MOTTO
Be larger than your task (Orison Swett Marden)
DAILY NOTES
Clearly it is still complete haze regarding the role of LENR in the great Funding plan for Clean Energy of the billionaires coalition. No communication yet, no lobby, no leadership.
As far as I know, nobody has asked Rossi what does he think about this opportunity
The long PdD saga has eradicated the sense of urgency and the desire to find a fundamental, radical group of solutions in many of the LENR researchers.
However today we have news from Brillouin (to be discussed only by those who have read the complete validation report, I think) and a world patent of Industrial Heat plus some other news, the field is living.
I am thinking about LENR fundamentals, I am preparing a presentation for BECFICE.
it will be never read, but (Motto) should I be smaller than my task?
DAILY NEWS
1) Industrial Heat World Patent published for Lugano style reaction device
https://patentscope.wipo.int/
2) Brillouin Energy Press Release on 3rd-Party-Involved Test:
Independent Technical Validation Report Completed On Brillouin Energy’s LENR HHT™ Reactor Core Systems (Press Release)
Brillouin Energy Corp: Believe it or not
I hope this is more than optimistic wishful thinking.
4) Dramatic Increase in Clean-Energy Funding
Led by Bill Gates, a group of tycoons will put billions of dollars into clean-energy technology.
2) Brillouin Energy Press Release on 3rd-Party-Involved Test:
Independent Technical Validation Report Completed On Brillouin Energy’s LENR HHT™ Reactor Core Systems (Press Release)
Brillouin Energy Corp: Believe it or not
3) Bill Gates hints at personal engagement in LENR in his Annual Letter
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/news/index.php/News/55-Bill-Gates-hints-at-personal-engagement-in-LENR-in-his-Annual-Letter/I hope this is more than optimistic wishful thinking.
Led by Bill Gates, a group of tycoons will put billions of dollars into clean-energy technology.
5) From MFMP - correction to a error (typo) in Rossi's US Patent:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7eIOSe9g5EnZUQ0cXVOT1BfTTg/view
Two news from Russia
6) A seminar of the Section of Quantum Radiophysics named after I.G. Basov
of Physics Institute of the Academy of Science Dec 04, 2015, 10.00
http://lenr.seplm.ru/seminary/seminar-otdeleniya-kvantovoi-radiofiziki-im-ng-basova-0412-2015-v-10-00-issledovanie-nikoenergeticheskikh-yadernykh-reaktsii-v-kristallicheskikh-strukturakh
the presentation of:
O.D. Dalikarov, M.A, Negodaev, A.S. Rusetskii
The investigation of low energy nuclear reactions in crystalline structures
(coordinates, data given for participants)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7eIOSe9g5EnZUQ0cXVOT1BfTTg/view
Two news from Russia
6) A seminar of the Section of Quantum Radiophysics named after I.G. Basov
of Physics Institute of the Academy of Science Dec 04, 2015, 10.00
http://lenr.seplm.ru/seminary/seminar-otdeleniya-kvantovoi-radiofiziki-im-ng-basova-0412-2015-v-10-00-issledovanie-nikoenergeticheskikh-yadernykh-reaktsii-v-kristallicheskikh-strukturakh
the presentation of:
O.D. Dalikarov, M.A, Negodaev, A.S. Rusetskii
The investigation of low energy nuclear reactions in crystalline structures
(coordinates, data given for participants)
- 7) An excellent analysis by Alexander Prosvirnov
- The results of the 22nd Russian Conference on Cold Transmutation of Nuclei and Ball Lightning http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6408
Two papers that can be very important for understanding LENR, but nobody can predict the direction of LENR theories today:
For the first thanks go to Vladimir Vysotskii- I want to know more about his recent achievments!
