Thursday, May 5, 2016

MAY 05, 2016 LENR INTRODUCING UWE DOMS' THENEW FIRE-THINKING

MOTTO

 Image result for quotations fireImage result for quotations fire
DAILY NOTES

Human intelligence is a pyrogenic product. Please read the 

 Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catching_Fire:_How_Cooking_Made_Us_Human
Why Fire Makes Us Human
Cooking may be more than just a part of your daily routine, it may be what made your brain as powerful as it is
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/why-fire-makes-us-human-72989884/#IxXoRZcuTrzAHUWE.99

Learning Fire Management was decisive for Homo sapiens to become the ruling species of Terra- from simply heating caves to palaces to manufacture of bricks  to cement kilns and pyrometalurgy in innumerable variants. Fire was explained first we have believed - as common sense dictates it that some principle-element leaves the burning stuff- it was called phlogiston. Later it was shown than something more trivial happens- the active part of our air, oxygen it was called-  20% as the Pareto Rule imposes it gives very exothermic reactions with many other substances- in practice only already burnt compounds- called ashes do not react. But there are some exceptions, no problem we have accumulated a lot of know-how both positive and very negative- out of control or accelerated beyond limits fire can be very harmful.

 Fire is an old source of energy, full of flaws and becoming obsolete. Homo technologicus started to search for better kinds of fire. LENR+ generating masive quantities of excess heat is the New Fire. It is a New Fire movement and recently I had an inspiring exchange of ideas with the promoter of New Fire in Germany, our new friend Uwe Doms from Oldenburg, Germany.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldenburg_(Oldb)

 I have learnt a lot from Uwe he is wonderfully open minded, dedicated to scientific preogress and able to see the essential.
He has a blog: https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/ and his favorite channel of communication is: https://twitter.com/The_New_Fire

 This is a first writing about Uwe's way.

 An idea I like very much is to use better our our EQ, emotional intelligence in our pro-LENR activity:
"That is what I want to achieve now, I want to reach people emotionally, not to convey LENR only by scientific facts, but in principle by infotainment. It should be fun to gather LENR information, it should be non-binding, it should be exciting. I want to reach the decision-makers on this bridge, because these do not respond to experts and not on personal approach (even if they are your friends), the decision makers in politics and business respond to their 'audiences', means in our case, voters and customers.
Only when these burp the doors, you can reach and convince the decision-makers, otherwise happens nothing, especially on such a hot iron as LENR!"

 Actually Uwe follows Cold Fusion LENR from the start when he was really young, he tells about his 1994 enthusiasm for ccomputer screen watching the NASA live stream of first impacts of Shoemaker-Levy 9, he was a student then...

 An almost poetical expression of his revolt for the misunderstanding of LENR:

 "As a supporter of evidence-based science, it is really unbearable, how grown men, who claim to have the ability of thinking, behave with regards to LENR. I have long tried to fight this battle, to make factual persuasion and have done that tirelessly for many years, very patient, have spoken to me blue in the face and sent me fingers to the bone."

 He has found an explanation- in a  source that was unknown for me- and I HAVE to explore it, fast:

 I then long researched why I constantly get in conflict with my basic attitude and found the explanation in the theory of the stages of moral development https://goo.gl/nJ41Qb encountered of Lawrence Kohlberg's. I belong to the 5% of mankind that is capable to think and act based on universal principles, not only able to understand a categorical imperative, but 'live' it, duty bound, which in consequence means that I am basically not driven from lower instincts and motives, as the 95% rest of mankind.

It was a real relief to find out that it is not because of me, or an deficit, or about the subject, that I probably may not be able to understand. It is the exact opposite, not I am 'wrong', it is simply the rest that is intellectually not capable to achieve a certain level of knowledge and understanding, that you need to cross scientific and mental borders, especially in early stages of ground breaking inventions.
Uwe says he also was a fast adopter of the Internet.

 How sees Uwe the specific situation of LENR?
All this applies, in principle, to all areas, but it is in particular true for the LENR - Cold Fusion topic. Any research hardly convince easy minded, esoterician, conspiracy theorists, and dilettantes etc. Especially concerning the LENR topic, because this is where are all the 'colorful people' are, all have their own opinion and strangely stick on their opinion, no matter what  the evidence is, everyone knows the 'truth' and I have not read anywhere that someone was convinced to change his mind.

