REDEFINING MISINFORMATION IN LENR
Yesterday, it seems, I have committed again a capital sin against science and truth.
I presented a Russian language paper about forbidden nuclear reactions that was in part about exploding wires and, horribile dictu! -what blasphemy! I have not immediately called the attention of the readers about the absolute truth in matters of exploding wires; see what wrote Lewis Larsen co-father of the W-L theory:
Mr. Gluck is again disseminating misinformation (or disinformation, depending on intent) about the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs which does in fact explain nuclear transmutation products observed with various types of spectroscopy on materials involved in high-current exploding wire experiments. Please see our initial Cornell physics arXiv preprint in which we discuss and explain the physics of the Wendt-Irion experiments at the University of Chicago that were published in Science back in 1922:
“Energetic electrons and nuclear transmutations in exploding wires”
A. Widom, Y.N. Srivastava, and L. Larsen (Sept 2007)
“Nuclear transmutations and fast neutrons have been observed to emerge from large electrical current pulses passing through wire filaments which are induced to explode. The nuclear reactions may be explained as inverse beta transitions of energetic electrons absorbed either directly by single protons in Hydrogen or by protons embedded in other more massive nuclei. The critical energy transformations to the electrons from the electromagnetic field and from the electrons to the nuclei are best understood in terms of coherent collective motions of the many flowing electrons within a wire filament.Energy transformation mechanisms have thus been found which settle a theoretical paradox in low energy nuclear reactions which has remained unresolved for over eight decades. It is presently clear that nuclear transmutations can occur under a much wider range of physical conditions than was heretofore thought possible.”
Then see pp. 628 - 631 in Section 4. titled “Exploding wires” in our peer-reviewed Pramana paper:
“A primer for electro-weak induced low energy nuclear reactions”
Y. Srivastava, A. Widom, and L. Larsen
Pramana - Journal of Physics 75 pp. 617 - 637 (2010)
The first time I have put his attitude in the context of fragmentation of the LENR field:
but he repeated it. I can understand him, he wants attention for his theory and person and it is usually ignored.People do a lot of things for attention including tightrope walking and suicide bombing; his choice is scandal
"Le style est l'homme meme" (Buffon)- my blog has tried to inform you about all his publications.
Just an non-relevant aside I like the paper cited by Lew; I will ask the opinion of some specialist about it. I have already invited the W-L scientist affiliated to LENR Cities to start discussing with their colleagues on Ego Out- a first positive answer came from Angelo Ovidi and later...silence. The same was valid for Lew but he likes conflicts. Being hypertensive and a grumpy old man, I need conflicts just at an IQ>85.
From now on misinforming in LENR will be defined as simply NOT speaking about the great virtues of the W-L theory?
1) A splendid up-coming events page from Cold Fusion Now- Ruby Carat:
2) Rossi we can throttle the E-Cat plant
3) Andrea Rossi says interesting things:
September 4th, 2015 at 5:10 PM
Yes and I hope you too.
If the E-Cat X will work as I hope, the old Hot Cat becomes obsolete, because the E-Cat X is more advanced.
September 4th, 2015 at 2:29 PM
I do not see any conceptual roadblock, just I deem it totally useless, because modules of 250 kW are more than enough to pile up all the power is needed even in big plants.
Yes, the E-Cat X is also the result of a better understanding of the E-Cat. I hope, because we still have to consolidate it, even if I am very optimist.
September 5th, 2015 at 7:27 AM
Now, at 08.20 a.m. of Saturday September 5th, the 1 MW plant is working well and stable but at 3/4 of its power, because we are making maintainance to a reactor. The “voice” is good, we are relatively calm. I am working on a new patent and studying again the book of Prof. Norman Cook. He signed my copy with a dedication to me!
AXIL'S COMMENTS ON ED STORMS DEFINITION INTERVIEW
Experiments have identified many mechanisms that can produce LENR reactions, Ed Storms has identified one of them. LENR can also occur in both the liquid, gas and plasma phases as shown in experiments done to identify LENR over the quarter century of its most resent phase of experimental history. Identifying the NAE is a process of reduction over all these experiments that must focus on identifying the common factors involved over these many currently identified forms of LENR and also the many more forms that are likely to be discovered in the future.
The fundamental causation of LENR must satisfy a global set of connected conditions.
This generalize causation mechanism must share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around an EMF vortex. This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect..
These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction(aka NAE), and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively.
Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments, the nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases.
The experiments of Ed Storms is a first step in a very long road ahead.