MOTTO
DAILY NOTES
a) About the Zeroth Rule of Research Projects
b) Andrea Rossi about Research Projects.
DAILY NEWS
1) USPTO Patent Application: HYDROGEN-LITHIUM FUSION DEVICE
DAILY NOTES
a) About the Zeroth Rule of Research Projects
zeroth
ˈimmediately preceding what is regarded as first in a series.
Thinking about the Axioms of Ed Storms has inspired me to think about the essentials of research projects- starting with the Zeroth Rule of the research projects-
i.e. before starting try to evaluate what brings the Project in case of 100%, total success. Surely you have heard about the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics that has to be taken in consideration before even thinking about what Thermodynamics allows, re commends or prohibits.
I have discovered the Zeroth Law hen leading series of research projects at OLTCHIM Chemical Works, mainly poly-vinyl chloride and its recipe components and processing additives and later in a very broad range chemical consultancy collaborations- chemistry is a central science and technology- all other industries ue chemical products. A very broad range of multi-actions from say lead-acid battery separators, additives for sintering, to optimizing the whitening process of weave baskets made of osier (Salix viminalis) and other bush plants. Low level seemingly but complex problems and good economic impact if it succeeds. Zeroth Rule of projects became a part of my standards a must, a step in decision taking.
This fundamental analysis is not restricted to the before the start period it can be done during the project, any time when it is opportune
For the case of Edmund Storms- his theory based on the AXIOMS- the Zeroth Rule is to determine if his theory is totally true and valid for any variant of LENR- what will we learn, what is the the shortest and fastest way to explanation of LENR, from there to prediction of the necessary experiments and to technological development.
b) Andrea Rossi about Research Projects.
We must make a distinction between R&D started by industries or industrial laboratories and R&D started by scientific concerns.
The aims of these two categories are structurally different.
An industry or an industrial laboratory starts an R&D exclusively basing the strategic decisions on the profit that such R&D can generate, compared to the investments necessary to make the same R&D . Apart this, all the other considerations about the wellness of humanity are pure hypocrisy and propagandistic mumbojumbo-tango.
The approach of a scientific concern ( university for example ) is different, because in this case the R&D can also have exquisitely cultural aims, with high costs and nil or small economic return: the quest for the Higgs field made by the CERN is a typical example of this. Science about the Higgs field and the associated wave of the Higgs boson will never generate anything economically profitable that could justify the immense costs of it, but, as Dante Alighieri made Ulysses say:
" Fatti non foste a viver come bruti,
ma per seguir virtute e conoscienza"
DAILY NEWS
1) USPTO Patent Application: HYDROGEN-LITHIUM FUSION DEVICE
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3198-USPTO-Patent-Application-HYDROGEN-LITHIUM-FUSION-DEVICE/?postID=18031#post18031http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220160118144%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20160118144&RS=DN/20160118144
2) #LENR #ECAT Saga: The Most Important Inconsistency by Dewey Weaver (so far)!
2) #LENR #ECAT Saga: The Most Important Inconsistency by Dewey Weaver (so far)!
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/lenr-ecat-saga-the-most-important-inconsistency-by-dewey-weaver-so-far/
3) inaccessible, from Google Scholar:
LENR IN CONTEXT-1
From Russ George's Blog:
EM DRIVE RISES DESPITE PATHOSKEPTIC DIRGE
3) inaccessible, from Google Scholar:
Our Renewable Future: Laying the Path for One Hundred Percent Clean Energy
https://books.google.ro/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=CQUEDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&dq=Low+Energy+Nuclear+Reactions&ots=5n3c6E9RRS&sig=35GwIbEB3dtOHGZz5dlwJVTbhlQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
R Heinberg, D Fridley - 2016
... Substitution Challenge Continues High-Temperature Heat for Industrial Processes
Low-Temperature Heat ... Efficiency Opportunity: We May Not Need as Much Energy Energy Intensity
The ... Nuclear Power Carbon Capture and Storage Massive Technology Improvements PART III. ..
Low-Temperature Heat ... Efficiency Opportunity: We May Not Need as Much Energy Energy Intensity
The ... Nuclear Power Carbon Capture and Storage Massive Technology Improvements PART III. ..
LENR IN CONTEXT-1
From Russ George's Blog:
EM DRIVE RISES DESPITE PATHOSKEPTIC DIRGE
http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/04/27/em-drive-rises-despite-pathoskeptic-dirge/
LENR IN CONTEXT-2
Let Your Frontline Workers Be Creative
LENR IN CONTEXT-2
Let Your Frontline Workers Be Creative
The difference between industrial and academic research is simply the incentive.
ReplyDeleteAcademic research is justified by continuous problem. Big Science is the big funding with no hope of short term solution best case.
Industrial research is justified by expected solution.
If academic research get a solution, it is dead and industry occupy the teritory.
If industrial research cannot make something interesting, or at least maintain hope of application , it ends.
Peter
ReplyDeleteThe Shawyer drive is as impossible as perpetual motion.
Have you heard of the perpetual motion
machine of Joseph Newman.
http://pesn.com/2012/11/05/9602216_Big-Eureka_The-Energy-Machine-of-Joseph-Newman/
Sam
Peter
ReplyDeleteEm drive reminds me of Star Trek.
Give me all you got Scotty.
She won't take any more Captain.
Written and Produced by
Gene Roddenberry another interesting
character from Texas.
Sam
The EM Drive reminds me of the Heisenberg Compensator, that in Star Trek allowed the Transporters to work, despite the Uncertainty Principle. When asked about how they worked, Roddenberry responded:
ReplyDelete"Very well, thank you."
Given enough time (billions of years?), effort, and resources, intelligent beings can achieve almost any goal, no matter how lofty or improbable.
ReplyDeleteAbout zeroth. If two models can explain any observable facts then there is a wall which is not part of observable facts.
ReplyDeleteAbout zeroth. If two models can explain any observable facts then there is a wall which is not part of observable facts.
ReplyDeleteI think we have to take Zeroth- as concept seriouslY. What do you think, mon cher Michel?
Deletepeter
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOn my mobile. Small keyboard. Big fingers :-)
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteAgree. I think that LENR is systemic and consequently can be analyzed from different points of view i.e parts of this system, all valid that is to say same temerature, and that we have to understand the system, and only the role of each part in this system. What means to find discrete solutions, that is to say configuration of this system with usedul properties for us.
Deletethanks, I think you could write an opinion paper for my blog, LENR ideas...
Deleteplease ponder..
peter
Agree. I think that LENR is systemic and consequently can be analyzed from different points of view i.e parts of this system, all valid that is to say same temerature, and that we have to understand the system, and only the role of each part in this system. What means to find discrete solutions, that is to say configuration of this system with usedul properties for us.
DeletePopeye! How are you getting on with your buttockular surgery?
ReplyDelete