In Rossi's case we have to deal with an additional level of paid lobbyists and interferers such as the under pseudonym working 'Thomas Clarke', who is targeting every discussion, no matter what is the topic, with epic text, so that it is impossible have a real discussion.
That's in short the initial situation, I would like to clarify better, but then I would have to write a book.

I really hope Uwe will write this Book!




DAILY NEWS

1) John Dash: 1933 - 2016
Christy L. Frazier

2) New Fire signals:
Energy generating device and energy generating method and also control arrangement and reactor vessel therefor 
WO 2015040077 A1

3) New publication by Holmlid and Kotzias shows new leads to Airbus LENR research

4) This is the full text of a Romanian language New Energies site- I am trying to get in touch with the author.
Free energy technologies- the results of year 2015, predictions for 2016
Tehnologii de energie liberă – rezultate ale anului 2015; tendinţe pentru 2016
http://burebista2012.blogspot.ro/2016/05/tehnologii-de-energie-libera-rezultate.html

 5) Andrea Rossi: strategie discutibili?
Post di Piergiorgio Varrone
http://22passi.blogspot.ro/2016/05/andrea-rossi-strategie-discutibili.html
Readable with Google Translate advises Rossi to be more peaceful

6) A German language LENR video:
E Cat kalte Fusion für die autonome Energieversorgung

7) By Lou Pagnucco
Possibly relevant recent patent applications- for LENR


LENR IN CONTEXT-1

 With thanks to Ron Kita who sent this:
Engineers create a better way to boil water—with industrial, electronics applications
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-waterwith-industrial-electronics-applications.html

 Sunshine in a bottle
Mimic the dance between carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, and you can tap into clean solar energy and ease climate change by Peter Forbes
Posted by at 2 comments:

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

MAY 04, 2016 IS THERE SOME SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE BABEL TOWER AND LENR?

MOTTO
Image result for "babel tower" quotations
DAILY NOTES

 The first days when my daughter Antonia came home from the kindergarten- from "the group of the smallest" we have remarked that she is speaking very loudly, all the time almost shouting."But Toni dear Mammy and Daddy are hearing well, why are you speaking so dreadfully loud?" She has explained that at the kindergarten "all the children speak, no one is listening; who speaks the loudest gets some attention"
The same has happened probably at the unsuccessful building of the Babel Tower where people suddenly started to speak quite different languages- they had to wait 
millennia for Google Translate to appear and even expert translators were completely missing. This story is interpreted usually as a punishment of God for excessive human pride- the Tower was planned to be obscenely high just to show we can do it!
I have a very different opinion- the multiplicity of languages is a great blessing that adds to vital interestingness of our human world, to diversity, allows the creation of many sorts of splendid verbal beauty. I enjoy tremendously- for example- discovering the untranslatable idioms, words- it is a great collection on the Web. 
There are more trivial and not so altruistic reasons to this- I have survived in the darkest yeaars of my family tragedy by working as translator and interpreter for relatively good money- easier work than wood-cutting, anyway.
As practice of oppression shows it is easier to rule and torment people who are speaking the same language as you. And monolingual hatred is also perfectly possible. I well remember how in night- I believe in 1993, my Serbo-Croatian- Romanian dictionary has self-destructed itself - the very similar Serbian and Croatian words started to massacrate each other.My daughter has inherited my fine collection
of dictionaries- I use now the Internet- the e-Babel. Including: https://www.babelfish.com/

 It is a sad reality that many times words have to be used in disputes and fight. I want to keep my black belts, 8-Dan title in verbal karate in at least three languages.I need this skill especially when some people try to shut down EGO OUT!

 Sincerely I fear that this editorial could be considered as an allusion to the post Babel state of LENR theories because it seems to be intolerable that after so many years we do not have an universally accepted LENR theory. I think this will be settled when we will be able to tell more exactly what is and what is not LENR. Or LENRs?

b) Felix Rends, LENR-Forum Moderator has an idea re LENR Theories

One fundamental Question is missing:

 "Do we need scientific theories and dozens of questions and speculations to use LENR energy to rescue our climate and progress the development of mankind?"

