MOTTO
DAILY NOTES
No, FAIRNESS is not a 100% euphemism for HONESTY; it is some superposition, intersection between the two concepts but not so important. Anyway fairness refers here to correcnes, respect of facts, written and unwritten rules, style and- in extremism- even a bit of elegance in behavior - related to quality and nobleness.
This morning I have read my Gmail messages and two of them made me angry and sad
The first came from Abd-ul Rahman Lomax an old discussion partner whom I sincerely admire for his encyclopedic LENR culture and elevated, clearly non-dualistic mode of thinking,and, I consider a blessing that usually our opinions- as those about reliability/reproducibilily problem in LENR are almost opposite creating broad spaces for discussion. However it seems that the acerbic and bitter Rossi-IH dispute is creating too much enmity and does not contribute much to the level, wording, quality, yes fairness of our myriads of disputes. (I feel guilty too but I can invoke self-defense- knowing it will be instantly denied with rage.)
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-20-2016-toward-cultural-history-of.html?showComment=1463971792371#c5412121867366578507
Here Abd writes:
you WROTE "Dewey Weaver just admitted on Lenr-Forum that IH’s strategy was to hedge their investment from the start..." and then attributes to me writing what is cited- by some Ad Astra and published on Rossi's JONP. Abd considers me the author despite the fact that I have explained so many times that it is my obligation as blogger to cite a large diversity of opinion without caring if it happens it is something very offending for in person- as being retarded, n obstacle to the progress of LENR, witched or corrupted by Rossi etc.
I take responsibility for what I say in my notes, editorials, comments but not for what other people write. It was unfair from Abd to say " You are tossing mud, Peter, I'm sad to see it." Have no idea what he actually thinks but I have high/deep doubts he likes Dewey's and Jed's modus operandi and parlandi in this fight. His (Abd's) ideal solution for solving LENR's problems- creating a future for it is: a successful, bright, repetitions of Melvin Miles stellar experiments from 1991 and a perfect demonstration of D +D --> He in a perfectly convincing manner; skeptics will shut up and funding will flow to LENR, bright future.
And who knows why is he now such an IH-phile?
The second nasty comment came from an Anonymous- my guess he is a known researcher, possibly a friend of mine. It is not for the first time that I feel the ill-will
and falsity of such (his?) messages:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-22-2016-other-doors-to-lenr.html?showComment=1463964279822#c7981087612583249798
It starts with: "Peter, with a friend like you, LENR doesn't need enemies. Your constant ludicrous bitching about how horrible "wet" PdD is..." He ignores completely my explanations, my scientific-technical arguments, the idea that PdD has huge merits but has attained its inhere nt limits. He seems to not understand my motivation- I am fighting for the victory (i.e. metamorphosis in a real energy source of LENR) , he is ready it seems to sacrifice a great and expanding Whole for a small, not healthy part. He opposes to the "let the best win!" principle.
A little devil whispers in my ear: " Be Ill-willed too, curse him - should his welfare, money, status be directly correlated with the successes, breakthroughs, progress in Pd D in the coming years!
But he is lucky, I am not ill-willed and all I am asking hims is to think. Think realistically and objectively if possible. If he does not suffer from the SS Syndrome like me.
A third example is what Jed Rothwell is doing on more Vortex chains. He says that he had access to many (all) the data of the 1MW test and these demonstrate beyond any doubt that IH is right, Rossi is wrong and the ERV is a complete XXXXX
It seems he is using imaginary data, that is very different from what the report (and Rossi- see the superheated steam and the 100.1 C issues for example.) Jed does not want or cannot answer the simplest question as the daily electricity consume pof the plant but wants to believed. Is this fair, collegial? Discovering the truth is not easy, but insulting anybody who thinks differently is easy. But unfair.It is painful to see him as an IH Warrior, much more wishing to be the E-Cats gravedigger that a builder of LENR.
DAILY NEWS
1) A new contribution of Vessela Nikolova; see here her E-Cta Andrea Rossi book: Scientific truth is not a majority decision” (Galileo Galilei)
LENR IN CONTEXT-1
Peek Inside Tri Alpha Energy, a Company Pursuing the Ideal Power Source:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601482/peek-inside-tri-alpha-energy-a-company-pursuing-the-ideal-power-source/?utm_campaign=newsletters&utm_source=newsletter-weekly-energy&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20160523
LENR IN CONTEXT-2
Common problem-solving traps and how to avoid them
Overthinking will only complicate a task, instead come up with a solution and begin to test it
DAILY NOTES
No, FAIRNESS is not a 100% euphemism for HONESTY; it is some superposition, intersection between the two concepts but not so important. Anyway fairness refers here to correcnes, respect of facts, written and unwritten rules, style and- in extremism- even a bit of elegance in behavior - related to quality and nobleness.
This morning I have read my Gmail messages and two of them made me angry and sad
The first came from Abd-ul Rahman Lomax an old discussion partner whom I sincerely admire for his encyclopedic LENR culture and elevated, clearly non-dualistic mode of thinking,and, I consider a blessing that usually our opinions- as those about reliability/reproducibilily problem in LENR are almost opposite creating broad spaces for discussion. However it seems that the acerbic and bitter Rossi-IH dispute is creating too much enmity and does not contribute much to the level, wording, quality, yes fairness of our myriads of disputes. (I feel guilty too but I can invoke self-defense- knowing it will be instantly denied with rage.)
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-20-2016-toward-cultural-history-of.html?showComment=1463971792371#c5412121867366578507
Here Abd writes:
you WROTE "Dewey Weaver just admitted on Lenr-Forum that IH’s strategy was to hedge their investment from the start..." and then attributes to me writing what is cited- by some Ad Astra and published on Rossi's JONP. Abd considers me the author despite the fact that I have explained so many times that it is my obligation as blogger to cite a large diversity of opinion without caring if it happens it is something very offending for in person- as being retarded, n obstacle to the progress of LENR, witched or corrupted by Rossi etc.
I take responsibility for what I say in my notes, editorials, comments but not for what other people write. It was unfair from Abd to say " You are tossing mud, Peter, I'm sad to see it." Have no idea what he actually thinks but I have high/deep doubts he likes Dewey's and Jed's modus operandi and parlandi in this fight. His (Abd's) ideal solution for solving LENR's problems- creating a future for it is: a successful, bright, repetitions of Melvin Miles stellar experiments from 1991 and a perfect demonstration of D +D --> He in a perfectly convincing manner; skeptics will shut up and funding will flow to LENR, bright future.
And who knows why is he now such an IH-phile?
The second nasty comment came from an Anonymous- my guess he is a known researcher, possibly a friend of mine. It is not for the first time that I feel the ill-will
and falsity of such (his?) messages:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-22-2016-other-doors-to-lenr.html?showComment=1463964279822#c7981087612583249798
It starts with: "Peter, with a friend like you, LENR doesn't need enemies. Your constant ludicrous bitching about how horrible "wet" PdD is..." He ignores completely my explanations, my scientific-technical arguments, the idea that PdD has huge merits but has attained its inhere nt limits. He seems to not understand my motivation- I am fighting for the victory (i.e. metamorphosis in a real energy source of LENR) , he is ready it seems to sacrifice a great and expanding Whole for a small, not healthy part. He opposes to the "let the best win!" principle.
A little devil whispers in my ear: " Be Ill-willed too, curse him - should his welfare, money, status be directly correlated with the successes, breakthroughs, progress in Pd D in the coming years!
But he is lucky, I am not ill-willed and all I am asking hims is to think. Think realistically and objectively if possible. If he does not suffer from the SS Syndrome like me.
A third example is what Jed Rothwell is doing on more Vortex chains. He says that he had access to many (all) the data of the 1MW test and these demonstrate beyond any doubt that IH is right, Rossi is wrong and the ERV is a complete XXXXX
It seems he is using imaginary data, that is very different from what the report (and Rossi- see the superheated steam and the 100.1 C issues for example.) Jed does not want or cannot answer the simplest question as the daily electricity consume pof the plant but wants to believed. Is this fair, collegial? Discovering the truth is not easy, but insulting anybody who thinks differently is easy. But unfair.It is painful to see him as an IH Warrior, much more wishing to be the E-Cats gravedigger that a builder of LENR.