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 33, no 1-2, 2008 13
Experimental observation and analysis of action of light
magnetic monopoles on multilayer surfaces
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BNGtrMXcwdFd0QWstalVhZUxURnlRTGFuMFA4/view?usp=sharing
STANISLAV V. ADAMENKO1 , VLADIMIR I. VYSOTSKII1,
2 1 Electrodynamics Laboratory "Proton-21", Kiev, Ukraine 2 Kiev National Shevchenko University, Kiev, Ukraine
ABSTRACT .
The mechanism of creation of hollow macroscopic periodic channel formed on a surface and in a volume of a MDS-structure during experiments with a high-current vacuum-tube diode at collapse conditions in anode is studied. It is shown that the reason for the appearance of such a trajectory can be the interaction of a magnetically charged particle with paramagnetic and diamagnetic surface layers of the MDS-structure. Particles with magnetic charge can be formed during the shock action of a highcurrent electron beam and the subsequent self-compression of the frozen magnetic field of the beam. It is shown that the great specific energy release, dQtot / dl ! "106 GeV / cm , spent on the formation of this channel can be due to the processes of nuclear synthesis which are occuring with participation of MDS-structure surface nuclei stimulated by magnetically charged particles. It is shown that these particles have small mass (much less then 10-22 gram) and are, most likely, light magnetic monopoles as proposed by George Lochak.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BNGtrMXcwdFd0QWstalVhZUxURnlRTGFuMFA4/view?usp=sharing
STANISLAV V. ADAMENKO1 , VLADIMIR I. VYSOTSKII1,
2 1 Electrodynamics Laboratory "Proton-21", Kiev, Ukraine 2 Kiev National Shevchenko University, Kiev, Ukraine
ABSTRACT .
The mechanism of creation of hollow macroscopic periodic channel formed on a surface and in a volume of a MDS-structure during experiments with a high-current vacuum-tube diode at collapse conditions in anode is studied. It is shown that the reason for the appearance of such a trajectory can be the interaction of a magnetically charged particle with paramagnetic and diamagnetic surface layers of the MDS-structure. Particles with magnetic charge can be formed during the shock action of a highcurrent electron beam and the subsequent self-compression of the frozen magnetic field of the beam. It is shown that the great specific energy release, dQtot / dl ! "106 GeV / cm , spent on the formation of this channel can be due to the processes of nuclear synthesis which are occuring with participation of MDS-structure surface nuclei stimulated by magnetically charged particles. It is shown that these particles have small mass (much less then 10-22 gram) and are, most likely, light magnetic monopoles as proposed by George Lochak.
The second, says probably (I have no home access to the journal)what we know today about BEC
Happy birthday BEC by Wolfgang Ketterle
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v11/n12/full/nphys3589.html
Bose–Einstein condensation in atomic gases was first observed in 1995. As we look back at the past 20 years of this thriving field, it's clear that there is much to celebrate.
AXIL DIXIT
LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
In my opinion, the fundamental nature of the Rossi effect is based on magnetism. The catalytic particle that produces the reaction is magnetic in nature. This particle is produced by heat pumping and EMF stimulation. The nature of this Exotic Neutral Particle (ENP)is reflected by the behaviour of the E-Cat itself and reflect how the E-Cat operates.
The ENP can exist at low energy pumping where the energy coming into the particle is equal to the energy leaving the particle. This is similar to the way Rossi keeps his reactor under control. Too much external energy pumping will result in the E-Cat going critical.
The same process of over pumping happens with the ENP. Overpumping brings it to the stage where it becomes self-sufficient requiring no additional EMF input. The energized ENP can get EMF from the environment around it not requiring external heat or EMF simulation to be applied.
The same is true for the E-Cat. When the E-Cat is subcritical, it requires heat and EMF stimulation to be applied. But when it is "over stimulated", it begins to meltdown since it has become independent from externally applied stimulation.
The ENP can live as long as it can catalyze energy production from the material around it. The ENP can live for days on its own as it brings in energy from the environment to sustain its internal LENR reaction processes.
