Monday, April 25, 2016

APR 25, 2016 LENR- SURVEY COMMENT INFO

MOTTO

Image result for oppression quotesImage result for oppression quotes


Thanks Fatum inside LENR an oppressed field per se, there is no traces of oppression!

DAILY NOTES

The results of Patrick Ellul's Survey are here
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aSOKJ_vr6XEDgj17cq10w_qqH1CdoLTIe3sXK8qIBYU/edit#gid=1861419

Grand total
it  probably/possibly works- before the Trial-                   86%
                                          after announcing the Trial         79.7 






b) Brian Ahern explains what Rossi does
 (I have promised to give here any LENR relted opinion in order to help a more equilibrated situation)

At first I was surprised at the continuing support for Rossi in spite of the lack of independent testing. The psychology is becoming clear and it is resistant to alteration.
CONSPIRACT MENTALITY


Most backers believe that an international cabal has vested interests to see Rossi fail. He supports this perspective in that it buoys his support. There are sufficient numbers of conspiratory adherents to keep him alive and well for the foreseeable future.

Anyone who falls prey to the conspiratorial fantasy can follow the Rossi caravan into oblivion while real LENR research tries to recover.


Just two question for Brian:
- how he defines "genuine LENR research"? and
- how this tries- more exactly- to recover?

I am still studying Edmund Storms' paper... 42 pages and high density of facts ideas


DAILY NEWS

Mats Lewan Receives an Electric Bill for 1MW Test Customer
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/24/mats-lewan-receives-an-electric-bill-for-1mw-test-customer/
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/04/20/lets-join-forces-to-bring-out-the-truth-on-rossi-ih-affair/

A Stellar Electric Bill for the Mysterious ‘JM’ (Hank Mills)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/24/a-stellar-electric-bill-for-the-mysterious-jm-hank-mills/
Details of Rossi’s Suit against Industrial Heat Available
http://coldfusion3.com/blog/details-of-rossi%E2%80%99s-suit-against-industrial-heat-available

John Dash – A Suppressed Video Resurfaces


In Romanian - free energy technologies in 2015, trends 2016 LENR many times:
http://www.dzr.org.ro/tehnologii-de-energie-libera-rezultate-ale-anului-2015-tendinte-pentru-2016/


AXIL SAYS


There is a class of experiments that show all aspects of LENR activity without the formation of a NAE.

Laser excitation of gold nanoparticles in a salt solution of heavy elements produce LENR in all its range of functionality. This shows that Surface Plasmon Polaritons are causative in LENR.

The transformation of LASER light into monopole magnetism is what SPPs do. This class of experiments boil LENR down to the most basic factors which remove the NAE as an essential in LENR.

The formation of metalized hydrides produce an amplification effect that supports the Bose condensation of SPPs to support high energy LENR production(LENR+)

The other LENR mechanism is the SmCo5 magnet which has the magic hexagonal crystal structure of active LENR promoters like metalize hydrogen. The Sm rare earth configures the Co atoms to take on the hexagonal configuration which directs all the magnetic spins along the Z axis.

IMHO, it is the crystal structure of the material that makes a molecule LENR active, That structure and placement of the atoms in the crystal formats the spin of the material to project forward anisotropy to concentrate and organize the spin in a concentrated direction...forward.SmCo is an anisotropic magnetic material. The magnetic beam energy is concentrated in a preferred direction.

Calculation of magnetic anisotropy energy in SmCo5

arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0303368.pdf 

LENR IN CONTEXT-2

A fine miniature by Tanmay Vora
http://qaspire.com/2016/04/25/organization-culture-is-a-reflection/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Qaspire+%28QAspire%29

Sunday, April 24, 2016

APR 24, 2016 LENR GREAT PAPER BY ED STORMS, SMALLER QUARREL, A BIT OF INFO

MOTTO

Once again, science has been forced to either reject the obvious or accept the impossible (Ed Storms) 

DAILY NOTES

Defending the rather schizophrenic structure of my blog

that is divided in NOTES and INFO written with two different brain hemispheres;
not a big deal 'cause i am a bisinisencephalian...

