(I
am old, timid and conformist, this explains “?” in the title)
Sooner or later, that day will come and the present LENR
paradigm will be confronted with the genuine experimental reality.
I think it will be a new surprising, well built but merciless
reality coming from functional devices. Devices with clear, well actionable
parameters, easy to measure and also based on good knowledge regarding initial,
intermediary and final products. My opinion (exposed for now in 53 papers from
the attached list) is that the reality will lead to profound changes- I doubt
even that the field’s name will remain LENR for long after the impact of
reality. If you are a lover of quotes – find some good ones here http://amasci.com/weird/skepquot.html;
anyway a popular mentality is: if reality contradicts me, shame on her! However,
in our case reality will hit very hard.
The present LENR paradigm was built on the PdD wet system
and because this is able to deliver only barely audible, stuttering answers
from Mother Nature, we have only one certainty – LENR exists. A certainty more
than Pliny the Elder had (who’s unique certainty was that nothing is certain) –
the certainty that the phenomenon manifested by excess heat is real. But nobody
knows with certainty what the phenomenon actually is.?
How complex it is, in how many stages it takes place and
in which extent and mode it is nuclear? Because it is nuclear in other forms
than the brutal force hot nuclear fusion- it must be some smart nuclear
ju-jitsu mixed with pre- and post nuclear phenomena.
LENR has already two or three main branches (PdD, NiH and
NiD- but the last one is still not certain, the jury is
still waiting for solid proofs, Dr. Mizuno!) Heat/Helium is valid for PdD- but it
cannot be applied for the more promising NiH systems; my guess is that it is
about different species.
A timely question is if the new Rossi Report around the
next corner will be the great paradigm killer and changer?
A great open question is if the impact of the coming
Rossi
Report No. 2 will help the actual paradigm of LENR or, on
the contrary, the Paradigm will be destroyed, even killed by the newly revealed
facts?
The day when the Second Rossi Report will be published
but this judgment will happen only IF ( a huge IF!) the report will give more
than thermal balance data- i.e. will show important information about what
happens- scientifically- in that HotCat working for long time. I hope it will
be a honest professional, work a sound appeal for radical paradigm change.
There are signs that it can be so: see here: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/09/29/e-cat-report-watch-thread/
the Third Party asked for outside help from important institutions. I commented overly positive to this; nobody
has disagreed with me and that fine. Nobody has agreed either and I cannot
interpret this in any way. My comment:
Asking for help is normal. LENR is too complex a matter to be
let to physicists alone. Plus it needs a bunch of theories, not only one, being
a multi-stage process; a simple reaction is only a very partial explanation. It
is a new world and you will see new concepts born or used, nothing bloody
anomalous just unexpected and new. More surprising than you imagine. Viable,
working LENR+ is considerably more rich, complex and interesting than initial
PdD electrolysis cell.
You, dear readers well know my obsession (sane) for the
priority and dominance of the negative, ergo I think for making a new way you
have to remove the obstacles first – and in this case the old theories are
those that stay in the way of the new understanding. The next step in logic is
to think about the Theory-calipse as part of the fall of the old Paradigm.
However
the situation is different- the many different LENR
theories are not additive they are not reciprocally supportive- on the
contrary: theory is fellow theory’s wolf to paraphrase “homo homini lupus”. The
most interesting fact is that recently a big new theory, a hyper wolf created
by the community’s most reputed, knowledgeable, most advanced scientist who is
a great master of combining and evaluating ALL, I repeat ALL the known
experimental data, Dr. Edmund Storms has sentenced to death all LENR theories,
except his own. Please read the book of
Ed Storms or ask him to send you the Appendix to it, very synthetic- I have no
right to disseminate it.
We can get a rather good vision of the historic events to
come next week (?)- in an epical battle: the beautiful theory of Ed Storms
fighting valiantly for the existent paradigm will encounter the (hopefully) very ugly and
unexpected facts revealed by the Rossi Report No. 2. Facts do not take
prisoners.
You already know that so much depends on the openness and
scientific boldness of the Report. After answering the fundamental question: was massive, long time, highly efficient (COP!!!?) excess
heat demonstrated beyond any rational, irrational and pathologically hostile
doubt? – we will investigate the scientific technological value of this
Opus.
How was managed control? Was the team able to abandon the
Nià
Cu transmutation idea- as main source of heat?
Were the main mechanisms, the principal processes and reactions found?
Was the team independent from the dominating bad memes of physics too? Where is
placed the Report on the 1 to scale of open-mindness?
How many times appear in the report words as ICPMS,
isotopes, “don’t know yet” “not nuclear” “active sites” and many other words
rich in significance? I am preparing. After the analysis of the Report what
will I regret: a) that I have expected too much from it? b) that I was too mild
in criticizing the old Paradigm? c) that I have not understood the Storms theory
because nanocracks and hydrotons etc., will be decisively confirmed by the Report?