Magnetic confinement increases efficiency of the reaction. Such confinement saves the externally applied energy that produced the ENP from being wasted.
The ENP can leave the reactor if the material that makes up the reactor enclosure is transparent to the optical and magnetic nature of the ENP. This might be why electrolytic cells have difficulty in sustaining powerful LENR reactions. In this case, the ENPs escape the glass beaker reactor enclosure and all the input energy that was pumped into the ENP is wasted to the environment. outside the electrolytic cell.
If the cell is made of material that can contain the ENP both optically and magnetically, the reactor will be efficent. Alumina is antiferromagnetic and will confine magnetic particles try to escape the reactor shell. Another method of ENP confinement that Rossi might use is a solenoidal confinement coil that keeps the ENPs away from the reactor walls in the center axis of the reactor.
For example, the so called Erzion phenomenon was discovered in a series of electrolytic experiments marked by unexplained changes in a pool of cooling water outside of the catalytic cell. After 40 minutes of electrolytic cell operation, water on the tungsten anode side of the cooling vessel started losing its transparency.
Water on the stainless steel cathode of the pool of cooling water remained transparent, at the same 40 C temperature. A sample of bubbly water, removed from the anode side, was tested for induced gamma radioactivity. No such radioactivity was found in it; the sample became transparent after 24 hours. Attempts to reproduce the long-term loss of cooling water transparency with other electrolytes, and under different electrical discharge conditions, were not successful. But the effect was highly reproducible when experimenting with the tungsten-anode electrolytic cell and the 7 M KF electrolyte containing 50% of heavy water.
That cooling water on the outside of the electrolytic cell's glass reactor shell at the right side (see Figure 1) is close to the anode while cooling water on the left side is close to the cathode. The disappearance of bubbles, after the electrolysis, was very slow (half-life of about 10 hrs). Attempts to explain the phenomenon in terms of cavitation, and other ultrasonic effects, were not successful. The only satisfactory explanation was possible within the framework of the erzion model. Authors believe that bubbles are produced through the action of neutral Erzions.
The Erzons phenomenon behavior is consistent with the magnetic based Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP). To begin with, the glass container is transparent to the magnetically based ENPs both optically and magnetically. The LENR reaction that keeps the ENPs viable produce the vapor that forms the water bubbles. The ENPs become energetically self sufficient in the water of the cooling pool where the ENPs remain viable for hours.
If the Erzons phenomenon is produced by magnetically based ENPs, an iron plate placed just on the outside of the glass wall adjacent to the anode would prevent the ENPs from exiting the glass electrolytic cell. With the ENPs blocked from travel, bubble production would be eliminated.
OTHER
thanks to Marc Jurich who has just sent this
Hank Mills
ReplyDeleteDecember 29th, 2013 at 2:34 PM
Dear Andrea,
The information you are sharing is facinating. While we wait for the full reports, it gives us something to think upon.
1 – If the mouse over stimulates the cat so it runs around in circles continually, not going back to sleep, does the cat always explode?
2 – Have you ever witnessed the cat running around in circles for extended periods of time, not needing any extra stimulation, but remaining stable?
3 – Other than heat from the mouse, is anything else stimulating the cat during the drive or self sustain periods? It may not work for the hot cat, but I wish there was some low power method of keeping the cat stimulated. For example, like the 100 watts of radio frequencies that kept the one megawatt plant in self sustain mode.
4 – By how many degrees on average does the surface of the cat vary from the end of the drive stage to the end of the self sustained stage?
----------------
Andrea Rossi
December 29th, 2013 at 6:10 PM
Hank Mills:
1- no
2- confidential
3- no
4- the temperature of the Cat raises when the Mouse is turned off, lowers when the Mouse is turned on
Warm Regards,
A.R.
===========
Rossi has provided a comprehensive explanation of the Cat and Mouse reactor clustering method in bits and pieces throughout his Q&A blog. One of them explains how the shutdown of power from the Mouse causes the Cat to be stimulated.
