Tuesday, June 14, 2016

JUNE 14, 2016 QUARK X THE LITTLE LIGHTHOUSE OF LENR'S FUTURE

MOTTO

“Man must behave like a lighthouse; he must shine day and night for the goodness of everyman.” ( Mehmet Murat ildan)

“A lighthouse is not interested in who gets its light! It just gives it without thinking! Giving light is its nature!” (Mehmet Murat ildan)



DAIlY NOTES

a) About the QUARK-X


 on ECAT News
http://ecat.com/news/ecat-quark-x-preliminary-report-findings
The first very preliminary report, very unexpected and surprising device, unique approach, three forms of excess energy, wonderful light of the Lighthouse of the LENR future.

The Report is here:


Report Disclaimer:
THIS IS NOT A THIRD PARTY REPORT AND ALL THE MEASUREMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE BY ANDREA ROSSI AND HIS TEAM. THEREFORE THESE RESULTS CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AT ANY EFFECT OTHER THAN AN INTERNAL PROCESS CONTROL, NOTHING MORE. 

DESCRIPTION OF THE QUARK X:
Cylinder made with proper material:
  • Dimensions:
    • length 30 mm  
    • diam  1 mm
  • Energy produced: 100 Wh/h
  • Energy consumed: 0.5 Wh/h
  • Light produced (percentage of the energy produced): 0-50%
  • Electric energy produced: 0-10%
  • Heat produced: 0- 100%
Light, energy and heat can be modulated to modulate the percentages within the limits above listed, provided the combined percentages must total 100%.
Extremely interesting is the blue light, the analysis of which has resolved theoretical problems related to the roots of the effect.
Temperature on the surface of the QuarkX: more than 1,500*CNote: 2 other QuarkX put in analogous situation gave the same results.
Further disclaimer:
THIS IS NOT A THIRD PARTY REPORT. IT IS AN INTERNAL REPORT RELATED TO MEASURES MADE BY LEONARDO CORPORATION
End of the report.
Description of the photo:
Photo of the heat exchanger pipe that contains the QuarkX: the light spot is through a light eye holed in the pipe. The blue halo from the hole has been analyzed and has made possible to understand the theoretical roots of the effect: the QuarkX is inside the pipe .
NOTE: THE PHOTO HAS BEEN MANIPULATED TO FORBID HIGH DEFINITION. The colors have been partially obscured. The light is much more intense.
Rational discussions have already started here:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/06/14/report-on-preliminary-findings-from-e-cat-quarkx-testing-posted-on-ecat-com/

b) To puts limits on the argle-bargle especially with geniuses.


This http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-12-2016-no-synthesis-paralysis-in.html#comment-form thread of discussions was nasty, ineffective and absolutely useless. But it will be of some good use because it eill lead to the abandonment of the impossible discussions.

I have tried to discuss calmly with Jed Rothwell about the essential aspects of the Rossi-IH dispute  In parallel so had tried Robert Dorr. This morning, Robert has stated: " Peter, you and I are speaking to a wall." Yes dear Robert but it is naot a stone or brick wall but one painted with a thick, sticky and smelly layer of a mixtura miserabilis composed of arrogance, omniscience, inerrancy, megalomania, rudeness, infallibility, negative adjectives, possession of privileged info ways...
.
An example, if Dorr says that Mats Lewan understands some data differently than jed, the answer comes as a lightning: "If Mats has seen the data, and he concludes the test was valid, he is an idiot."
Re the ERV and Rossi, Jed declares serenely: "Yes, evidently I am smarter than them. So are the experts from I.H." He adds "You have seen Rossi's previous tests. You know that he made sloppy, terrible mistakes" OK, some of these tests have convinced  IH to start their 3 years collaboration with Rossi.  
Jed obsessively repeats that he is not lying- that is he says things that he thinks, knows they are not true. I have never accused him of lying, the situations is simpler and worse- he errs systematically, misjudges the situations or data, and inflates his ideas - knowing he is genius compared to his xxxx (censored!) opponents he wants very strongly to impose his ideas by any-verbal- means. 
My most disturbing problem with him is that I am trying in vain to explain him that what he and Dewy is doing- i.e. dwarfing, destroying, annihilating the 1MW test, demonstrating that it was a complete failure from the first second o the last and in all time between- is not exactly in the favor of Industrial Heat that has happily used the Test/Plant to get investors and had made a strategic blunder not stopping the failed test and fast-divorcing from Rossi who owns a contract that stipulates- Test good, IH pays 94 millions. The Trial could be anticipated- Rossi considered and does so now- the Test was a success. If the test is a fraud- a reason more for IH to get rid of this "collaborator" early.
Jed says: "What you say makes no business sense. Letting Rossi continue was was a good strategy. It was not a bit suicidal. Rossi had the equipment and the lab set up. It did not cost I.H. extra money to let him continue to try. It did no harm to them.

It did harm. Allowing a fatal error, total fiasco (or infamous scam?) to happen, putting yourself at the risk of an expensive trial is clearly self-destructive.

I see the dialogue here with Jed is impossible, discussing with a genius is not contagious in any way, so I will focus on other subjects, things of more use. Sorry Jed! You have done good things for classic LENR but LENR+ is not for you and vice-versa.

