Wednesday, April 27, 2016

APR 27, 2016 MAINLY LENR INFO

MOTTO

 Image result for knowledge quotationsImage result for knowledge quotations

DAILY NOTES

 This is a personal understanding and/or interpretation of the basic axioms of 
the axioms- established truth in the LENR thinking of Edmund Storms- reflected in his extended explanation paper.
  https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BQzdKUFdWdjBGX0dsczMzT3FBZ3ZsT19Sa1FB/view
Ed Storms is the scientist with the most extended  knowledge in LENR- see  his books and many papers.
That means his First Axiom would be that it is necessary to accumulate the maximum of data. process it in knowledge and distill in wisdom -as his real LENR wisdom, very impressive.
The second Axiom is to use the real data, find explanation based on observed data not on imaginary data or ideas.
 I cite: "  accept the experimental results  and form a theory around the data"

I don't know if it is an axiom or not but Ed Storms has an excellent opinion about Mother Nature: "Nature is very clear in showing the path" - and he also thinks there are common principles mechanism of LENR for the entire scale of working temperatures. So what we learn (from him too) from PdD is valid for N iH up to thr melting temperature of Nickel.

 The paper is  a must read and has to be thoroughly discussed.
I am waiting if Ed will say something re his Axioms then we will continue with applications.

DAILY NEWS

 1) LENR technology impeded by American Fortune 150 Energy Companies?

2) The live results of the New Survey by Patrick Ellul are here:

3) John Dash - Cold Fusion Experiments - MIT
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=38d_1461679092&comments=1#S16y55ywJZhURFSG.99

4) Free Energy Finally being released for humanity!! - Andrea Rossi and Cold Fusion Game Changer
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3159132/pg1?disclaimer=1

 5) Cold Fusion-latest connections:
http://cfconnection.leapforwardlab.com/

6) From Andrea Rossi's Blog

JJ
April 27, 2016 at 7:20 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
Science prescribes that LENR must emit high energy gamma rays. Why the E-Cat does not ?
Cheers,
JJ
Andrea Rossi
April 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM

JJ:
Science is a descriptive enterprise, not a prescriptive one.
Prescription is not good science, description of experiments and related results is good science.
Description of products is ultimately the best.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
7) In Cold Fusion 2.0, Who's Scamming Whom?
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2016/04/in-cold-fusion-20-whos-scamming-whom.html


8) Rossi: E-Cat Test for ‘Very Important’ New Customer in June
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/27/rossi-e-cat-test-for-very-important-new-customer-in-june/

9) In Ukrainian:
Кінець нафтової ери… Генератор Россі
End of the oil era- the Rossi generator
http://technovesty.com/?p=2884

 LENR IN CONTEXT-2

Can You Learn Creative Problem-Solving?
Oddly enough, the need to drive innovation in teams may call for a systemic process to develop creative thinking.


Posted by at

16 comments:

  1. AnonymousApril 27, 2016 at 11:55 AM

    Your heaping of praise on Storms seems curious, he is undoubtedly well read in the field and published but his record of experiments shows he's been distinctly unable to produce any significant results... incompetence at the bench of the art of science very often results in mouthing of minutia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousApril 27, 2016 at 11:55 PM

      it is not praise it is reality.
      But have I said that I agree with the Axioms?
      peter

      Delete
  2. AxilApril 27, 2016 at 12:59 PM

    Ed Storms is selective with the LENR experiments he chooses to include in his analysts. For example, he does not include any results from J. Fisher on Exotic Neutral Particles, Holmlid's experiments, the laser excitation of transuranic salts or any of the heavy particle results from Keith Fredericks. It is the exception that proves the rule.

    Einstein proved the theory of general relativity by showing how the precession of the orbit of Mercury exactly followed his theory. One special exception can tell the entire story of a seemingly intractable mystery of science.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mary YugoApril 27, 2016 at 2:43 PM

    Oh wow what a night! I'll write in more detail soon but let's just say I'll need a new wig! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roger BarkerApril 27, 2016 at 3:18 PM

      Mary darling, you were amazing! Just when I thought you could do no better you surprise me again! The best part was when you kept screaming Defkalion and Brillioun. That was awesome!

      Delete
    2. Mary YugoApril 27, 2016 at 3:40 PM

      Oh Rog you tease! Yeah that was fun. Almost as much fun as posting thousands of posts on random forums regurgitating the same thing over and over again.

      I thought your midget intro was a nice touch ...

      Delete
    3. Roger BarkerApril 27, 2016 at 3:55 PM

      Well if you want a midget intro then Popeye is your man! The complete midget package, height, appendage and intellect. Minuscule in all accounts. :-)

      What about your gimp Mary? You kept him locked up for a long time ...

      Delete
    4. Mary YugoApril 27, 2016 at 4:15 PM

      Which one hun? I have lots of gimps! There is Jami (screws his sister), JohnP (down his pants), NTAK (wants a sex change badly), JKW (half his head is missing) and many others.

      I brought them all out last night. Did you not notice the differences between them?

      Delete
    5. Roger BarkerApril 27, 2016 at 4:35 PM

      No Mary, I didn't notice! But you know what they say about gimps, don't you? You've seen one you've seen em all!

      Same time tonight Mary?

      Delete
    6. Mary YugoApril 27, 2016 at 4:51 PM

      Sure why not! I'll go get a new wig. Let's also use some soap tonight. I so enjoy that slick burning after sensation!

      Delete
    7. Roger BarkerApril 27, 2016 at 5:18 PM

      It's a date sweetie. Starve the midget and hang the gimps. That'll keep them fresh.

      Don't worry about the soap. Only the best for you ... rough pumice :-)

      Delete
  4. sam northApril 27, 2016 at 6:03 PM

    Peter
    Can you edit the jokes.If they were funny
    they could be tolerated but they are not.
    They are a insult to your fine blog.
    Sam

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary YugoApril 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM

      Hi Sam, don't be jelly you can't join the party.

      xxx
      Mary

      Delete
  5. AnonymousApril 28, 2016 at 7:22 AM

    Here is an example of some "pathological science" that I participated directly in. Back in the day of the birth of the "pollution era", I was a grad student working in methods to detect both inorganic and organic airborne pollutants. One experiment was to irradiate organic molecules in the vapor phase with a 10.6 micron CO2 laser, and look at the emitted photons in the infrared. The experiments showed that under those conditions, ALL absorption bands were raised to the level of emitting, including those at 3.3 microns. The physical chemists and physicists said that experiment was obviously wrong, as a 10.6 micron excitation photon didn't have nearly enough energy to stimulate emission of a 3.3 micron photon, and papers on the experments were rejected. Some very few years later, it was found that molecules in a laser beam could simultaneously "grab" multiple 10.6 micron photons with extreme rapidity, and the energy was dispersed into ALL the possible emission bands, including 3.3 micron, resulting in emission at that higher energy wavelength.

    I suspect a metallic lattice is capable of similar effects.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousApril 28, 2016 at 7:32 AM

      thank you very interesting. do you want to write a guest editorial for the blog?
      Not as Anonymous, please

      peter

      Delete
  6. BloggerDecember 16, 2016 at 9:28 PM

    WE ARE LOOKING FOR LIVE WEBCAM MODELS!
    EARN UP TO $10,000 EVERY WEEK.
    SIGN-UP AS A BONGA MODELS CAM MODEL TODAY!

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)