 Hundreds of thousands of years even the smartest human beings where not able to explain what we today call the 'Standard Model of particle physics' They had no idea what electromagnetic is, or weak and strong nuclear interactions, and certainly they know nothing about subatomic particles. But some of them made fantastic inventions, inventions that brought us to where we are today and now we have another fantastic invention, why not use it first and try to solve the theory problem later? 

 Concerning LENR I am pretty much sure, that it is a kind of an exothermic stripping reaction like the Oppenheimer–Phillips processhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer%E2%80%93Phillips_process but that is only speculation. 


DAILY NEWS
1) Lattice Energy LLC - Neutron production and nucleosynthesis in electric discharges - from lightning bolts to batteries - May 3 2016

2) From Dewey Weaver-  my  thanks:
European Physical Society, 43rd Conference on Plasma Physics
Huly 4-8, Leuwen, Belgium
Proposed Satellite Meeting to the  43rd EPSMeeting on Plasma Physics on
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions ...
https://kuleuvencongres.be/eps2016/scientific-program/satellite_meeting
3) Use of Frequencies in the E-Cat

4) Rossi Thinking About Using QuarkX for Charging EVs for Almost Infinite Range

5) Up-updated:
#LENR #ECAT Saga: Dewey Weaver – the FUD & Uncertainty Machine In Action!

6) Cold Fusion Connection- Latest Feeds:


LENR IN CONTEXT-1

 Water fountain of life and energy
Io ce l’HHO! Acqua fonte di vita e di energia

From Jack Cole thanks!
Hints of a New Particle Could Completely Change Physics as We Know It
http://mic.com/articles/142410/large-hadron-collider-new-particle-could-completely-change-physics-as-we-know-it#.QS4Ei5iDx

LENR IN CONTEXT-2

Please try to combine this with...or to juxtapose to... my editorial:
More than words
Human communication is a glorious chaos. And images, from art to emojis, sometimes say it so much better than language can
by Thom Scott-Phillips
Posted by at 2 comments:

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

MAY 03, 2016 LENR: SOME DISCUSSIONS, SOME IN FO, SPIRIT OF PEACE- ABSENT!

MOTTO

 Epoché: means consider wrong anything given for right, take nothing as given, start from the chaos and patiently build up something completely unexpected. 
(Andrea Rossi's personal slogan re the creative thinking of the Inventor)


DAILY NOTES

 The papers received- see LENR IN CONTEXT-2 - made me enthusiastic- I am absolutely convinced the most important skills of the coming LENR leaders are systems thinking, design thinking combined- as the motto shows it too- with powerful critical thinking.

 Ed Storms has received some new answers to his fundamental questions
From JoshG.

 1. Do you accept production of helium as the source of energy from a fusion reaction? If not, what is the source of the measured energy?

No, I believe that fusion and other nuclear effects are actually byproducts of the process that underlies the generation of excess heat. You can read my thinking on it here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/icqomucyy9qwt1s/MathisianPhysicsandLENR-PreliminaryGuideMay2draft.pdf?dl=0

Or if that doesn't work, here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5nqCJFoFccdOG5uTUZsa1JWcmM/view


2. Do you accept that this helium-heat relationship has been obtained using both electrolytic and gas loading of Pd? If not, why not?

Well, if helium is produced, then it is a byproduct of the processes underlying LENR, but I do not believe that any apparent byproducts of a fusion reaction are the primary cause of excess heat.


3. Do you accept that this fusion reaction does not occur in the lattice structure, such as in vacancies or dislocations? If not, where do you propose the source of heat originates in a material?

I don't think fusion is the main cause of excess heat, and I don't see any reason to think cracks or dislocations are crucially important. AHE's may be important, but not for the reasons Storms thinks. 

4. Do you accept that formation of unique nuclear active site is required to host the fusion reaction? If not, where does the reaction occur?

I believe the process that produces (most of) the excess heat in LENR is not fusion and can be produced under many circumstances and configurations, and does not require the formation of a unique NAE. 

5. Do you accept that tritium is a nuclear product from the same mechanism that produces helium? If not, what mechanism produces tritium?

Yes. They are byproducts of the same process, which is not fusion. Tritium is produced by neutron capture, D + N. 

6. Do you accept that LENR is produced by a universal mechanism that operates in all materials and involves all isotopes of hydrogen? If not, please identify the nature of the different mechanisms. 

 YES. See paper at the links for more info. 

