
I don’t know who was the first to call CF anomalous, but he/she has made
a fatal error, the effect is new, unexpected even surprising (smart researchers
are surprised only by the absence of surprises. Anomalous is pejorative,
offensive. Do you want an anomalous oven or an anomalous car?
However many good people have discovered and are
convinced that the effect, LENR exists and continued to try to solve the
problem of improved processes. These people organizes meetings, the great ones
have arrived this year to No 19. However the main aim of these meetings seems
to be to create opportunities to many people, some of them young, to present new
variants of weak and sick and unreliable LENRs or is helping theorists to apply
their one-step, simple explanation to a process for which the prefix “multi”
can be applied in multi-mode. Very rarely was it organized a serious, even
desperate discussion re why the XXXX is this strange category of phenomena so
weak and difficultly reproducible, concluding that this situation is
INTOLERABLE and MUST BE CHANGED. By any means!
A last remark- one of the starting aims of Cold Fusion
was to be NUCLEAR. I am increasingly thinking this is an equivalent of the
cat’s color not of the cat’s mice hunting ability. (I am speaking about Deng
Xiaoping’s cat not Andrea Rossi’s). I hope LENR+ is Nuclear in a quite new,
harmless way.
Losing aims, due to replacement by means, or in any
other way is the best recipe for failure and/or disaster for anyone and for
everything.
If a field loses its aims, it loses its original
identity and can be resurrected only from outside. LENR+ will regenerate the
noble and useful Cold Fusion dream.
