Thursday, September 1, 2016



Image result for toughness quotationsImage result for toughness quotes'

Please re-read these quotations:
And perhaps this issue of my blog:


a) The times coming -till the end of thr Rossi vs Darden Trial are an exam of toughness for the E-Cat technology

You will see that the technology is tough and indestructible- at the Trial.
The next stage, more difficult will be to show that it is tough and irresistible and will conquer the market of energy.
Tough people will perform both tasks,and a tough and invincible class of technologies will be created, you will see.

b) Ed Storms' opinion about progress in LENR

Peter, let me add additional insight about why no progress is being made when understanding LENR.  Anyone who has bothered to look at the surface of nuclear active material at high magnification is in for a shock.  The surface is very complex in both composition and morphology. Nothing about this material is typical of what is considered to be ideal, normal material.  Nevertheless, the various theories are all based on the known behavior of ideal material.  In other words, the theories are describing material that does not exist in the real world.  Physics is accustomed to describing conditions to which math can be applied, such as plasma or ideal energy states.  The conditions in which LENR takes place are controlled by conditions over which the physicist has neither control nor knowledge. Therefore, they are describing an imaginary world.  At the same time, the measurements are based on the average behavior.  This average has very little relationship to the extreme conditions that actually exists and can determine how LENR functions.  I see no progress possible until the ideas are applied to what is real. 

Dear readers, please tell what you think about this!  I want now to add a single idea- the visible part is indeed complex, but the invisible part- nano- and smaller is even more complex. For PdD the distribution of impurity atoms plays an important role in reproducibility and actually it is unquantifiable and almost non measurable. Complexities over complexities.


1) Lattice Energy LLC - Liu et al increase effective electron masses in ZrTe5 by applying very high magnetic field - Aug 30 2016

2) Viktor Romanovski has performed search for articles, papers about.S. Filimonenko (who claimed to be the first inventor of Cold Fusion) and his experimental works

Виктор Романовский провел поиск статей о И.С. Филимоненко и его экспериментальных работах

3) REDDIT LENR updated:                                                   

4) From Rossi's JONP- about his enemies.

August 31, 2016 at 8:55 PM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
a guy in a hostile blog has written that when you write ” kWh/h” to indicate energy you make a mistake due to your poor knowledge of mathematics, because the h at the numerator and the h at the denominator cancel each other and remains only kW. What do you answer?
Andrea Rossi
August 31, 2016 at 9:57 PM

That statement is a paradigmatic example of the fact that, as Prof Umberto Eco wrote, in the blogs every imbecile can sell himself to somebody as a scientist even if he is an analphabete.
As every person that has a knowledge of the concept of energy will confirm to you, kWh is a quantum of energy: this is the shortcut of the full name, that is ” kilowatthour”.
Therefore, when you write “x kWh/h”, you shortcut the expression ” x kilowatthour/h”, which means “the kilowatthours that you are generating or consuming in one hour are x”.
To say that the two H eliminate each other because one is in the numerator and the other is in the denominator is not just wrong, it is extremely stupid, because is like to eliminate the letter h from the word kilowatthour at the numerator, where an amount of energy is defined, and the total time from the denominator, which is the Hour of time during which the energy is produced or consumed: in a nutshell, the two H stay for two completely different things, therefore they cannot be eliminated !!! The guy who wrote this bestiality not only has not a minimum knowledge of Physics, but also of Mathematics ( or, better, of elementary school Aritmetics) because not only has not understood what is the concept of energy, but also how the fractions work and when they can be reduced.
So, if you want to be correct, please remember: the definition “1 kWh/h” is absolutely correct, and corresponds to a precise amount of energy ( 860 kcal, or 3526 kJ ) consumed or produced in one hour. When you write that you are consuming ( or producing) 1 kWh/h, you mean that every hour you are consuming or producing 3526 kJ. And please do not eliminate the h from the fraction!
Warm Regards,
P.S. The guy who wrote these bestialities must be pardoned: he is a puppet paid to write bestialities and, as they say in Italy ” Pure lui tiene famiglia” ( he too has to feed his family )

September 1, 2016 at 12:20 AM

Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Obviously your answer to Dan is correct. We had another example of how incensistent your foes are.
Just ignore them and proceed with your great work.
Andrea Rossi
September 1, 2016 at 6:48 AM

They are not inconsistent, they are consistent as a series of puppets that take advantage of non expert readers to create a hostile environment around the character they are paid to destroy. It is an old story that many years ago worked, today does not: twenty years ago it was enough to buy a couple of corrupted journalists of main newspapers to assassinate a character and prepare the environment against his work. Today, with the internet, it is impossible, because if you write a stupidity or a falsity it backfires immediately if the reaction is proper. This is the double edge issue of the blogs: from one side, they allow to any imbecile to play the guru, from the other they allow anybody to make the guru naked like the famous king, in real time.
Warm Regards,

5) A new thread at LENR Forum in French

FrenchWeb : La Grande Disruption - Par Jean-Michel Billaut, fondateur de l'Atelier BNP Paribas


Nuclear Dynamics and Electronic Effects of Hydrogen on Solid Surfaces
Authors K. Fukutani, M. Wilde, S. Ogura
First published: 26 August 2016

Hydrogen is involved in a variety of chemical processes on surfaces. While hydrogen exhibits vibrational and rotational dynamics in its adsorption state, it in some cases undergoes diffusion into the substrate as well as on the surface, and participates in chemical reactions. Furthermore, hydrogen exchanges an electron with surfaces having a significant effect on the surface electronic structure. In this personal account, we review our recent studies on surface nuclear dynamics of hydrogen, hydrogen transport across surfaces, catalytic hydrogenation/isotope exchange reactions, and charge transfer between the surface and hydrogen by using a depth-resolved technique of nuclear reaction analysis and a quantum-state-selective detection of resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization in combination with surface science techniques. As a future prospect, we refer to ultraslow μ spin rotation spectroscopy for a direct probe of the hydrogen charge state at surfaces.