The most important part of my blog is DAILY NEWS- my self assumed duty is here to provide the readers fast with all the information re LENR or correlated in a way to it. I get information from friends and forums, however I have to search the Web many hours daily- it is a relative scarcity of information, many echo-papers or obsolete ones presented as new. Plus many traps- poisoned sites.
I do NOT make any quality or  authenticity/falsity analysis and I have published everything LENR related, including messages asking- en passant- my execution as you well know. Yesterday I have published a message coming from Sifferkoll and asking if they were hacked by Dewey Weaver- who is an ally of IH and a enemy of Andrea Rossi. A problem to be settled directly between the parts but more voices have advised me to remove that link for the sake of the good reputation of my blog.  
Nobody has asked me to cut the message asking for the removal of Ed Storms and me from LENR. One of my favorite sayings is:'Do not give me advices I can err by myself too" (Pitigrilli) "
For me it is more important to offer complete information, the readers and history will select anyway. So at this part of the blog, I am  interested in everything LENR. Please help me and send information that is not easily accessible.

Re the Sifferkoll info re hacking:
 Dewey Weaver who is on a closed LENR forum with me, states that actually the site was not hacked but an event was used to attack him unjustly.
It is extremely regrettable that LENR is in a state of war but this will not last much I hope and then the winner will write the history, as usual. The tragic aspect is that this time it is about the survival of LENR as technology.

However DAILY  NOTES is different it is me, my unpopular but stubborn LENR ideas here I enjoy censoring, maneuvering, convincing dominating, ruling. Not today it is Sunday and I am tired.
For tomorrow on the positive site I have to discuss about Ed Storms' great paper - see it below and on the other side to prepare some checkmating answers to those who dare to think differently than me. (actually the reverse is true) 

DAILY NEWS

1) Edmund Storms great paper:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BQzdKUFdWdjBGX0dsczMzT3FBZ3ZsT19Sa1FB/view?usp=sharing
How basic behavior of LENR can guide a search for an explanation 

Edmund Storms LENRGY, LLC Santa Fe, NM, 87501 (4/2/16) 

ABSTRACT 
The LENR effect was identified 27 years ago by Profs. Fleischmann and Pons as production of extra energy by a normal chemical structure, in this case PdD. Over a thousand published papers now support the discovery and the energy is shown to result from fusion of hydrogen isotopes without the need to apply energy and without energetic radiation being produced. By conventional standards, the claims are impossible. Nevertheless, a new phenomenon has been discovered requiring acceptance and understanding. The major behaviors and their present understanding are described in this paper and are used to suggest how an effective explanation might be constructed. Once again, science has been forced to either reject the obvious or accept the impossible. In this case, the normal skepticism needs to be ignored in order to determine if this promised energy source is real and can provide the ideal energy so critically needed.

2) an interesting idea-thread

Parallel with the invention of the light bulb




3)  From Gregory Goble
LENR and Numerology Theory/Formula

ends with a quote:
"The explanation could be based on a good theory that is not yet known but ‘exists’ in the universe of possible reasonable ideas." (I. J. Good)

4) Two messages from Andrea Rossi one scientific and one...about war

maurice
April 24, 2016 at 3:42 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the “reverse Mossbauer Effect”: are you sure the recoil energy is enough to subtract energy from the gamma rays to the point to reduce them to 50-100 keVs ?
Thank you,
Maurice


Andrea Rossi
April 24, 2016 at 10:48 AM
Maurice:
No, I am not sure, but I propend to think so. I have worked with advanced mathematical models on the well known formula of the Mossbauer Effect, that contains like in a nutshell all the following development that is at the base of my theoretical percourse. Now I have a problem: from one side, I am not ready for a publication, but from the other side I would like to publish it to receive massive critics to check if I am wrong.
I am convinced that the reverse Mossbauer Effect integrated with the lattice theory of Prof Norman Cook is the right direction, but I am not sure that my convinction is correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Andrea Rossi
April 24, 2016 at 10:40 AM

Andy Stokes:
Yes, you are correct: the ERV gave to IH one year of time, during the test, to get all the information they wanted about all his instrumentation; the men of IH, who attended the test every day for one year, has all the possibiliries to get all the data they wanted related to any instrument, flowmeter included.
Nobody of IH, ever, had anything negative to say of the flowmeter ( that was sealed: I remember perfectly the opera ballet dancers of IH chant that all the instrumentation was of the ERV, made their investors of Woodford notice that the flowmeter was sealed, when Woodford’s specialists came to the plant ). When the ERV disassembled the instrumentation all the guys of IH were around, getting photos and any possible information; the ERV told us that he was getting back his instrumentation to certify with the manufacturers that their margin of error had not been modified during the year test, AT THE SAME CONDITIONS OF FLUID AND TEMPERATURE OF THE TEST).
Obviously, evidence of all this will be requested in due time, in due place. The report is a short resume necessarily reduced: the 12 600 000 data taken by the ERV cannot be printed: 66 000 pages could be necessary.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

