Sunday, August 28, 2016



Mother Nature has only Solutions but no Problems (real life problem solving truism)

People need to be cautious because anything built by man can be destroyed by Mother Nature. (Russel Honore)

If you can't be in awe of Mother Nature, there's something wrong with you. (Alex Trebek)

Mother Nature is not sweet. (John Shelby Spong)

Mother nature is a fickle and forgetful bitch," she snapped. "She needs a helping hand and I am trying to hurry her along for their sake.” (Sabrina Jeffries) 

Mother Nature," he murdered half aloud and grinned, "we think of her as a benevolent old lady. Maybe instead she's the wantonest kind of whore.” (Harold Sinclair)

Nature speaks clearly to him who knows how to understand her, and has no need of interpretation. (Antonio Vallisneri)

I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or anything that could be understood as anthropomorphic.  (Albert Einstein)

Thus, I love nature primarily for the puzzles and intellectual delights that she offers to the first organ capable of such curious contemplation. (Stephen Jay Gould


a) The status of the Srorms-Gluck discussion about the essence of LENR

Ed: I know of only one way to reduce chaos, which is to apply what is known about what is real. That is, use what is observed in the lab to guide the imagination. I attempted to provide this information in several books and in many review papers. Chaos reigns because people in the field ignore most of this information. 

Peter: However if PdD cool on which this information is based is not genuine LENR or is not as say NiH at >1250C, the the value of what we know is questionable and we must discover new things. 

Ed: No believable evidence supports the claim that LENR can  occur >1250°C. What little evidence exists has not showed that the apparent extra energy results from a nuclear reaction rather than from an unexpected chemical reaction.  No extra energy reported by Rossi  was obtained at this temperature.  His devices have always worked at much lower temperatures. Even these examples are in serious doubt.  

In contrast, PdD has been explored by hundreds of studies and shown to produce nuclear products by many replications.  Yet, you ignore this huge body of work and favor a few poorly done studies. Why??  You ignore simple explanations and favor complex explanations having very little relationship to what is observed. Why?  You add to the chaos that is characteristic of the LENR field.  Why?
Ed Storms also says: 

Ed: Also, a good way to get knowledge about what someone else knows is to ask questions. I have found that this approach is very rare in this field. Everyone has an opinion that is unmoved by any argument.

Peter: However again if new forms of LENR need new science than we have to ask Mother Nature  by experiment, helping her by technology to give clearer, louder smarter answers.

Ed: We have asked Nature and Nature has given an answer to a few people. You need to ask these people what Nature said. Instead, these people are ignored. What questions would you ask instead of the ones that have been clearly answered? Why would your answers be accepted any more than those provided by anyone else?   In fact, who can be believed in this field?
Peter: My final word about the question: which sort is the genuine lENR? - is that we have actually to decisively de- ask this question. Reason there is no LENR, but LENRs each genuine in its own specific way and mode. Howgh!

Ed: Are you willing to believe that a collection of very unusual phenomenon has been discovered, each unrelated to the others?  If so, you clearly can not be trusted to contribute any useful insight about LENR. 


My answer to this

A- what I strongly dislike is the last paragraph- I never told that the phenomena are unrelated to each other, they have common features and specific features, yes each needs  specific treatments and investigations to be understood and ways to be developed toward applications- but why is Ed using the poisoned, alien word "unrelated"? A fair exegesis excludes the use of false citations and additions to what the opponent writes...

B-  It is no problem that Ed and I are using radically different modes of thinking especially regarding the relative value of the Known and the Unknown,unfortunately  there are great differences in our starting suppositions. This discussion becomes semi-impossible due to some selective data half-denial by Ed. The Ni systems- Piantelli, Rossi, Defkalion,  and around Rossi as Bondeno, Lugano, Parkhomov, MFMP  and many replicators are not fully accepted- in corpore- due to lack of believability or weak calorimetry. With this premise- we are at a dead point and have to wait till NIH will be confirmed even for those who do not take it in consideration. The most radical way will be if/when the COP of 50-60 obtained in the 1 year/1 MW experiment will be confirmed. Obviously Ed does not think about the Quark that works at 1400 C and rejects the idea of accelerated massive genesis of NAEs  at high temperatures he is convinced that NAE is a nano-crack and nothing else. I do not understand why he excludes heat over 1250 C, however cracks will not be stable at high temperatures?!

