tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post3660385524292959256..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: NOV 29, 2015- LENR DISPUTE & INFO WITH HELP FROM FRIENDSGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-70688646693982453512015-11-30T02:41:54.594-08:002015-11-30T02:41:54.594-08:00Dear Old Friend,
thanks- I would like to publish...Dear Old Friend,<br /><br />thanks- I would like to publish it, as it is or extended corrected by you, it is very valuable nd true.<br />Waiting for your approval, please join me openly in the fight for Truth in LENR.<br /><br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-88994814804051819032015-11-30T02:41:49.624-08:002015-11-30T02:41:49.624-08:00Dear Old Friend,
thanks- I would like to publish...Dear Old Friend,<br /><br />thanks- I would like to publish it, as it is or extended corrected by you, it is very valuable nd true.<br />Waiting for your approval, please join me openly in the fight for Truth in LENR.<br /><br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-27596232277626030922015-11-29T14:08:51.295-08:002015-11-29T14:08:51.295-08:00Ed is correct one needs to use the right tools tha...Ed is correct one needs to use the right tools that allow observations and data to be collected. Some of us have looked for nano features, ;like what Ed suggests, and with the instrumentation capable of doing so, that is TEM ( transmission electron micrography). In my experience with this technique on samples known to produce 4He in abundance (e15+ atoms) neither definitive nor suggestive 'nano-cracks' were prominent. Of course one problem with looking in ever smaller domains is that the landscape becomes very much larger and the techniques are very laborious. Contrary to 'nano-dimensional' clearly fusion domains features of many microns to tens of microns that were certainly definitively identified as nuclear active domains have been a perfectly commonplace feature in a variety of nuclear active metals + deuteriom. Protium (ordinary hydrogen with it's trace D) controls by the way show neither helium production nor nuclear active domains.RGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13317393699961815171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-45686503788756282022015-11-29T14:08:42.090-08:002015-11-29T14:08:42.090-08:00Ed is correct one needs to use the right tools tha...Ed is correct one needs to use the right tools that allow observations and data to be collected. Some of us have looked for nano features, ;like what Ed suggests, and with the instrumentation capable of doing so, that is TEM ( transmission electron micrography). In my experience with this technique on samples known to produce 4He in abundance (e15+ atoms) neither definitive nor suggestive 'nano-cracks' were prominent. Of course one problem with looking in ever smaller domains is that the landscape becomes very much larger and the techniques are very laborious. Contrary to 'nano-dimensional' clearly fusion domains features of many microns to tens of microns that were certainly definitively identified as nuclear active domains have been a perfectly commonplace feature in a variety of nuclear active metals + deuteriom. Protium (ordinary hydrogen with it's trace D) controls by the way show neither helium production nor nuclear active domains.RGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13317393699961815171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-25682130343076597042015-11-29T11:01:36.688-08:002015-11-29T11:01:36.688-08:00There seems to be two broad schools of thought in ...There seems to be two broad schools of thought in LENR: those who believe that LENR is catalytic and those who don’t. Peter has educated me in the catalytic paradigm and I now join him in his thinking on nuclear catalysis. Ed Storms is not in the catalytic school of thought. It seems to me that the school of catalysis considers the production of the catalytic effect must originate from the catalytic action of an Exotic Neutral Particle. There are a dozen ideas as to what that particle is but it can be tested for. To illustrate for example, the experiments doing the Cathode 64 test could have placed the cathode on a photographic emulsion immediately after LENR activity has stopped to check for particle tracts. If an experiment does not show ENP tracts, than the concept of ENP is falsified. <br /><br />Ed Storms says: “It is well known in research that we see only what we are expecting to see. This is a universal experience and says nothing about the competence of the researcher. For example, if radiation were expected, a detector would be set up. If radiation were not expected and a detector was not used, any radiation would not be seen. The radiation would remain invisible and be ignored. It would not be discovered no matter how competent the researcher.”<br /><br />Researchers that expect to see ENP particle tracts have seen them. If the ENP camp wants to kill off the catalytic ENP school of thought, falsify the ENP theory by testing for the ENP when excess heat is observed in an experiment.<br />Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.com