tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post5234102323818548239..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: LEONID URUTSKOEV: Phenomenological model of collective Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-53194189100825853752015-10-11T12:26:15.709-07:002015-10-11T12:26:15.709-07:00Thank you, but what you say is only a fragment of ...Thank you, but what you say is only a fragment of an idea- can you please EXPLAIN?<br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-72961869567025032602015-10-11T12:07:24.380-07:002015-10-11T12:07:24.380-07:00На сайе http://live.cnews.ru/forum/index.php?show...На сайе http://live.cnews.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=68570&pid=1998189&st=7150&#entry1998189<br />эта тема обсуждается давно<br /><br />Vladimirtim, Вам будет интересно,- француз пришел к идеи коллективных ядерных реакций.<br /><br />Леонид URUTSKOEV: Феноменологическая модель коллективных низкоэнергетических ядерных реакций<br /><br />http_title<br /><br />Это только полшага в правильном направлении.<br />До полного понимания, огромная дистанция.<br />В моем же распоряжении четкая теория, множество удачных конструктивных решений и новые теоретически находки. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-74603980180273141242015-10-09T11:07:44.101-07:002015-10-09T11:07:44.101-07:00The work of Leonid Urutskoev and D.V. Filippov on ...The work of Leonid Urutskoev and D.V. Filippov on exploding titanium foils are formative to my understanding of the LENR reaction. One point that greatly impressed me seen in these experiments was the detection of the LENR reaction far from the plasma channel produced by the exploding foil. I call this feature of the reaction “action at a distance”. In these exploding foil experiments, fission of uranium was detected in a chamber in the test device that was physically separated from the location of the plasma channel. From Holmlid, we now know that muons and mesons can be produced by the LENR reaction, these subatomic particles can travel over a considerable distance to initiate muon catalyzed fission.<br /> <br />The LENR reaction has a gigantic range of action from nanoscale energy production in biological transformations to the formation of transuranic elements of the most heavy kind at the high energy range of the reaction. <br /><br />This wide range of transformation of elements confuses most LENR theorists. It is difficult to envision how transuranic elements tha usually form in the trillion degree environment inside supernova can be produced here on earth in a bucket of water. <br /><br />Most of the LENR old guard believe that LeClare is mentally unbalanced for claiming that his cavitation based reaction can produce the heaviest transuranic elements that exist. Holmlid also does not understand that his laser based reaction which produce temperatures up to as much as 500 million kelvin is a LENR reaction.<br /> <br />But transformation of elements can occur all the way up to the quark soup level of nuclear processes being as energetic as any nuclear processes to be found in the universe. The more energy that is fed into the LENR transformation process, the more energetic is the resulting nuclear products that will result. <br /><br />At the very high end of the LENR reaction scale, a scale that befuddles our understanding, the scale at which transuranic elements form, the question that is begging to be answered: what force can encompass multiple atoms together with all their associated electron clouds so that they can be combined together to produce an ultra heavy atom. The answer is magnetism; nano magnetism, asymmetric magnetism, strong optical magnetism and Fano resonances in asymmetric plasmonic metamolecules, magnetism as intense as any to be found anywhere in the universe.<br />Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-73429031468659855702015-10-09T10:31:40.147-07:002015-10-09T10:31:40.147-07:00I think you misread something. The last reaction...I think you misread something. The last reaction creates N, Mg, Si all distant from Iron out of Nickel. And ,like the first commentator I see that this reaction too doesn't conserve charge and is endothermic.Gammahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11384139377695962166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-79065542136174244272015-10-09T09:47:02.436-07:002015-10-09T09:47:02.436-07:00Leonid Urutskoev is a widely published researcher ...Leonid Urutskoev is a widely published researcher in the field of nuclear physics. Some of his publications - excellent works > Here: http://65.54.113.26/Author/19401692/leonid-i-urutskoevAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-19796409750957897672015-10-09T07:13:41.658-07:002015-10-09T07:13:41.658-07:00sounds familiar, everything decaying toward iron, ...sounds familiar, everything decaying toward iron, borrowing energy from the collective and parents on opposite sides of the divide pressing rapidly inward to produce daughters closer to iron. froartyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06965146299157983498noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-29282926850921240842015-10-09T06:07:22.215-07:002015-10-09T06:07:22.215-07:00At least at first blush, I find this article to be...At least at first blush, I find this article to be absolutely fascinating.Lenr5https://www.blogger.com/profile/12508348676253544976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-24268074491904200952015-10-09T05:00:43.244-07:002015-10-09T05:00:43.244-07:00Great a real theorical way from a long time !
Cong...Great a real theorical way from a long time !<br />Congratulations<br />David FOJTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-23128563554309413692015-10-09T04:37:20.000-07:002015-10-09T04:37:20.000-07:00I struggled to read the poor English and follow th...I struggled to read the poor English and follow the incoherent arguments made in this paper. The overall conclusion seems to be that in an unexplained way lower energy nuclear reactions are more probable than higher. But exactly the opposite conclusion is expected if there is an approach or separation of charged nuclei. The Coulomb barrier is not even discussed.<br /><br />Regarding the citation of Bosch &. Faestermann in ref [5], this work regards natural Re187 which beta decays with a tiny 2 keV energy. In this exceptional case ionization of the Re will effect the half life. But this is not expected for low Z isotopes and higher energies.<br /><br />The authors suggest a lower energy reaction might be responsible for lithium reactions:-<br /> Li7+2H→Li6+He3+0.47 MeV<br />Unfortunately the energy has been wrongly calculated and in fact is endothermic. Furthermore the reaction does not conserve charge.<br /><br />For a critique of the Lugano results see http://blog.stepchange-innovations.com/2014/10/excess-heat-isotope-changes-e-cat-lenr-reactor-part2<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com