I am still confused about the analyses made/not made by Rossi.
He helps/does not help- paradoxical style; nobody has tried to console or help
me and I do not know what to think...
Yesterday in an interview with John McGuire Rossi said:
This report is no doubt very
interesting and we are studying it because, as you probably know, there is a surprising
result regarding the Nickel-62 in particular, and we
are studying it because we are strongly directed, under a theoretical point of
view, to understand these kinds of results that was unexpected.
Today, answering on his blog to Italo R.:
No doubt about the increase of 62Ni, which we found many times, about the entity
measured a strong work is in the making
It seems to be a contradiction here, I dare to think but I
am not sure.
The brightest comment of this day was made at this very
positive and encouraging paper:
LENR-THE PROMISE OF CLEAN AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY Lecture
October 20.
The comment of Christopher Calder:
“There are many exciting players in the race to bring Low Energy
Nuclear Reaction (LENR) to the marketplace. There are also several competing
hot fusion nuclear reactor designs that could be very cost effective and
compact. The main thing is we have to replace fossil fuels and end the
renewable energy fad-fiasco. For details and the BIG PICTURE, please Google *The
Renewable Energy Disaster*. We need solutions that do not cause far more
problems than they solve.”
The last
sentence seems to be general but also an allusion to Rossi and to the Report-
but this is my opinion, not Christopher’s.
I am
still waiting the authors of the Report will answer to the doubts regarding
energy measurement (because I KNOW Rossi’s feline creatures are able to
generate huge quantities of excess energy. I say and sign this, Mary Yugo and
her companions trolls can call me as they wish) The problem of sampling is more difficult,
does a complete analysis exists and is this in harmony with the former analyses
made. I still hope he has told the truth today and not yesterday.
Calder
is right: progress is when the number of the problems decreases and the number
of solutions increases, when each problem is replaced by an other one, as
tricky as the original we have stagnation; when we are overwhelmed by problems
it is
decay – and if always the same old problems hit us- it is probletence.
I will
start a list of Solved Problems in LENR. Can you suggest some examples?
Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment