Wednesday, October 28, 2015


True disruption means threatening your existing product line and your past investments. Breakthrough products disrupt current lines of businesses.
(Peter Diamandis)

Our friend Alain Coetmeur has attracted attention to a paper by Peter Diamandis:

Peter Diamandis Talks About Disruptive Adjacencies

A wise paper, we see good examples of where and how disruptions takes place, and all these disruptions make the technology revolutions- not only in IT, but also in Energy Technology and in Matter Technology, we see how Mankind is radically and fast improving- transport, transfer and transformations of information, energy, matter
for making our lives better. The triple IEMT revolution- it goes more and more as a whole.

The question is: how will LENR disrupt the energy market?  For the time given, the game is played in Rossi's 'festina lente' (hurry slowly) style -it is a gentle disruption and this sounds like an oxymoron- contradiction in terms.
This has inspired me to think about how endemic are oxymorons to our field, but all I can do now is present them in a chaotic order. We have had disastrous victories and encouraging defeats-and we try to learn from the history is that all we learn from history is that man can never learn anything from history. (George Bernard Shaw). For this also see the European Tragedy happening these days.
See the clearly misunderstood nature of LENR, see weak LENR oppressing potentially strong LENR, the progressing by what we know not by what we MUST learn and growing up in the cradle long term, ad-hoc strategy, see the blind eyes to the bad luck start of the story, the change by remaining the same, remark passive actions. It is amazing how the controlled irreproducibility is accepted with serene desperation, not hunted as a dangerous criminal fact.. Nothing is more depressing than the incurable optimism of the PdD people- because it causes inertia to the necessary deep changes.
The dominant LENR ideology is  "fragmented unity" instead of accepting the diversity. otherness and separatedness hiding in plain sight. Mixing immiscible things is dangerous, denial of the dynamic difference between LENR and LENR++ makes impossible to understand  and develop both Theories peacefully divorced  from reality are as useful as a bloodsucker leech for a wooden leg.
Not exactly an oxymoron but  we have to accept that in LENR+ you cannot do without knowing, but even more you cannot know if you don't do first. Science and Technology connected in parallel this is the unique solution in many forms.

I will not reject what I have written here but I accept it is slightly exaggerated.


1) The Physics of Condensed Plasmoids and LENR

2) Andrea Rossi- the TV interview with Vessela Nikolova is accessible from here
October 28th, 2015 at 7:44 AM

Franco Papini:
You sent us an email that you are not able to place in the blog and asked me to publish it here.
Please read your text reported hereunder:
” Dear Andrea Rossi, did you listen to this interview:
Maybe your readers are interested to take a look”.
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,

Andrea Rossi- except the idea of "negative results finally" that has to be explained
technically- this is good communication and diplomacy.
October 28th, 2015 at 7:29 AM

Thank you for your important sustain.
I want to say this and this to be clear: if the results of the tests on course will be positive, it will be a positive result not just of our Team, but also of all the persons that, like you and like all the Readers of this blog. With their suggestions and encouragement they have helped us substantially to overcome some strongly discouraging moments and to work with the necessary determination to obtain our US Patent. When I read our US Patent I cannot forget the endless suggestions I got from our Readers on the matter; I read very carefully all the comments of yours, even if it doesn’t seem to be so; every comment is studied and analyzed by me, to get from it all the information written and not written: sometimes unwritten info are more important than the written ones from which they are directly and indirectly implied.
This said, I prefer wait for the results of the tests on course, before talking of the post-tests era. Such results could be either positive or negative; if positive, the merit will be shared between all of us, because I learnt a lot from all of you and from my Team, but if negative I will be the sole responsible of the failure, because I have been the director of this all and I am the one that decided all the choices.
Thank you for your “permanent” attention to our very hard work.
Warm Regards,


Good Thinking: What You Need to Know to be Smarter, Safer, Wealthier, and Wiser
by Guy P. Harrison

No comments:

Post a Comment