DAILY NEWS

1) Rossi: QuarkX to be a ‘Tremendous Suprise for Everyone’
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/05/03/rossi-quarkx-to-be-a-tremendous-suprise-for-everyone/

2) BigBank & BigOil ($GS $JPM $XOM …) Short Position in Oil Futures $CL_F at July 2014 Levels!

3) Not very new but was it well discussed?
US Navy Patent on LENR / LANR Particle Source
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2016/04/12/us-navy-patent-on-lenr-lanr-particle-source/

4) #LENR #ECAT Saga: Dewey Weaver – the FUD & Uncertainty Machine In Action!
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/author/admin/
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/author/admin/

 5) E-Cat Quark-X LENR in 1956? (Alan Smith)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/05/03/e-cat-quark-x-lenr-in-1956-alan-smith/

AXIL DIXIT- about LENR theory
Unless a LENR theory can explain the miracles of LENR in a fashion that fits seamlessly into the workings of the structure of the theory, then the theory is just word soup. The explanation of the miracles comes first because their explanation in the context of existing science is a prerequisite for the acceptance of LENR by the world as a valid science. Theoretical hand waving is not sufficient. 

No theorist has attempted to understand the miracles of LENR let alone explain them in the context of existing science, let alone attempting the grueling task of fitting them seamlessly into his theory.

Some LENR theorists even avoid using data from experiments where these miracles are manifest because they don’t believe that they are even possible. Some theorists say that deuterium hot fusion is occurring without the production of gamma rays.

Some theorists ask where others stand on this deuterium fusion issue without explaining how gamma radiation and unstable by-products are not present. Such theories are a joke.


LENR IN CONTEXT-1

 The secretive billionaire-backed plans to harness fusion
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160428-the-secretive-billionaire-backed-plans-to-harness-fusion?ocid=global_future_rss

 LENR IN CONTEXT-2

 A MUST FOR ANY LENR THINKER:
https://thesystemsthinker.com/?utm_source=Leverage+Networks+Email+Contact+List&utm_campaign=35b03ada18-The_Systems_Thinker_Launch_5_2_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5b6ed273b9-35b03ada18-73238569&goal=0_5b6ed273b9-35b03ada18-73238569

Why is simpler better? (it is about Ockham Razor- a concept I am looking at with mixed feelings- as a LENR-ist)
https://aeon.co/essays/are-scientific-theories-really-better-when-they-are-simpler?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=e2bcf48d0b-Daily_Newsletter_03_May_20165_2_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_411a82e59d-e2bcf48d0b-69012005
Posted by at 1 comment:

Monday, May 2, 2016

MAY 02, 2016 LENR CONSENSUS & DISENSUS, ABOUT MU ANSWERS



MOTTO

 a Mu answer means:
un-ask the question,
indicate the question is fundamentally flawed, or
reject the premise that a dualistic answer can or will be given.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)

Or the Answer is so much greater than the Question.


DAILY NOTES 

 Everybody knows that FAQ means Frequently Answered Questions
Less known is the not-so-good sounding acronym FUQ meaning Fundamentally Unanswerable 
Questions- that is more or less inherent for LENR. As you know, a special category of questions that are  not answered are those that need Mu answers- a Zen concept  my generation has learnt from Robert Pirsig's stellar book which had a determining influence on my thinking. When I have read then my basic preoccupation was the Quality of Polyvinyl Chloride and the book's central issue is Quality.
http://webpages.charter.net/sn9/literature/mu.html

 I have accepted and embraced the "mu" answers in my everyday and professional thinking- after demystification. I think now we have a case where the concept could help better understanding of why we are not understanding some vital issues

 There are problems with important questions  asked in the frame of LENR.
Yesterday at my request, Ed Storms has accepted to publish his ideas here including this:

 LIST OF ESSENTIAL QUESTION REGARDING UNDERSTANDING OF LENR BY ED STORMS.
1. Do you accept production of  helium as the source of energy from a fusion reaction? If not, what is the source of the measured energy?
2. Do you accept that this helium-heat relationship has been obtained using both electrolytic and gas loading of Pd? If not, why not?
3. Do you accept that this fusion reaction does not occur in the lattice structure, such as in vacancies or dislocations?  If not, where do you propose the source of heat originates in a material?
4. Do you accept that formation of unique nuclear active site is required to host the fusion reaction? If not, where does the reaction occur?
5. Do you accept that tritium is a nuclear product from the same mechanism that produces helium?  If not, what mechanism produces tritium?
6. Do you accept that LENR is produced by a universal mechanism that operates in all materials and involves all isotopes of hydrogen? If not, please identify the nature of the different mechanisms. 

