tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post3367114017451557161..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: DEC 21, 2106 LENR AND THE TOP WORD OF 2016Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-21127143872364918142016-12-23T22:49:04.005-08:002016-12-23T22:49:04.005-08:00It must be clear by now surely, that all this '...It must be clear by now surely, that all this 'heading towards 5 sigma' rubbish is just a delaying tactic to assist in 'kicking the can down the road' for yet another year. It seems to have worked pretty well over this year almost now gone.<br />At the beginning of this year, soon after the demise of the all powerful partnership was announced (which some strongly suspected had already happened but was denied, I might add), it was said by Mr Rossi that none of this would affect the rapid progress into massive production of the well tested 1MW plants. It achieved a COP of 50 no less, so why would anyone want to wait for something better? <br />And yet here we are at the end of this very same year, chasing a new never before mentioned random goal of '5 sigma'. <br />What happened to the previous random goals we were waiting for, such as the certification for home use of a simple ecat water heater? Oh yes, I remember now, it's 'On course'. Better check the heading! After five years there has been a lot of drift in the directional gyros.)<br />Well, it seems they were all superseded in turn by the next year's new random goal. <br />I wonder how long this 'heading towards 5 sigma' goal can be maintained while producing nothing?<br />I think we are probably due for a new 'marvelous all powerful partner' to justify a few more year's of faithful following. After all, surely they would do all that 'due diligence' stuff so if they invest their money in it, it must be genuine. Right? <br />Well, apparently not.Pweethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09197878743499245329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-35506951707097491852016-12-22T10:17:05.598-08:002016-12-22T10:17:05.598-08:00Translate
Olen
December 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM
Dear ...Translate<br />Olen<br />December 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM<br />Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:<br />Are further tests on course for the evolution of the low temperature E-Cats?<br />Olen<br /><br />Translate<br />Andrea Rossi<br />December 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM<br />Olen:<br />Yes.<br />Warm Regards,<br />A.R.<br /><br />JPR<br />December 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM<br />Update?<br /><br />Andrea Rossi<br />December 22, 2016 at 9:49 AM<br />JPR:<br />We are working well, the Team is up also during these holidays.<br />Merry Christmas and a Great 2017 to all our dear Readers !<br />Andrea Rossi<br /><br />Yrka<br />December 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM<br />Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.<br />1. Your desire to achieve 5 sigma is related to the theoretical basis originating in the quark-X nuclear reactions?<br />2. This affects the design of the quark-X and pre-production?<br />3. What today thermal effitsiency quark-X?<br />Thank you for taking the time to answer.<br />Merry Christmas, your wife and your team!<br />Yury Isaev<br />engineer<br />Tyumen, Russia<br /><br />Andrea Rossi<br />December 22, 2016 at 7:53 AM<br />Yrka:<br />1- no<br />2- no<br />3- the COP will be disclosed when it will be presented.<br />Warm Regards,<br />A.R.<br /><br />Giuliano Bettini<br />December 22, 2016 at 2:49 AM<br />Dear Andrea,<br />quote:<br />Pekka Janhunen<br />December 21, 2016 at 2:48 AM<br />Dear Andrea,<br />The term sigma5 in this context is unclear to me. Which one of the following does it refer to:<br />1/ Out of 3.5million time units (e.g., seconds) that it runs, it fails for one time unit?<br />2/ Out of 3.5million units produced, one of them is faulty?<br />3/ Something else?<br />regards, /pekka<br /><br />Andrea Rossi<br />December 21, 2016 at 1:02 PM<br />Pekka Janhunen:<br />No, it is a totally different issue, related to the repetition of the data from the units under R&D.<br />Warm Regards,<br />A.R.<br />I suppose that it’s possible to exactly define the term sigma5, just to avoid “the interactions between something and nothing”. :)<br />“.. it is a totally different issue…” but, what is it?<br />Kind regards, a happy new year,<br />Giuliano Bettini.<br /><br />Andrea Rossi<br />December 22, 2016 at 7:51 AM<br />Giuliano Bettini:<br />Is a calculation based on the repetitivity of a series of data.<br />Happy New Year to you,<br />A.R.<br /><br />Janne<br />December 22, 2016 at 6:02 AM<br />Dear Andrea,<br /><br />If it took you 10 months to reach the current 3.5 Sigma, is it possible for you to reach 5 Sigma by February? In other words, is the presentation still on track to be held then?<br /><br />Best Regards,<br /><br />Janne<br /><br />Andrea Rossi<br />December 22, 2016 at 7:50 AM<br />Janne:<br />I do not know.<br />Warm Regards,<br />A.R.sam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.com