Wednesday, December 21, 2016



Image result for quotations surrealImage result for quotations surreal

Yes, and today we got 3 terabytes of          I prefer the real, but as raw

surrealism                                                     material for the true and useful


a) I have lost again.

The most reputed dictionary, Merriam Webster has chosen or nominated that the top word for the year 2016  is SURREAL
I agree that our world is indeed painfully surreal but it is too much passivity and resignation- even a dose of desperation in this word. I think my PROBLETENCE

would have been ten times better- it is a call to action. I lost again, but now comes 2017...
We also can discuss in which extent our LENR is also surreal and dominated by prbletence. As 1) and especially 8) show it- LENR is surreal.

LENR Miracles plus
Gregory Goble
Actually what is NASA doing in LENR?

Kaikki blogit puheenaiheesta NASA Kylmäfuusio LENR

Gregory Goble:
Another LENR Mystery for the list
Who are the Global Energy Corporation 250MWe to 5GWe SMG Hybrid LENR fusion fission GeNie reactor construction contracts with and where will they be built? 

Factors plus: Microwaves, Plasmoids, Nano Dust (of George Egely)


1) From the Miami Court Pacermonitor

Tuesday, December 20, 2016
94 misc Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure StatementTue 6:15 PM 
Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by United States Quantum Leap, LLC (Nunez, Rodolfo)
93 misc Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure StatementTue 4:41 PM 
Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by J.M. Products, Inc. (Leon de la Barra, Francisco)
92minutes Discovery Hearing Tue 3:56 PM 
PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan: Discovery Hearing held on 12/20/2016. Total time in court: 50 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Christopher Rebel Jude Pace, Christopher Martin Lomax, Brian W. Chaiken, Christopher Perre. (Digital 15:01:04) (cg1)
91 notice Notice (Other) Tue 10:22 AM 
NOTICE by Cherokee Investment Partners, LLC, Thomas Darden, IPH International B.V., John T. Vaughn re87 Notice of Hearing by Attorney Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Notice of Hearing (Pace, Christopher)

2) Italian Contribution to LENR (by Gianni Albertini- UNIVPM-I, Domenico Bassani- SIDOM-I, Fabio Cardone -CN  R-I)

3) From Gregory Goble
Who Holds A Priori in the World of LENR Patents? Cold Fusion Patent Granted 1998

4) From Steven Krivit
Imitation the Sincerest Form of Flattery?
Comparison of Fontani-Costa-Orna Book and Nelson Book

5) The famous Scientific American paper translated in Russian

6) Updated web-search for Brilliant Light Power

7) USQL, JM Products Post Corporate Disclosure Statements: ‘No Parent Company of J.M. Products’

8) Disseminated by the LENR Forum- and  surreal:
today the Miami court released document 91 with very interesting information coming from Industrial Heat!

IH claims to have recorded and collected over 3 TB of data (documents, videos, measurements), while Rossi never produced any documents or other data.
Could this be the end of Rossi and his E-Cat?

Read and discuss here in the forum thread:


Coherence is fundamental

The throughout the vacuum, electromagnetic fluctuations are produced at a constant average rate under the purview of the uncertainty principle. The name that tags these fluxuations is virtual particle production. These fluxuations in the fabric of space-time is called “quantum spin liquid”.

Quantum spin liquids may be considered "quantum disordered" ground states of spin systems, in which zero point fluctuations are so strong that they prevent conventional magnetic long range order.

More interestingly, the vacuum as a quantum spin liquid is a prototypical example of ground state with massive many-body entanglement, of a degree sufficient to render these states distinct phases of matter. 

The vacuum is completely entangled at long range as identical patterns of virtual particle emerge throughout the vacuum, with each pattern strongly entangling other identical patterns. 

Just by chance, patterns of virtual particles come into existence at wide spread locations in the vacuum and become connected.

Quantum entanglement, a phenomenon in which virtual particles as fluxuations in the electromagnetic field, shed their separate identities and assume a shared existence, their properties becoming strongly correlated with one another. The virtual particles act identically no matter how far away they are separated. Normally physicists think of these correlations as spanning space, linking far-flung locations in a phenomenon that Albert Einstein famously described as “spooky action at a distance.”

Even harder to accept, there is a growing body of research investigating how these correlations can span time as well. What happens now can be correlated with what happens later, in ways that elude a simple mechanistic explanation. In effect, you can have spooky action at a delay.

These correlations seriously mess with our intuitions about time and space. Not only can two events be correlated, linking the earlier one to the later one, but two events can become correlated such that it becomes impossible to say which is earlier and which is later. Each of these events is the cause of the other, as if each were the first to occur.

But perhaps most important, researchers are working towards a new way to unify quantum theory with Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which describes the structure of space-time. The world we experience in daily life, in which events occur in an order determined by their locations in space and time, is just a subset of the possibilities that quantum physics allows.

Some physicists take this as evidence for a profoundly nonintuitive worldview, in which quantum correlations are more fundamental than space-time, and space-time itself is somehow built up from correlations among events, in what might be called quantum relationalism. The argument updates Gottfried Leibniz and Ernst Mach’s idea that space-time might not be a God-given backdrop to the world, but instead might derive from the material contents of the universe.

In this view quantum entanglement is more fundamental than space time because quantum entanglement generates space time. Quantum entanglement is not sensitive to the constraints of space time, that is, quantum entanglement connects events without regard to distance or the past and future.

The key to control space time and the forces that operate in space time is the control of entanglement and coherence. This is what LENR engineering is all about.

​How coherence manipulation produces force.

In the EmDrive, microwaves setup standing electromagnetic waves inside the metal cone that disturbs the coherence in the vacuum so that virtual particle coherence is reduced. This application of energy to the vacuum is similar to inflating a balloon by increasing the air pressure inside the balloon. There is a unbalancing of the vacuum between the inside of the cone and the outside that remains neutral. This is like a balloon that has a higher air pressure on the inside of the balloon than the outside. An adiabatic inertial reaction force is produced to rebalance the imbalance setup in the vacuum generated by the microwaves. This inertial force attempts to rebalance the uneven vacuum energy distribution that exists between the inside and outside of the cone. The cone is configured to focus this adiabatic inertial reaction force in a desired direction.

The balloon is not very good. The air pressure inside the balloon is equal throughout the volume of the balloon, but in a metal cone, the standing wave pattern of the standing waves produced by the magnetron are unequal throughout the volume of the cone so there will be less force generated in one given section of the voluum than in another. The unequal distribution of vacuum energy will resolve into a force vector in a preferred direction. The key to optimizing the force produced by the cone is to maximize the imbalance in the emf standing wave distribution inside the cone.

One way to test this theory, is to demonstrate the reduction of the half life of an radioactive isotope in the regions of positive vacuum energy against the result produce in the regions of negative vacuum energy. The positive vacuum energy should produce a reduction in the half life in the radioactive isotope. 

This experiment can be done in a home microwave with a turntable. Find the zone of maximum microwave resonance and place the isotope there. You should see a reduction of the half life as a result in the amplified strength of the weak force at the point of maximum microwave strength.

By the way, this amplification of the weak force through injecting energy into the vacuum is how George Egely produces LENR in his microwave reactor.


Rthan Siegel
5 Scientific Myths You Probably Believe About The Universe
Date:December 19, 2016
Source:Missouri University of Science and Technology
A team of researchers has demonstrated a more efficient, less cost-prohibitive way to split water into its elements of hydrogen and oxygen. Their approach could make hydrogen fuel a more viable energy source in the future while addressing the technological challenge of developing clean and renewable energy without depleting Earth’s natural preserves. (very interesting, please read the entire paper!)




  1. Translate
    December 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM
    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Are further tests on course for the evolution of the low temperature E-Cats?

    Andrea Rossi
    December 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM
    Warm Regards,

    December 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM

    Andrea Rossi
    December 22, 2016 at 9:49 AM
    We are working well, the Team is up also during these holidays.
    Merry Christmas and a Great 2017 to all our dear Readers !
    Andrea Rossi

    December 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM
    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
    1. Your desire to achieve 5 sigma is related to the theoretical basis originating in the quark-X nuclear reactions?
    2. This affects the design of the quark-X and pre-production?
    3. What today thermal effitsiency quark-X?
    Thank you for taking the time to answer.
    Merry Christmas, your wife and your team!
    Yury Isaev
    Tyumen, Russia

    Andrea Rossi
    December 22, 2016 at 7:53 AM
    1- no
    2- no
    3- the COP will be disclosed when it will be presented.
    Warm Regards,

    Giuliano Bettini
    December 22, 2016 at 2:49 AM
    Dear Andrea,
    Pekka Janhunen
    December 21, 2016 at 2:48 AM
    Dear Andrea,
    The term sigma5 in this context is unclear to me. Which one of the following does it refer to:
    1/ Out of 3.5million time units (e.g., seconds) that it runs, it fails for one time unit?
    2/ Out of 3.5million units produced, one of them is faulty?
    3/ Something else?
    regards, /pekka

    Andrea Rossi
    December 21, 2016 at 1:02 PM
    Pekka Janhunen:
    No, it is a totally different issue, related to the repetition of the data from the units under R&D.
    Warm Regards,
    I suppose that it’s possible to exactly define the term sigma5, just to avoid “the interactions between something and nothing”. :)
    “.. it is a totally different issue…” but, what is it?
    Kind regards, a happy new year,
    Giuliano Bettini.

    Andrea Rossi
    December 22, 2016 at 7:51 AM
    Giuliano Bettini:
    Is a calculation based on the repetitivity of a series of data.
    Happy New Year to you,

    December 22, 2016 at 6:02 AM
    Dear Andrea,

    If it took you 10 months to reach the current 3.5 Sigma, is it possible for you to reach 5 Sigma by February? In other words, is the presentation still on track to be held then?

    Best Regards,


    Andrea Rossi
    December 22, 2016 at 7:50 AM
    I do not know.
    Warm Regards,

    1. It must be clear by now surely, that all this 'heading towards 5 sigma' rubbish is just a delaying tactic to assist in 'kicking the can down the road' for yet another year. It seems to have worked pretty well over this year almost now gone.
      At the beginning of this year, soon after the demise of the all powerful partnership was announced (which some strongly suspected had already happened but was denied, I might add), it was said by Mr Rossi that none of this would affect the rapid progress into massive production of the well tested 1MW plants. It achieved a COP of 50 no less, so why would anyone want to wait for something better?
      And yet here we are at the end of this very same year, chasing a new never before mentioned random goal of '5 sigma'.
      What happened to the previous random goals we were waiting for, such as the certification for home use of a simple ecat water heater? Oh yes, I remember now, it's 'On course'. Better check the heading! After five years there has been a lot of drift in the directional gyros.)
      Well, it seems they were all superseded in turn by the next year's new random goal.
      I wonder how long this 'heading towards 5 sigma' goal can be maintained while producing nothing?
      I think we are probably due for a new 'marvelous all powerful partner' to justify a few more year's of faithful following. After all, surely they would do all that 'due diligence' stuff so if they invest their money in it, it must be genuine. Right?
      Well, apparently not.