Tuesday, June 28, 2016



The rule or domination by a meme or memes which are cultural practices or ideas that are transmitted verbally or by repeated actions from one person's conceptions to the minds of other people.

My Septoe: "20. We live in memecracies, ideas dominate us."

In the original introduction to the word meme in the last chapter of 'The Selfish Gene,' I did actually use the metaphor of a 'virus.' So when anybody talks about something going viral on the Internet, that is exactly what a meme is, and it looks as though the word has been appropriated for a subset of that. (Richard Dawkins)

Image result for memes quotes


a) IH 's plan seems to be based on memes- killer for Rossi and friendly for them

'Meme', the cultural equivalent of "gene" is a concept and word of vital importance  however paradoxically it is not a strong meme itself- it is a bit too intellectual. However you cannot think well if you do not consider the existence of memes. I have written a lot about them including in this Blog. 
If you are not familiar with memes please read at least:

It is my pleasure to announce you that now again memes have helped me to solve a prob;em I found first very difficult- in retrospective I was slow and non-creative and rigid in thinking.
It is about the enigma of the furious and seemingly senseless character and plant and technology assassination campaign of the IH propagandist lead by Jed Rothwell. (see a new opus by him below). 

Why, for Hermes's sake, if they are right and can automatically  win the Trial?
Why, for Minerva's sake, if they are wrong, does it help when facts speak at the Trial?

First it is obvious that IH manifests a totally negative enthusiasm toward the Trial and try very hard to escape from it see papers at 4) Legal battle. No traces of the noble spirit of "Fiat Justitia, pereat mundus"   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_iustitia,_et_pereat_mundus Justice at any price, but perhaps the cost is too high and the chances to win not so very high.
So what they actually do is clear:

Stay calm but angry, inventive, efficient, and make MEMES- two types: 
A- Killer anti-Rossi and anti- what belongs to Rossi memes;
B- Friendly nice pro-IH memes
A-memes are cheap, free, but B-memes have a cost and need more fantasy.. and money. PLEASE read for that the opinions of Doug Marker.

The plan is to disseminate these memes on the Web, make them contagious, the Press, the public opinion and perhaps even the jurors from the Court  will be memefied so the 'obviously good' will increase tremendously its chances to defeat the 'evidently malefic.'
We live in memecracies. Indeed?

 b) Jed Rothwell's  new opus 

Did Rossi and IH have a valid contract that states; that if the general performance test were successful . . ."

I have not read the contract carefully, and I know little about contracts. Here is what I know: the performance was not successful. The data from Rossi proves that the machine did not work.

"IH has not paid and said the Test was not good; where is the first written document with serious warnings from IH to Rossi saying this; was it after the 1st, 2nd or 3rd ERV report?"

This is not a technical question. This has no bearing on calorimetry or science. This question illustrates how you have missed the point. You cannot judge a technical question by looking at people's behavior, or by examining business contracts. This question is fluff.

The dispute between Rossi and I.H. is about calorimetry. It is about flow rates, temperatures, steam quality and instruments. Your questions are irrelevant. Even if you knew the answers, they would not bring you one millimeter closer to knowing whether the machine worked or not.

Instead of waiting to learn the technical details, you obsess over these unrelated, non-scientific questions and gossip that has no bearing on the technical issues. I do not understand how a person with a technical background could make such a mistake. 

So dear Jed there are only technical questions, later you say we have to apply the Scientific Method. Please apply it to Rossi's question regarding persuasion of the investors, OK?


1) Ok, So What Did Really Happen When Industrial Heat F*cked Up the Deal with Leonardo/Rossi? And Why?


