Sunday, March 22, 2015

SWEET SUNDAY MORNING LENR NEWS



MOTTO


I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed.
(Michael Jordan)


HAPPY BIRTHDAY WISHES TO DEAR FRIENDS:

Today- to HIDEO KOZIMA- in Shizuoka, Japan

Tomorrow- to YIANNIS HADJICHRISTOS in Athens, Greece
and to LENR, born COLD FUSION, overall and forever!

DAILY NEWS

Bob Greenyear about Alexander Parkhomov:

"Dr. Parkhomov, Thankyou.
CONGRATULATIONS... Again
AMAZING NEWS!
Dr. Parkhomov reports that the target temperature of 1200ºC in the fuelled reactor was achieved by the time the electric power had reached around 600 W (in contrast to 1070 W needed to reach 1200ºC in the dummy). Then within an hour, the regulator had decreased the input power to just 330 W to maintain the same 1200ºC. Approximately, this has been the power required to during the whole operation of the reactor.
The thermocouple is fixed on surface of tube with fuel in the middle of the tube.
Operation of the reactor was interrupted due to a heater burn-out at 10:50 on March 20 (Moscow time). Fortunately though, the tube with fuel wasn't damaged.
When a replacement heater was used, the reactor RESTARTED!! at 11:10 on March 21 and works still.
This is the first independent report of high power LENR being able to be cooled down and re-started.
It is difficult to grasp the significance of this information.
Dr. Parkhomov, Thankyou.
We need to replicate this with extreme urgency, if verified, we might be at the dawn of the New Fire era.

THANK YOU, BOB AND MFMP TOO!

Tomorrow we will have what to celebrate- joy and hope are for the future not for the 
past of continuous fight with the stubborn impossible- that just now prepares capitulating.

See also the discussions here:
[Vo]:Parkhomov - Reaction Restarts from Cold
and here:

Making a Nuclear Power Point

Michel Vandenberghe of LENR-Cities, invited as Visionary Speaker for "2b AHEAD" Future Congress in June

Screening effects in LENR in laboratory experiments and in stars




5 comments:

  1. Exciting time. Next steps first replication by another party and then
    1) long duration test, 30 days, with this absurdly small amount of fuel
    2) proportionality of heat to fuel mass
    3) power production versus temperature

    Then 100s of good experiments.
    1) Ni to LiAlH4 ratio and cut off
    2) Ni and H no Li, anything?
    3) Ni and Li no H, anything?
    4) pressure as a parameter
    5) large fuel load and SLOW and careful exploration of temperature below the peak reaction
    6) better insulation and higher COP values
    7) 1KW production with high COP and long duration

    Ed Pell

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please make the list bit more complete and I will publish it as "Ed Pell's suggestion for an experimental plan"- tomorrow.
      Thanks,it is very good,
      Peter

      Delete
    2. Please make the list bit more complete and I will publish it as "Ed Pell's suggestion for an experimental plan"- tomorrow.
      Thanks,it is very good,
      Peter

      Delete
  2. Add RF and magnetic radiation measurement to the debug list. Pressure measurement is also required.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If the Piantelli theory of negative hydrogen ion based reaction is true, how does the development of a pressure reduction from 5 bar to .5 bar (a order of magnitude pressure drop.) be caused by the development of negative hydrogen ions? The gas pressure should have doubled because the H2 molecule becomes -H. The hydrogen pressure decrease as seen in experiment speaks against negative hydrogen ion development. It looks like H2 has become 20H somehow. Now how can that have happen?

    Furthermore, the rapid startup of the Russian reactor points to a fuel preprocess that reformats the fuel in a special way so that the initial long startup fuel mechanism is not required again.

    If the Piantelli theory of negative hydrogen ion base reaction is true, how does this ion survive for so long through a extended reactor cool down without losing its negative charge? All the hydrogen should have reformed to its initial H2 default configuration.

    I believe that the hydrogen takes a form that remains reaction active through a cool down for an extended period of time as indicated by the recent Russian experiment. I also believe that the hydrogen negative ion cannot remain reaction active through an extended cool period in the reactor. Ions don't stay ions when cold.

    Piantelli does not use a "secret sauce". Could rapid restart somehow involve the "secret sauce." Is the Piantelli reactor a lot less powerful than the E-Cat? Could the Piantelli reactor show rapid restart also? Is the LENR reaction mechanism different between the Piantelli reactor and the E-Cat?

    ReplyDelete