tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post3745928498821734210..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: NOV 30, 2015 A GREAT DAY FOR LENR BECAUSE BECFICE WAS BORNGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-84568883238226239652015-11-30T22:39:11.980-08:002015-11-30T22:39:11.980-08:00Clustered LENR reaction require that LENR be a cat...Clustered LENR reaction require that LENR be a catalytic reaction both in the cause of the reaction and the effects of the reaction.<br /><br />Bose condensation in LENR requires that LENR must be a catalytic effect. Only a catalytic based reaction can support Bose condensation. A catalytic object is the same before and after the reaction...it does not change. The LENR reaction cannot continue as a Bose condensate unless the Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP) is unchanged by the LENR reaction. This implies that any change such as energy gain that LENR produces must be shared equally by all the members of the Bose condensate.<br /><br />This clustered reaction effect in a Bose condensate is called super-absorption. But in the experiments of J.C. Fisher, he shows that tens of thousands of LENR reactions are caused by a single catalytic exotic neutral particle (ENP). It is possible that this free moving particle is entangled with others of it kind in a bose condensate which will share equally in the energy produced in the clustered reaction.<br /><br />For example in a extreme case, it looks like the 100 micron nickel Lugano ash particle #1 was converted to Ni62 in one clustered LENR reaction involving many billions of nickel and lithium atoms. The energy produced by this huge clustered reaction could have been buffered by a Bose condensate of ENPs.Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-36473570149278505892015-11-30T20:00:57.157-08:002015-11-30T20:00:57.157-08:00http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.2752.p...http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.2752.pdf<br /><br />Here is the math support for the “Mössbauer Effect”. It shows that a monopole magnetic field is the most sensitive element to the Mössbauer effect.<br /><br />From the Urutskoiev exploding titanium foil experiment<br /><br />4) Various difficulties of interpretation gradually led Urutskoiev and his research team to the conclusion that magnetic poles could be a possible source of the strange radiation effects they had observed. They became aware of the present author’s work and a fruitful collaboration has been initiated.<br /><br />From the very beginning, an important experiment was realized by Urutskoiev and Ivoilov [54], using the fact that 57Fe is at the same time magnetic and the most sensitive element to the Mössbauer effect. They irradiated, at some meters from the source of the supposed monopoles, a sample of 57Fe . Behind the iron sample was one pole of a long linear magnet, in order to repel the monopoles of the same sign and attract the monopoles of the opposite sign. Owing to the Mössbauer effect, they found a distinct shift of a characteristic γ ray.<br /><br />They repeated the experiment with the other pole of the magnet behind the iron sample and, with the same exposure they found a γ ray shift in the opposite direction [54].<br /><br />One can make two remarks about this experiment :<br /><br />a) This is one of the most brilliant proof of monopole magnetism. But there are others : for instance, the fact that Ivoilov focused a monopole beam with an electromagnet.<br /><br />b) If the 57Fe target sample used in the Mössbauer experiment is abandoned for three days, the preceding characteristic γ ray spectrum goes back to its mean normal position. This half-life effect seems to hold for all the effects of magnetism induced by monopoles: they seem to have a limited time of life (not predicted by theory). But other effects, such isotopic shifts are definitive.<br /><br />From this experimental result, the half life of SPP monopole magnetism is three days.<br /><br />54. N. Ivoilov & L. Urutskoiev, The influence of « strange » radiation on Mössbauer spectrum of F57 in metallic foils, Rus. Applied Physics, N° 5, 2004 (in Russian). <br /><br />In english:<br />http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-297/aflb297m331.pdfAxilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-54548156829161819752015-11-30T16:11:42.219-08:002015-11-30T16:11:42.219-08:00The particle #1 analized in the Lugano report reve...The particle #1 analized in the Lugano report reveals amazing things about the character of the LENR reaction. This 100 micron particle is over 99% pure Ni62. This implies much about how the LENR reaction behaves.<br /><br />Ni66 does not appear in that miracle Lugano ash particle.<br /><br />See:<br /><br />http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/19/my-opinion-regarding-rossicook-reaction-theory-axil-axil/ Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-51146187911165467652015-11-30T10:02:44.377-08:002015-11-30T10:02:44.377-08:00Re: "Catalyst." If the NIckel-Hydeogen...Re: "Catalyst." If the NIckel-Hydeogen results may be explained by a NIi62--> NI66_-->Ni 62 cycle, appparently Ni62 would be called a catalyst. Perhaps a reasonable definition of a catalyst would be "a reactant which is regenerated during a reaction sequence.in a cyclic process. " Dean L. Sinclairhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07011574261048476893noreply@blogger.com