MOTTO
OWN YOUR OWN JOURNEY
(GAPINGVOID, today, about your "career path")
DAILY NOTES
THIS IS AN EDITORIAL
I confess, today I enjoyed being an independent blogger, It is quite impossible but I a trying to explain you why and how.
OK, yesterday I wanted to continue my pre-analysis of ICF20with the paper of the AIRBUS leader:
A new approach to Entropy, heat and order (20) Jean-Francois Geneste (France
The author knows if this has something to do with/for the problems of LENR, however it digs at the roots of Science and it is so noble, so "dulce at decorum " to focus on FUNDAMENTAL things! This is what I intend to do now.
Help came from Ed Storms' pre-appreciation of ICCF20; you will see that by no means it could be called "enthusiastic"- -I cite:
Well Peter, the papers chosen by the people who control how LENR is studied and explained have provided the same old crap. I see nothing new. I'm now very glad I did not plan to attend. I see no future for this field until a new collection of people get involved and take a fresh look at the evidence. The present thinking is locked into an attitude having very little relationship to what is real. I submitted a paper in an attempt to encourage a different approach. It was assigned to a poster session. We will see if anyone cares to comment about my ideas in their papers, which so far is not happening. It is clear that my value to this field is disappearing, as is my interest in the subject. Being and getting older does not help, as you know.
(my highlighting with red)
Yes, dear Ed getting older is not a continuous happiness or orgasm, just you know - the alternatives are even worse!
This morning came the trigger comment, I regret it is anonymous because I want to thank personally to the author for this help just-in-time:
Very interesting topics presented here (especially those regarding new theoretical developments). Also I want to post a just spotted link with the answer to a central aspect underlined and developed by the author of this blog: Problem Solving skills and why there are not exercised in traditional educational systems who lack a good guiding:https://www.quora.com/
This unknown friend raises the fundamental problem of modes of thinking; I have to say with sadness that my classic essay:
MODES OF THINKING- MY TAXONOMY.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/modes-of-thinking-my-taxonomy.html
exactly as my 20 Real Life Problem Solving Ru;es is not taught in schools, universities, institutions and companies; the consequence being the increasing domination of destructive forms of probletence.
In that essay, when speaking bout LOGICAL THINKING, it is a remarkable quote:
Logical thinking is that safe and beaten path on which you can go from one swamp to an other” (Karoly Simonyi)
What are those "swamps'? The first one is "Basic assumptions" and the second- "Conclusions."
Going back to the ICCF20 papers, it is easy to see that we can envisage some papers having something in common- as e.g. Japanese authors writing about mixed metal nano-particles or theorists focused on deep level electrons.
These groups have SHARED BASIC ASSUMPTIONS and shared assumptions define a CULTURE. Not many share Ed's well described basic assumptions and no one accept my 6 Pillars of LENR+.
Ergo, ICCF20 is a multicultural gathering- and waht is bad exactly as in the social, national, political, cultures, it is a bad sort of multiculturality- from non-additive to incompatible to mutually hostile cultures.
It is a rule of complementarity linking importance and definibility, culture being extremely important is difficult to define, just for a start please look at:
We have to work out a compatible, functional set of LENR cultures.
And it is much more for LENR and culture as you can see below:
A SHORT INTERVIEW WITH ANDREA ROSSI QUESTIONS BASED ON THE IDEAS OF THIS EDITORIAL.
ANSWER
ANSWER
DAILY NEWS
1) Is LENR viable?
https://www.quora.com/Is-LENR-viable
2) Cold Fusion kits (updated)
http://www.lookingforheat.com/
3) Remember the lst of ICCF20 oral presentations is here:
http://www.cobraf.com/forum/immagini/R_123631852_1.pdf
4) E-CATNEWS
http://www.ecatnews.net/
5) Lewis Larsen 30 year anniversary of his publications in Barron's Magazine:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lewis-larsen-30-year-anniversary-of-larsen-economic-and-market-predictions-published-in-barrons-magazine-interviews-1986-and-1988
6) GREAT THANKS TO PIERRE CLAUZON
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 41, 2016 1
Enriching of water in deuterium during an electrical dischsrge
Enrichissement d’eau en deuterium lors d’une décharge électrique
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-411/aflb848Nantes_v2.pdf
G. DE LACHEZE-MUREL1,3, E. BON2 , C. DAVIAU1 , D. FARGUE1 , M. KARATCHENTZEFF1 , G. LOCHAK1 , A. MARIZY1,3, D. PRIEM2 , G. RACINEUX2
1 Institut Louis de Broglie, 23 rue Marsoulan, 75012 Paris
2 Ecole Centrale de Nantes, 1 rue de la Noe, 44321 Nantes 3 CEA/DAM, Bruyères-le-Châtel, 91297 Arpajon
7) About the new edition of Randell MIlls new book, in Russian (the announcement)
ED STORMS LIKEDTHE NEW RANDELL MILLS BOOK>
You have already read Doug Marker' very positive opinion about the
book.
