Saturday, August 1, 2015

INCREASING COMPATIBILITY OF METAL AND HYDROGEN-A MUST IN LENR TECHNOLOGY!



MOTTO

What counts in making a happy marriage is not so much how compatible you are but how you deal with incompatibility. (Leo Tolstoy)

I am happy quoting here a Russian author because I am enchanted by what I consider the essence, the spirit, the leit-motif of the Russian Parkhomov replication  that I have fast-translated this morning.
Remember DGT's slogan: "make hydrogen more reactive and nickel more receptive" it is about increasing the compatibility and affinity of the gas-metal pair  Now the Russian scientists have revealed more procedures that have exactly this aim.
It seems this increase of compatibility is an absolutely necessary stage for a good  
LENR+Technology. 
It is well known that psychologists and sexologists recommend trial marriages for couples who have doubts regarding their long time compatibility.
Hydrogenation stages of nickel seem to be something similar.
Congrats to this group of replicators for the bright idea!

P.S. If I think a bit, my all favorite -the best- LENR Patent:
WO 2010/058288
METHOD FOR PRODUCING ENERGY AND APPARATUS THEREFOR 
is, in part, also about a method of compatibilizing metal and hydrogen.




DAILY NEWS

The Parkhomov replication report from Moscow is disccussed now both at LENR Forum:                                                                                                                       http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/1870-Moscow-researchers-Group-produce-excess-heat-COP-3-at-a-temperature-1350oS-in-a-/

You can also ask questions from the Moscowite researchers                                                  www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/1870-Moscow-researchers-Group-produce-excess-heat-COP-3-at-a-temperature-1350oS-in-a-/?postID=6513#post6513

and at E-Cat World:
New RussianPrkhomov Cat replication clai COP over 3 at 1347 C

прСтатьи Климова Анатолия Ивановича по плазмоидным технологиямСсылки на статьи

Anatolii Ivanovich Klimov about plasmoidal technologies  http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/stati-klimova-anatoliya-ivanovicha                         Something is missing here, who can tell this to the website master?

Andrea Rossi says a great truth (in red)

July 31st, 2015 at 4:59 PM


Hank Mills:
I sympathize with you.
The effect has been replicated well from scientists like Parkhomov and a good work is on course in other laboratories. About the other issues you raise, I am sure that smart persons like you can understand that I cannot give away graciously our IP to allow replicators to get solace.
I take the chance you offer me to thank all the replicators for their attention to our work and i am sure all of them understand that I cannot devastate our enterprise and severe the serious investments necessary to the worldwide develpment of our concern. Nobody serious could invest in an enterprise without a well defended IP. I always said that the e-Cat is a very complex thing.
About to give evidence in all the world of the validity of the effect: provided the tests on course will give positive results ( which is not certain yet, therefore scepticism has full right of citizenship), such evidence will not be given from any laboratory replicator, but from the products in the market and to make our products reach massively the market we need to preserve the Intellectual Property.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Frank Acland
July 31st, 2015 at 11:29 AM

Dear Andrea,

Thank you. Some typical ways that breakdowns are handled in business are as follows. Which of these would apply to your plants?

1. Have redundancy built in (if one reactor breaks down, a spare turns on automatically while the broken one is repaired)
2. Provide spare parts to operators, if a quick fix is possible.
3. Provide manuals and training materials so staff can make possible repairs.
4. Have a help desk where people can call for technical support.
5. Have mobile teams of service personnel who can travel to sites to take care of major repairs.

Many thanks,
Frank Acland

Andrea Rossi answers to Frank Acland
July 31st, 2015 at 1:39 PM

Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
4- yes
5- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.

5 comments:

  1. Remember DGT's slogan: "make hydrogen more reactive and nickel more receptive"

    LenzandCoLab said:

    "Probability of Heat excess is increased significantly if you add hydrogen support to the set up like Chineese or Focardi. Or just got Ni powder from the previous experiment to the reactor(or do it twice). And don't forget to add LiAlH4."

    We discused this reuse of old fuel that was indicated in the Lugano fuel analysis as follows:

    e-catworld.com/2015/07/05/lugano-fuel-analysis-axil-axil/

    The is no evidence that nickel absorbs hydrogen to any great degree. What may be happening is that hydrogen is being chemically transformed into a form that is more receptive to the LENR reaction. In fact, the Russian experimenter recommends the use of fuel used in a prior reactor run.

    I would recommend the process that Leif Holmild uses to produce hydrogen based Rydberg matter in his experiment.

    With respect to the recent report by Ólafsson and Holmlid, "Holmlid used Shell 105 catalyst (Fe2O3-K based with >8% K content) - and only that (!!) - as an ultra-dense Rydberg state Deuterium generator because it's convenient to use, cheap and apparently because it works out of the box without further treatment (as also confirmed by Sveinn Ólafsson on LENR-Forum)."

    NOTE: According to Shell, the 105 catalyst contains 84.3% iron as Fe2O3, 2.4 %chromium as Cr2O3 and 13.3% potassium as K2CO3.

    ------------------

    Ólafsson and Holmlid report getting heat from the use of hydrogen and the 105 catalyst without the use of a laser.

    The potassium provides a catalytic build template that convert the hydrogen to a solid form by using a Rydberg blockade process.

    The same effect can be achieved by using an electric arc. DGT used this method in their technology to produce hydrogen Rydberg matter.

    See

    http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v11/n2/abs/nphys3214.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. The root problem of high power LENR is that it has never been properly shown to work. Never. Not at all. Not once.

    By the way, how is Defkalion doing these days? Talk to Hadjichritos recently? When is the newest Hyperion version going to be for sale?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The root problem of high power LENR is that it has never been properly shown to work. Never. Not at all. Not once.

    By the way, how is Defkalion doing these days? Talk to Hadjichritos recently? When is the newest Hyperion version going to be for sale?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry about the double post. The forum software did not show me the original one.

      Delete
    2. I am sorry yu have doubts- I tthink doubts regarding your own doubts. It is a strange situation.
      But it will end soon. And Defkalion's technology will come back.
      Peter

      Delete