C- Ed says:  We have asked Nature and Nature has given an answer to a few people.
It is relevant what have asked these people- and we know they have limited the questions mainly to the classic PdD LENR system; we also know that the answers were- LENR surely exists, it is not reproducible at will , it depends on hidden or immeasurable parameters too. I interpret these results also that Pd D is not a complete LENR system, the dynamism due to high temperature enhancement is missing from it. Reading these papers with attention is not an equivalent of a good question?  What can learn a goatherd from a shepherd?  A lot, but goats and sheeps are sufficiently different to need separate strategies. By the way, it is not correct to say my sheeps know all, while you have only zombie goats- not real ones.

I remark and I do not like it Ed uses again the lazy and arrogant "ignore" instead of the active and brave "reject"

There is a great and significant difference between the vision/opinion of Ed and mine about Mother Nature (please  read now the Mottoes, yes it is a diversity of opinions there!)
For Ed, Mother Nature is a nice lady who loves and respects the Great Laws and tries to help us to understand Her. She adores simplicity and common sense logic, her favorite tool is Occam's Razor. 
I think Mother Nature is a narcissistic person, trying to be interesting at any price (sometimes even low price) playing with complexity, diversity, strangeness, fast and deep change, secrets and especially surprises.  She thinks that many times the most complicated answer is the best one. She respects her own Laws but she chooses what Law to respect, when and why. She cares for us, but in a very special way. Ed's LENR ideology and mine are actually mirroring our images of Mother Nature.

The E-Cat is neither CHEMICAL, FISSION nor FUSION. It is a MACHINE!” (Chapman)

Aneutronic Fusion – the QuarkX Explained (Steve H)

Cold Fusion Is Real Fire From Water Part 2 Of 4 Mp3 Download


Is blue the new green? Wave power could revolutionize the renewable-energy game

Scientists stunned by huge MIT discovery

Saturday, August 27, 2016



The word is not explicit in the Mottoes below, but they are about/linked to 

The meaning behind this quote is very deep! Appreciate the genuine people in your life who have always been there for you without asking anything in return!! Aline ♥Image result for genuine quotations


LENR is in an identity crisis, in a definition crisis- and this started at its 
unconventional birth. And in chaos, as I told. So we can just try to define waht is actually genuine LENR? The majority of the researchers and their associates from multiple areas still consider the original system of the Founders is the true, veritable, authentic scientific field. NiH is rather unknown, uncertain, not sufficiently studied. Terra incognita hic errorem. Inside the NiH land, Francesco Piantelli says his is the unique actual "vero" "anomalous process" and Andrea Rossi is just using a summum of transient secondary physico-chemical processes . Andrea Rossi says the Piantelli process does not give massive excess heat, ergo it is not genuine.
Multiple Rosssi replicators have obtained excess heat however on the additive and not the genuine industrial multiplicative level. Isn't the LENR chaos more than genuine, my friends?
Based on the natural idea that the genuine PdD a model and source of information for all the forms of LENR, yesterday Ed Storms has stated:

I know of only one way to reduce chaos, which is to apply what is known about what is real. That is, use what is observed in the lab to guide the imagination. I attempted to provide this information in several books and in many review papers. Chaos reigns because people in the field ignore most of this information. 

However if PdD cool on which this information is based is not genuine LENR or is not as say NiH at >1250C, the the value of what we know is questionable and we must discover new things. 

Ed Storms also says: 

Also, a good way to get knowledge about what someone else knows is to ask questions. I have found that this approach is very rare in this field. Everyone has an opinion that is unmoved by any argument.

However again if new forms of LENR need new science than we have to ask Mother Nature  by experiment, helping her by technology to give clearer, louder smarter answers.

My final word about the question: which sort is the genuine lENR? - is that we have actually to decisively de- ask this question. Reason there is no LENR, but LENRs each genuine in its own specific way and mode. Howgh!


1) This letter to editor apppeared at News
Column on fusion ignores information
This letter is in response to the recent “Earth Talk” column published in thePoughkeepsie Journal, (“ Fusion reactors far from reality,” Aug. 4).

The column ignores recent developments in fusion technology. Aerospace giantLockheed Martin is working on a fusion reactor design that is small enough to be built on assembly lines and uses microwave energy rather than costly lasers to ignite hot fusion reactions.

A number of well known corporations, such as Mitsubishi, Toyota and Volvo, are working on cold fusion reactors, now popularly known as Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR). “Low energy” signifies the relatively small amount of energy required to start the fusion reaction.

The most common fuels used for LENR reactors include nickel powder, lithium and hydrogen gas, as well as palladium and deuterium. Mitsubishi has a proven method of using LENR to transmute elements, which proves beyond reasonable doubt that fusion has occurred at low temperatures.

No one knows when economical and reliable fusion reactors will hit the marketplace, but there is ample reason to be more optimistic than the analysis would suggest.

Christopher Calder
Eugene, Oregon

2) Cold Fusion/LENR- the war of patents
Fusione fredda / LENR: La guerra dei brevetti


4) A historical 2014 conference:
David Nagel – Scientific and Practical Questions about Cold Fusion

5) NASA and LENR Free downloads

6) [W85.Book] Free Download The New Fire: A Simplified Introduction to Cold Fusion and LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) PDF ePub Book nby Dennis W. Drumheller


2016 Fall Meeting of the APS Division of Nuclear Physics
Thursday–Sunday, October 13–16, 2016; Vancouver, BC, Canada
Session 1WB: New Frontiers in Low-Energy Nuclear Theory I

9:00 AM–10:48 AM, Thursday, October 13, 2016
Room: Junior Ballroom A&B

Sponsoring Unit: DNP
Chair: Sonia Bacca Bacca, TRIUMF

Abstract: 1WB.00002 : Advances in ab initio theories for nuclear reactions

Author: Sofia Quaglioni (LLNL)

Driven by high-performance computing and new ideas, in recent years \textit{ab initio} theory has made great strides in achieving a unified description of nuclear structure, clustering and reactions from the constituent nucleons and their strong and electroweak interactions. This is giving access to forefront tools and new fertile grounds to further our understanding of the nuclear force and electroweak currents in nuclei in terms of effective degrees of freedom. A fundamental understanding of nuclear reaction mechanisms and a new capability to accurately compute their properties is also relevant for nuclear astrophysics, terrestrial applications of nuclear fusion, and for using nuclei as probes of fundamental physics through, for example, neutrino-nucleus scattering. In this talk, I will present recent highlights and reflect on future perspectives for this area of nuclear theory. Prepared by LLNL under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344.

A nanoscale wireless communication system via plasmonic antennas


An especially good issue of Gapingvoid:
Without DOUBT nothing is possible
Rethinking Groupthink: Great Advice For Leaders From Adam Grant’s New Book “Originals”

Friday, August 26, 2016



Image result for adequate quotationsImage result for adequate quotations

What is genius, anyway, if it isn't the ability to give an adequate response to a great challenge (Bette Greene)


The complete title of this issue of my Blog is:


a) My opinion about this

-In life, but especially for technology ADEQUATE is a very friendly, desirable adjective. Beyond its etymology and its many quasi equivalents in translations (in Romanian it exists as "adecvat" but "fitting" (potrivit) is more popular.
Its direct antonym inadequate is a sentence to death in science and in technology-
politics for example is not so tolerant re total lack of quality.
Yesterday I wrote about chaos in LENR,  s regarding its cause, it seems we still are not using the really necessary, significant, relevant source, methods, thinking- so we are lacking adequacy on the whole intellectual activities' hierarchy- data, information, knowledge, wisdom, prediction.
As I have told it many times, I think adequacy can be found only at and from complete LENR systems- vapor phase, high temperature transition-metsls based and not in the classic system. Short term, re-focus LENR research from Pd Cool to Ni hot, despite or exactly because we know more about Pd and the experimental base for Ni is still smaller than that for Pd. We know  a lot about Pd but is this indeed adaequate for deeper, holistic understanding and for the advancement of the whole LENR field?My personal opinion is still that it is much more Unknown than Known in LENR.Of what help is if we know a lot about the hallux (big toe)  for the study of the foot- for example the knee? (I just have rheumatic pains)
We need adequate DIKWP and this is in the future.