Now Ed storms writes:
"I started reading the book about Mills. Mills has clearly made important discoveries and has a plausible explanation. But in spite of all he has done, the empty heads reject him just like they reject LENR. I can see why. At least 1/2 the people in the US are so ignorant they have no ability to understand reality, as their support for Trump demonstrates. Evidence in other countries suggests an even bigger problem in understanding reality."
LENR IN CONTEXT-1
Atomic scale pipes available on demand and by design
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/09/160907135129.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ftop_news%2Ftop_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Top+Science+News%29
LENR IN CONTEXT_2
Why don't high schools teach indepedence and critical thinking?https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-high-schools-teach-indepedence-and-critical-thinking
Why Leaders Need to Understand the Difference between Influence and Manipulation
http://people-equation.com/why-leaders-need-to-understand-the-difference-between-influence-and-manipulation/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ThePeopleEquation+%28The+People+Equation%29
OWN YOUR OWN JOURNEY
(GAPINGVOID, today, about your "career path")
THIS IS AN EDITORIAL
I confess, today I enjoyed being an independent blogger, It is quite impossible but I a trying to explain you why and how.
OK, yesterday I wanted to continue my pre-analysis of ICF20with the paper of the AIRBUS leader:
A new approach to Entropy, heat and order (20) Jean-Francois Geneste (
The author knows if this has something to do with/for the problems of LENR, however it digs at the roots of Science and it is so noble, so "dulce at decorum " to focus on FUNDAMENTAL things! This is what I intend to do now.
Help came from Ed Storms' pre-appreciation of ICCF20; you will see that by no means it could be called "enthusiastic"- -I cite:
Well Peter, the papers chosen by the people who control how LENR is studied and explained have provided the same old crap. I see nothing new. I'm now very glad I did not plan to attend. I see no future for this field until a new collection of people get involved and take a fresh look at the evidence. The present thinking is locked into an attitude having very little relationship to what is real. I submitted a paper in an attempt to encourage a different approach. It was assigned to a poster session. We will see if anyone cares to comment about my ideas in their papers, which so far is not happening. It is clear that my value to this field is disappearing, as is my interest in the subject. Being and getting older does not help, as you know.
(my highlighting with red)
Yes, dear Ed getting older is not a continuous happiness or orgasm, just you know - the alternatives are even worse!
This morning came the trigger comment, I regret it is anonymous because I want to thank personally to the author for this help just-in-time:
Very interesting topics presented here (especially those regarding new theoretical developments). Also I want to post a just spotted link with the answer to a central aspect underlined and developed by the author of this blog: Problem Solving skills and why there are not exercised in traditional educational systems who lack a good guiding:https://www.quora.com/
This unknown friend raises the fundamental problem of modes of thinking; I have to say with sadness that my classic essay:
MODES OF THINKING- MY TAXONOMY.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/modes-of-thinking-my-taxonomy.html
exactly as my 20 Real Life Problem Solving Ru;es is not taught in schools, universities, institutions and companies; the consequence being the increasing domination of destructive forms of probletence.
In that essay, when speaking bout LOGICAL THINKING, it is a remarkable quote:
Logical thinking is that safe and beaten path on which you can go from one swamp to an other” (Karoly Simonyi)
Going back to the ICCF20 papers, it is easy to see that we can envisage some papers having something in common- as e.g. Japanese authors writing about mixed metal nano-particles or theorists focused on deep level electrons.