Clearly formulated, accepting Yes/No- based on Ed's premise that a LENR explanation MUST be based 
on known experimental facts- and ..unanswered, See the replicas of Axil, Michel Vanderberghe, Fedyr Mykhaylov - after Daily News.
I hope eventually there will be more harmony between the questions and the answers. I think ED has an explanation why the specificity of his questions based on a reality derived from 27+ years of experiments is challenged.

 I have the same problem with my LENR ideas- at a lower scientific level. Anyway I have no hopes  regarding to convince anybody that my heretic (last week a good friend called them radical)- except Mother Nature.
See please, just FYI my LENR FUQ list:

PETER GLUCK'S LIST OF FUNDAMENTALLY UNANSWERABLE LENR QUESTIONS

1. What exactly is and what is not LENR- definition, delimitation,?
2. The extent of the field?
3. How much of the LENR territories are known and how much still expects to be conquered?
4. What is the ratio between the already known and the still unknown in the field and  which ones are more important for the progress i.e. transforming LENR in great science and a rich source of energy?
5. Is LENR dominated by unity- the same mechanisms everywhere or by a spectacular diversity, many alternative possibilities?
6. Are the LENR processes relatively simple or on the contrary, very complex, having more stages- as pre-nuclear, nuclear and post-nuclear.
7. Do you hope that a single bright theory will explain and guide all forms of LENR or there is necessary to develop specific theories, some outside of nuclear physics?
8. Do you agree that the initially discovered PdD electrolytic cold fuson is an incomplete form of LENR and that research for energy has to be continued in systems developed by engineering and technology?
9. Do you accept that the LENR systems that are able to release intense, usable excess energy are functioning due to a dynamic process of generation of active sites?
10. Do you accept that the aim of LENR technologies is to use nuclear enrgy but with zero harmful radiations?

So much for today, nothing new or surprising here. these questions have a glorious history of unanswerability.

 DAILY NEWS

 1) From Hank Mills
Question List for All Successful Replicators
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3207-Question-List-for-All-Successful-Replicators/

 2) From Me 356

Reactor A melted, excess heat was present! - Lenr Forum


3) Rossi/Leonardo vs. Industrial Heat et al. (Update #3: Rossi Makes Statement on ‘Partial’ ERV Reports)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/05/01/rossileonardo-vs-industrial-heat/


5) The most important and difficult question
WHAT IS COLD FUSION
The answer is too vague yet:
Cold Fusion is a technology that can use water to create Energy. But who has a better one, just now?

 6)  Estimation #LENR #ECAT Knowledge and Interest; 1k hard core, 15k lurkers, 200k Interest, 2M awareness
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/

 7) From Frank Grimer:
Clays - possible environments for COLD FUSION
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3212-Clays-possible-environments-for-COLD-FUSION/?postID=18378#post18378

8) Andrea Rossi answers at JONP:

Orson
May 1, 2016 at 9:11 PM

Dr Rossi,
Now, after this first month of litigation with IH, you can have an idea if it is going to damage your work to develope the E-Cat.
Has this work been slowed down ?
Thanks,
Orson

Andrea Rossi
May 2, 2016 at 6:45 AM

Orson:
On the contrary, our R&D has been accelerated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

AXIL ANSWERS TO ED STORMS'QUESTIONS

With the greatest of respect I offer an opinion of Ed Storms request for dialog based on the evidentiary ground rules that Ed has dictated. Ed Storms is stuck in a rut. Ed has been looking for the same LENR indicators for decades and this stagnation in expectations has calcified Ed’s theoretical though processes.

These ground rules include as follows:

1. The production of Helium
2. The production of Tritium
3. The production of excess heat
4. The helium-heat relationship

The experiments of Holmlid has shown us that there is another way to look at the LENR experimental landscape, that being subatomic particle production. If Ed Storms would modify his experimental expectations, he would see a completely new perspective on the ways and means of the LENR reaction. 

