tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post5560985437765004354..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: JAN 28, 2017 LENR THEORIES IN 4-LETTER WORDSGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-31526796494311657962017-01-31T05:33:33.674-08:002017-01-31T05:33:33.674-08:00Zyntix furthermore, you should use any styles of o...<a href="http://www.healthsupreviews.com/zyntix-male-enhancement/" rel="nofollow">Zyntix</a> furthermore, you should use any styles of oils or drug treatments for constructing your muscle mass underneath supervision or steerage of a clinical representative Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18005628352454245936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-61811147565361511452017-01-29T08:09:17.107-08:002017-01-29T08:09:17.107-08:00https://youtu.be/1Z7FXK_2CAc
Comment from the sam...https://youtu.be/1Z7FXK_2CAc<br /><br />Comment from the same video .<br /><br />COMMENTS • 3<br /><br />Add a public comment...<br /><br />James Rovnak<br />Interesting! How does this compare with Norman Cook & Andrea Rossi's theory?<br />1 year ago•1<br /><br />Mart Gibson<br />+James Rovnak You will have to ask them. I have communicated briefly by email with Norman and he recognized the geometric similarities with his face centered nuclear lattice. He seemed intrigued. In fact I suspect it was his viewing of this video that got the viewership ball rolling. If you are really interested in the fundamentals to this subject, I recommend you view some of the theoretically based videos at the YouTube channel under my name. They reiterate on a more fundamental particle level the geometry of Cook's QND, which I believe is correct based on my cursory review. My understanding is that Rossi has been consistently taciturn about his work, and I know nothing further of it. I spoke with Peter Hagelstein at some length about a month or so ago about the subject. He has recently been investigating the tetrahedral interstitial regions of the palladium lattice, and said he had a paper in review that addressed these regions. I have not read it. I don't believe the granularity of the lattice is involved, though I would surmise that the granular boundaries would tend to collect helium. I believe the tetrahedral interstices near the surface of the lattice in conjunction with deuterium saturation of the lattice are key. With respect to quantum phenomenology of my other videos, my approach is that fundamental particles are actually classical oscillations of an underlying spatially continuous substrate with an extremely high bulk modulus. As such the oscillations, operating at a characteristic frequency based on the inertial density of that substrate under the stress of ongoing cosmic expansion, can best be understood using classical wave analysis and the stress/strain relationship, with which you as an engineer will be well acquainted. What are called fundamental particles by the standard model of physics, quarks and leptons, are clearly an interaction of the nodal and anti-nodal components of these oscillatory structures in high energy collisions. I have used, but now hesitate to use the term waves for this phenomena, because it conjures images of planar waves in a liquid medium, which is an inaccurate representation. Such oscillation is more like an instance of microscopic internal friction of an extremely dense solid that exhibits isotropic torsion which resolves to orthogonally oriented directions. The result is an initial torsional displacement that oscillates while rotating in place, creating the neutron. Such rotational oscillation prevents dispersion of the oscillatory energy, as the primary nodes rotate in space at a yoctohertz frequency. Continued expansion of the substrate results in a drop in mechanical impedance and a transmission of energy and power at the leading node as the electron which we register as beta decay. The fundamental oscillation losses some energy and therefore frequency to become the proton. This is basic structural engineering and it gets lost on theoretical physicists. I hope you will find it of interest, pursue the links, and let me know what you think. If you will pursue the matter, you will find a model which, arguing from first principles, correctly predicts to 8 order of magnitude in most cases, the basic observed quantum, as well as some macro, properties of spin, the quantum nature of gravity, charge, magnetic dipole moment, neutron/proton/electron mass ratios, the nature of anti-particles, Newton’s gravitational constant, the Hubble rate, etc. Cheers Mart Gibson<br />1 year ago•<br /><br />Ian Walker<br />Excellent video Sir<br />1 year ago•1<br /><br /><br />sam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-46868174914072599932017-01-28T23:02:37.479-08:002017-01-28T23:02:37.479-08:00Sorry, this is just an opinion:
A rule for LENR
...Sorry, this is just an opinion:<br /><br />A rule for LENR<br /><br />Nuclear energy transfer from a nucleus to a Bose condensate quasiparticle ensemble member(BCQEM) happens without radiation because its energy storage capacity is large enough to hold enough energy to reach the meson creation level without an EMF overflow. The BCQEM acts like a big energy holding tank. When the BCQEM does overflow, the BCQEM produces mesons through Hadronization. The BCQEM is a BEC of SPPs. The BEC lives on the surface of the UDH.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadronization<br /><br />When the quasiparticle is not a member of a Bose condensate, it releases stored nuclear energy less than or equal to 300,000 electron volts. This is a single SPP.<br /><br />Energy transfer from the nucleus to the individual or collective SPP is via entanglement. The SPP becomes the same particle as the nucleus and shares energy.<br />=================<br /><br />Holmlid states: <br /><br />Quote<br /><br />"More recently, another form of Rydberg matter has been detected and studied, where the electron orbital angular momentum l is zero. The Rydberg matter structure is in this case instead given by the spin angular momentum s > 0. This quantum number was identified experimentally to have values s = 1, 2 or 3, giving an interatomic distance of only 0.57 pm in level s = 1.3This type of matter is usually called ultra-dense hydrogen with notation as H(0) for simplicity, with most studies concerned with the level s = 2 with experimental H-H bond distance of 2.3 ± 0.1 pm."<br /><br />In UDH, the electrons form a stationary spin wave on the surface of the UDH, the electrons sit still and don't orbit (electron orbital angular momentum l is zero). In this state, electrons will become entangled with photons and become SPPs. All the SPPs become entangled and form a BEC. Thus the UDH effectively produces a huge SPP with huge energy storage capacity. This SPP is quasi stable and continually releases energy as mesons when its meson energy limit is reached.<br /><br />In a non BEC state, single SPPs on nanowire have a small energy storage capacity and will release stored energy as XUV light when they decay. (10 to 100 picoseconds)Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.com