Actually I will regret nothing because the victory of
truth is more important than my Ego- my blog Ego Out is built on this
principle. I don’t think that the members of that independent
but courageous team will regret that they have not read
my blog because they could have find, if not answers but creative questions
there. Rossi himself surely does ignore Ego Out because he well knows who my
friends are.
Will the Report be a great surprise? For whom?
Peter
Added later:
[1] COULOMB AND OTHER BARRIERS FOR LENR http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/01/coulomb-and-other-barriers-for-lenr.html
[2] STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES OF LENR AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/02/strategic-principles-of-lenr-and-their.html
[3] SEQUEL TO LENR STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES. THE LIMITS OF A
LENR THEORY http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/02/sequel-to-lenr-strategic-principles.html
[4] Explaining the LENR Pdisaster http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/02/explaining-lenr-pdisaster.html
[5] LENR+ IS NOT A SONG, IT IS AN OPERA! http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/lenr-is-not-asong-it-is-opera-advent-of.html
[6] A MOTTO FOR ICCF-19 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/a-motto-for-iccf-19.html ”Solving the
useful heat source problem.”
[7] Early History of Cold Fusion, Three Miracles and Three
Marks. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/early-history-of-cold-fusion-three.html
[8] 24 YEARS OF HEROIC HISTORY, MANY YEARS OF GLORIOUS
FUTURE http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/24-years-of-heroic-history-many-years.html
[9] THE ROOT OF THE LENR PROBLEM and THE STEM OF THE
SOLUTION. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/the-root-of-lenr-problem-and-stem-of.html
[10] Rethinking (continuously) and understanding (deeply)
LENR+- just a new episode. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/04/rethinking-continuously-and.html
[11] SCIENCE OR ENGINEERING? SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING! http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/04/science-or-engineering-science-and.html
[12] ACTIVE SITES AND N.A.E http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/05/active-sites-and-nae.html
[13] A SERIOUS SITE RAISES THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEM http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/a-serious-site-raises-most-serious.html
[14] LENR AND SCIENTISM. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/lenr-and-scientism.html
[15] SCIENTISM-1, GLUCK-0; the first half. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/scientism-1-gluck-0-first-half.html
[16] HOW LENR TECHNOLOGY FIRST? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/how-lenr-technology-first.html
[17] NUCLEAR HAMBURGER? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/nuclear-hamburger.html
[18] RE-THINKING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/re-thinking-scientific-method.html
[19] LENR- VERY NECESSARY CHANGES http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/lenr-very-necessary-changes.html
[20] WHY Pd-D LENR WILL NEVER WORK
COMMERCIALLY: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/why-pd-d-lenr-will-never-work.html
[21] SOME REASONS WHY LENR N.A.E. CANNOT BE CRACKS. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/some-reasons-why-lenr-nae-cannot-be.html
[22] CONTINUING TO CRACK THE ‘CRACK
IS N.A.E.’ THEORY:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/continuing-to-crack-crack-is-nae-theory.html
[23] IDEAS AND MODES OF THINKING FOR SOLVING THE LENR
PROBLEM. I. THINKING IN BLACK AND WHITE. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/ideas-and-modes-of-thinking-for-solving.html
[24] IDEAS AND MODES OF THINKING FOR SOLVING THE LENR
PROBLEM. II ABOUT REALITY DENIAL http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/ideas-and-modes-of-thinking-for-solving_30.html
[25] EVERYTHING I KNEW ABOUT COLD FUSION WAS
WRONG http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/09/everything-i-knew-about-cold-fusion-was.html
26] Active sites vs. NAE, is there a
priority? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/active-sites-vs-nae-is-there-priority_1.html
[27] HOW “COLD FUSION” FITS IN MY GRAND VISION OF
EXISTENCE..AND A MIRACLE. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/how-cold-fusion-fits-in-my-grand-vision.html
[28] MY DIAGNOSIS FOR THE ILLNESS OF COLD FUSION http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/11/my-diagnosis-for-illness-of-cold-fusion.html
[29] COLD FUSION NEEDS A NEW PARADIGM NOW. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/11/cold-fusion-needs-new-paradigm-now.html
[30] COLD FUSION, WHAT NOW? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/12/cold-fusion-what-now.html
[31] ENGINEERING IS THE WAY TO MAKE LENR USEFUL. (First
part) http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/01/engineering-is-way-to-make-lenr-useful.html
it is about reproducibility
[32] WHY COMPLEXITY IS SO SIMILAR TO CHOLESTEROL? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/01/why-complexity-is-so-similar-to.html it is about complexity
[33] HOW LONG WILL COLD FUSION’S 25 YEARS WAR
LAST? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/03/how-long-will-cold-fusions-25years-war.html
it is about MIT 25 Anniv
[34] WHAT WOULD THEY SAY TODAY? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/05/what-would-they-say-today.html
it is about rhetoric discontent
[35] THE VUCA WORLD OF LENR, HOW LONG IT WILL
LAST? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/the-vuca-world-of-lenr-how-long-it-will.html it is about VUCA weaknesses
[36] PAST (COLD FUSION) VERSUS FUTURE (HENI) IN LENR.