2) Jones Day Lawyer Drones on Repeat in Another MTD. However, again Showing the Malicious Intent of IH!
6) The mystery of the irrational withdraw of the ECAT support

 7) TheNewFire - LENR News

8) Yet Another LENR Theory: Electron-mediated Nuclear Reactions (EMNR) 
9) Andrea Calaon∗ Independent Researcher, Monza, Italy 

An attempt is made to build an LENR theory that does not contradict any basic principle of physics and gives a relatively simple explanation to the plethora of experimental results. A single unconventional assumption is made, namely that nuclei are kept together by a magnetic attraction mechanism, as proposed in the 1980s of the past century by Valerio Dallacasa and Norman Cook. This assumption contradicts a non-proven detail of the standard model, which instead attributes the nuclear force to a residual effect of the strong interaction. The theory is based also on a property of the electron which has been known for long, but has rarely been used: the Zitterbewegung (ZB). This property should allow the magnetic attraction mechanism that binds nucleons together, to manifest also between the electron and any isotope of hydrogen, leading to the formation of three neutral pseudo-particles (the component particles remain separate entities), collectively named here Hydronions (or Hyd). These pseudo-particles can then couple with other nuclei and lead to a fusion reaction “inside” the electron. The Coulomb barrier is not overcome kinetically, but through what could be interpreted as a range extension of the nuclear force itself, realized by the electron when some specific conditions are satisfied. The most important of these necessary conditions is that the electron has to “orbit” the hydrogen nucleus at a frequency of 2.055 × 1016Hz. This frequency corresponds to photons with an energy of about 85 eV or equivalently a wavelength of 14.6 nm in the Extreme Ultra Violet (EUV). So the large quanta of nuclear energy fractionate into EUV photons during the formation of the Hydronions and during the coupling of Hydronions to other nuclei. The formation of Hydronions requires the so called Nuclear Active Environment (NAE), which is what makes LENR so rare and difficult to reproduce. The numbers suggest that the NAE forms when an unshielded atomic core electron orbital that has an “orbital frequency” near to the coupling frequency is stricken by a naked Hydrogen Nucleus (HNu). This theory therefore implies that the NAE is not inside the metal matrix, but in its immediate neighbourhood. The best candidate atoms for a NAE are listed, based on the energy of their ionization energies. The coincidence with the most common LENR materials appears noteworthy. The Electron Mediated Nuclear Reactions (EMNR) theory can explain also very rapid runaway conditions, radio emissions, biological NAE, and the so called “strange radiation”. ⃝
c 2016 ISCMNS. All rights reserved. ISSN 2227-3123 Keywords: EMNR theory, Extreme ultra violet, Hydronion,

10) Electron Deep Orbits of the Hydrogen Atom 
J. L. Paillet-1 , A. Meulenberg- 2 
1 Aix-Marseille University, France, jean-luc.paillet@club-internet.fr 
2 Science for Humanity Trust, Inc., USA, mules333@gmail.com 

This work continues our previous work [1] and in a more developed form [2]), on electron deep orbits of the hydrogen atom. An introduction shows the importance of the deep orbits of hydrogen (H or D) for research in the LENR domain, and gives some general considerations on the EDO (Electron Deep Orbits) and on other works about deep orbits. A first part recalls the known criticism against the EDO and how we face it. At this occasion we highlight the difference of resolution of these problems between the relativistic Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation, which leads for this latter, to consider a modified Coulomb potential with finite value inside the nucleus. In the second part, we consider the specific work of Maly and Va’vra [3], [4]) on deep orbits as solutions of the Dirac equation, so-called Deep Dirac Levels (DDLs). As a result of some criticism about the matching conditions at the boundary, we verified their computation, but by using a more complete ansatz for the “inside” solution. We can confirm the approximate size of the mean radii of DDL orbits and that decreases when the Dirac angular quantum number k increases. This latter finding is a self-consistent result since (as distinct from the atomic-electron orbitals) the binding energy of the DDL electron increases (in absolute value) with k. We observe that the essential element for obtaining deep orbits solutions is special relativity.


Some thoughts on why Jed Rothwell is so surprisingly persistent with his comments and claims that the entire Rossi 12 month test was a failure (and by default plus his blunt claims that Andrea Rossi and his claims dishonest).

Firstly, those of us who made published comments about IH's highly questionable behavior (such as my own comments published here) honed in on these aspects ...

1) That IH had paid 2 lots of money to Rossi for eCat tech

2) That IH have been in a relationship with Rossi for close on 3 years and not given any prior clear indication before the 12 month test of any issues with that relationship.

3) That Rossi's claim that IH used the early phases of the 12 month test to do fundraising. (this was very damning to IH's position).

4) Especially, that when this all exploded, the loudest anti Rossi voices were almost all known anti LENR people as well and thus were clearly biased and opportunistically leaping in to exploit the Rossi IH rift but were still using the situation to attack LENR in general.

What I am seeing, is that IH have adjusted their tactics in their publicity battle with Andrea Rossi by privately enlisting the support of people we all know are pro LENR (such as Jed Rothwell - and 1 or 2 others). Jed is currently and without doubt, a champion for IH's position. The issue you (Peter) raise regadring this is how is Jed able to be so certain when few others have access to what ever it was/is that he has been given access to.

The outcome: Jed is proclaiming (probably with some sense of justification) that we now need to accept 'Jed says' vs 'Rossi says'.

IMHO, it is clear that IH have set out to enlist the support of recognized pro LENR identities to counter the quite effective anti IH messages that Andrea Rossi put out around the time he filed his lawsuit.

But the questions you (Peter) raise, are valid questions and deserve to be answered. Clearly there will be no answers from Jed who argues he doesn't know other than the material passed to him to enlist his active anti Rossi remarks.

So, by enlisting people who are known to be pro LENR people, IH are effectively countering the harsh criticism some of us directed at them and also those people who we know are both anti LENR and anti-Rossi and who leaped on the IH bandwagon as champions of their battle with Rossi. 

It seems to me IH saw itself in difficulty in the word war until it was able to associate its position with pro-LENR people and break away from only being supported by the opportunity grabbing anti-LENR voices we all know so well.


In regard to IH actively enlisting pro-LENR people to publicly join in their defense, If I were in their shoes (they are clearly in a difficult position) I would do what they are doing too.

But, it does raise the question as to what kind of inducements or assistance that IH might be offering these people to go public on their behalf and in their defense against Andrea Rossi.

I know that all LENR researchers need and seek support so when pro-LENR people clearly become vociferous supporters of the IH position against Andrea Rossi, it justifiably raises the question as to what 'rewards' tangible / intangible, these pro IH voices are being offered.
All such questions are valid and deserve answers.

Doug Marker

Monday, June 27, 2016



What is impossible in LENR ? That Andrea Rossi will give it up before everybody will be able to get energy from it.
That is the only impossibility I can be sure of,  (Andrea Rossi).

Image result for paavo nurmi quotationImage result for jesse owens quotations

“Citius, Altius, Fortius.
Faster, Higher, Stronger.” (Olympic quote) 


In soccer, LENR and Life Citius always wins !

Yesterday my wife and I were watching soccer UEFA EURO 2016 Belgium vs, Hungary. After a few minutes remembering my career as apprentice chronometrist for athletics from the 1950s my father acting then as coach- I told my wife:"see the Belgians are running so much faster, under 10.5 seconds per 100 meters while the Hungarians are slower then 11 seconds per 100 meters. it will be  catastrophe. 
Something similar happened a few days ago when the Albanians "outrun" the Romanian team. Fastness is so important in other sports too, I remember that as a kid I was sent to maestro Pellegrini's fencing school and he was contented with me- clumsy but very fast moving hands. It was in our period of reading Dumas and Michel Zevaco etc.  so it was a cult of fencing and duelling but it is over now I have some duels with LENR people as below.

It is not easy to speak about fastness in classic LENR  However Rossi obviously loves speed inclusive in development.

b) Facts can be understood only in their context.

Jed Rothwell:
You have not seen the data, so you have no basis to be convinced. Or not convinced. This is a technical issue. Opinions don't count. Everything hinges on flow rates, temperatures, instrument specifications, and so on. Based on these factors, experts at I.H. concluded that the reactor is not producing any excess heat. I am far less capable than those experts, but to the best of my ability, looking at a sample of that data, I too reached that conclusion.

