tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post6257034528996735698..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: A TRAGIC AND EXPENSIVE CONFUSION HITTING LENRGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-85790025096473769522015-02-24T00:32:52.510-08:002015-02-24T00:32:52.510-08:00LENR is more of a science than supersymmetry is. T...LENR is more of a science than supersymmetry is. The pursuit of supersysmmetry cost 10 billion dollars and counting. aka FUBAR.Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-10577167393372966552015-02-21T03:13:05.421-08:002015-02-21T03:13:05.421-08:00I like the concept of shielding forces because I h...I like the concept of shielding forces because I have never been able to wrap my head around the idea that a force of any kind can make particles attract, because in my mind all forces must be direct by pushing or indirect by shielding other pushing forces. I understand Bosons as a stream of particles so many that you can not see them as individuals but by statistics and probability. <br />I am not a physicist but have spent some time reading and thinking about this. What I say here might be obvious for the professionals and if so, your discussions run much deeper where I am lost. Or the professionals truly believe in attracting direct forces. I would be pleased to know which, do you know Axil (or any other who have an answer)? <br />Mats002Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-3069650673078959772015-02-20T23:35:34.488-08:002015-02-20T23:35:34.488-08:00LENR is pseudoscience, no doubt.
Dangerous? Mayb...LENR is pseudoscience, no doubt. <br /><br />Dangerous? Maybe, when it is used as a vehicle of fraud for financial benefit. <br /><br />Otherwise, methinks not.<br />tyyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05296030725193206870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-38700440830759704792015-02-20T11:05:30.787-08:002015-02-20T11:05:30.787-08:00Why is it so hard for today's science to under...Why is it so hard for today's science to understand how the collective action of electrons can affect the nature of the weak and strong forces inside the nucleus.<br /><br />The mechanism of superconductivity gives us a clue. Both Its theory and it behavior inspired Higgs among others to solve the mass problem in particle physics. But amazingly, we have been shown in a recent superconductor experiment that we do not need a large particle accelerator to see the Higgs field at work though a Quantum Phase Transition. A condensed matter superconducting system configured with the appropriate crystal structure will reveal the Higgs field in action. Superconductivity shows that mass is just the shielding of force carriers. <br /><br />If a crystal structure can produce mass, why cannot a crystal structure and its attendant electron dance produce nuclear rearrangement so that one or more nuclei can achieve a lower energy level by converting mass to energy? Neutrons are not required when the forces of nature are being directly manipulated inside every level of the nuclear hierarchy by the proper electron dance. After all since mass and energy are the same thing, both the production of mass and energy are caused by the exclusion of the various force carriers from their attendant subatomic particles. <br />Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.com