(PRESENT) http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/past-cold-fusion-versus-future-heni-in.html
it say the future very ifferent from the past
[37] LENR- THEORIES OR PRINCIPLES? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/lenr-theories-or-principles.html
it is about the important principles technological principles better than
theories, critique of Staorm’s theory
[38] ABOUT SLOW PROGRESS AND CRAZY
PREDICTIONS. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/about-slow-progress-and-crazy.html
it is a bout slow progress and it give my Why Technology first?
[41]
THE CASE OF
THE WHISPERING AND STUTTERING OPERA SINGER (LENR Miniature)
[42] THINKING ABOUT LENR AND THE DIKW SCALE. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/thinking-about-lenr-and-dikw-scale.html
[43] ABOUT ANTS AND LENR utpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/about-ants-and-lenr.html
[44] ROSSI’S GREAT REPORT- ON THE DIKW SCALE http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/rossis-great-report-on-dikw-scale.html
[45] THE TRUE LENR EXPERTS http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/the-true-lenr-experts.html
[46] WHAT IF LENR GETS BIG MONEY? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/what-if-lenr-gets-big-money-internet-is.html
[47] WHY I MUST WRITE A BOOK ABOUT UEHMDI? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/why-i-must-write-book-about-uehmdi.html
[48] ARISTOTELES,
TWO TIMES. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/aristoteles-two-times_15.html
[49] LENR AND THE TROUBLES WITH THE 21st CENTURY http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/lenr-and-troubles-with-21st-century.html
[50] A
CONTRIBUTION TO THE HEAT/HELIUM DISCUSSION http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/a-contribution-to-heathelium-discussion.html
[51] THE DEATH OF WET PdD WAS HIGHLY EXAGGERATED. OR NOT? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/the-death-of-wet-pdd-was-highly.html
[52] NEW LENR TAXONOMY. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/new-lenr-taxonomy.html
[53] LENR NEEDS ACTIONABLE PARAMETERS http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/lenr-needs-actionable-parameters.html
Added later:
LIST OF NEW PARADIGM OF
LENR PAPERS PUBLISHED IN 2013-4.
[1] COULOMB AND OTHER BARRIERS FOR LENR http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/01/coulomb-and-other-barriers-for-lenr.html
[2] STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES OF LENR AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/02/strategic-principles-of-lenr-and-their.html
[3] SEQUEL TO LENR STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES. THE LIMITS OF A
LENR THEORY http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/02/sequel-to-lenr-strategic-principles.html
[4] Explaining the LENR Pdisaster http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/02/explaining-lenr-pdisaster.html
[5] LENR+ IS NOT A SONG, IT IS AN OPERA! http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/lenr-is-not-asong-it-is-opera-advent-of.html
[6] A MOTTO FOR ICCF-19 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/a-motto-for-iccf-19.html ”Solving the
useful heat source problem.”
[7] Early History of Cold Fusion, Three Miracles and Three
Marks. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/early-history-of-cold-fusion-three.html
[8] 24 YEARS OF HEROIC HISTORY, MANY YEARS OF GLORIOUS
FUTURE http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/24-years-of-heroic-history-many-years.html
[9] THE ROOT OF THE LENR PROBLEM and THE STEM OF THE
SOLUTION. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/03/the-root-of-lenr-problem-and-stem-of.html
[10] Rethinking (continuously) and understanding (deeply)
LENR+- just a new episode. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/04/rethinking-continuously-and.html
[11] SCIENCE OR ENGINEERING? SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING! http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/04/science-or-engineering-science-and.html
[12] ACTIVE SITES AND N.A.E http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/05/active-sites-and-nae.html
[13] A SERIOUS SITE RAISES THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEM http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/a-serious-site-raises-most-serious.html
[14] LENR AND SCIENTISM. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/lenr-and-scientism.html
[15] SCIENTISM-1, GLUCK-0; the first half. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/scientism-1-gluck-0-first-half.html
[16] HOW LENR TECHNOLOGY FIRST? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/how-lenr-technology-first.html
[17] NUCLEAR HAMBURGER? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/nuclear-hamburger.html
[18] RE-THINKING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/re-thinking-scientific-method.html
[19] LENR- VERY NECESSARY CHANGES http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/lenr-very-necessary-changes.html
[20] WHY Pd-D LENR WILL NEVER WORK
COMMERCIALLY: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/why-pd-d-lenr-will-never-work.html