DAILY NEWS

1)  Edmund Storms publishes improved variant of his theory paper; 


How basic behavior of LENR can guide a search for an explanation 

http://lenrexplained.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Expanded-explanation-revised.pdf Edmund Storms LENRGY, LLC Santa Fe, NM, 87501 (4/2/16) 
ABSTRACT 

The LENR effect was identified 27 years ago by Profs. Fleischmann and Pons as production of extra energy in a normal chemical structure, in this case PdD. Over a thousand published papers now support the discovery and the energy is shown to result from fusion of hydrogen isotopes without the need to apply energy and without energetic radiation being produced. By conventional standards, the claims are impossible. Nevertheless, a new phenomenon has been discovered requiring acceptance and understanding. The major behaviors and their present understanding are described in this paper and are used to suggest how an effective explanation might be constructed. Once again, science has been forced to either reject the obvious or accept the impossible. In this case, the normal skepticism needs to be ignored in order to determine if this promised energy source is real and can provide the ideal energy so critically needed.




2) Seminar Cold Nuclear Fusion and Ball Lightnings at PFUR takes place Thursday une, 16, 2016 at 16.00

http://lenr.seplm.ru/seminary/seminar-kholodnyi-yadernyi-sintez-i-sharovaya-molniya-v-rudn-sostoitsya-v-chetverg-16-iyunya-2016-g-v-1600

Program of the day:
1. 16.00 – 16.20 , AI Laptuhov (IZMIRAN, Troitsk), "On the absence of CNF, radiation and Erzion in LENR processes"
2. 16.20 - 17.00 S. Godin, VIESH, "Observation of excess heat in the hydrogenated metals and plasmas"
3. 17.00 - 17.10 Distribution and sale of out-of-print collection of 2015 works 
of the All Russian CNF BL Conference 22 . 2015
4. 17.10 – 17.30 Meeting of the Redaction Committee
3) Mad Dog” Fred Zoepfl of the ECN Troll Dungeon plans To Visit Swedish Embassy to Discuss Lithium!http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/mad-dog-fred-zoepfl-of-the-ecn-troll-dungeon-plans-to-viFsit-swedish-embassy-to-discuss-lithium/
4) LENR for Dummies — A Beginner’s Guide to Cold Fusion Research (LookingForHeat.com Video)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/06/13/lenr-for-dummies-a-beginners-guide-to-cold-fusion-research-lookingforheat-com-video/
5) Andrea Rossi
June 13, 2016 at 10:03 PM

Wayne:
No. The results are the output of measurements made by me, but reality cannot depend on a subjective act. I honestly made my measurements together with my team and our Pertner, we celebrated, but we know pretty well that there are still shortcomings. The sole real validation will be made by the Customers when and if the QuarkX will hit massively the market. Now we must operate along two directions:
1- consolidate the reliability of the results and the product
2- organize a massive production
Warm Regards,
A.R.

6) Benefits and challenges of urbanization and low carbon energy needs in India
LENR mentioned as a possibility

LENR IN CONTEXT-1


Light-matter interplay probed: Physicists achieve quantum Hall state with light
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160613144700.htm
LENR IN CONTEXT-2


6 Key Ways Design Thinkers Approach Problems

10 comments:

  1. WE CELABRATED.
    That's what I like to hear

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would that be celebrate or calibrate? If it is a calibration, it is a first for Rossi, and reason to celebrate.

      Delete
    2. Celebrate Calibrate, Dance To the music.

      Delete
  2. Brian Ahern, Physicist and Rossi denyer.June 14, 2016 at 6:12 PM

    A message to all Rossi Taliban. The filament that is 1mm in diameter and has 0.5 wats of input will glow at a temperature of 1500C. Welcome to the Stefan-Boltzmann equation.

    There is no magic along these lines since Edison.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The blue like might be similar to the light that is produced by Sonoluminescence. In this process, recent experiments conducted by the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign indicate temperatures around 20,000 K (19,700 °C; 35,500 °F).

      Maybe the Quark reactor is not a black body but use the same processes that are at work in Sonoluminescence.

      Delete
    2. The blue like might be similar to the light that is produced by Sonoluminescence. In this process, recent experiments conducted by the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign indicate temperatures around 20,000 K (19,700 °C; 35,500 °F).

      Maybe the Quark reactor is not a black body but use the same processes that are at work in Sonoluminescence.

      Delete
    3. The Stefan-Boltzmann equation states that the total power P radiated is equal to the area A multiplied by the emissivity epsilon multiplied by the Stefan-Boltzmann constant 5.67e-8 W/m^2 K^4 multiplied by T^4 where T is the temperature in Kelvin. Assuming for simplicity epsilon = 1, T = 1773 K, A = pi*0.001 m * 0.03 m, I obtain P = 53 W which is 100 times the input power of 0.5 W for a COP of 100. Does pointing this out make me a member of the "Rossi Taliban"?

      Delete
    4. As has also been pointed out on "www.e-catworld.com", it is likely that, given the small size of the filament, a non-negligible amount of additional heat is being lost through heat conduction through the leads or to the surroundings.

      Delete
  3. the anonymus Taliban calculated with and area off by a lot Area + piR*2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian,
      I'm the "anonymous" who posted an estimate of the power radiated using the Stefan-Boltzmann equation. I'm not sure I understand your comment, but let me break-down my reasoning regarding my calculation of the area. Ignoring the end-pieces (which would only increase the total area) the area of a cylinder is equal to the circumference (pi*d where d is the diameter) times the height of the cylinder h. Here d = 1 mm or 0.001 m and h = 30 mm or 0.03 m so A = pi*d*h = 3.14*.001 m*.03 m = 9.43 e-5 m^2. If I multiply this by the Stefan-Boltzmann constant 5.67e-8 W/m^2-K^4 and again by (1773 K)^4 (since 1500 C = 1773 K) I obtain 53 W.

      Delete