Nothing to do with LENR but I liked it:
Smarter brains are blood-thirsty brains

Focus on What Won't Change
ends with:
"But look for the old classic with new eyes. Don’t see the trees; see the forest. Don’t see now; see forever. Don’t see countries; see the world.
Then start looking for how to make that world just a little bit better".


  1. incorrect..... kWh = kilowatt hours is energy, kWh/h is thus energy per time and therfore a unit of power and not energy. power and energy are different.

  2. Yeah. Rossi had very poorly explained the releationship between power and energy on his blog, and I mentioned this on, with

    I did not state what "Dan" had said. I called kWh/h a Rossi "trope," which I used to mean a customary expression, generally idiosyncratic. I copied the Rossi interchange and this note about the units was the only comment on it.

    " Kwh/h is a Rossi trope, he uses it all the time. 1 kW = 1 kWh/h. Basic math. The hour cancels in the numerator and denominator. The poor kid!"

    "Poor kid" remark was a commentary on the explanation given by Rossi, which was not "pedagogical" and would be likely to confuse.

    "Trope" does not mean "wrong." kWh/h is a unit of energy, meaning exactly the same thing as kW. Rossi, in his answer you quoted, however, reveals massive confusion, staring with believing what he is told without checking, then he began to rant about "The guy who wrote these bestialities must be pardoned: he is a puppet paid to write bestialities and, as they say in Italy ” Pure lui tiene famiglia” (he too has to feed his family ."

    Peter, you have known me for years. Planet Rossi is infected with conspiracy theory ("Paid FUD") and Rossi is deranged and it seems to be getting worse. You hitched your hopes to a nightmare.

    1. Abd - strangely, Rossi's kWh/h would be pedantically correct if the output power is variable but averages to that number of kW. Since Rossi claims to be producing power in pulses, he's therefore right to use this unit. I wouldn't worry about it, therefore. The real question is whether the output was correctly measured. The answer there seems to be "no" unless someone can come up with an explanation for where ~980kW over ~350 days disappeared with no evidence as to where it went.

      I have a good supply of popcorn while I'm waiting for someone to produce a physically-possible answer to that.

    2. He does not explain it that way. That would be "average power," over a particular time. Most power is not steady. If I have a resistor, and I apply AC power to it, the power varies continually. I did refer to the occasional usage of kWh/h on lenr-forum, in later commentary. His comments about the units dividing, though, were totally off. What I really noticed is how he converted a small comment, misrepresented, into a rant about those paid to attack him. Rossi is literally insane. Is he "Dan"?

      And his comments about exoplanets, again, showed ignorance, lack of attention, since it was mentioned that Proxima Centauri is the nearest star. The affair with Hydro Fusion, covered in An Impossible Invention, showed that he did not understand the problem of chopped AC power. This is not fatal, except it meant that none of his personal AC power measurements could be trusted. And Rossi v. Darden is showing that nothing he says can be trusted.

  3. kWh/h is the same as kW but kW is NOT a unit of energy it is a unit of power. kWh is a unit of energy. 1kWh is 3.6 million Joules kWh is energy, kWh/h is power.

  4. Peters only nightmare has been
    Jed Rothwell.
    Or they just annoy each other.
    I don't but some people think Jed is
    a paid fud.

    1. Dear Sam,
      In the anme of our friendship, please do not try
      to think in my place, you cannot judge the significance and importance of events, people for me. A fly is a fly, an eagle is an eagle. I don'yt want any answer to this, let's focus together on important things. OK?


    2. Peter
      I DO NOT think in your place.
      It is my opinion only.
      Probably just poor wording on my
      part that you think so.
      Your Friend

    3. No problem, just I have no obsession just love to do some tings- now fewer and fewer.
      Some professional and cultural issues I was very fond of.

      Not negative obsessions except communist oppression.


    4. And Rossi claims I'm paid FUD. Consider the world view involved. This is literal insanity, paranoia, and that is a theme of his life.

    5. OK, should I convince him that you are amateur FUD?

      Better tell me sincerely what do you think about the flowmeter- Murray-Rothwell rheo0logical miracle?

      About the photos of unknown location and timing arranged to show different unexistant situations.
      You were a honest man.

  5. Peter
    Oppose Oppresion were ever
    you find.

  6. When a tree is falling, tough people don't give up. Smart people get out of the way. When "tough" becomes "stubborn," it can be fatal. The true virtue is patience.

  7. Do you know you can hack any ATM machine, so why
    going for loans that you will still pay back with interest!!!
    We have specially programmed ATM cards that can can
    be use to hack ATM machines, the ATM cards can be used
    to withdraw at the ATM or swipe, at stores and POS. We
    sell this cards to all our customers and interested buyers
    worldwide, the card has a daily withdrawal limit of $5000
    on ATM and up to $50,000 spending limit on in stores. and
    also if you in need of any other cyber hack services, we
    are here for you anytime any day.
    : contact
    us via email address…