SEP 30, 2015 LENR INFO

DAILY NOTE

 LENR investments- increasing interest.
Edmund Storms publishes Report No 6  see please No 3, below
He writes:

"Here is Progress Report #6. This report extends the insights described in Report #5 and shows that several common conclusions about LENR are wrong.  These errors have handicapped efforts to achieve reproducibility and have lead several theories in the wrong direction.

Temperature plays a significant role in affecting the amount of power produced by LENR. The activation energy for power production is very similar to the activation energy for diffusion of D in PdD.  This behavior is consistent with my theory in which temperature is described as helping D reach the NAE by diffusion through the surrounding lattice."
This fine experimental study will continue

No direct news from the Russian Conference at Sochi,  yet

DAILY NEWS

1) Updating the LENR research activity of the Francesco Celani working team (Live Open Science) Aggiornamenti sull'attività di ricerca LENR del gruppo di lavoro di Francesco CELANI all'INFN (Live Open Science)

http://22passi.blogspot.ro/2015/09/aggiornamenti-sullattivita-di-ricerca.html

2) The patent of Andrea Rossi about thermo-electric generator

http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/886-The-patent-of-Andrea-Rossi-about-thermo-electric-generator/ 

older patent(s)

3) Edmund Storms Progress Report No. 6
Additional Behaviour of pure PdD

4) Andrea Rossi says
September 29th, 2015 at 2:53 PM

Hank Mills:
We will make the analysis of the charges also with the SIMS, obviously after the end of the tests. Before such analysis I can’t say anything.
About the E-Cat X: we will give data after the due tests and what is interesting for us are mainly 2 things:
1- COP
2- Safety and absence of radiations outside the E-Cat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Andrea Rossi
September 29th, 2015 at 8:19 PM

Steven N. Karels:
To detect He after opening the reactor is close to impossible and during the operation we cannot insert any probe ( who tried replications knows how difficult is to seal the reactor against leaks). Besides, when you get a hint of He traces, it is impossible to know if it just comes from the atmosphere.
Anyway, we’ll see. We certainly will search for it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

%) In Swedish: “"Energy Revolution nearby for Swedish research success"

http://www.di.se/artiklar/2015/9/28/energirevolution-nara-efter-svensk-forskarframgang

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/09/30/energy-revolution-close-swedish-business-magazine-on-leif-holmlids-muon-fusion/

6) Further to that cold fusion piece that I reported a couple of days ago I’m loving this.
Submitted by IWB, on September 30th, 2015

http://investmentwatchblog.com/further-to-that-cold-fusion-piece-that-i-reported-a-couple-of-days-ago-im-loving-this/

7) Woodford Equity Income Fund Invested in Industrial Heat after 2.5 Years of Due Diligence

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/09/30/woodford-equity-income-fund-invested-in-industrial-heat-after-2-5-years-of-due-diligence/

DOUG MARKER AND AXIL ABOUT THE COMMENTS AT THE FORTUNE PAPER

'Doug says:

Have just read the comments section of the Fortune magazine interview of Tom Darden. And what a sorry set of interactions !.

Within just a few posts it has degenerated into ridicule and personal attack. Sadly, consistent with an obsessive desire on the part of a few well known activists to 'poison' the value and wisdom conveyed in the Tom Darden interview.

IMHO there can be no better words to describe the behaviour of those attackers than to call them 'pathologically obsessive'. Much of the flow has turned into Nobel laureat Brian Josephson (a very kindly well spoken and gentle person) defending himself from personal attack by Steven Krivit and Mary Yugo (aka George Hody and multiple other net aliases).

One has a right to ask why these antagonists and friends chose to 'pollute' what was a very good interview that was timely honest and expressed in well presented points. A resonable conclusion is that these critics are not interested in reasoned points of view but in poisoning the topic in any way they can.

The implication from them is that no one can make a reasonable value judgement about exploring such interesting new science as LENR represents without undergoing vilification and personal attack of the highest order no matter the credentials of the person showing a positive perspective on the promise of LENR.

It is very intimidating to be on the end of ridicule when one is seeking reasoned debate and opinion.

The bottom line for myself, is that the people involved in poisoning the Fortune interview are either 'pathological obsessives' (I give this a high probability) or are people with a paid vested interest in sabotage (some may see this as the higher probability). For myself, it is hard to see any other posibilities. 

AXIL has added:

This back and forth recrimination seems to be the same process that happens a while ago when Brian Josephson posted a response to an article. 
Brian Josephson seems to be plagued by a swarm of blood-sucking gadflies intent on keeping him silent.

OTHER

From Bob Greenyer- thanks:

Li and LiH growth on Nickel

http://www.doc88.com/p-8512140860382.html

Possibly useful for the LiNiH opera composed by Andrea Rossi