tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post7510113982228139802..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: THE LENR-ist’s SUNDAY Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-32054979346969700242013-04-28T15:46:32.804-07:002013-04-28T15:46:32.804-07:00Random Observations:
- New Energy (such as offere...Random Observations:<br /><br />- New Energy (such as offered by LENR+) is a potential global game changer (we all would know this)<br /><br />- There are 3 types of glory/satisfaction from discovering a 'dramatic' new invention :-<br />1) being the officially recognized inventor - likely a Nobel prize - and/or name goes up in lights and is written into history of mankind<br />2) making a lot of money from commercialization (like an Edison)<br />3) achieving a purely personal satisfaction at making such a discovery<br /><br />- Visions of endless fame and wealth are able to 'blind' even the most seeing person. That blindness can lead to strange behavior. It can also lead to delusions of grandeur.<br /><br />- Highly creative and inventive people (right brain dominance), can often become so attached to their inventions (even art) that they will not let it go. It can be as if they fear they will lose a part of themselves if they hand their creation over to others. This aspect of creatives, is (IMHO) is usually not fully understood by more logical (less creative left brain processing) people who may simply regard such behavior as highly suspicious if not as evidence outright dishonesty. Some people in such a position may prefer to take their discovery to their grave rather than share it.<br /><br />- There are and have been in the life of us people, dreams of technology control/environmental control, specifically: harnessing fire, safety from predation, ready comfort, reliable access to food, easy transport, personal & group flight, access to global knowledge, variations on space travel, endless cheap energy, teleporation, etc: etc:. Many such dreams have been achieved, some seem close, others still in the realm of fantasy. <br /><br />- Dreams can be incredibly powerful to some among us. They may even warp reality for some.<br /><br />DSMdsjm1https://www.blogger.com/profile/07779323885237127015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-17602323816886594912013-04-28T13:34:09.100-07:002013-04-28T13:34:09.100-07:00It is not in the commercial interests of the curre...It is not in the commercial interests of the current Ni/H reactor developers to reveal the capabilities of their products. Such a revelation would awaken intense industrial competition. Even though this excuse to keep a low profile has been used by scammers for centuries to justify lack of product proof, sometimes a low profile turns out to be just that.<br /><br />It may just be giving these LENR reactor developers time to understand what their products are doing. <br /><br />Unlike the US government who can afford to keep their projects black until they are forced to reveal them when the bombs fall, commercial R&D shops need to release some info to keep the development funds coming in.<br /><br />Is this behavior a scam or just business as usual in this modern age? <br /><br />Our system of commerce has recourse to those who so invest. As has happened recently with John Rohner of Papp engine celebrity, the investors in his company got to a point where they felt compelled to inform the FBI that they may have been conned and John Rohner is currently up to his earlobes in lawyers and their fees.<br /><br />This is appropriate justice; this is a powerful deterrent to inappropriate commercial behavior, just ask Bernie Madoff.<br /> <br /><br />Besides all this commercial investor regulation, do the investors in alternative energy systems need maryyugo to look after their interests? Yes, Mary has a heart of gold and cares about all the stupid people.<br /><br />The proper tools of business exist. IMHO, if she wants to do some good, Mary should spend her considerable time, talent, and energy fighting the moves of entrenched interests to deregulate governmental regulation of commerce.<br /><br /><br />Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-55094793733750484502013-04-28T12:12:08.836-07:002013-04-28T12:12:08.836-07:00Dear Mary,
Just let's make a sharp difference ...Dear Mary,<br />Just let's make a sharp difference between credibilityand his double "main line" is so snobbish.<br />Otherwise I fully agree with you that perfect "beyond any doubt" demos have to be made.<br />May I remind you my old blog paper: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/05/call-for-perfect-e-cat-experiment.html<br />Rossi has ignored it and I became persona non grata on his blog. However it is still time for an absolutely convincing test.<br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-49731663053411688142013-04-28T11:57:21.741-07:002013-04-28T11:57:21.741-07:00Dear Alain,
