tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post6386339910103691671..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: 11 NOV 2015 THE FUTURE OF LENR IS NOT A SCIENTIFIC FATALITY BUT A TECHNOLOGiCAL CHALLENGEGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-30329171230288218722015-11-12T07:44:53.021-08:002015-11-12T07:44:53.021-08:00Interesting observation.
If not crack, the hydroto...Interesting observation.<br />If not crack, the hydroton may be "built-in", palladium built around the hydroton.<br /><br />another possibility is that it is not hydroton, but a fractal structure.<br />Maybe 2.xD (fractal foam like structure), or 1.xD (tree like structure?).<br /><br />my intuition , from the difficulties of physicist to find good model, is that LENR is not 3D, and if not even 1D/2D, it can explain the problems of theory.<br /><br />geometry is the key. less QM, more geometry.<br />CoM conservation lead to symmetry constraints.<br />fractal and sub-3D structures create badly known phenomenons.<br /><br />no idea where it is, but LENR is where we don't have much experience.Alain_Cohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08352476615242858677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-13556145210830606612015-11-11T18:09:45.607-08:002015-11-11T18:09:45.607-08:00Co-disposition works 100% of the time in palladium...Co-disposition works 100% of the time in palladium systems and it is not crack based. Co-disposition does produce nanoparticles which seems to be pervasive in LENR reactions.Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-6376487690067516062015-11-11T17:47:29.751-08:002015-11-11T17:47:29.751-08:00The SAFIRE project (Stellar Atmospheric Function I...The SAFIRE project (Stellar Atmospheric Function In Regulation Experiment) is exploring the “electric sun” hypothesis. Recently Montgomery Childs reported that SAFIRE Project is finding nuclear products and massive energy spikes with a device designed to simulate the electric sun.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFsTttzh0oA<br /><br />Like many experiments, Safire may have recreated a long dead LENR mechanism based on plasma condensation. <br /><br />Safire has discovered a layer of dark mode hydrogen that accumulates near the outer surface of the hydrogen plasma ball in the SAFIRE experiment. This layer absorbs energy until it reaches a limit where it erupts. The input power is only 1800 watts of DC power and the power produced during an eruption is between 2,000,000 to a maximum of 10,000,000 watts. There is also signs of a material with a nucleon count of 3 being produced in the experiment.<br /><br />A theory that could explain the development of the dark layer is the “Dark mode” polariton soliton theory. The polariton “Black Hole” absorbs energy until it reaches a limit whereupon it explodes in a bosenova. This is a behavior that is also seen in the experiments of Holmlid, defkalion and even Rossi among other LENR experiments.<br /><br />This theory can be verified by the appearance of K-mesons and its decay products such as muons and electrons. A particle detector that follows Holmlid’s design might work well in the Safire experiment it show that a tachyon based nuclear process is happening in SAFIRE.<br /><br />There have been reports that solar flares produce changes in nuclear decay rates here on earth.<br /><br />This may be do to the separation of positive and negative vacuum energy between the interior of the sun and its surroundings.<br /><br />A experimental suggestion for the Safire experiment is to check nuclear decay rates before, during, and after a 10 megawatt outbursts to see if the vacuum is being distorted by the cause of the outburst.<br /><br />This SAFIRE experiment looks a lot like the plasmatron, an overunity power device produced in the 1980’s using hydrogen based plasma.<br /><br />Experimenters in overunity could duplicate the SAFIRE and/or the plasmatron experiment and test for emissions of sub-atomic particles.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT-94c1Q6MsAxilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-20888655706252468172015-11-11T16:56:16.685-08:002015-11-11T16:56:16.685-08:00From Ed's list:
"5. Most of the heat ener...From Ed's list:<br />"5. Most of the heat energy results from He4 formation when deuterium is used. An effective theory must explain how helium is formed while producing the amount of energy expected to result from D+D fusion."<br /><br />Peter's comment:<br />"5. OK, but how could NiH produce also Helium?"<br /><br />It wouldn't. The list is a list of known phenomena, not of everything claimed anywhere. I have seen no evidence that NiH produces any helium at all. Ed thinks it produces deuterium, and then there could be some small reaction level from that, producing helium, maybe, but it would be tiny<br /><br />Peter, there is something you studiously ignore. There is very little good data on NiH. What we have with NiH are some commercial claims, with almost all the data being unconfirmed. Ed's list is about what has been confirmed, he is attempting to describe known phenomena for cold fusion theory to address. He does attempt to explain NiH reactions. However, his list is not covering every reported phenomenon.<br /><br />The difficulty of creating NAE shows that ordinary material doesn't work. Something has to change, the material must be conditioned in some way, at least with wet PdD, about which the most is known.<br /><br />Your comment is: "LENR is initiated only with great difficulty being caused only by a novel and rare condition- NAE. It is not probable that cracks are and why should they be novel?"<br /><br />Cracks come in sizes. This list does not propose cracks, you are jumping ahead to the application to Ed's own theory. He proposes "nanocracks," which are cracks so small that I somewhat question whether or not the term "crack" is even appropriate. They are linear regions of stressed palladium where there is an widening of the gap such that his hydroton structure can form.<br /><br />The proposal that NAE involves cracks is quite possible, in my view, but there may be other ways to form a working NAE. Don't attempt to apply Ed's criteria to experimental work not covered by it.Abd ulRahman Lomaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14566271926809161923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-117169010255599162015-11-11T14:07:29.723-08:002015-11-11T14:07:29.723-08:00It is nice to know there are people who are thinki...It is nice to know there are people who are thinking straight in this strange world.<br /><br />Not you, Peter.tyyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05296030725193206870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-79302395596946130932015-11-11T12:46:17.214-08:002015-11-11T12:46:17.214-08:00It is oftentimes irresistible to ignore experiment...It is oftentimes irresistible to ignore experimental results that do not fit into the framework of our theories.<br /><br />The miracle Lugano ash particle is so unbelievable, there is a natural assumption all of us will make: this particle must have been salted. We will also assume that the buildup of lithium and nickel isotopic changes on and in the ash happened at a relatively constant rate over a long period of time. But what may have happened is a one time explosive reaction where lithium and nickel interacted in a singular and monolithic event involving billions of atoms. Rossi is not the only example of this LENR behavior. Such an event was seen in Holmlid's experiment where billions of fusion reactions instantly produced huge numbers of neutral particle reaction products. The way Holmlid laid out his experiment leaves no doubt.<br /><br />Just by chance, the analysts of the isotopic change in the Lugano ash content picked up this one in a million 100 micron nickel particle as the object of their examination.<br /><br />The nickel screen(defined in his patent) inside the alumina tube kept this big particle from entering the central regions of the reactor tube. There was just a few of these oversized particles produced by the fuel preparation process. Most of the smaller nickel particles made it through the mesh and entered the central region.<br /><br />When the ash was removed, 99.8 % of the ash was held in place by the mesh inside the reactor tube by the wire mesh. Only the biggest ash particles came out of the reactor tube during the ash dump. <br /><br />To make a valid comparison, the Lugano testers selected a large fuel particle from the fuel held back after the fuel loading process. <br /><br />That fuel particle was isotopically normal.<br /><br />This one ash particle was so unusual that it is near impossible for it to be fabricated by someone who wanted to salt the ash sample. <br /><br />The salter would have had to remove the 100 micron fuel particle and replace it with the Ni62 and Li6 coated ash particle. When the fuel was loaded, the fuel was divided into parts where some fuel was reserved for latter isotopic analysis and another part was loaded into the reactor. The devil is in the details when the method of scam is considered.<br /><br />We must try to understand how a massive burst LENR reaction involving billions of atoms can occur in a single event. And how a single isotope can result from many(many to one) different precursors that fed into this singular clustered reaction.Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.com