LENR IN CONTEXT-1


New state of water molecule discovered https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160422163157.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ftop_news%2Ftop_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Top+Science+News%29


LENR IN CONTEXT-2 


Still valid today, unfortunately- hatred and envy is targeting Science.
Don’t Heed the Haters: Albert Einstein’s Wonderful Letter of Support to Marie Curie in the Midst of Scandal

Saturday, April 23, 2016

APR 23, 2016 THE R-PROBLEM AS LENR DRAGON A STORY AND ANDREA ROSSI"S OPINION

MOTTO


Image result for dragon quotations


DAILY NOTES

A. A metaphor of in-house dragonslaying in LENR -land

Irreproducibility is the in-house dragon of the non-technologized LENR systems.

I am writing about dragons because it happens to be Saint George's Day- that I remember well because I have a cousin Gheorghe (Gyuri) whom I want to congratulate today. You surely know about the dragon slayer activity of Saint George
however this- dragon slayer- was obviously a very popular imaginary profession, especially in the Middle Ages.

Just a few years before the start of the Renaissance, the inhabitants of a newly built castle have observed in terror that a very carnivorous Dragon is hiding somewhere in the labyrinthine underground spaces of the castle and, usually in the most dark nighttime comes and eats a human, usually children. The dragon has also robbed some innocent but beautiful maids. Nobody dared to confront the beast and the leading noblemen have decided: we will hire a professional DS- highly qualified 
Dragon Slayer. You know then it was much bureaucratic thinking and a cult of titles and qualifications. Statistically speaking it was twelve times more important WHO says or does something than what he/she says and/or does. (The world has progressed and changed and evolved from then- now it is 20 times more important!)
OK, the expert they found  A. BS in Dragon Hunting from the University of Sorbonne,
PhD in Dragon Slaying from the Siegfried Univ of Reykjavik, specializations in Africa
China and the Komodo Island etc. a real authority in the matter.  Indeed it was a case of veni-vidi-vici - he came, have killed the dragon, at his request was very generously paid and went away.

But surprise! (you know surprises are statistically 80% bad)- a week later an other 
Dragon has appeared at least 1.5 times more ferocious than the first! Tragedy. horror, desperation!
But then it came an offer from an dragon slaying amateur with no high qualifications at all: This, B. said: " I have killed many dragons, not bid deal. With a sword like mine and a good asbestos shield to protect you against the flames they emit, anybody can kill a dragon. WHAT I WANT IS TO SOLVE YOUR DRAGON PROBLEM!

OK, B. has killed the new dragon than has spent a week with mysterious investigations. Then he told the followings to the gathering of the leading noblemen:
"Dear gentlemen I know you will not pay me at all and I will become very unpopular here. Because I have very, very bad news for you. It happens you were so unlucky to build this fine castle exactly on a Dragon's Nest full with dragon's eggs in different stages. The dragons eggs as you know are invisible and intangible and cannot be destroyed even by explosives- anyway these are not invented yet. My advice is - let this castle to the dragons and build an other castle in a safe place- I will help you to find it."
Nobody knows how this story has ended- it is a legend about a deserted castle-
all its inhabitants- it is said-were all eaten by voracious dragons.

If somebody wants explanation regarding this confusing story- please write me.


B. What says Andrea Rossi about the LENR-Dragon- irreproducibility


Q. 
Dear Andrea what is you personal hands-on problem -solving at intense work view of irreproducibility in LENR? Is the problem solvable or an inherent fatality of the LENR systems?
A.
Ireproducibility is not a fact, but an opinion based upon statistics. It can come from  sources:
A- a LENR can be irreproducible because it does not work;
B- a LENR is irreproducible because the inventor does not give information;
C- the LENR is reproducible by an expert of the art, but with a limited know-how, so that the efficiency is lower

The case A is irresolvable.
The cases B and C are automatically resolved when a product enters the market: in a nutshell the problem is not the reproducibility, the real problem is the realization of a product.
A product is the sole sword Saint George can kill the dragon with.

About the theoretical issue: it is important under a cultural point of view, but not essential- Mankind has made use of photons for thousands of years without any theory about them. Think to Archimedes' mirrors and ask the ghosts of the burnt ships if they worked properly.
About my theory: I am convinced my effect is due to the reverse Mossbauer effect and I made mathematical models for this but I am still not 100% sure I am right.

DAILY NEWS

Two great papers from Infinite Energy- professional journalism of high quality!

1) Reporting a Lawsuit in LENR

2) A Patent Lawyer Considers the Ross / Industrial Heat Lawsuit - An Interview with  David French

3) Infinite Energy Magazine Covers Rossi and Industrial Heat Case and Future of LENR
4) A Coincidence? The @Namecheap Hosting – Dewey Weaver WP Hack Connection 

5) Somebody is Watching and Acting – Serious Hacking attempts on @sifferkoll Triggered by #LENR ERV Analysis!

6) From Gregory Goble
NO LENR at Clean Tech Forum 2016 WHY?
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lenr-clean-tech-forum-2016-why-gregory-goble



7) Rossi's missing secret or E-CatX Description or both?



Andrea Rossi- about his theory- see his answer above in the DAILY NOTES too, please:
8) Andrea Rossi
April 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM

Jona:
I have written a paper with the mathematical models to explain this, and the essence is in the Reverse Mossbauer Effect.
I am still afraid to publish it, more study has to be done and I want not to burn it prematurely in the battlefield, but the more I study, the more I am convinced of it.
I gave the draft of my paper to several scientists to explain me where am I wrong. Should it be possible to publish it just as a draft, not as a publication, I would do it, to collect critics and understand better, but I am afraid to do this move, for obvious reasons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.


Friday, April 22, 2016

APR 22, 2016 LENR KNOWLEDGE IN THE MAKING

MOTTO

When there is much desire to learn, there of necessity will be much arguing, much writing, many opinions; for opinion in good men is but knowledge in the making. (John Milton) (taken from Gurteen's Knowledge)


My good friend Doug Marker sends an other nice quote, LENR-izing it.:

The LENR world is divided into people who think they are right"
taken from here
https://michaelberryphysics.wordpress.com/quotations/


DAILY NOTES

MY DEAR READER FRIENDS!

This is a personal request to you All! Please have the kindness to answer to Patrick Ellul's Survey here:
http://goo.gl/forms/lpXfgDUVZV

I will consider the number of your answers as a thermometer of you empathy toward me and my efforts to provide you info and news from the world of LENR. THANK YOU!

THE ESSENCE OF THE ERV REPORT RE. THE 352  DAYS 1 MW LENR TEST
According to Andrea Rossi


ERV ( Expert Responsible for Validation): Dr Eng. Fabio Penon
Got the doctorate at 24 years old in nuclear engineering with 110/110 Summa cum Laude in the University of Bologna ( you all know perfectly what this does mean)
Worked as nuclear engineer in a nuclear power plant
Has 20 years of experience as a certificator and validator, worked with Bureau Veritas and with CGS 
He has been chosen in agreement with IH and paid 50% by IH, 50% by Leonardo Corp
During the test Darden and his investors, with their engineers, visited the plant and said it was stellar; after the visits to the plant during the test IH collected fom the UK and CHINA investors 150 million dollars.
They discovered the test was not good after receiving our invoice
The test endured 352 days, 24 hours per day
The measurements have been made with the ERV's  own instrumentation, sealed and certified
He collected 12 600 000 data. If printed would be 66 000 pages
The Report is a synthesis  of 26 pages
At the end of the test the ERV had retrieved all his instrumentation, got it back to Italy, sent every instrument  to the manufacturers to check that it had not lost precision.
The certification after-test certified that the instrumentation had a margin of error equal to when it had been manufactured AT THE PRECISE CONDITIONS OF TEMPERATURE AND FLOW OBTAINED DURING THE TEST
COP obtained: 50-60, mostly in ssm mode

You know I have nightmares due to antihypertensive medication. This report could be a fine subject for a nightmare: I am a consultant and I get the task that I MUST accomplish because I have no money- to demonstrate that the document actually says: zero excess heat, overall and all the time. I will prefer to wake up.

