tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post3432247106193111044..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: NOV 22, 2015 LENR NOT VIOLATING LAWS JUST CHOOSING OTHER LAWSGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-41868648727540531332015-11-22T16:03:54.040-08:002015-11-22T16:03:54.040-08:00Very Interesting article in Infinite magazine on C...Very Interesting article in Infinite magazine on CF pioneer Richard Oriani, who died in august.<br /><br />http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/OrianiObituary.pdf<br /><br />"Fisher suggested to Oriani that he place the CR-39 detectors outside of the electrolyte. He says, “Oriani did that and he found evidence of particles that he could record outside the apparatus. He put two plastic detectors in the gas that was coming off the electrolysis...Lo and behold, he got a shower of tracks on those. Thousands of tracks, more than he cared to count.”<br /><br />Reference:<br /><br />http://www.fondazionefrisone.it/eventi/catania07/FisherJradiationprod.pdf<br /><br />External Radiation Produced by Electrolysis — A Work in Progress<br /><br />These particles are strange. What could these particles be? They don't obey the inverse square law that defines a spherical radiation pattern because the detectors outside the glass don't show any particle activity. Subatomic particles like neutrons are not effected by air flow, they are just to small to hit air molecules. Air has its own moderation profile and these particle don't look like they are being moderated.<br /><br />In fact, airflow affects the movements of these particles by a factor of 7.<br /><br />quote: "The results of this experiment are plotted in Fig. 4. When the fan is on the flux of particles in excess of preexisting background increases by a factor of about 7 compared with when the fan is off".<br /><br />These particles are massive enough to be on the same mass level as air molecules.<br /><br />Components in Dry Air<br /><br />The two most dominant components in dry air are Oxygen and Nitrogen. Oxygen has a 16 atomic unit mass and Nitrogen has a 14 atomic units mass. Since both of these elements are diatomic in air - O2 and N2, the molecular mass of Oxygen is 32 and the molecular mass of Nitrogen is 28.<br /><br />Total Molecular Mass of Air is 28.97. This is about 28 GeV.<br /><br />From the article as follows:<br /><br />"Fisher says that Oriani used the polyneutron theory on two major experimental efforts. The second collaboration is now a paper in progress on creating the same reaction in a solid, using a stack of two CR-39 detector chips. Fisher notes that they found “tremendous numbers of etch pits, thousands of etch pits.” Sometimes they were “not uniformly scattered across the surfaces; sometimes there would be a patch on an outside surface for which there was not a patch for the inside surface. Once there was a big patch on one inside surface that was matched by another patch on the facing inside surface on the other detector chip.” After matching up all of the pits and showers, Fisher says “it became clear that the reactions had started in various places in the interior of the sandwich of plastics and in at least one place the reaction had spread from one detector into the other.” He calls this “an incredible and terrific experiment” and hopes to finish the paper soon."<br /><br />IMHO, these strange particles are tachyons with a mass of about 1,000,000 GeV. <br /><br />These particle that Fisher and Oriani called polyneutrons produce LENR: they cause LENR in all LENR systems. I have explained how these polyneutrons form. They are relatively new to science which calls them "dark mode" Surface Plasmon Polaritons(SPP)Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-27151203584494369662015-11-22T14:29:33.067-08:002015-11-22T14:29:33.067-08:00Axil you know not of what you speak but sometimes ...Axil you know not of what you speak but sometimes your insights prove useful. As for producing melting of palladium and many other metals under water while being sonicated that is not a matter of the water disappearing first, the heat comes first in the water along with prodigious 4He. Works in D2O well poorly if at all in H2O. <br /><br />Regarding producing cold fusion the most simple experimental apparatus is nothing more than a glow discharge tube, aka compact flourescent light bulb. Remove the interior coating on the glass tube, add nano-particulate hydrogen loving metals such as Pd, Ni, Ti, Nb, Zr and more. Reassemble under hiigh vacuum, this is where a lot of artistry comes in, evacuate the 'bulb' then add back some D2 gas, or if you are a die hard lenr type H2. You've now made a deuterium lamp, by managing the tube to contain the maximum amount of D2 while still striking a glow, a nice pinkish blue for D2, the tube will produce cold fusion. Beware of intense 'mischugenon' radiation which behaves somewhat predictably like neutrons but clearly is not neutrons. Not every bulb will become a fusion bulb but many will, especially good ones will slowly turn from dull red heat to brilliant white heat and self-destruct. The challenge of course is to refine and tune these cold fusion 'heat lamps' for long life and controllable heat output. RGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13317393699961815171noreply@blogger.com