These groups have SHARED BASIC ASSUMPTIONS and shared assumptions define a CULTURE. Not many share Ed's well described basic assumptions and no one accept my 6 Pillars of LENR+.
Ergo, ICCF20 is a multicultural gathering- and waht is bad exactly as in the social, national, political, cultures, it is a bad sort of multiculturality- from non-additive to incompatible to mutually hostile cultures.
It is a rule of complementarity linking importance and definibility, culture being extremely important is difficult to define, just for a start please look at:
What is Culture?
https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/globalpad/openhouse/interculturalskills/global_pad_-_what_is_culture.pdfWe have to work out a compatible, functional set of LENR cultures.
And it is much more for LENR and culture as you can see below:
A SHORT INTERVIEW WITH ANDREA ROSSI QUESTIONS BASED ON THE IDEAS OF THIS EDITORIAL.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Please explain us a positive paradox concerning your activity!
We can three main categories of people in research and development:
- THINKERS- homo sapiens scientificus- they want, first of all, to know and understand;
- DOERS- homo faber- they want to solve the problems, to build and create;
SPEAKERS (even better called CHATTERS)- Homo blah-blahiensis unable to understand well, but ready to criticize, deny, denigrate they want to stop and destroy other people's work. In Internetese they are Trolls.
First Question
You are educated as philosopher, it is evident you love and admire Science however the Opus of your life, creation of the first LENR systems with multiplicative excess heat shows you are a DOER a gate opener an absolute pioneer. Think scientifically, act technologically! Entrepreneurship is just an other name for creativity. How did it happen?
ANSWER
The model of my Father, a hard worker and an entrepreneur, he worked from 6 a.m. trough 10 p.m. all his lif. When I was idle. my Mother (always working with my Father- she having a doctorate in literature) used to say: What are you doing? Are you am amoeba? Go to study!
Second Question:
Some negative effects of your successes
thinkers envy you and try to negate the scientific value of your inventions;
Homo blah-blahiensis is your deadly enemy. Their bravos (paid killers) try to annihilate both your character and your Opus. They invent stories, sins, bad deeds and imaginary problems- as I have shown recently (A Stake in Dracula's heart...)
On the technical level where they are mainly illiterate, they go in two directions:
Rossi process is not working, zero excess heat;
Rossi process did not work, claimed energy too great , no consumers existed, so much energy cannot be consumed.
It is clear that you had not started the Trial without perfect answers to these accusations, so beyond anything in connection with the legal aspects- what do you want o tell to all those Homo blah-blahiensis?
ANSWER
What counts are facts; the facts we produced are in all our publications, reports, and in the plants and devices we built.
Rossi's answers show that he belongs, by birth, education and personal willpower, effort- to a culture of work, duty and creativity.
DAILY NEWS
1) Is LENR viable?
https://www.quora.com/Is-LENR-viable
2) Cold Fusion kits (updated)
http://www.lookingforheat.com/
3) Remember the lst of ICCF20 oral presentations is here:
http://www.cobraf.com/forum/immagini/R_123631852_1.pdf
4) E-CATNEWS
http://www.ecatnews.net/
5) Lewis Larsen 30 year anniversary of his publications in Barron's Magazine:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lewis-larsen-30-year-anniversary-of-larsen-economic-and-market-predictions-published-in-barrons-magazine-interviews-1986-and-1988
6) GREAT THANKS TO PIERRE CLAUZON
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 41, 2016 1
Enriching of water in deuterium during an electrical dischsrge
Enrichissement d’eau en deuterium lors d’une décharge électrique
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-411/aflb848Nantes_v2.pdf
G. DE LACHEZE-MUREL1,3, E. BON2 , C. DAVIAU1 , D. FARGUE1 , M. KARATCHENTZEFF1 , G. LOCHAK1 , A. MARIZY1,3, D. PRIEM2 , G. RACINEUX2
1 Institut Louis de Broglie, 23 rue Marsoulan, 75012 Paris
2 Ecole Centrale de Nantes, 1 rue de la Noe, 44321 Nantes 3 CEA/DAM, Bruyères-le-Châtel, 91297 Arpajon
7) About the new edition of Randell MIlls new book, in Russian (the announcement)
Dr. Randell L. Mills выложил для свободного скачивания свои книги по теории гидрино
You have already read Doug Marker' very positive opinion about the
book.
Now Ed storms writes:
"I started reading the book about Mills. Mills has clearly made important discoveries and has a plausible explanation. But in spite of all he has done, the empty heads reject him just like they reject LENR. I can see why. At least 1/2 the people in the US are so ignorant they have no ability to understand reality, as their support for Trump demonstrates. Evidence in other countries suggests an even bigger problem in understanding reality."
Atomic scale pipes available on demand and by design
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/09/160907135129.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ftop_news%2Ftop_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Top+Science+News%29
also Inspiring
Why we' re not winning the war against bacteria?
Antibiotics: Will the bugs always win?
Antibiotics: Will the bugs always win?
Clearly not the only war we humans -will lose.
LENR IN CONTEXT_2
Why don't high schools teach indepedence and critical thinking?https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-high-schools-teach-indepedence-and-critical-thinking
Why Leaders Need to Understand the Difference between Influence and Manipulation
http://people-equation.com/why-leaders-need-to-understand-the-difference-between-influence-and-manipulation/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ThePeopleEquation+%28The+People+Equation%29
Eight Powerful Ways to Generate Great Ideas
http://www.innovationresource.com/eight-powerful-ways-generate-great-ideas/
http://www.innovationresource.com/eight-powerful-ways-generate-great-ideas/
Peter
ReplyDeleteEd Stormes said this on your Blog.
I see no future for this field until a new collection of people get involved and take a fresh look at the evidence.
Would you say that is what Bob Greenyer
is doing with Aarhus University?
Thanks
Sam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K_GBBspZjs
ReplyDeleteBuilding on the past year of experimentation and analysis, the SAFIRE Project is moving into Phase 2, which takes the lessons from the Phase 1 Proof of Concept Prototype into a much larger chamber. Phase 1 ended on a cliff-hanger with indications of fusion and transient million-fold CME-like eruptions. Monty will present some aspects of the new chamber design, and also explain some of the equally challenging tasks of building SAFIRE Phase 2.
Is Safire a plasmatron?
http://rexresearch.com/chernetskii/chernetskii.htm
A russian scientist: Alexander Chernetsky experimented with a hydrogen plasma reactor called a Plasmatron that produced a COP of 5. Since there is nothing new under the Sun, the Safire experiment could be the plasmatron. We might make some deductions derived from Safire so far. If it is producing He3, from hydrogen fusion, then the experiments should be dead from gamma radiation or at least have radiation sickness.
The fact that Safire experimenters all look healthy speaks to the prospect that the reaction that is producing the hydrogen fusion if any must be LENR. We assume that thermalization of gamma is a result of Bose condensation (BEC) in the reaction. This BEC might be caused by a superconductivity of hydrogen going on.
The Safire experimenters claim that they see layering of the hydrogen plasma in many bands with positive and negative ions segregated in each layer. This might indicate that a process of "hole" superconductivity may be occurring.
The hallmark of the LENR reaction is the segregation of protons (holes) from electrons where the LENR reaction is occurring in the electron (negative ion) band.
I would advise Safire to look for RF radiation from Spin waves formed in the negative ion band(s) as well as the emission of mesons containing strange quarks. These mesons will decay into muons and electrons.
The fusion that Safire is seeing might be coming from muon catalyzed fusion which occurs when muons find a pair of protons to orbit.
This process being currently observed in the Safire experiment has been of interest to LENR theorists in Russia for many years as follows:
http://www.jeanemanning.ca/articles/russian_discoveries.php
Atlantis Rising ( June 2002 )FORMER IRON CURTAIN HID REVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH
CONFERENCES REVEAL ENERGY DISCOVERIES FROM FORMER SOVIET UNION
... A focus on the East must include the late Professor Aleksandr Chernetskii of Moscow. He developed a plasma generator said to convert vacuum energy into electricity. A press release at the time quoted Chernetskii as saying experiments with different circuits proved that the energy output was always greater than the input. The mysterious effect was called the self-generating discharge. One experiment with a powerful plasma unit burned out the huge megawatt electrical substation of the Moscow Aviation Institute. The discharge had reached a critical point in which superstrong current flowed from the generator and back into wires to the substation. In an experiment with an input of 700 watts, the generator produced nearly five times as much.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete