MOTTO
A long dispute means that both parties are wrong. (Voltaire)
It is Sunday, the Me356 Parkhomov replication was interrupted from reasons still not clear for me. An other replication can start soon or not; I still have to find out. No great events or news or important publications to be published today.
However, the truth of the Voltaire quotation was has been inspiring for me and (if accepted and understood) could be a rude awakening for many of LENR colleagues.
But no, I will use the protective variant of the word IF before the nasty questions
There are questions, long disputed that cannot answered on a simplistic base as
It is Sunday, the Me356 Parkhomov replication was interrupted from reasons still not clear for me. An other replication can start soon or not; I still have to find out. No great events or news or important publications to be published today.
However, the truth of the Voltaire quotation was has been inspiring for me and (if accepted and understood) could be a rude awakening for many of LENR colleagues.
But no, I will use the protective variant of the word IF before the nasty questions
There are questions, long disputed that cannot answered on a simplistic base as
I am right, you are wrong, white/black, yes/no.
The fundamental, existential dispute is usually asked as:
- Is Cold fusion real or not real? Transposed in is LENR real or not, things become a bit more complicated.
Initially it was- are those nuclear reactions in the PdD electrolysis cell possible ergo real?
See for example the script of the Brief introduction video of Jed Rothwell:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618 (I just translated the script In Romanian
it would be nice to have it in many languages as my 20 Problem Solving Rules)
However, the more valuable question is generated by the Fleischmann Pons great Promise: IS Cold Fusion or LENR a real important source of energy?
If Voltaire is right then those who deny the reality of LENR are wrong- it is real and it is nuclear at least in part and perhaps in a special mode.
However the initially discovered form of it is not an energy source it is just a harbinger, precursor of the real stuff.
About other LENR disputes in the chronicized phase- in an other editorial.
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618 (I just translated the script In Romanian
it would be nice to have it in many languages as my 20 Problem Solving Rules)
However, the more valuable question is generated by the Fleischmann Pons great Promise: IS Cold Fusion or LENR a real important source of energy?
If Voltaire is right then those who deny the reality of LENR are wrong- it is real and it is nuclear at least in part and perhaps in a special mode.
However the initially discovered form of it is not an energy source it is just a harbinger, precursor of the real stuff.
About other LENR disputes in the chronicized phase- in an other editorial.
DAILY NEWS
An important coming exhibition in Kazahstan- says about alternative nuclear energy, ICCF-19
ЭКСПО-2017 и перспективы альтернативной ядерной энергетики.http://yvision.kz/post/499918
Answering the Editorial:
Is Cold Fusion Real?
http://2greenenergy.com/2015/05/10/is-cold-fusion-real/Long dispute, isn't it?
Quantum Tunnelling in Cold Fusion (DBs)
An important coming exhibition in Kazahstan- says about alternative nuclear energy, ICCF-19
ЭКСПО-2017 и перспективы альтернативной ядерной энергетики.http://yvision.kz/post/499918
Answering the Editorial:
Is Cold Fusion Real?
http://2greenenergy.com/2015/05/10/is-cold-fusion-real/Long dispute, isn't it?
Quantum Tunnelling in Cold Fusion (DBs)
http://www.drboblog.com/quantum-tunnelling-cold-fusion-dbs/
New Fire and Ancient Fire Compared (Mike Henderson)http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/10/new-fire-and-ancient-fire-compared-mike-henderson/
Andrea Rossi answers to Tom Conover:
Tom Conover
May 9th, 2015 at 7:11 PM
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on the special results from the Lugano test. It has been my experience that simplicity becomes elegance (at least in mathematics) and the Lugano Cat is certainly an elegant system. I can tell that you are very excited about the major impact it has had on the design platform of the domestic system. Dare we hope that your new results may provide us with hope of the domestic E-Cat being able to power a few appliances in our homes?
Looking forward to the excitement that each day holds,
Tom
Andrea Rossi
May 9th, 2015 at 9:10 PM
Tom Conover:
Now it is 10 p.m. of Saturday May 9, where I am, inside the 1 MW plant: I am bouncing between the 1 MW plant and the Hot Cat, both in operation, both stable. This enormous work that our team is making is aimed to arrive to the target you have given the description of. For the domestic unit it will be much easier to start with heat generating E-Cats, because to produce electricity with so small units is still an unresolved problem, notwithstanding many prototypes of direct conversion, too “green” to be taken as mature solutions; to apply the Carnot cycle to a domestic E-Cat is, obviously, impossible and all the possible alternative we have found are not applicable to small units. To make domestic heaters , to heat houses is the target where the sea meets the sky within my sight
OTHER
NOT "OTHER", ACTUALLY, IT IS CLOSELY CONNECTED WITH LENR:
Tesla got a few of the investors into early power or electricity companies offside with his plans to use wireless electricity as a means of electrical distribution.
http://revolution-green.com/wireless-electricity/
New Fire and Ancient Fire Compared (Mike Henderson)http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/10/new-fire-and-ancient-fire-compared-mike-henderson/
Andrea Rossi answers to Tom Conover:
Tom Conover
May 9th, 2015 at 7:11 PM
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on the special results from the Lugano test. It has been my experience that simplicity becomes elegance (at least in mathematics) and the Lugano Cat is certainly an elegant system. I can tell that you are very excited about the major impact it has had on the design platform of the domestic system. Dare we hope that your new results may provide us with hope of the domestic E-Cat being able to power a few appliances in our homes?
Looking forward to the excitement that each day holds,
Tom
Andrea Rossi
May 9th, 2015 at 9:10 PM
Tom Conover:
Now it is 10 p.m. of Saturday May 9, where I am, inside the 1 MW plant: I am bouncing between the 1 MW plant and the Hot Cat, both in operation, both stable. This enormous work that our team is making is aimed to arrive to the target you have given the description of. For the domestic unit it will be much easier to start with heat generating E-Cats, because to produce electricity with so small units is still an unresolved problem, notwithstanding many prototypes of direct conversion, too “green” to be taken as mature solutions; to apply the Carnot cycle to a domestic E-Cat is, obviously, impossible and all the possible alternative we have found are not applicable to small units. To make domestic heaters , to heat houses is the target where the sea meets the sky within my sight
OTHER
NOT "OTHER", ACTUALLY, IT IS CLOSELY CONNECTED WITH LENR:
Tesla got a few of the investors into early power or electricity companies offside with his plans to use wireless electricity as a means of electrical distribution.
http://revolution-green.com/wireless-electricity/
I bet, WiTricity ill be almost exclusively to strat/feed LENR generators around 2027. However it comes a bit late: how good it would be to go wireless with all those coming Parkhomov replications, just now!!!
A couple of people on various forums have commented that perhaps there is an external factor such as some special, rare type of cosmic ray which triggers the reactions. This might explain some of the difficulties, What is your opinion?
ReplyDeleteThe difficulties inherent to the PdD system are invincible- only clean degassed surfaces work well at say more than 200C.
DeleteYou cannot build a technology based on occult cosmic factors or astrology and I hope these ideas are false.
Peter
The difficulties inherent to the PdD system are invincible- only clean degassed surfaces work well at say more than 200C.
DeleteYou cannot build a technology based on occult cosmic factors or astrology and I hope these ideas are false.
Peter
Muon catalysed fusion is accepted technology.
DeleteCosmic rays deliver a constant supply of muons.
Perhaps there is a connection.
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/615/1/012016/pdf/1742-6596_615_1_012016.pdf check this out Peter?
ReplyDeletethank you, my friend it is in the issue of May 17- Ego Out
Deletepeter
thank you, my friend it is in the issue of May 17- Ego Out
Deletepeter