OTHER

I am under the magic of powerful concept of the Milton quote. Please tell me where is knowledge in the making and where knowledge is almost frozen- in LENR?


DAILY NEWS

1) Very sad news:
LENR Pioneer John Dash Dies

http://news.newenergytimes.net/2016/04/21/lenr-pioneer-john-dash-dies/

2) LENR - Nuclear - Grid = Economic Survival
http://londont.blogspot.ro/2016/04/blackout-clouds-threaten-as-north.html


3) Rossi: For 1MW Plant Test, Maximum Possible Input 300kW — Average Output 1 MW

4) Seminar "Cold nuclear Fusion" and Globular Lightning at the People's Friendship University of Russia will be held at April 28 16.00

Coordinates ways of access given as usual.

Program of the Day
1. 16.00 – 16.15 N.V. Samsonenko: "Science News"

2. 16.15 – 17.00 S. B. Alimanov (innovative Company BINAR) ; "The quantum Law of  Hubble".

3. 17.00 – 18.15 Yu.N. Bazhutov, A.I. Gerasimova, V.P. Koretskii, G.S. Liapin (Research Institute for physics-engineering problems "ERZION"- The demonstration of excess heat obtained by plasma electrolysis"

4. 18.15– 18.30 Meeting of the redaction committee

AXIL IS SPECULATING THIS:

Here is some speculation, I believe that the EcatX might be under a secrecy order and therefore being tried in Federal court, because of its similarity to the EMDrive.

The physics is very cutting edge, controversial, and not easy to understand.

Rossi let out that the ECatX produced thrust without propellant but Rossi latter took it back as a mistake or misunderstanding in language. Somebody might have muzzled Rossi.

http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/04/now-thrust-from-the-e-cat/comment-page-1/

The ECatX might use the same physics as the EMdrive to produce thrust, but would be far more powerful.

The new EMDrive theory as follows

http://www.examiner.com/article/has-the-impossible-em-drive-being-tested-by-nasa-finally-been-explained

Assuming the radiation emitted by a LENR reactor is hawking radiation, it might be possible that the LENR reactor will accelerate in its frame of reference because it changes the nature of the vacuum in its frame of reference relative to the inertial frame of the universe. Hawking radiation makes virtual particles into real particles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect

Simply stated, if acceleration produces Unruh radiation then Hawking radiation will produce acceleration, if Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle.

A LENR reactor in space will produce a reactionless drive.

Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement:

"Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle."

Hawking radiation, Unruh radiation and the equivalence principle

http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.5564 


LENR IN CONTEXT-1
A very disturbing trend- not limited (in spirit) to Russia:
Rethinking Lysenko's legacy
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6284/421?utm_campaign=toc_sci-mag_2016-04-21&et_rid=33799724&et_cid=434140


Thursday, April 21, 2016

APR 21, 2016 TWO SHORT ANSWERS FROM ANDREA ROSSI & LENR INFO

MOTTO

Image result for "fatal errors" quotationsImage result for "fatal errors" quotations


                                   Image result for "fatal errors" quotations



 I feel encouraged to make some fatal errors, in my LENR thinking, not in my very calm financial life- till I have time. The essential thing is : they should be MY errors!
My professional career is over- all I wish is to continue this blog so I can allow myself those two great errors. Some friends say I have already done them- my alternative vision of LENR's history and the Technology First! idea.

DAILY NOTES

Two answers from Andrea Rossi

It was a lot of discussion about the harm Andrea Rossi has done to LENR Classic  by disfocussing research and thinking from the deep understanding of LENR to commercial applications. My opinion is that  with Rossi or without Rossi we are actually very far from understanding LENR. And that LENR can be understood better and faster by studying it in the E-Cat than its historic cradle (that i believe it -has in part a functionality of a Procrustean bed). Rossi does harm to scientific LENR is a meme; but it is some truth in the reverse- for the E-cats being considered  descendants of the Fleischmann-Pons Cell is not exactly the great Prize at the lottery- in world of physicists the best unpopularity indicator of Cold Fusion/LENR
is still around 98%, I guess.

Therefore I asked him:

Q1- 
You had been and stil are forced to work in hostile and stressing circumstances- one of the reasons being that your work is been considered in a sense a continuation of that of Fleischmann and Pons. This is and is not true- you are going on your way, with your methods and you have said addio to the past- my opinion. Do you agree? (I have sent him the paper entitled: "Great Innovators Create the Future, Manage the Present, and Selectively Forget the Past"- read it at LENR IN CONTEXT-2; Forget the past is not a simple subject!