I now take this to mean that when Rossi shuts off a magnetic confinements field coil that keeps the Magnetic Neutral Particle(ENP) inside the Mouse, the LENR reaction in the Cats take off because the ENPs can get through the hot alumina and then get into the Cats to stimulate the LENR reaction.
The fuel mix in the Cat must be richer and more LENR reactive than the fuel mix in the Mouse stimulator.
Regarding:
ReplyDeleteToward a More Scientifically Literate Public
http://today.ucf.edu/toward-a-more-scientifically-literate-public/
Michael Bass,
What would happen if the cause of Cold fusion was based on Photonics, your specialty? lf the experts that the public trusts whose scientific specialties include nuclear physics astrophysics, and particle physics and who have declared that Cold fusion is pathological science have no background in photonics to make that unequivocal statement about cold fusion. You understand that photonics is far removed from mainstream nuclear physics. It involves obscure quantum mechanical processes, wave physics, and quasiparticle formulations such as the polariton. What if the cause of cold fusion involved the dark mode Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP). What expert in science would understand it in the required depth besides you? The fields of science have become too broad and unconnected for one expert to make absolute statements about other obscure phenomena in another field of science.
Am in total agreement that science has become so specialized and so diverse, not to mention so incomprehensibly filled with ideas that may have little or no real basis in reality, that it is virtually impossible for anyone to be even slightly conversant with it all.
ReplyDeletewe need a much more coherent and basic physical science.
i probably am as far off as the people I criticize; however, to me, the Oscillators in a Substance Model of Existence, which Is published in books on Amazon, by this writer, of course, is a start toward a simple and comprehensive modelling which might serve as a basis for interdisciplinary understanding.....
The big error, even and especially for supporters, is to focus on the theory.
DeleteWho cares if Cold Fusion is nanoplasmonic, when assessing if F&P were genuine discovery ?
What was needed is competent electrochemists, experts in calorimetry, and silenced physicist.
The physicist from their highest incompetence declared the competent guys, incompetent...
because they used theory to consider it was their domain, instead of staying on the ground and see that it was just measurements, not QM.
We can’t build a bridge without a plan. We can’t get LENR to work without a valid theory. I am beginning to think that LENR is caused by magnetic particles, let’s call them Exotic Neutral Particles (ENP) that can float on currents of air. This theory has implications to getting LENR to work. If a reactor is build out of material that is transparent to ENPs then these important particles could escape the reactor without producing more ENPs thus keeping the LENR reaction energy starved. But if the reactor could be insulated from EMP escape, then the reactor would hold onto the energy that it produces and become gainful.
DeleteReplicators are perplexed by the success of Parkhomov’s reactor. Why can’t anybody get the Parkhomov reactor to work even with the same fuel that he used? But everybody is amused by the old iron pot that Parkhomove ran his experiment in. That iron pot could be keeping the magnetic ENP from escaping the confines of his reactor. All the other replicators let their precious ENPs escape into the air.
Why does Rossi enclose his fuel in a cartridge containing layers of steel? Could the iron particle in the Lugano fuel sample come from a magnetic confinement system? Does Rossi have an iron mesh inside the alumina tube to produce magnetic confinement? If theory says that keeping ENPs confined is important, then the use of iron and steel in Rossi type reactors becomes interesting.
Am in total agreement that science has become so specialized and so diverse, not to mention so incomprehensibly filled with ideas that may have little or no real basis in reality, that it is virtually impossible for anyone to be even slightly conversant with it all.
ReplyDeletewe need a much more coherent and basic physical science.
i probably am as far off as the people I criticize; however, to me, the Oscillators in a Substance Model of Existence, which Is published in books on Amazon, by this writer, of course, is a start toward a simple and comprehensive modelling which might serve as a basis for interdisciplinary understanding.....
You are right, physics needs conceptual coherence.
DeletePeter