tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post8894701678502524257..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: DEC 30, 2016 SIX STEPS STRATEGY LENR PLAN FOR 2017Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-1381406204495514282016-12-31T05:44:28.439-08:002016-12-31T05:44:28.439-08:00Dear Marc,
Thank you very much for the wishes and ...Dear Marc,<br />Thank you very much for the wishes and for help and inspiration in 2016- I still owe you an answer re the family relationships and work- it will come<br /><br />Pleasehelp me with the 6 Step Plan.<br /><br />Happy New year!<br /><br />Your old but still breathing friend,<br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-74450964528171634782016-12-31T01:17:42.644-08:002016-12-31T01:17:42.644-08:00regarding: “Peculiarities of hydrogen absorption –...regarding: “Peculiarities of hydrogen absorption – Nd90Fe10” (Vladimir Dubinko)<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IANBoybVApQ<br /><br />Programmable magnet<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_magnet<br /><br />It may be possible to create a monopole magnet using a SmCo5 feedstock. First, aquire of SmCo magnet. Remove its magnetic field by heating it above its Curie temperature. Then magnetize just one pole of the demagnetized feedstock with an electromagnet using a powerful DC current. But only apply this magnetic field to the surface of one end of the SmCo bar feedstock. Only a north pole of the magnet should be activated. <br /><br />Another possible configuration is to machine a parabolic shape on the surface of end of one poles of the demagnetized bar magnet. Then precede to magnetize that surface as described above. An alternative is to place north pole magnetic dots on the surface of the parabolic surface of the SmCo bar. The spins of the atoms in the SmCo magnet might produce focused magnetic field lines converging at the focus of the parabolic surface. <br /><br />Or you can get polymagnet to do these jobs for you.<br /><br />www.polymagnet.com<br /><br /><br />As indicated in the Vladimir Dubinko experiment, these specially configured anisotropic rare earth magnets should produce a LENR reaction when used in a hydrogen atmosphere, H of D.Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-84521134730423190122016-12-31T00:49:14.868-08:002016-12-31T00:49:14.868-08:00Regarding the 6 in the years.... Let's go for ...Regarding the 6 in the years.... Let's go for 86 first, Peter.<br />A wonderful 2017 for you and your family and for LENR(+)!<br />MarcAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13120876471812507338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-17762614794037549602016-12-30T17:05:02.394-08:002016-12-30T17:05:02.394-08:00Comment from Lenr forum
optiongeek
User Avatar
St...Comment from Lenr forum<br /><br />optiongeek<br />User Avatar<br />Student<br />Dec 24th 2016+1<br />axil wrote:<br />The Defkalion system was the forerunner of the suncell. The R6 reactor was a plasma based reactor that failed because of material meltdown problems. The liquid electrode approach solved this problem in the SunCell. Mills has succeeded so far because he is able to amass capital for engineering R&D whereas Defkalion ran out of money.<br /><br />Mills has succeeded because he has a theory that he has used like a map to find the correct design. The breakthrough in power density came in Nov. 2013 when Mills realized that the ionization of the catalyst was creating a charge build up that was rate-limiting. The solution, brilliant as always, was to induce the reaction within an arc current. Why an arc current? Because an arc current has negative resistance in the conditions prevailing in his plasma. With negative resistance, ionization of the catalyst actually *lowered* the voltage instead of increasing it. Lower voltage leads to even faster catalytic reactions and you have a powerful positive feedback loop. BOOM. Without the theory, especially the part about the ionization of the catalyst, none of this can be predicted. No theory, no device. Before you, again, attempt to assign your own pre-conceived theoretical notions on to Mills' success, please educate yourself on his theory. He's already explained that the reaction is independent of the type of hydrogen being used. It can't be a nuclear reaction.<br /><br />In fact, all you need to do to convince yourself that Mills is right is to look at solar flares. Solar flares can produce as much power output as the entire sun for limited periods. However, the matter density in these flares is vanishingly low, far too low for the power source to be from fusion. There *must* be another primary power source in solar flares. And, of course, there is. Solar flares are the dark matter generators of the universe. The conditions for hydrino production are perfect, just like in the SunCell.<br />Post was edited 2 times, last by “optiongeek” (Dec 24th 2016).<br />sam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.com