Friday, March 31, 2017



The question is indeed,
Is it honesty or greed 
That drives Industrial Heat
If it were honesty, then why need
Their opposers the beat
And their unfounded treat?
So Peter, I agree indeed
That Industrial Heat
Is driven by the greed!  (Marc Ellenbroek) 

Thanks, dear Marc and let's hope LENR Technology will not be swallowed!


a) Good news for PdD

With the help of Sergey Tsvetkov (thanks, friend!) I succeed to get in touch with the Russian LENR researcher Vitallii Alexeevich Kirkinskii (see in Ego Out)  who is well known for his achievements in the study of the gas-phase high temperature  Pd-D system. I want to facilitate an open discussions and - why not! collaboration between Vitalii and our other colleagues who are trying to develop the original cold fusion system. Perhaps the theorist will be also inspired by high temperature (600 C)  PdD,
Let's see.

b) First answer to the idea of IH-ically correct  FAQ re Rossi vs  Darden litigation

The answer comes from the middle Pillar of the DeJAvu enclave the one obsessed with the half full pipes. Actually he gives answers for other cases to how all in the same spirit.

Q: Did the one-year test produce significant excess heat?
A: No, and even if it had the instrumentation was so poor it would be impossible to confirm that.
Tomorrow it will be an ideal day to discuss these ideas.


1) From the Miami Court Pacermonitor  re the rossi vs Darden litigation

Thursday, March 30, 2017
233 respm Response in Opposition to Motion Thu 4:51 PM 
RESPONSE in Opposition re197 MOTION to Exclude The Opinions and Testimony of Dr. K. Wong filed by Leonardo Corporation, Andrea Rossi. Replies due by 4/6/2017.(Annesser, John)
Att: 1  Exhibit A,
Att: 2  Exhibit B,
Att: 3  Exhibit C,
Att: 4  Exhibit D,
Att: 5  Exhibit E

You can see them here:

2) COLDFUSIONCONNECTION- Latest feeds by Doktor Bob

3) E-Catalyzer/Andrea Rossi- the litigation with Industrial Heat has be eneded towards the end of month July (in Italian)

4) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

March 30, 2017 at 11:23 AM

Dear Andrea:
Let me resume in an abstract the essence of the litigation:
You made 1 year of test to validate the E-Cat and got a COP indisputably good measured by a nuclear engineer chosen as the ERV by both parties, and this is a fact. IH has cashed 50 millions from Woodford and 200 millions from the Chinese Government thanks to the visits of their experts to your plant, while you were working like a beast during the nights to make the E-Cat perform well, and they also used Jim Bass of JM to get good references during the visits of their British and Chinese investors. Until then, IH did not make a single complaint of all the ones they are making now, correct? At the end of the test, when they had to pay you, they said the test was a fraud, but maintained possession of all the money they collected thanks to you during the test. Eventually, to make happy and fool their investors, (unless the same investors are in bed with IH making a more deep financial fraud) they bought with a ridiculous amount of real cash and a lot of toilet paper (shares of the empty boxes of Cherokee) a bunch of a tenth or two of fake companies, that have fake intellectual properties made by revoked patents, patent applications that will never be allowed, useless patents that have never produced anything useful and other things of the sort.
Is this all true?


Andrea Rossi
March 30, 2017 at 1:56 PM

I cannot comment issues related to the litigation on course,
Warm Regards,

March 31, 2017 at 2:57 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi,
A litigation like the one on course between you and IH how much costs in the USA: in the range of:
1- five zeroes?
2- six zeroes?
3- seven zeroes?
Andrea Rossi
March 31, 2017 at 7:47 AM

Six zeroes.
Warm Regards,
Benjamin Cascone
March 31, 2017 at 3:06 AM

Dr A.R.:
All the puppets of the ventriloquist of Raleigh that slander you in some blogs are officially partners (employees or consultants) paid by IH, did you know this? They publicly declared, without disclosing they are paid by IH, that their goal is to bias negatively against you the Court by means of the blogs.
Andrea Rossi
March 31, 2017 at 7:44 AM

Benjamin Cascone:
No comment.
We treat the issues related to the litigation only in Court.
Warm Regards,


1) Thanks to Dieter Britz
Steven C. Hamm, , David L. Knies, Olga Dmitriyeva, Richard Cantwell, Matt McConnell
Optimal Surface Doping of Lead for Increased Electrochemical Insertion of Hydrogen into Palladium
Electrochimica Acta Volume 233,  Pages 71–77

2) Thanks to Sam North for this Hot Fusion ITER-Info
A Dream of Clean Energy at a Very High Price 

Two papers for a better, more modern understanding of Evolution

3) Unified theory of Evolution

4) Here's Why Evolution Can Be "Survival of the Friendliest"

5) BOOK 


  1. Comment from Lenr forum

    LENR Calender
    5 hours ago
    As an aside: it looks to me that so far IH has been flinging a lot of poo at the wall trying to see if something sticks. I think that rather than engaging consultants that enable them in those ideas (remember 100.1C, the DN40 pipes, etc), and instead of denigrating "planet Rossi", they should have instead hired someone from planet Rossi to try and debunk the IH arguments.

    Someone like IHFB is I admit a bit biased, but when IH comes up with an unconvincing argument, he sees right through it and asks that more digging be done.

    IH has some good reasons to be concerned about the 1MW e-cat test results. However, I think they should have put forward the stuff that is obviously wrong rather than the stuff they don't understand. More digging should have been done on the latter. Maybe that's what Dewey was doing on the forum. In that case, he could have been more friendly to "planet Rossi", who are just people who are also trying to find the truth, but just have a different way of thinking.

  2. Thanks dear Sam,
    you ae right this is wise note-to be used in theeditorisa=al.

  3. Link to comments on Lenr forum about
    MFMP and Suhas.

    1. The term 'Planet Rossi" is apt. How can anyone support him when he refusednto let IH observe where and how the heat was being used on the other side of the locked door?

      You have to be from another planet to explain this.

      These extraterestrial explanations have a common theme. Namely, forces are trying to steal and then supress is technology.

      I in turn, will be vilified forbeing uncharitable to the multi-convicted con man from Milan.

      "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 17 times, shame on the planet Rossi inhabitants."


    3. Brian,
      I'm sorry, but what the heat was being used for is irrelevant to the guaranteed performance test, especially if the party using it does not want to reveal this. This has nothing to do with being from another planet. I certainly agree that Rossi needs to prove that he satisfied the GPT, although to me this is a detail compared to the need to prove that his current QuarkX technology works. If he is unable to show that the COP on the GPT was distinctly larger than 1, then this certainly does raise doubts about his technology. However, this is in my opinion exclusively an IH problem. Also, given that as of now we do not have any consistently reproducible, publicly demonstrated and publicly reproducible LENR technology with significant power output (100's of watts or more) and COP (greater than say 2) even with the multitude of researchers who receive support from IH, makes me wonder if IH is more interested in tying up and/or delaying LENR for maximum profit. Certainly, the legal complexities of IH's shell companies and investments, as well as the troll-like behavior of some of their investors (e.g. Dewey Weaver) seem to support this.

      In any case, a "unipolar" world in which only IH controls all of the IP related to LENR is not a good idea. On the other hand there appear to be a number of independent researchers NOT supported by IH who appear to be having significant success in following Rossi's path. I look forward to the day when these efforts are rewarded by replicable, high-power (100 W or more), high COP (COP > 2) results.