DAILY NEWS
1) A new contribution of Vessela Nikolova; see here her E-Cta Andrea Rossi book: Scientific truth is not a majority decision” (Galileo Galilei)
http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/scientific-truth-not-majority-decision-galileo-galilei/
And the book:
2) Presentation of Rodion Boris Ustinovich in 2011- in the studios Global Wave of Ya.N. Starukhin at the seminatr of the Polytehnik Museum:"Rythmodynamics of the Nature" Video
на семинаре в Политехническом музее “Ритмодинамика природы” (рук. Иванов Ю.Н.)
http://lenr.seplm.ru/novosti/doklady-rodionova-borisa-ustinovicha-v-2011g
5) More IndustrialHeat WhiteHouse Connections; AGW Agenda, Tech Policy and National Security
And the book:
English Edition coming soon!
2) Presentation of Rodion Boris Ustinovich in 2011- in the studios Global Wave of Ya.N. Starukhin at the seminatr of the Polytehnik Museum:"Rythmodynamics of the Nature" Video
Доклады Родионова Бориса Устиновича в 2011г.
в студии Старухина Я.П. Глобальная волнана семинаре в Политехническом музее “Ритмодинамика природы” (рук. Иванов Ю.Н.)
http://lenr.seplm.ru/novosti/doklady-rodionova-borisa-ustinovicha-v-2011g
3) M.Ya. Ivanov and al: LENR THEORY AND APPLICATION TO AEROSPACE POWER PLANT
ABSTRACT:
The first part of the article sets out the elements of
the theory of low energy nuclear reactions
(LENR). Integral semi empirical and differential
LENR simulations based on the analysis of the
mass excess for the initial and destination of
combustion products are proposed. Our model
fully relies on the basics of classical nuclear
physics. It allows recommending new fuels for
similar processes heat generation with the
comparative assessments of their thermal
efficiency. The second part of the article submits
the detail differential LENR simulation bases on
the analysis of the internal structures of electron,
proton, neutron and nuclear with their particle
thermodynamics. We are introducing also the real
space thermostat, which allow us to obtain the
careful estimation of the entropy growth at the
aerospace power plant design. The last part of the
paper considers the possibility of LENR applying
in aerospace propulsion. LENR is a form of
nuclear energy and potentially has over 4,000
times of energy density chemical sources. It
does not have any harmful emissions or radiation
which makes it extremely appealing. LENR will
impact aircraft performance capabilities,
environment, economy and society.
4) PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS
of the 23-th RUSSIAN CONFERENCE on COLD NUCLEAR
TRANSMUTATION of CHEMICAL ELEMENTS
and BALL LIGHTNING
Dagomys, Sochi, Krasnodar region
June 19-26, 2016
5) More IndustrialHeat WhiteHouse Connections; AGW Agenda, Tech Policy and National Security
6) Rossi: “Steam Was Superheated” in 1MW Plant Test
7) ETIAM-Finland- New Share issue:
8) COLD FUSION CONNECTION-Latest Feeds
9) Rossi and Hydrofusion Make Offer on Swedish Factory
LENR IN CONTEXT-1
Peek Inside Tri Alpha Energy, a Company Pursuing the Ideal Power Source:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601482/peek-inside-tri-alpha-energy-a-company-pursuing-the-ideal-power-source/?utm_campaign=newsletters&utm_source=newsletter-weekly-energy&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20160523
LENR IN CONTEXT-2
Common problem-solving traps and how to avoid them
Overthinking will only complicate a task, instead come up with a solution and begin to test it
Rothwell's persistant barrage deserves reply. For more than 20 years Rothwell has been nothing but a primadonna armchair sychophant in the field of cold fusion and subsequently LENR. He's never lifted a finger to do anything real other than make preposterous pompus statments all about how great Jed thinks Jed is. For those who have had the misfortune of knowing him all these years there is no question about his contributions, they have been nothing, save putting on-line the fine, though heavily Jed edited and thus biased, lenr/canr library. He has over the years never changed, he is still the same blowhard decietful primadonna typical of those born with silver spoons in their mouths. Anyone who gives any credibility to his bragging mental instability is a bigger idiot than he, and that is a very high mark to reach.
ReplyDeleteThe commentary on Jed is harsh. Unfortunately it doesn't really help in evaluating his current actions.
DeleteYou would likely have achieved greater impact had you left out the emotional harangue and the personal attacks.
Cheers
Doug Marker
Dear Diug,
Deletewhich commentry, mine? I sppoke about factsmainly. Or lack of info in what Jed says..
best,
Peter
As a researcher in the field of LENR I am not impressed by anyone's opinion. Research is the concentration upon scientific facts, not upon opinions of other people. So nobody's opinion can influence research in a negative way, that's completely nonsense. Only wrong scientific facts can delay LENR research.
DeleteAnother anonymous ;-))
you should not condemn IH. They are innocent until proven guilty in this country. It is Rossi that has accused IH. There has been little at all coming from IH
ReplyDeleteMy apologies, Peter, I don't know how I did that, I'm usually pretty careful about attribution, but you are right, you did not say what I quoted you as having said. In other words, Peter, I made a mistake. I have deleted that comment, but, yes, I did write it. My, my, you have some Stuff to deal with here. All the best....
ReplyDeleteAbd ulRahman LOmax.
DeleteThat was a very honorable response to Peter. It helps cement my view of you as being bluntly honest and in most circumstances very very thorough.
Cheers
Doug Marker
Dear Abd,
DeleteApologies gladly accepted.
Please help the Editorial of today- it is about LENR as a Whole, the biggest picture, developing a holistic-holographic view of our field.
Thanks in advance,
Peter
Dear Abd,
DeleteApologies gladly accepted.
Please help the Editorial of today- it is about LENR as a Whole, the biggest picture, developing a holistic-holographic view of our field.
Thanks in advance,
Peter
"He seems to not understand my motivation- I am fighting for the victory (i.e. metamorphosis in a real energy source of LENR) , he is ready it seems to sacrifice a great and expanding Whole for a small, not healthy part. He opposes to the "let the best win!" principle."
ReplyDeleteNo, Peter, it is you who don't understand. Your tactic of fostering artificial divisions within the LENR community IS NOT HELPING MATTERS. Neither you nor I know whether PdD has reached some or other limit, or whether something completely new will outpace it and all the others and be published next week.
YOU are the one "playing favorites", not me. And in doing so, you are actually helping those who want to kill off LENR. Far from "fighting for victory", you are actually "giving aid and comfort to the enemy". I, at least, have the intellectual modesty to know that I do NOT know what the best approach will ultimately turn out to be. It may be Ni/H, or Pd/D, or even (after Langmuir) W/H.
Peter
ReplyDeleteI think the anonymous commenters should identify
themselves when they post negative comments about
a person.
Sam
I have been reading Peter's Blog for quite some time and although I think he feels that there is little to be achieved from the study of the Pd/D reaction I have always seen him open to a good argument with well supported facts. I don't assume to speak for Peter but I think "Anonymous" is misunderstanding Peter's concern for everything LENR both LENR and LENR+. I think a conversation form all angles is worthwhile and constructive and I certainly don't see how it hurts in the search for the truth(s) of the whole spectrum of reactions that we call "Cold Fusion".
ReplyDeleteDear Robert,
DeleteI am indebted for your help & kind words. So is LENR -the PROBLEM.
Truly yours,
Peter
Dear Peter, you make a big work in Favour of LENR.
ReplyDeleteBut currently the ambience is everywhere deleterious.
We need courage to continue working, but I am sure you have much courage !
Very friendly.
Jean-Luc
Mon cher Jean-Luc
Deletemy deep gratitude.
My definition of education is to learn somebody to cope with ANY situation and I am educated in thsis ense.
Yours,
Peter
Peter is chivalrous enough to allow direct insults to his own person be posted here. I don't see how that translates to his restricting discussion on this board. I personally haven't seen anyone arguing the merits of "wet" systems here, just complaining about Peter not liking them. We want results please, not whining!
ReplyDelete