b) Edmund Storms has a different opinion

Peter, you note that chaos exists in the LENR field and you suggest ways it can be reduced. Yes, I agree, this is a problem. I know of only one way to reduce chaos, which is to apply what is known about what is real. That is, use what is observed in the lab to guide the imagination. I attempted to provide this information in several books and in many review papers. Chaos reigns because people in the field ignore most of this information. This approach is easily detected simply by looking at the list of references provided in a paper about LENR. Most papers make no effort to examine or reference other studies. Instead, the references list mostly what the authors have published in the past. In other worlds, people keep plowing the same ground without caring what other people have discovered. I see no hope for the chaos to be reduced until people from the normal scientific professions get interested in the subject. Conventional scientists normally are much less dogmatic in their opinions and more interested in what other people believe than is typical of people in this field.

Also, a good way to get knowledge about what someone else knows is to ask questions. I have found that this approach is very rare in this field. Everyone has an opinion that is unmoved by any argument. Therefore, questions are not asked because the answers mean nothing to the individual. As result, nothing changes. The same opinions are expressed and defended without change, regardless of the evidence. So, I see no future for this field until it becomes part of normal science. Unfortunately, I do not see this happening any time soon.
The discussion will continue and history will define what is the adequate LENR ideology.

1) DIY LENR TEST KIT (Friendly Robot Upgrade)

2) Aug. 08, 2016 Igor Iurievich Danilov9 "Philosophical Storm") about the mechanism of LRNR at the interaction of laser rays on the radioactive wastes and about th hafnium bomb (two videos(


The key to LENR is strong coupling between the hydrogen atom and light.

For more detail see as follows:


Nonperturbative coupling of light with condensed matter in an optical cavity is expected to reveal a host of coherent many-body phenomena and states [1–7]. In addition, strong coherent light-matter interaction in a solid-state environment is of great interest to emerging quantum-based technologies [8, 9]. However, creating a system that combines a long electronic coherence time, a large dipole moment, and a high cavity quality (Q) factor has been a challenging goal [10–13]. Here, we report collective ultrastrong light-matter coupling in an ultrahigh-mobility two-dimensional electron gas in a high-Q terahertz photonic-crystal cavity in a quantizing magnetic field, demonstrating a cooperativity of ∼360. The splitting of cyclotron resonance (CR) into the lower and upper polariton branches exhibited a √ ne-dependence on the electron density (ne), a hallmark of collective vacuum Rabi splitting. Furthermore, a small but definite blue shift was observed for the polariton frequencies due to the normally negligible A 2 term in the light-matter interaction Hamiltonian. Finally, the high-Q cavity suppressed the superradiant decay of coherent CR, which resulted in an unprecedentedly narrow intrinsic CR linewidth of 5.6 GHz at 2 K. These results open up a variety of new possibilities to combine the traditional disciplines of many-body condensed matter physics and cavity-based quantum optics.

The key to LENR is strong coupling between the hydrogen atom and light. When the cavity that holds the hydrogen is the optimum size, vacuum energy provides most of the energy to delocalized electrons from protons to form metalized hydrogen. The optimum cavity size does the same job as extreme pressure to form metalized hydrogen. 

If hydrogen is packed into a Nano cavity of the ideal size a strong coupling state might be achieved between the protons in the hydrogen and the light. In this way a state of superconductive coherence of protons might be formed: a proton condinsate. 

This state of superconductivity has been detected by Holmlid and Miley in iron oxide. The high temperature proton BEC might produce a super-dense state of hydrogen as measured by Holmlid where the electrons and protons are delocalized from each other, this state of charge delocalization has been seen in water inclusions inside a crystal.
Water Molecule Spreads Out When Caged

What actually compresses the protons into a condinsate is vacuum energy because the cavity squeezes the light/matter condensate greatly. 

As described in the referenced article by looking for a hydrogen BEC in cavities, a LENR researcher could find the ideal dimensions of the Nano cavity that produces the condensed hydrogen and engineer a material that produces this ultra-dense hydrogen crystal in abundance.

Currently in LENR reactors, pure chance produces metalized hydrogen in a highly porous metal that feature a wide range of cavity sizes which include the optimum cavity size that is made widely available by random chance.

