PARKHOMOV's THIRD PRESENTATION.
The complete presentation is at: https://yadi.sk/i/zTRxBwVofYmaE
THE TEXT
AGP-3
Results of the long-time testing of the
new variant of the analog of thermogenerator of Rossi
By Alexander Georgevich Parkhomov.
The experiments with the devices similar with
Rossi’s thermogenerator- about which I spoke at the previous seminars have shown that the mixtures of
nickel and aluminum hydride heated in a hermetically closed ceramic tube to
temperatures over 1100 C effectively prodice heat, significantly more than the
used energy.
But the working time of these reactor is too
short to produce measurable isotopic changes and also to show that the release
of the excess heat is caused by cold nuclear transmutations.
For achieving longer continuous work durations
we had to change much the construction of the reactor. First of we had to
Renounce to the calorimertry used based on the
measurement of the quantity of evaporated water because it is difficult to ake
all day addition of water.
The construction of the reactor for long time work.
The tube of the reactor
aimed for long time work is 29 cm long and so only its central part is heated.
Due to low thermal conductivity of the ceramic he ends of the tube are not very
warm (at 1200 C in the center the ends
are not warmer that 50C; this allows the use of epoxy adhesive for closing the
tube.
For heating we have used
resistor Х23Ю5Т (Kanthal A1)
That is
working up to 1400 C.
The fuel
mixture (640 mg Ni + 60 mg LiAlH4 is in a container of thin stainless steel.
For displacing the air from the tube we have used ceramic filling/liners.
The
manometer with a limit of measurement of 25 bars is connected with the reacor
with a thin tube of stailess stel.
Reactor during testing
Heating of reactor to working temperature.
Measuring pressure during the heating process
The increase of pressure starts around 100 C.
Maximum pressure of appr 5 bar was
attained at 189C after this pressure starts to fal and at 900C is smaller than
atmospheric. Greatest decrease ( 0.5 bar) at 1150 C then starts to increase
slowly to atmospheric.
Heating reactor to working temperature
The
temperature 0f 1200C at the surface of he working tube was attained in 12 hours
of stepwise increase of power of the electrical heater up to 630W. After this
the power necessary to maintain the temperature of 1200C decreases in 1 hour to
330W
The power of heating during almost 4 days till
the burning out of the heater
For almost 3 days the power necessary to
maintain the temperature of the reactor tube at 1200C was in the limits of
300-400W. Before the burning out, the power started to incresase and at burning
out it was at 600W
The burning out was caused by stepwise
oxidation of the resistor.
Working of the reactor with the new heater
The temperature
of 1200C was maintained with using the power of heater of 500-700W.
The power necessary for maintaining the given
temperature.
At
temperatures over 700 C the reactor with fuel consumes less electrical energy
than that necessary for the reactor with no fuel. This shows the presence of a
heat source besides the electrical heater.
For
heating to the temperature of 1200 C the power necessary for reactor with no
fuel is 1100 W, for reactors with fuel first we need 650W and after an hour
300- 330 W.
From this
we can evaluate that the excess heat is 800W. The thermal coefficient COP is
1100/330= 3.3
But this
is only a rough estimate not considering the differences between processes of
thermo-generation with and without fuel.
When there is no internal heat source, the temperatures outside and inside are the same and the temperature measured with the thermocouple is equal with the tempeaure measured with the temperature of the surface of the heater.
When the reactor works with fuel a thermal flux is started from inside to outside that leads to a temperature gradient. Therefore the temperature measured with the thermocouple is greater than the temperature of the surface of the heater.
At the temperature of 1200C in the proximity of the thermocouple the temperature of the surface of the heater is 1070 C. Thus so the reactor produces only the heat necessary without fuel to heat to 1070C that is 800W and not 1100.
The thermal coefficient is COP= 800/330=2.4.
Container with fuel after extraction of the tube of the reactor. Sided by ceramic inserts.
Fuel after extraction from the container.
Image of the used fuel at optical microscope.
Conclusions.
1. The apparatus worked continuously for more
than 3 days, producing more than twice as much as the applied electrical
energy. 50 kWh or 18MJ were produced in excess of the electrical energy
expended. This amount of energy could be obtained by burning 350g of
petroleum products.
2. The reactor chamber pressure during slow burning was relatively low (in this experiment up to 5 bar)
3. The used fuel had the appearance of soft droplets of golden color mixed with grey powder.
4. The resultant used fuel mixture was sent for analysis of atomic and isotopic composition. But the results, unfortunately, have not yet been received.
2. The reactor chamber pressure during slow burning was relatively low (in this experiment up to 5 bar)
3. The used fuel had the appearance of soft droplets of golden color mixed with grey powder.
4. The resultant used fuel mixture was sent for analysis of atomic and isotopic composition. But the results, unfortunately, have not yet been received.
Thank you Peter for translating this!
ReplyDeletethanks, dear Marc, easy text however I started translating from slides not well visble foe me and induced troubles
ReplyDeleteterea re other Russian language papers to be presented.
peter
thanks, dear Marc, easy text however I started translating from slides not well visble foe me and induced troubles
ReplyDeleteterea re other Russian language papers to be presented.
peter
Thanks a lot Peter for translating this, really appreciated!
ReplyDeleteDear Francesco,
ReplyDeleteTo translate is a hobby for me, in the old bad times I have gained money from translating- in Romanian from English, German, French, Italian, Spanis, Bulgarian- mainly
With this one I had bad luck computer glitch, see the first variant sent..
I hope somebody will combine text and images.
Tanti auguri,
Peter
Peter
Dear Francesco,
ReplyDeleteTo translate is a hobby for me, in the old bad times I have gained money from translating- in Romanian from English, German, French, Italian, Spanis, Bulgarian- mainly
With this one I had bad luck computer glitch, see the first variant sent..
I hope somebody will combine text and images.
Tanti auguri,
Peter
Peter
Many thanks for the translation Peter.
ReplyDeleteBest wishes Pete.
Friendliest greetings to Sue and you! I regret to not be able to come to ICCF-19.
DeletePeter
1) I also think that Peter made great service to our community by translating the new article, and by frequent sharing of what he knows and thinks.
ReplyDelete2) What does one learn by measuring pressure, in the new version of Parkhomov's reactor? Pressure of what? What is the significance of the pressure peak on page 9 ?
“I began meeting poets because I’m a poet. People kept saying I would end up translating poetry and that’s in fact what happened.” Her first experience as a translator was translating her own poetry for publication in magazines in the U.S.
ReplyDeleteWanting to do something for the poets there, Jesse Lee hatched the idea of pairing 23 young Uruguayan poets with 23 American poet translators to create América Invertida: An Anthology of Younger Uruguayan Poets, which is being published by the University of New Mexico Press in the fall.
She also came under the spell of Circe Maia, Uruguay’s most acclaimed poet. "Everyone in Uruguay says she should win the Nobel Prize," Jesse Lee said. Maia, who is 83, lives in a provincial town five hours from the capital. “Like Eudora Welty, she’s very well known among writers, but doesn’t live in the big city. People make the pilgrimage to see her.”
Christian translation services
english to spanish translation
spanish translation
translate english to spanish