tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post8908124763890826218..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: RE-THINKING LENR FOR SUCCESS.Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-52699093829545055262015-04-05T06:19:54.480-07:002015-04-05T06:19:54.480-07:00The problem isn't palladium......the problem i...The problem isn't palladium......the problem is that the original work used electrolysis to load the substrate. Electrochemistry is fiendishly difficult, with a huge number of very difficult to control variables. <br /><br />And yet, palladium/electrochemical systems HAVE given evidence of very large energy releases (Pons and Fleischmann's "cube" experiment, with boiled off all its water (D2O), melted through its containment, through a Transite benchtop, and some distance into a concrete floor). Other researchers have seen similar runs.<br /><br />The real first major advance (made by Arata), was the discovery of the use of "gas-loading" the palladium instead of electrochemically loading.<br /><br />That Pons and Fleischmann were electrochemists was probably the biggest initial "mistake", and the whole source of later problems....the "physicist replicators" (at least those who didn't commit outright fraud) just didn't realize now complex EC was. To them, it looked simple. But they simply didn't have the in-depth knowledge to realize that they were wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com