I like your ideas that add value to t...Dear Alain,<br /><br />I like your ideas that add value to this paper.<br />I will be glad to discuss with you in private e.g.<br />on Skype as I have yesterday with our mutual friend M.V.<br />As you know, the French professors of engineering have taught me essential things.<br />Peter Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-24255882056072049002013-04-28T11:36:11.245-07:002013-04-28T11:36:11.245-07:00No need to overcomplicate. To be credible to main...No need to overcomplicate. To be credible to main line science and main line media, all LENR proponents need to do is what Rossi, Defkalion and Miley claim to have done.<br /><br />They need to show a reactor which makes dozens or hundreds of watts with little or no power input for periods of days or weeks using an overall volume which can't hide fuel or batteries. NOBODY HAS EVER DONE THIS under proper conditions of observation and measurement by reliable and credible people.<br /><br />The continual evasive behavior of Rossi, Defkalion and Miley suggests nothing but fraud in the case of the first two and probably self delusion or errors in the case of Miley.<br /><br />As for all the others, their claims to power output are either small and probably attributable to measurement errors, or they can't reproduce the experiments themselves, much less having them reproduced independently.<br /><br />There are excellent reasons most people pay no attention to claims for LENR. They are simply not convincing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-43802158466077942722013-04-28T11:00:07.586-07:002013-04-28T11:00:07.586-07:00It SEEMS you are right, however I had so many surp...It SEEMS you are right, however I had so many surprises<br />as told 80% bad and 20% good in my life that my honest answer is "I don't know"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-65941040049496889512013-04-28T10:16:24.323-07:002013-04-28T10:16:24.323-07:00I learned the principle of learning more from erro...I learned the principle of learning more from errors from quotes of Zepelin. This man know much about building, innovating, and failing. <br /><br />About how science as a community can cope with the black swan called LENR, I've considered the work of Thomas Kuhn on the structure of scientific revolution.<br /><br />from his work it is clear that :<br />- LENR as anomalies were rejected as you can expect fromv any anomaly chalenging "normal science". absolutely normal<br />- LENR have no hope to be accepted without a total, all encompassing theory, <br />- LENR will only be accepted when giving huge advantage to the "new school" compared to the "old school"<br /><br />this is a reason to confirm that your vision of LENR+ is the good one.<br />there is no hope in proving LENR, because all evidence will be rejected whatever they are.<br />LENR evidence are already much enough, and they were enough even in 91... what happened after 91 is the usual denial of fact that Thomas Kuhn describe until there is a full perfect theory that give huge advantage to it's believers, compared to the installed normal science. <br />You don't fight denial with fact. Science in "normal mode" is immune to facts.<br /><br />The usual solution to get out of denial is when the "new school scientists" find a fully coherent and greatly advantageous new theory...<br />We are far from that, and we need much funding to find experimental evidence driving theoretical ideas... Solution like LHC to generate not few anomalies, but a huge volume of anomalies.<br />Where can came that funding ?<br /><br />The funding have to came from LENR+, the "business compatible" version of LENR. not an anomaly, but an industry.<br /><br />My idea is that first you make it fly, and it seems the case for Defkalion, Rossi and Brillouin.<br />Then with the cash you fund research.<br /><br />I would warn researchers not to continue to focus on theoretical explanation, and to focus on experimental data, then on phenomenological analysis to make control better.<br />That is what the Wright brothers have done, and that was the key.<br /><br />the theory is to be found, sure, but it is like finding a girlfriend, a wife, a mother for your kids...<br />You don't start by dreaming of kids, at the first date.<br />First seduce her, then share intimacy, then marry and develop projects together, then kids will came without much efforts.<br /><br />for LENR, first make it happens, then increase the signal, then understand the factors, then develop phenomenological model and control, then increase volume of data on what is happening...<br /><br />and theory will came naturally, like kids in a loving couple.<br /><br />and please, until the end, scientist should forget about theory.<br />LENR have been plagued by theoretical concerns...<br /><br />claims of impossibility while it was simply unexplained results, and on the other side, pet theories that started from easy theories breaking QM instead of proposing imaginative process in known QM.<br /><br />by the way, this plan seems coherent with defkalion scientific strategy.<br />Maybe is it the spirit of engineers.<br />NB: in France, engineer is a strange concept between science, management and technology...but we consider that Eiffel was an engineer, like Von braun, Vauban,Cugnot, Zeppelin, Tesla - see http://www.jesuismort.com/biographie_celebrite_chercher/celebre-ingenieur-61.php - this is in France what we have nearest to the garage inventor.<br /><br />Alain_Cohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08352476615242858677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-39158816411051540522013-04-28T09:42:49.148-07:002013-04-28T09:42:49.148-07:00There are no professors. If there were professors,...There are no professors. If there were professors, rumors and leaks would have appeared. I predicted two weeks ago that he would never release the names of the 'professors', because they only serve to extend his fraud.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com