Monday, August 22, 2016

AUG 22, 2016 LENR+ MUST BE BASED ON MULTIPLICATIVE EXCESS HEAT

MOTTO

BOTH MOTTOES ARE ABOUT EXCESS HEAT AT LENR AND  LENR+

Image result for multiply quotationsEImage result for multiply quotations

DAILY NOTES

a) About my statement of yesterday, what will not grow up; continuation

answering to a comment of Edmund Storms:


You well know that I have always spoken about the electrolytic PdD
with its inherent disadvantage of being cool, dirty and wet.
The active surface of the cathode cannot work, NAE-genesis is limited
by temperature and NAEs are deactivated uncontrollably. Lack of actionable parameters, not manageable process. THIS WILL NEVER GROW UP.

High temperature PdD is different, we have discussed about Vitalii
Kirkinski's system working at 600 C, moderate excess heat release for the time given but he has an European Patent for the process.
If Pd works with H too or not, if it can be made to generate continuously NAEs, if the competition-  between bulk and surface can be solved in the favor of the active sites- all these are open questions.
I do not understand the idea of deactivation via increasing the temperature
I  have always spoken about the role of the dynamics of the metals surface atoms, temperature increases- more active sites are generated. My idea is that active sites are quantum structures not quantum voids as in your theory.

I want to add some of my points of view; I am aware and sorry that what I will say is contributing to new forms of polarization in LENR but I m oriented toward solving the problem. And I define the solution as LENR applied to generate massive energy, a new superior energy source. I see science and basic understanding as a means to this, not the final aim. Basic understanding can be in part in form of principles, rules, best practises a combination of physics and other disciplines.
And I repeat a successful LENR system is  LENR+ that is excess heat is much enhanced  by orders of magnitude. COP of 1.5 is additive, COP of 50-69 as calaimed for the 1 year Rossi experiment is multiplicative. Some of you simply do not believe
this result, OK, the idea remains, only LENR with multiplicative excess heat is good for industry.  Multiplicative excess heat or nothing-is the slogan.
One line of attack- idealistic and actually honest in name of the sacred Scientific Method is that he went on a shortcut toward applications before LENR was completely understood. (actually it is still at a  low level of understanding everybody agrees (more or less). 
I take full responsibility for having anticipated this approach in my "Technology
First" paper in 1995. Instead of waiting 50 years or more till pure science could - alone- tell the most important scientific features of LENR, Rossi made appeal to technology and created those conditions  in which LENR works, is multiplicative
and now science can also fulfill its duty in parallel to growing applications.. Is this anti-scientific? On the contrary it is a great creative Synergy. LENR per se is based on synergies.

Note: Rossi has not read my paper, he simply went on the natural way of fast solving a problem, by technology, engineering and Science  re-invigorating  a domain that was quasi moribund in 2011.



DAILY NEWS

Romanian paper about Cold Fusion 2nd part
Fuziunea la rece partea 2-a
http://www.radioromaniacultural.ro/fuziunea_la_rece_p2-53829
http://altmarius.ning.com/profiles/blogs/fuziunea-la-rece-p2

A new thread: RNBE 2016 William Collis - a heretical theory involving unusual particles.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3653-RNBE-2016-William-Collis-a-heretical-theory-involving-unusual-particles/?pageNo=2


Bob Greenyer announces:MFMP Presentation in Silicon Valley announces intended future activity, including on-site cooperation with Aarhus Nano Technology University in Denmark


LENR IN CONTEXT-1
Thanks to Jack Cole for this info:
Australian scientists just set a world record for solar thermal efficiency

3 comments:

  1. Sorry, Pete, but "useful LENR" is LENR that can be replicated easily and started reliably. Whether it uses Pd, Ni, Ti, or something else is irrelevant. It is WAY too early in the technology process the draw the conclusions that you are trying to sell. Easy reproducibility is, at this point, far more important than high power levels.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Peter,

    How do you judge the fact that Andrea played Hydrofusion and SP regarding the hotcat-test?

    Best regards

    Rip

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will ask Hydrofusion when we meet: are they angry with Rossi?
      pete

      Delete