However Rossi has a good memory  and his answer shows he is thinking about the essence here:
A1- 
Yes, but to F&P goes the merit of the Start: without their intuition of the existence of the possibility to make LENR - I think still everybody would think that the only way to make houses is to shoot bricks with a cannon. 
(I like this metaphor!)

You know my areas of interest, so you will find my second question as natural:
Q2- 
You are speaking mainly about LENR Science; can we know what are your basic, personal principles regarding LENR Technology, LENR Management and LENR Business?
A2-
In this case I do not think there is to invent, I think there is to copy.
The strategy- commercial and industrial- to diffuse the E-Cats can be the same, I think, as used by Microsoft to diffuse Windows, I am studying what they did to copy them.
Obviously when you start a war, you have a strategy, but you must be readyto change it depending on how battles go on.


DAILY NEWS


1) Wow! $100 Million Contract Signed For LENR
https://newenergytreasure.com/2016/04/19/wow-100-million-contract-for-lenr/

Are We in the Early Stage of LENR ‘Patent Farming’? (Doug Marker)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/21/are-we-in-the-early-stage-of-lenr-patent-farming-doug-marker/


2) Did Theranos Break the Law?\
It is about blood testing- however it is interesting that Cold fusion is considered a precedent- see how its story is told:

"Greeley thinks that there is precedent for Theranos’s woes – in cold fusion.
How so? In 1989, two electrochemists — Stanley Pons of the University of Utah and his mentor, Martin Fleischmann of Britain’s University of Southampton — announced that they had “produced up to 100% more energy than was required to run it with a fusion reaction in a benchtop apparatus at room temperature,” according toWired.
Until that time, only million degree Fahrenheit fusion reactions had produced energy in more than minuscule amounts for more than fleeting periods of time, noted Wired.
Sadly for Pons and Fleischmann, other scientists criticized their work.
According to a 1993 BusinessWeek review of Gary Taubes’s book Bad Science: The Short Life and Bad Times of Cold Fusion, “Rather than meet criticism with new evidence, cold fusion’s advocates made fresh claims based on no information or on data that, Taubes documents, were fudged. They refused to divulge methods or measurements, threatened legal action against damning scientific papers, and attacked critics, not on scientific grounds, but for lacking faith.”
In October 2015, Holmes appeared on CNBC’s MadMoneyto discuss the first Journal story suggesting problems at Theranos.
“This is what happens when you work to change things. First they think you’re crazy, then they fight you, then you change the world,” she said.
This brings to mind the words of Mark Twain, “History doesn’t repeat itself but it does rhyme.”
3) This is What I Know for Sure (Roger Bird)

4) Gary Wright' new opus
Cutting the Gordian Knot Surrounding the Andrea Rossi and Industrial Heat LLC, E-cat Patents
http://freeenergyscams.com/cutting-the-gordian-knot-surrounding-the-andrea-rossi-and-industrial-heat-llc-e-cat-patents/

5) From Andrea Rossi's blog: 

Andrea Rossi
April 20, 2016 at 8:56 PM
Steven Ransom:
I am confused: IH says my plant is worth nothing…but: to fight against something that is worth nothing you need the most powerful Law Firm of the world ? That’s like to shoot an atomic bomb to hunt a rabbit !
Warm Regards,
A.R.


and this continues with:

Alexvs
April 21, 2016 at 1:04 AM

Mr Rossi:
The reason why IH is shooting an atomic bomb is that 89,000,000 $ are not a rabbit.
Alexvs

Andrea Rossi
April 21, 2016 at 7:31 AM

Alexvs:
Even if a rabbit costs 89 000 000, you still do not use an atomic bomb to shoot at it: besides, the “hunters” we are talking of are used to expensive animals. They deal daily with them, it’s the core of their business: they sold a dog of 150 million dollars in change of 15 cats esteemed 10 million dollars each, after an accurate fair value auditing. So, it’s odd that they are so impressed of a rabbit priced 89 millions, to the point to use an atomic bomb !
Warm Regards,
A.R.

LENR IN CONTEXT-1

New material combines useful, typically incompatible properties

Entrepreneurs: Emulating Nature by Miki Saxon