[21] SOME REASONS WHY LENR N.A.E. CANNOT BE CRACKS. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/some-reasons-why-lenr-nae-cannot-be.html
[22] CONTINUING TO CRACK THE ‘CRACK
IS N.A.E.’ THEORY:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/continuing-to-crack-crack-is-nae-theory.html
[23] IDEAS AND MODES OF THINKING FOR SOLVING THE LENR
PROBLEM. I. THINKING IN BLACK AND WHITE. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/ideas-and-modes-of-thinking-for-solving.html
[24] IDEAS AND MODES OF THINKING FOR SOLVING THE LENR
PROBLEM. II ABOUT REALITY DENIAL http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/ideas-and-modes-of-thinking-for-solving_30.html
[25] EVERYTHING I KNEW ABOUT COLD FUSION WAS
WRONG http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/09/everything-i-knew-about-cold-fusion-was.html
26] Active sites vs. NAE, is there a
priority? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/active-sites-vs-nae-is-there-priority_1.html
[27] HOW “COLD FUSION” FITS IN MY GRAND VISION OF
EXISTENCE..AND A MIRACLE. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/how-cold-fusion-fits-in-my-grand-vision.html
[28] MY DIAGNOSIS FOR THE ILLNESS OF COLD FUSION http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/11/my-diagnosis-for-illness-of-cold-fusion.html
[29] COLD FUSION NEEDS A NEW PARADIGM NOW. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/11/cold-fusion-needs-new-paradigm-now.html
[30] COLD FUSION, WHAT NOW? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/12/cold-fusion-what-now.html
[31] ENGINEERING IS THE WAY TO MAKE LENR USEFUL. (First
part) http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/01/engineering-is-way-to-make-lenr-useful.html
it is about reproducibility
[32] WHY COMPLEXITY IS SO SIMILAR TO CHOLESTEROL? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/01/why-complexity-is-so-similar-to.html it is about complexity
[33] HOW LONG WILL COLD FUSION’S 25 YEARS WAR
LAST? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/03/how-long-will-cold-fusions-25years-war.html
it is about MIT 25 Anniv
[34] WHAT WOULD THEY SAY TODAY? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/05/what-would-they-say-today.html
it is about rhetoric discontent
[35] THE VUCA WORLD OF LENR, HOW LONG IT WILL
LAST? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/the-vuca-world-of-lenr-how-long-it-will.html it is about VUCA weaknesses
[36] PAST (COLD FUSION) VERSUS FUTURE (HENI) IN LENR.
(PRESENT) http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/past-cold-fusion-versus-future-heni-in.html
it say the future very ifferent from the past
[37] LENR- THEORIES OR PRINCIPLES? http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/lenr-theories-or-principles.html
it is about the important principles technological principles better than
theories, critique of Staorm’s theory
[38] ABOUT SLOW PROGRESS AND CRAZY
PREDICTIONS. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/about-slow-progress-and-crazy.html
it is a bout slow progress and it give my Why Technology first?
[39] LENR WANTS TO GROW UP
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/lenr-wants-to-grow-up.html
it is about probletence in the field.
[40] LENR’S FUTURE MATTERS MORE
THAN ITS PAST
Will this third party test be honest and all revealing? Will the independent testers keep the reasons why they have tested the Hot-Cat system in a particular way secret as per some initial understanding with Rossi to keep confidential the design and theory that underpins the Hot-Cat.
ReplyDeleteIn particular, during this second third party test (TPT), I predict that the Hot-Cat will generate a huge amount of Radio frequency (RF) radiation. This very large amount of RF will by its fundamental nature have imposed a major impediment in testing. People who test a system that produces a large amount of RF radiation are operating in a highly disorderly testing environment.
To compensate, the testers would have needed to avoid the disruptions and inherent inaccuracies imposed on the monitoring electronics and sensors that such a radiating system imposes on the testing equipment.
I believe that this huge RF radiation environment forced the use of a remote temperature camera in the first TPT test. This gigantic RF production will be a major clue as to how the E-Cat works.
Will the testers keep the reasons why they are compensating for the RF interference a secret as required by an initial pretest confidentiality agreement with Rossi. This emanation of a large RF signature from the Hot-Cat will be an unambiguous clue to how the Hot-Cat works.
If the TPT is scientifically honest, I expect to see a chart that depicts the RF emanations from the Hot-Cat as a function of power output. This would be similar to a gamma radiation chart vs. power output.
If the TPT is scientifically honest, the inner workings of the Hot-Cat will be easy to see from the data provided. If the past is prolog, from what was publicized in the first TPT, there will be a careful screening of the test data that is revealed publically in this second TPT to keep the inner workings of the Hot-Cat opaque.
The report has been published.
ReplyDelete