What really compresses hydrogen to the LENR active ultra-dense metalized state is not high pressure, but the ideal combination of cavity shape/size, light frequency, EMF environment and vacuum energy. 


Scientists solve puzzle of converting gaseous carbon dioxide to fuel
Saving the planet from climate change with a grain of sand
Date: August 25, 2016
Source:University of Toronto
Every year, humans advance climate change and global warming by injecting about 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Scientists believe they've found a way to convert all these emissions into energy-rich fuel in a carbon-neutral cycle that uses a very abundant natural resource: silicon. Readily available in sand, it's the seventh most-abundant element in the universe and the second most-abundant element in the earth's crust.


How to Create an Exponential Mindset

Thursday, August 25, 2016



'My first 3 Septoes/100 are centered on the idea of interestingness of the World, snd Chaos is there:
1.The Universe feeds our insatiable curiosity forever
2. The Universe is obsessed to be interesting.
3. The world is simultaneously chaotic and ordered.

Image result for chaos quotationsImage result for chaos quotations


Thinking about chaos and LENR,  Chaos and LENR

As you probably have remarked my blog strategy is to write daily and offer you LENR information, and, in the same time to examine the problems and perspectives
of LENR from a different - if possible new- point of view. 
This morning I have decided to think and write about chaos in our field- and how could we have less of it... then in the late afternoon I came upon this paper revealing a novel facet of the concept:

Chaos could provide the key to enhanced wireless communications

It is multi-directional chaos in LENR:
- expressive chaos- conceptual the concept are not well defined and related'
- explanatory chaos- many incompatible, uncorrelable theories, lack of taxonomy;- -  - exegetic chaos- no unitary, systematic interpretation of the data and facts;
- exploratory chaos- experimental strategy is rather aleatory no best ways and best practises established.
But there are already forming islands or order and rationality in the chaos.
For those who dislike "chaos" we can call it "slight disorientation".

ICCF20 will be an opportunity to find and build more order in LENR and to reduce significantly the chaos- a task for the real LENR community. The people who care for LENR.


1) Presentation at:
69th Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference
Monday–Friday, October 10–14, 2016; Bochum, Germany
Session MW6: Poster session II
5:30 PM–5:30 PM, Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Room: Foyer 
Submitted for the GEC16 Meeting of The American Physical Society 

Excess Thermal Energy In The Cell Loaded With Mixture of Ni Powder And Li[AlH4] SHI NGUYEN-KUOK-1 , YURY MALAKHOV-2 , IVAN KOROTKIKH-3 , 

 Interest has significantly increased in the study of LowEnergy Nuclear Reactions. Especially after the publication of the test results from Andrea Rossi’s high-temperature heat source that operates on a mixture of Nickel powder and Lithium Aluminum Hydride. Initial experiments showed that the reaction is unstable; occurring in a narrow temperature range (in practice, it is outside the melting temperature of the fuel materials). In this work we describe the design of the heat generator, the calorimetric method for measuring the amount of heat energy. The results demonstrate excess heat during heating the powder mixture of Ni and Li[AlH4] to temperatures ranging from 1030—1140 C. The generator did not expose an X-ray photographic emulsion. 
2-Associate professor 

2) My Mettling Into Cold Fusion Cold Fusion Replication Mp3 Download
LENR под воздействием лазера

5) 08 Aug. 2016 "Global Wave" ( Ya.P. Starukhin) went  s second time to Eisk to meet and discuss withAlexander Evghenievich Kuznetsov VIDEO


The inventor created his LENR reactor with a working temperature intermediary between those of the E-Cat and the Hot E-Cat of Rossi (750 C) - similar as construction with Rossi's nigh temperature generator, however with the difference that Rossi has increased the temperature while Kuznetsov has increased the pressure of hydrogen. 
Comment on Rossi's Patents

Rossi patent update.…621/PDOC/WO2016018851.pdf

As was shown in the Lugano demo, waveform stimulation produces a limited power density reaction that does not exceed at most COP=3 and some say far less. The stimulation that might be used to produce the very high COP is the electrostatic stimulation that generates the TAO effect. That is the reference to the two electrodes that can produce an EMF potential of up to 100,000 volt and is defined in an update to the Rossi patent.

If you read this patent update that references the NEW electrostatic stimulator which operates between 50 and 100 KV, Rossi says that the resistance heater is NO LONGER REQUIRED for reactor operations but is still required to heat the reactor to operating temperature at startup.

Rossi also says that the reaction temperature is between 400 to 600C. This means that the update is applied to the LOW TEMPERATURE REACTOR. 


Mechano-chemical Synthesis of NaAlH4 ˖ Optimization of Reaction Conditions

Won-Bi Han1,a, Ki-Kwang Bae1,b, Kyoung-Soo Kang1,c, Seoung-Uk Jeong1,d, Won-Chul Cho1,e Chang-Hee Kim1,f and Chu-Sik Park1,g,* 

1 Hydrogen Energy Research Center, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea a, b, c, d, e, f, g,* author) 

NaAlH4 was mechano-chemically synthesized with high energy ball-milling method. The effect of synthesis conditions such as milling time, H2 pressure, chloride catalysts, and solvents was investigated to enhance the synthesis of NaAlH4. Among the chloride catalysts, TiCl4 showed the highest H2 pressure decrease which means the highest NaH conversion to NaAlH4. Furthermore, when the NaAlH4 was synthesized with THF solvent, it exhibited the higher H2 pressure decrease than that of sample prepared without THF solvent. This is mainly due to the synergy effect of TiCl4 catalyst and THF solvent. 


Bruno the brave
For anyone who dares to voice dangerous ideas and risk imprisonment or exile, Giordano Bruno remains a hero
Thinking about the martyrs of Cold Fusion, LENR. remains a hero

Wednesday, August 24, 2016



“The smaller your reality, the more convinced you are that you know everything.” 
(Thomas Campbell)

Image result for "small fish quotationsImage result for "small fish quotations

It is even better to be a fish commensurate with the Ocean.

A special problem arises when small fishes develop an unhealthy ambition to swallow big fishes.


First of all please read these comments including some answers of Alain Coetmeur:

My answers-in-red to Ed Storms of yesterday were ignored not rejected with contempt and  facts. I have to accept that the F& P Cell due to its immense merit- it has shown that cold fusion- in the form of excess heat is reality- is a very strong meme. It is good, it gave us a great dream.  It is a factory of dreams - infinite energy- so it is not recognized that it has inherent weaknesses, has attained its limits and actually it was the harbinger of the Energy Solution not the Solution per se. in  sense it is an object of cult and what we have learnt by using and testing it in thousands of experiments, in some part successful- data, information, knowledge wisdom- despite their local applicability are imposed upon the entire field of LENR much extended e.g.  from palladium to all the transition metals, from 100 to 1400 C including protium beside deuterium, and lots of new features and parameters- some of them actionable. (lack of actionable parameters is the fatal weakness of PdD wet, electrolytic system. 
Strong meme - Pd D is still the genuine, true, sang-bleu core LENR- NiH a la Piantelli was always considered kind of illegal, nonexistent, intruder and LENR+ was ab ovo unacceptable.
A strange situation- a part of LENR tries to devour the whole., the small fish tries to swallow or t least kill the big fish. It is a strong initial hostility against  LENR+ and technology. PdD is so well known (?) then why try to work with other combination much less known, just because Andrea Rossi claims to have discovered a method to genarate enhanced excess heat and because a lot of Rossi replicators have obtained excess heat, even if not in the multiplicative form as Rossi says hehad. Rossi is denied, and not friendly, not with hope that he has achieved something.
I fear history of LENR will record this as a great discovery trying to stop or slow down its own progress. If no LENR+ exists or can be created the LENR field is sentenced to death.


1) Faking LENR With Thermite? (LookingForHeat Video and Report)

2) Updated- Cold Fusion-videos:


Artificial Atom“ Created in GrapheneElectrons reveal their quantum properties when they are confined to small spaces

New approach to determining how atoms are arranged in materials
Date:August 23, 2016
Source:North Carolina State University
Researchers have developed a novel approach to characterizing how atoms are arranged in materials, using Bayesian statistical methods to glean new insights into the structure of materials. The work should inform the development of new materials for use in a variety of applications.


From Harold Jarche
connected curiosity