MOTTO
"For LENR, our new job is to convert attention into confidence."
(Michael McKubre)
The coming days and weeks have the highest chances to be decisive. Replications - goood ones are Research of high quality- needing both creativity and discipline, and can have positive effect and impact.
As I have already told 8 successful replications will suffice to melt away the last traces of doubt,
will put a muzzle on the most aggressive LENR deniers.
What have we LENR-ists to do in support of our front-line replicators:
- we must go from the probletent mode to the problem solving mode;
- we have to replace wishful, idealistic thinking with realistic, pragmatic thinking
- we have to advance from the omniscient PdD based mentality to the fast learning NiH based mentality;
-to abandon the mixing-all generalizing approach and to adopt the separating-specifics and distinguishing LENR from LENR+
BUT what is the great task- to instill true content in all these noisy slogans and to put flesh on this skeleton of bare ideas. My duty- first.
TODAY"S INFO
Let's help the only person to partially reproduce s Hot Cat (James Rice)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/22/lets-help-the-only-person-to-partially-reproduce-a-hot-cat-james-rice/
Andrea Rossi
February 21st, 2015 at 10:29 AM
IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO ALL OUR READERS:
ATTENTION: ANOTHER FRAUDOLENT SALE OF E-CATS HAS BEEN PUT ON THE INTERNET.
THE BOGUS WEBSITE IS:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/e-cat-energy-catalyzer
THEY PROPOSE THE SALE OF E-CATS AND ASK MONEY IN ADVANCE TO PRE-BUY THEM.
THIS IS A TOTAL FRAUD.
WE DO NOT KNOW THEM, WE NEVER HEARD OF THEM BEFORE ( I HAVE BEEN INFORMED RIGHT NOW OF THIS FRAUD), THEY HAVE NO AGREEMENT WHATSOEVER WITH US, WE ARE NOT SELLING DOMESTIC ECATS, THE PHOTOGRAPHIES PUBLISHED IN THIS FRAUDOLENT SITE ARE TOTALLY INVENTED AND NEVER PRODUCED BY US. WE WILL NEVER SELL THEM ANY OF OUR PRODUCTS, THEREFORE IF YOU GIVE THEM MONEY TO BUY OUR PRODUCTS YOUR MONEY WILL BE TOTALLY LOST FROM YOU.
IN GENERAL, DO NOT GIVE MONEY TO ANYBODY THAT SAYS THAT HE CAN SELL YOU OUR PRODUCTS BEFORE INFORMING US WHO HE IS: WE WILL IMMEDIATELY INFORM YOU ABOUT THE REALITY. ANYBODY WHO ASKS YOU MONEY IN ADVANCE TO BUY A DOMESTIC E-CAT IS A FRAUDSTER: WE DO NOT ASK MONEY IN ADVANCE TO MAKE A PRE-ORDER AND WE DO NOT SELL DOMESTIC E-CATS.
IN CASE OF INDUSTRIAL PLANTS, ALWAYS ASK US CONFIRMATION THAT THE PERSON THAT IS OFFERING YOU ANYTHING IS AN AUTHORIZED LICENSEE.
YOU CAN PUT YOUR QUESTIONS TO
info@leonardocorp1996.com
I BEG ALL THE BLOGGERS THAT TALK OF OUR WORK TO REPRODUCE THIS MESSAGE, TO HELP TO AVOID THAT HONEST PERSONS GET THEIR MONEY STOLEN FROM THESE FRAUDSTERS.
WARM REGARDS
DR AND REA ROSSI, LEONARDO CORPORATION (CEO)
AXIL DIXIT
this is so wise and significant that I cannot let it as a comment
The answer to this speed of adoption question is found in the details.
From the very beginning, Rossi has had real and long standing problems with controlling his reaction, so he has been forced into a complex design plan that has enabled him to make reactor development progress. That path involves a (spaghetti code like) low power density reactor design solution that greatly increases the complexity and high initial cost on energy investment of his reactor design.
A complex design is far less adoptable than is a simple design. This complex design will have a high rate of failure, need expertly trained maintenance personnel, be inordinately expensive to manufacture and to operate.
A simple and well controlled LENR reactor is possible to design and build. Such a reactor prototype has been produced by DGT by using electric arc stimulation of the LENR reaction.
The speed of adoption is directly related to the complexity of the design of the reactor. If someone can develop a simple LENR reactor that features high power density, and design simplicity the speed of that reactors adoption will be dazzling. The adoption of the complex Rossi design will be greatly impeded especially in the technically unsophisticated third world where LENR based energy is needed the most. Rossi's current design is a first world design that needs the energy of this reactor the least.
I just wonder why Axil thinks that DGT has developed a simple working reactor. A proper (three party or peer reviewed) proof of that claim is still to be published. If it were the case than I believe DGT would have put their product on the market already, because it is so simple. So Axil, why do you think so?
ReplyDeleteHi Mark,
DeleteAn interesting question - Why do you believe DGT would put anything 'on the market', ? - what market ? - what do they have ? a fully commercial product (just like that)".
Also, do you seriously believe any company that 'may' have a working LENR reactor is not going to be bought out (as Rossi claims he has been) so as to address global 'opportunities' that go way beyond our humble interests.
As a hypothetical, lets make an assumption that some middle eastern country that has its entire economy built around sale of energy (oil) and has billions of $s in reserve and gets to hear about claimed LENR devices. And lets assume they put the feelers out through their high level US contacts over the past 3 years to have them validate to their satisfaction, that this new potential energy source is 'real', by conducting *private* tests.
At this point our 'hypothetical' could go 2 ways - 1) Testing comes back negative - the end of this hypothetical. Or 2) Testing comes back positive and says this new energy source is real (but may need more time to productize, but not much).
So if you were the Sheik putting out these feelers are you going to want to trumpet your interest to the world (to please Mark and friends) or are you going to go into silence mode ?. Think about it. Yeah we know Andrea can't keep quite but unsurprisingly he is now (best I can see) really playing a distraction game and it seems to be effective.
Now if you were the interested party. Would you want the companies you are dealing with to blare all on the internet or to shut up. And then if you concluded that this new technology was real enough to change existing energy consumption what would you do with the energy you currently sell ? - perhaps you would drop the price of current energy dramatically so as to a) put other producers under financial stress (to try and limit their ability to buy into the new energy) and b) to pave the way for introducing the new energy that will have an even greater lowering impact of current energy.
Now if you think the above scenario is simply very fanciful, I am saying that I don't !. The personalities are real & the story plausible. But we all have to figure these things out for ourselves, if we can. Some of us can't see the forest because of the tress that get in the way.
We live in interesting times.
DSM
about indigogo, I opened a problem about that offer...
ReplyDeleteadvise them to contact IH and Rossi...
hope this helps