You, Peter Gluck and everyone else will have to wait to see the data, and also the analysis of it from Rossi and from I.H. You cannot decide anything until then. You cannot even have an opinion. The rules of engineering and science say that every judgement must be grounded in facts, and you have no facts.
I think it is a grave mistake for Peter to assume he knows what is going on, and to assume that Rossi is right in this dispute, and that I.H. and I are lying. Since he has no facts, this reaction is purely emotional. It is irrational. Since he has no engineering details, he trots out all kinds of half-baked notions about business contracts, or the timing of announcements, or he quotes lies spread by Rossi -- as if you can draw a technical conclusion from such fluff! It is pathetic.

Peter is wrong. He will regret it if the facts are ever revealed. In science, you must never let your emotions or wishful thinking overrule rational, objective, fact-based analysis.

Jed continues stubbornly to non-answering to my 5 stupid, nosy and irrelevant questions and, as a symptom of something I still do not want to  define exactly he answers to an imaginary question I have never put

This question, his not mine can be formulated as: 

"Rossi says test good, IH says test bad. Being a Rossi fan and having b ovo great prejudices against IH, I believe Rossi. Why, on which basis, you, Jed are certain that IH is right? IT IS AN NONEXISTENT QUESTION!

I will repeat and explain my questions in a form a bit more accessible  for you, supposing you are right 100%.
Rossi wrong, IH right. e will state together if this manoeuvre contributes to the missing IQ of the questions, makes them less impertinent and gives them a minimum of sense and relevance.

NOTE. I see logical rational straight thinking and discussions are not on your list of strengths so I must have more patience with you, just first I want to tell you about FACTS that are your privilege and not given to dorinary people:
Facts have significance only in context.
A first fast example. You read;

"Edmond Dantes has mercilessly ruined the lives of three rich and happy men"

What  a sadistic rascal is the natural reaction to this but if you put the fact in proper context - the story of Count Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas= changes the understanding of the facts completely, isn't? Now your facts being OK let's return, for the lasttime to the lowly evaluated questions

1- Did Rossi and IH have a valid contract that states; that if the general performance test were successful, they should pay a great sum to Rossi? Possible answers Yes and No- the contrct was broken by IH. 
Seemingly facts missing it was not and it has opened Rossi's way to a Trial. Jed please do not sya me that IH is happy with Trial, I am stupid but not sooo stupid!
It means if Rossi's results were indeed  such a catastrophe total and continuous to maintain the contract.. why 's sake (the Greek God of Greed)

2- IH has not paid and said the Test was not good; where is the first written document with serious warnings from IH to Rossi saying this; was it after the 1st, 2nd or 3rd ERV report? 
What could be confidential or secret in such a document of angelic honesty- "you are in trouble, we do not see excess heat even with the magnifier glass!" Harmony between thoughts, words and action is essential even to a company.It did not happened even at the end of the test or at the receipt oh ERV report no. 4. It happened when the Trial started. What is ou fact, in what context?

3- IH employees have participated at the test in parallel with Rossi's men; is there a written document showing they are in any way discontent with the test and the test being “a disaster”?

Is this a toxic question?  Rossi says they were there- what is the fact yu know and those who ask- no?

4- When was the total incompetence of the ERV discovered; i.e. the inadequacy of the measuring instruments and when was it stated that the measurements are fatally flawed? (a document dated in 2015?)

As far as I can understand the methods of measurement were the same- dreadful from start o finish, they were never good then. This is a sad but explosive fact in the context of  a vlid 94 milliion contract.
for a successful test.

5- Rossi claims: “All I know is that Darden and JT Vaughn collected $150 million after the test of the 1 MW E-Cat began, using the first and second report of the ERV as a tool to get the money, then after the 4th report ( equal to the former ones) they said what they said and did not pay” Is this slander and false accusations? Is this slander or false accusation?

This question deserves its color, it can be an infamous accusation but it comes from Rossi and who knows better the facts related to the 1MW plant?  Is it a stupid question? Not at all because it is disturbing It is nosy only if it false, completely. It is not relevant for Jed but it can be relevant for many people some of them quite influential due to its deeper significance.

So Jed I ask you to not invent my questions, retract at least "nosy" and feel free to play with your facts
that are flawed like the ultraviolet unicorns- invisible, intangible, unverifiable  missing birth certificates
and.. prepare to get facts from the Trial. My own sources say, but I can not reveal their identity that
the trial will take place in the first 5 days of September. A new rule- all the witnesses will be obliged to perform an IQ test before testifying. You have arranged this, ?


1) Excess Heat Generation in Ni + LiAlH4 System (New Report by I.N. Stepanov and V.A. Panchelyuga)

2) LENR afternoon with Ubaldo Mastromatteo- more videos
Pomeriggio Lenr Ubaldo Mastromatteo (5)
Claudio Pace
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxyaORT1_vEI have to ask Ubaldo to send us the text! not clear yet in which extent it is about LENR in the frame of rational mysticism

3) An interesting paper signalled by EGO OUT on June 25, is discussed here:
[Vo]:Ukrainian Paper on the active particle of LENR

4) A cold fusion paper in Dutch:

5) Andrey Illich Fursov (Russian Historian, sociologist, polytologist and publicist): About the Nuclear Cold Fusion of Ivan Stepanovich Filimonenko


6) At June 21, 2016 at Geneva Switzerland it was a press conference about an epochal discovery of transmutation of chemical elements by a biochemical method.
At the press conference have participated Tamar SahnoViktor Kutashov scientists
who made this discovery and Vladislav Karabanov administrator and leader oif this project.
Link to the patent for this invention

Very interesting I started to discuss with Vladimir Vysotskii about this he is the greatest specialist in biochemical transmutations.

7) Also see the above info, here:
Russian Team “Actinides” Announces Discovery of Industrial Biochemical Method of Elemental Transmutation (Press Conference and Press Release)

8 ) Greg Goble
Energy 54+ Black Swans listed by Paul Maher
Umair Haque: "The Art of Awakening"
It is time for a LENR awakening!

Why rudeness at work is contagious and difficult to stop

Sunday, June 26, 2016



Image result for quotations IMPOSSIBLEImage result for quotations IMPOSSIBLE

41 proverbs about IMPOSSIBLE

A great book about Andrea Rossi's technology has "impossible" in the title but "real" in the spirit!



An excellent book; I hope it will have more editions-additions; the next one will be probably about "Gloriously surviving a nasty turmoil" Forza, dear Mats!


It is Sunday clearly not the favorite weekday of an old workaholic who cannot leave the house due to the high intensity of the solar radiation (tempest predicted for tomorrow).
This morning after reading my mails and making the usual basic web search- I had to conclude:"today it will be impossible to get an abundance of LENR news!" A coincidence my last message of yesterday was for Jed Rothwell telling him that its is impossible to accept his IH 'anachronology' (anachronistic  time flow, unnatural sequence of the events) despite his over-repetitive exporting of proof less points of view.
Third - third rate meeting with the word "impossible"-  was caused by the updating of an intelligent test combined with paremiology (study of the proverbs)in Romanian - in the frame of a collaboration with a local psychologist- helping her to extend the portfolio of IQ tests. As an aside it is a world class group of psychologists here in Cluj. Some of the proverbs have to be about possible/impossible see some in English at the link at Motto above.

So let's speak about impossible- the dominant positive psychology says we have to use a thinking in which nothing is really impossible, or impossible for ever and this is not a bad trend at all as long as we combine it with critical thinking and realism.It has lead us to choose the two image Mottos.
But let's depart from idealism. actually the impossible exists it is omni-present, statistically there are much more impossible things than the possible ones and my educated guess here is for a Pareto ratio, as overall-- 80% impossible, 20% possible. I am joking, however the real expert in any field is able to distinguish what can be made from what is impossible to be. made History has shown that there are many painfully impossible things in Cold Fusion-LENR too and for the time given it is ana obstacled way from making them possible.
First it seems it is impossible on very long term to convince nuclear physicists that the cold fusion reaction is possible. Tens of theoretical constructs and thousands of successful but not reproducible reactions in many environments are not able to change this situations. Honest, straightforward methods to convince scientists but other people too about the existence of LENR as in some many books (now Ed Storms' second book is in the front-line) or videos as this by Jed Rothwell:
It is sad to see now that the advent of the field was NOT an  analog of the Kitty Hawk flight and the early history of LENR is NOT an equivalent of the history of aviation.  Some obstacles are impossible to be removed or broken.Scientists needsane doses of dogmatism to possibly survive, other people are much more value- than truth-oriented; they are interested in a source of energy and not in an unexpected. scientific phenomenon.
Honesty in reporting the results is excellent but it seems creativity is even more important. And in my personal opinion it is an impossible in the way of a rectilinear advancement- the true virtues of LENR can be achieved only above a high temperature I would say today 650 C where the surface dynamism suffices for controllable, up scalable powerful genesis of catalytic   nanostructures in which the low energy nuclear reactions can take place. Below this temperature the phenomenon exists but cannot be enhanced and made reproducible and technologically significant. Unfortunately it seems impossible to convince my colleagues about this.

As you well know what we could call the technological branch of LENR is now plagued by an conflict for which "impossible" is just an euphemism.
It is a collection of impossibilities,for me the greatest is to understand why IH attacks Rossi and his technology with all means and bombs possible at the highest intensity  as if they a re driven by hatred or guilt(?), when they say they will win the Trial easily because the E-Cats are in impossibility to generate excess heat! Why then so much ado for nothing?  


Rossi accuses Industrial Heat of Trying to Sell him his Own Ecat Licensehttp://coldfusion3.com/blog/rossi-accuses-industrial-heat-of-trying-to-sell-him-his-own-ecat-license

As in this comment too:
Andrea Rossi
Those who repeat the same things even after due answers have given evidence of their errors, do not look for truth, they are just looking for the sale of the Roman Colosseum to their investors.
Every resemblance to any part involved in a litigation is purely casual.
Warm Regards,

QUANTUMHEAT Celani Replication Plan

quantumheat.org stats and valuation

Lattice Energy LLC - 1994 conference paper - Prof John Dash reported production of gold and silver in electrochemical cell experiment - June 24 2016

Why is it so Important for the FUDers to Hide the Fact that the ERV Reports were Used to Raise Money?

Saturday, June 25, 2016



No Motto today, just to remind to my dear  readers the very basics of this blog:

Definition of ego-out :.


  1. 1. (n.) The quantity of information, knowledge and wisdom lost by the death of an individual.
    Origins: Peter Gluck of Cluj, Romania. Editor of Info Kappa.
Dated Dec. 2010



how people become prisoners of their own ideas.
In 1992 I concluded that Cold Fusion is a form of catalysis- before being nuclear science- and formation of catalytic active centers (later NAE) depends on the mobility of the surface atoms of the metal. This mobility- surface dynamism becomes significant over say 400 C and Rossi has extended temperature to to 1500 C. Cool systems are good for science but not for technology.
Technology needs multiplicative excess heat not additive.

Crazy ideas perhaps but I belong to them.


Jed Rothwell  has commented on my blog...too. Except an impressive (but not for me) verbal rudeness he is using cheap unintelligent tricks, first he tries to insinuate
that the questions re. IH 's strange behavior belong to me in the frame of some personal vendetta against a decent, honest, correct company, with the best intentions toward the future of LENR. Nobody else in the LENRgroups  except Jed knew about the problems with the test and as far I know he has not shared this information with nobody. Perhaps with you, dear Abd- and when? It is not about my questions it is about openness clarity, straight re relations in business about accountability, the image of a company. Jed's ethics... but better we should speak about real things, that exist.

there is a big difference between questions asked in a court and stupid, nosy, irrelevant questions asked by Gluck which he knows will not be answered. He is only asking to make himself look good. The content of his questions is senseless: the timing of I.H. decisions was up to them, and has no bearing on the validity of the decisions

Gluck and others were surprised at the negative results. Beyond that, somehow they have the weird notion that I.H. was obligated to give everyone their evaluation of the test at every stage of the year. That there is something underhanded, or illegitimate about holding back an evaluation and giving Rossi many months and many opportunities to fix the problems. They seem to think it is not possible I.H. saw problems all along and yet they neglected to inform Peter Gluck of their evaluation.

Nobody was surprised by the negative results- the surprise was their timing and the frame in which this information was delivered. It is not about Peter Gluck it is about the LENR and the business communities.

I will not explain again why the action to e-destroy Rossi and kill his technology, annihilate his plant, nullify his results is absolutely absurd and useless as long Jed and partners are convinced they will win the Trial without problems. 

I ask Jed to read LENR IN CONTEXT-2 of today.


!) Other papers from the Sochi Congress

.... (shown yesterday)

A.I. Gerasimova- video presentation: it is about plasma electrolysis
lead by Yu.N. Bazhutov
Philippe Hatt: Structure of the nuclei
A. V. Chistolinov: "About the nature of globular lightnings"
M.F. Vereshchak: About the excess energy release in the nickel hydrogen system:
video not accessible for me, will try later

V.A. Pancheloga, I.N. Stepanov; "About the excess heat release"
Experimental confirmation of excess heat release in the Ni-LiAlH4 sytem excess heat ~10-50%
Minimal power at which excess heat is observed 65W
A.P. Bikmuhamedova: " observed data for globulr lightning 2016, Interaction of globulsr lightning with glass
2) Justice, God, and LENR- an interview with Randy Heckmanhttp://www.nicholaskowalski.com/blog/justice-god-lenr-an-interview-with-randy-hekman
"Starting a business in Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR), was it a difficult journey? Does cold fusion have potential?

Sure it has been challenging. I have worked fulltime for 3 of the last 20 years. The remainder has been very much back burner. Mostly what I have done is do some scientific experiments that hopefully will lead to commercial products. Around the world, many people are working in this new area and some company just raised $50 million for commercial production. I am cautiously optimistic that what I am working on will have a great impact."

3) Post Brexit -Legacy Energy vs LENR

4) Who is taiking about LENR on social media networks? 

5) lenr-invest.com stats and valuation

6) lenr-cars.com stats and valuation

7) On the Nuclear Coupling of Proton and Electron 
Volodymyr Krasnoholovets, Yuriy Zabulonov, Ihor Zolkin  

We study both experimentally and theoretically the creation of a new physical entity, a particle in which the proton and electron form a stable pair with a tiny size typical for a nucleon. A new theoretical approach to study atomic, sub atomic and nuclear systems is suggested. In the framework of this new approach, which takes into account a submicroscopic concept of physics, we discuss similar experimental results of other researchers dealing with low energy nuclear reactions in a solid, plasma, sonofusion and the electrostatic field generated by piezocrystals. It is shown that the formation of sub atomic particles, which we name subatoms, involves an inerton cloud of an atom from the environment. The inerton cloud, as a carrier of mass, is absorbed by the electron and proton, which strongly couples these two particles in a new stable entity – the subhydrogen. Besides, we have generated a subhelium and argue the existence of subdeuterium. In addition to these subatoms there exist also nuclear pairs formed by a subatom with proton, deuteron and neutron. 

Papers by Dufour, Storms, Nagel, Randy Mills the Rossi patent etc cited- quite interesting!

8) From Google Scholar text inaccessible
Believable statements of uncertainty and believable science
Richard M. Lindstrom

Nearly 50 years ago, two landmark papers appeared that should have cured the problem of ambiguous uncertainty statements in published data. Eisenhart’s paper inScience called for statistically meaningful numbers, and Currie’s Analytical Chemistry paper revealed the wide range in common definitions of detection limit. Confusion and worse can result when uncertainties are misinterpreted or ignored. The recent stories of cold fusion, variable radioactive decay, and piezonuclear reactions provide cautionary examples in which prior probability has been neglected. We show examples from our laboratory and others to illustrate the fact that uncertainty depends on both statistical and scientific judgment.

Fragment: "... Fleischmann and Pons's paper. Other workers were also unable to duplicate the publicized work electrochemically, so that research in low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) has nearly, but not entirely, stopped. Since the discovery ...

9) LENR Test Bed Upgrade – Pressure Control


Researchers Create “Dark Hydrogen” in Lab — Believed to Exist on Gas Giant Planets