This writing appears with one day delay due to the ants’
wisdom idea of AXIL – an important message for the LENR community-I had to
publish with no delay.
It is stimulating to me that this morning has appeared a
note: “International
Academic Report on Cold Fusion Imminent” on Frank Acland’s E-Cat World. Author
anonymous but the info is professionally written.
Intelligence is best defined as “the ability to not
confound the points of view” however especially in research projects, it is
also the ability to “process lower quality information- partial incomplete,
partial redundant, contradictory, in part outright false, imaginary, cryptic,
neutral or senseless all these mixed in unpredictable and incognoscible ways
and proportions.” A bit long but real and made for the case of Rossi, you need
much intelligence to follow him…
Rossi’s communication methods are, at least in part,
justified, I feel empathy for him. The first short-time Report of 2013- a quite
decent and serious work was dismissed not for its intrinsic imperfections but
because Rossi could interfere
with the research so the Report was not quite
independent.
I have disagreed e.g. in:
but with no success. The LENR community has also uncritically
accepted without analysis the Luca Gamberale Report that tries to discredit a
very good demo by
DGT, logically consistent. The Gamberale Report refers
only to tests made by he author in unusual conditions.
“LENR community” is not a real entity but its collective
spirit does not accept easily that its own existential and developmental
problems could be solved by outsiders. And Rossi had all the time a non-ideal
behavior that has aggravated the situation...
“Independent”
means now a study executed at least 12,000 miles distance from the inventor,
with all communication lines interrupted. Ergo, Rossi is practically forced to
tell us that he has no idea about the results and will get the Report 3 days
before it is published. He says repeatedly “cuculo” style that the report will
be positive or negative, he cannot predict how. Actually it is obvious the
Report will be both positive and negative- in a frame of expectations.
It is excluded it will be absolutely negative- total
absence of excess heat measured each 5 seconds for >2000 hours. (pure
masochism!) It will be not absolutely positive either- plenty of excess heat
with no input energy i.e. COP infinite and heat level adjustable at will. (triumph
at the 3rd power) Without a definition, positive or negative do not
mean much, more exactly- nothing at all. I don’t know what is the hydrogen
pressure in the HotCat but beyond any doubt it is very high mediatic pressure
on Rossi to make the Report absolutely independent- something as impossible as
useless.
Rossi, on his angelic side is extrovert and enjoys
communicating
seeks the friendship of people, therefore he cannot work
in isolation with no feedback and encouragement.
.
In a DIKW evaluation of this unknown Report, we must
abuse of the interrogative approach- asking a lot of temporary unanswerable
questions.
The first question: where will this Report be published?
Even those who believe in miracles – it will probably NOT Nature (impact factor
(21,323) or Science (impact factor 12,465) this would be the performance
equivalent of climbing the Everest barefoot with nitrogen put in your oxygen
bottles by enemies. My preference was the International Journal of hydrogen
Energy (impact factor 2930) but the Professors have not consulted me. I am
unable to guess the journal in which the Report will be published.
DATA
The heat release is intense, the Hot Cat is much bigger than
an electrolytic LENR cell- plenty of data will be gathered.
The input-output balance for more months will allow us to
“feel” the stability of the process…it will be a huge volume of INFORMATION. How
well presented- it depends on the independent team.
KNOWLEDGE- Rossi says the Professors can publish what
they wish and I really want this to be true. What will they give
KNOW NOTHING- the skeptics try to convince us that
nothing relevant will be given, just a heap of unanalysable data. How this will
be done – I let them to say.
KNOW WHAT- will be the excess heat demonstrated beyond
any doubt, great and long term? At the end of the test, the Hot Cat was very
tired, moribund or still having 8 of its 9 cat lives?
Will the COP increase and stabilize after the start
period, will it be decently high- say well over 6- and constant or
adjustable? Was the system in danger of
runaway or of collapse? Was it stopped and restarted? Unexpected events? I am
very curious-what has happened?
KNOW HOW- it is easy to understand that Andrea Rossi does
not want to tell to the real and imaginary competition how the Hot Cat does
work. In the same time he is aware that this time only by telling which
reactions give the heat- he will be recognized as a great inventor and elite
researcher. The essence is the chemical composition of the active core before
and after the long reaction time. Composition is only a small part of what makes
the system functional- the HotCat is not the useful cat- but Rossi plus the
team of professors have a problem here, scientific and kind of diplomatic.
WISDOM Rossi has alluded many times he will present his
Theory simultaneously with the Report. He has a great opportunity to
demonstrate his wisdom. Will he do it, or not I don’t know. But this theory
will change everything we knew about LENR. LENR+ is not like LENR, actually it
is not genuine LENR, but a bunch of other processes.
Dear Reader- I have tried very hard to think logically
here and I think I have succeeded in part. However logic as it is stated in:
“Logical thinking is
that safe and beaten path on which you can go from one swamp to an other”
(Karoly Simonyi)
Here the premises from
which logic leads to conclusions are now quite swam-like. How they will be
after the publication of the Report?
Just to mention that
the author of the quote has written a book
about the cultural
history of Physics, one of my models for my coming book
“Useful Energy from
Hydrogen-Metal Deep Interaction”- Deeper than electrons.
Peter
Rossi's ecat failed a test from the one reliable Swedish agency which examined it. In that test, they found that Rossi's measurements underestimated input power by a factor of at least 3. Defkalion's only correct test was, in fact, Gamberale's. Gamberale would not have given up a potentially highly lucrative business if he had not believed he was being defrauded.
ReplyDeleteThere have been serious problems with everyone of Rossi's demonstrations and tests. Rossi's machines are simply electrically heated instruments of deception. Wait a while, Peter. You will see.
I like this formulation: "electrically heated instruments of deception"
DeletePlease define the professors in a similar wording
You fixoskeptics are admirable in a way..."la Garde meurt mais ne se rend pas"
Peter
Part 1 or 2
DeleteI don’t know Luca Gamberale, so I did some research into his background. I like to state up front that anyone who has more info about him and his level of ethics is welcome to rebutt. I am also a prejudiced supporter of DGT. That said: there are two sides to every story.
In terms of this DGT Europe guy, I don't trust his account or his take on things because he has gone into the LENR development business himself. As a future LENR dealer with human nature what it is, it is natural for these various potential venders’ of LENR reactors to bad mouth each other. Rossi says bad things about DGT and DGT let slip some bad things about Rossi. This new guy is just doing what they all do. As an application developer and reseller of DGT reactors, Gamberale’s former company had no right to know how that R5 reactor works internally. Even with this contractual constraint in place as the history of these events reveal, his former company paid a million dollars in the vain hope to look under the dress of DGT, but DGT was too modest or too smart to show their goods.
Did Luca Gamberale want to setup his new company in the same way that Defkalion was started? I believe so. We might never know who stole what from who but Italians are notorious for their lack of business ethics. I am surprised that DGT did not go after Luca Gamberale's NDA violation. I guess they did not want to waste precious money on lawyers. After all, DGT Europe was in the Ni/H reactor application business not in the development of Ni/H technology itself.
Luca Gamberale has publically bemoaned that DGT never left him alone with an R5 reactor unattended. Why would that bother this man? Maybe Gamberale wanted to take some nefarious advantage in the dark of night to look inside that R5 reactor, or even better to remove some selected parts for reverse engineering opportunities thereby supplying him with a huge technical head start for his own company that he has subsequently started.
It is not in the interest of any company to admit that key parts of their technology are compromised. This degrades the value of their intellectual property in the market place. Ask Rossi about this vis-à-vis DGT.
What is known for sure, Defkalion saw that the Rossi reactor worked and that gave them the impetus to form a LENR development company themselves. The takeaway based on DGT's reaction: Rossi’s reactor works and is powerful. The formation of a DGT LENR development company speaks to that certainty. In like manner, if Luca Gamberale believed in what he has said about the R5, he would be a fool to get into the LENR development business himself.
Part 2 of 2
DeleteLuca Gamberale's Experience
CEO, Scientist
LD-Brane srls
March 2014 – Present (7 months) Milan Area, Italy
LD-Brane is a startup operating in two main fields:
1) R&D in the field of LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions). LENR is a most promising powerful source of energy, safe, clean an cheap. It has the potential to supply humanity of heat, electricity and fresh water for the next decades. What is still missing is a full understanding of the physical principles at the basis of the reactions and an efficient and reliable industrial implementation. LD-Brane has a scientific programme for the experimental and theoretical study of LENR and for the realization of prototypes for the production of energy running using LENR. LD-Brane participates to the research program of the most prominent research centers in Italy and Europe, both public and private.
2) development of highly techological cloud solutions:
routing and planning optimization for fleets of trucks http://www.speedyplan.com
integrated platform for the quality Assurance of Echotomographs for medical use in hospitals
Independent Scientific Consultant
September 2013 – Present (1 year 1 month) Milano
CTO
Defkalion Europe
January 2013 – September 2013 (9 months)
PhD - Scientist
Pirelli Labs
Public Company; 10,001+ employees; Automotive industry
January 2001 – July 2010 (9 years 7 months)
Project Leader on experimental physics.
study of coherent optical properties of crystals subjected to nuclear magnetic resonance
scientist
Pirelli Cables
Public Company; 10,001+ employees; Automotive industry
2000 – 2001 (1 year)
Some internet research as follows:
ReplyDeleteAvatar Polymorph was born in the storeroom of a Canberra hospital on 5 May 1961, the same day that Alan Shepard became the first American to leave planet Earth and travel into space. His father’s family has been involved in South Australian and national politics for a number of generations. His mother’s family came to Australia as refugees from Lithuania in 1949. He has a history degree from Adelaide University and worked for several years as a policy adviser in the PM’s Department in Canberra and later for the Victorian Premier’s Department. He has continued to write occasional fiction and also on nanotechnology, futurology and spirituality (including under his current name, Avatar Polymorph). Ill from 1996 to 2007, he has been based around Fitzroy, Melbourne, since 1990, including for various Performance Art and other art projects.
Interview
http://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/162-transhumanist-activist-avatar-polymorph/
I had a positive impression of the first TIP report, the second one will most likely be an improved and augmented version of the first report, TIP1 was positive, so I think it's reasonable to predict that TIP2 will reaffirm and support the TIP1 results by adding significant amounts of long term data and addressing some of the (mostly absurd & ridiculous), complaints about protocols and procedures, (a few being valid), including the ludicrous possibility of hidden infra-red lasers and exotic non standard frequencies and waveforms coming from the mains. We should also not forget the (again,..absurd & ridiculous), accusations of tainted professors performing the testing. In this regard, the pathological skeptics of TIP1 passively assisted in the formulation of the second report by giving the TIP2 testers an assessment of what should be altered tweaked and changed for the second round of tests. We should of course expect a second round of spurious and outlandish complaints from the chronic disbelievers of LENR after TIP2, I predict that the reports veracious credentials will effectively drown out the shrieks of the noisy dissenters.
ReplyDeleteIt comes a moment when the pathological breaks all the limits of irrationality
Deleteand all we can do is to ignore it. Than the pathological will do as Ouroboros
finally eating itself
Peter
I have seen that Navajo proverb which explains how it is hopeless to try to convince pathoskeptics :
Deletehttp://emilysquotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/EmilysQuotes.Com-wake-asleep-pretending-wisdom-people-understanding-native-american-proverb-Navajo-proverb.jpg
arguments are not a question.
this is why pathoskepticism touch mostly educated people like physicist, because in fact competence is not a question, and ignorant people have no reason to believe ins conspiracy theories agains evidence if they are not concerned personally.
Most skeptic we face are simply doing cargo Cult skepticism...
they pretend to be skeptic, but they are simply believers, desperate believers fighting evidences, like most conspiracy theorist.
If the Rossi effect is real, who care what skeptics say? Why does anyone care if the arguments are worthless?
DeleteI think that believers have no solid confidence in Rossi and his previous tests. They are very insecure. That has to be the only reason they care what a bunch of anonymous internet critics say about it.
If any of Rossi's tests had been clear and truly independent, then every major player in the energy field would have rushed to participate. What is it about that that believers don't get?
If someone was offering almost free energy without limit, you really think nobody would pay attention? Except a few believers on internet forums? And a tiny branch of a company that specializes in building brick houses?