The production of mesons, pions, Kaon, muons, and electrons leave little room in the interpretation of these experimental results.
The production of Kaons, indicated that strange matter is produced in the LENR reaction. This can only happen when quark/gluon plasma is produced when quarks are deconfined in the nucleus. This also means that the monopole flux tubes that connect quarks together are being screened. This in turn implies that monopole flex tubes are being produced by chemical means.

The production of LENR through magnetism also implies that intense RF radiation will be produced in active LENR experiments. Such RF radiation has been seen in the experimental results produced by me356 who has verified that the LENR reaction is producing this EMF radiation. The experimental results from Defkalion also show powerful magnetics and RF production.

Ed Storms should modify his experimental procedures, methods, and expectations to detect subatomic particles, specifically muons. This could be done by using a cloud chamber. An RF and magnetic detection method should also be a part of Ed’s experimental setup.

The experimental data that an experiment produces colors the theory that is derived from that data.

 MICHEL VANDERBERGHE SENDS AN ANSWER TO ED STORMS
My 2 cents contribution (I'm not a Physicist - System architect background) 

A simple framework for LENR
Nanoscale:  Their defining characteristic is a very small feature size in the range of 1–100 nanometers (nm). It is not miniaturization; the nanoworld lies midway between the scale of atomic and quantum phenomena, and the scale of bulk materials.  It occurs in solid, plasma, liquid.
At the nanoscale level, some material properties (Thermal, Electrical, Magnetic, Optical, and Chemical) are affected by the laws of atomic physics, rather than behaving as traditional bulk materials do. 
A nanostructure, Geometry and asymmetry, a nanoscale assembly used to apply effects, Thermal, Electrical, magnetic, Optical and Chemical using the properties of its constituents, on some of them to trigger Reactions.
Thermal, Electrical, Magnetic, Optical and chemical effects change the properties of these nanostructure. Physical effects are applied to activate and control the set of effects which are applied to some constituents.
At some stage, there’s a coherence or condition of equilibrium where applied effects and properties effects create a stable global effect which can be thermal, electrical, magnetic, Optical or Chemical (or a set of).
Depending on the constituents, a sequence of effects need to be applied, activation, to reach a coherent state. LENR is systemic and there are many solutions.  Such nanostructure can be considered as ‘alive’ material. LENR can be considered as a discrete state of matter. QED applies.
Hypothesis:  there’s always a transformation of some constituents to exit from the coherent state.
There’s native solutions where such systemic behavior occur.  A single effect or set of effects on an existing nanostructure trigger the reaction.
Non-native solutions are engineered solutions. An external sequence of effects need to be applied on a well-defined constituents first to create the nanostructure.
Where the additional energy comes from:   Physics "as usual"

How to use the framework 

To model behaviors  (& build simulation tools at some stage)

Materials properties, Properties dynamic behavior/ effects,  Assembly and assembly of assemblies, geometry and Asymmetry / effects,  Interaction model/ required effects.
Effects / Constituants Interaction and so on...
Michel. 
Michel Vandenberghe
LENR-Cities SA 
FEDYR MYKHAYLOV GIVES SOME ANSWERS - MATCHING ED STORMS QUESTIONS

 1. For the reaction of Li + H.
2. At low energies, the priority will be without neutron channel.
3.The reaction is in the octahedral voids lattice Ni.
4.This area called cloud Cottrell. There is its isotope enrichment D in diffusion.
5.The reaction D + D = T + P. The reaction between the partially shielded deuteron are in octopore lattice Ni and accelerated incident deuteron.
6. Continuous production of neutrons with a low pulse of the proton plasmon interaction with the conduction electrons. 

 LENR IN CONTEXT-1

 Researchers list 'seven chemical separations to change the world'https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160427150612.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ftop_news%2Ftop_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Top+Science+News%29
Posted by at 21 comments:

Sunday, May 1, 2016

MAY 01,2016 TIME FOR (RE) DEFINING LENR!

MOTTO

 Thoughts, like fleas, jump from man to man, but they don't bite everybody. (Stanislaw Jerzy Lec)

 In a war of ideas it is people who get killed. (Stanislaw Jerzy Lec)
DAILY NOTES

 Let's forget The War in LENR for a while (but perhaps after reading the very natural 6) at News) and focus on essential problems. LENR, the field is in systemic deep crisis

 See please how Edmund Storms describes the situation and tries to lead us toward a solution:

 I expect you all have noticed why no agreement can be reached about how to go about explaining LENR. Everyone has a different belief about what LENR does and how Nature operates.  one would apply QM, an other colleague would shift an electron to a forbidden orbit, other people would look to the chemical lattice as the site of the process, and I focus on nanocracks and the chemical issues.  Without agreement about basic principles, no agreement is possible. This would be like having a group of Muslims and Catholics trying to agree on the nature of God.  Normally such agreements are achieved either on the battle field or in a class room under the total control of a professor. Since we have neither method available, I would like to ask some questions to see if we can have any possibility of agreement.

Perhaps anyone who is interested would answer the questions and give reasons for your answers. 

1. Do you accept production of  helium as the source of energy from a fusion reaction? If not, what is the source of the measured energy?
2. Do you accept that this helium-heat relationship has been obtained using both electrolytic and gas loading of Pd? If not, why not?
3. Do you accept that this fusion reaction does not occur in the lattice structure, such as in vacancies or dislocations?  If not, where do you propose the source of heat originates in a material?
4. Do you accept that formation of unique nuclear active site is required to host the fusion reaction? If not, where does the reaction occur?
5. Do you accept that tritium is a nuclear product from the same mechanism that produces helium?  If not, what mechanism produces tritium?
6. Do you accept that LENR is produced by a universal mechanism that operates in all materials and involves all isotopes of hydrogen? If not, please identify the nature of the different mechanisms. 


All of these questions can be answered without using any math. The answers will identify which LENR religion you belong to and how a discussion has to be structure to reach agreement.  Once some agreement can be reached about the basic issues, we can then turn to the details for discussion, using math when required.  If the basic issues cannot resolved, the details would not matter because we would not be discussing the same subject.  In fact, that is the problem we have right now. We are not discussing the same phenomenon.  We can not even agree on what LENR is. Until we do, we can not hope to agree on how it operates.  So, lets start with the basics and see whether any agreement is possible.

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT HERE, Ego Out is relatively unpolluted by the usual Detailitis, Dilutitis, Disputitis, Disfocusitis that can make any serious discussion, KO on Forums.....

 In addition to what Ed has said,I think we have to try to re-define and radically what is LENR-or LENRs (better), we have to rethink PdD, NiH older variants and new variants- etc.the connection between diverse kinds of LENR, it cousins and neighbors.

 DAILY NEWS

1) Decentralization and LENR (Michel Vandenberghe)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/30/decentralization-and-lenr-michel-vandenberghe/

2) New Live Test by Brian Albiston Started (April 30, 2016)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/05/01/new-live-test-by-brian-albiston-started-april-30-2016/


3) About LENR origin then feed back from Alexander Gromov


LookMoo
May 1, 2016 at 2:46 AM

Dear Mr. Rossi,

In one of your replies you briefly mentioned that IH had guided tours with potential customers during the one year test of the 1 MW plant.

Can you tell us a little bit more about these happenings??

Like:

* How many guided tours
* When was the last guided tour by IH.
Andrea Rossi
May 1, 2016 at 7:52 AM

LookMoo:
We have the movies of them, because the plant had cameras for security issues, and photos, but all this information cannot be published before it is disclosed in Court.
I can make this statement, though: all I said in this blog about the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat will be sustained by undisputable evidence in Court.
I say this now: all the main investors that gave real money to IH before IH bought other IP around have repeatedly visited our plant. I can also add this, because it is already public: the ERV made a partial report every 3 months and the results were the same as in the final report. This means that IH received a report in April, a second report in July, a third report in October, before the final report. The results of all these report were the same, moreless. IH not only never criticized the reports, but shown the reports to Woodford and in an official conference in China, using them to collect investments. The comments of Darden about the reports can be read in his interviews after the Chinese conference.
So, for one year of test IH accepted with great enthusiasm the reports, used them to get enormous investments from funds and never made a single communication to the ERV, who sent to them all the preliminary reports, not a single word in negative.

The situation changed as soon as payment time came.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

7) The Possible Political Impact Should LENR Emerge (Doug Marker)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/05/01/the-possible-political-impact-should-lenr-emerge-doug-marker/

LENR IN CONTEXT-1

 From Maria Popova's fine Brain Pickings- it is much more there! The Psychology of Time and the Paradox of How Impulsivity and Self-Control Mediate Our Capacity for Presence
Posted by at 13 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)