tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post6175330744716238083..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: NOV 16, 2015 LENR OPINIONS AND INFOGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-71519112468231615952015-11-16T15:01:17.538-08:002015-11-16T15:01:17.538-08:00Codswallop, the presumption is clear that when Ros...Codswallop, the presumption is clear that when Rossi has spoken or written of hydrogen being 'H' is clearly that this means normal a hydrogen mixture with both light and heavy isotopes. The same is true in 25 years of NiH reports, no one has ever stipulated that they had a source of isotopically pure light 'H' which is much harder to come by than isotopically pure deuterium. <br /><br />This is the sort of 'twist of words' that every patent attorney worth the price of a cup of coffee adheres to. As for loading any and all of the various hydrogen loving metals, all such metals love and absorb all isotopes of hydrogen. <br /><br />Long before Rossi many researchers were showing the positive effects of nano-dimensional particles in activity related to hydrogen in both chemical and nuclear (including cold fusion) context so clearly nothing Rossi claims in that regard can possibly endure the challenge of prior art. <br /><br />These sorts of playing fast and loose with patent wording is the oldest game in the book for those who seek to through up patent smoke to go with their mirrors. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-31308436012864027692015-11-16T12:21:59.185-08:002015-11-16T12:21:59.185-08:00All things are possible but it was always clear fr...All things are possible but it was always clear from the start that Rossi was relying on Ni loaded with Monatomic H then agitated with heat. This is what Piantelli used and also what Defkalion used. Initially the monatomic H was piped in under pressure. <br /><br />If you look closely at the process in the various patents you can see that at an early stage (around 2008) Andrea Rossi introduced a catalyst that allowed internally released H2 to be released and converted to Monatomic H and that initially appeared to be his justification for his 'secret sauce' in his patent (the law says that such a catalyst is not patentable as it is a known process). The other Rossi claim to innovation was use of particular sized 'nano' particles of Ni as a powder. In the early Piantelli patents, Piantelli used an Ni coated rod and piped in Monatomic H. <br /><br />So trying to infuse D into Ni is not (AFAICT) viable. However a Pd lattice structure does allow D to be infused and uses an electrolytic technique to do so. The process in PdD AFAICT is that the D gets converted into Tritium releasing excess heat whereas the apparent process in NiH is that the Ni undergoes an isotopic shift (transmutation) taking in the H and releasing excess heat. (there was a time when some believed that Ni was transmuted into copper but AFAICT that is no longer believed). <br /><br />So to answer your question, it is not a known process to try to load Ni with D. Because of the obfuscation in Andrea's patents and his descriptions of his reactors, people are able to (and do) imagine anything.<br /><br />I am no expert just an observer so what I say may be me misinterpreting the processes and details.<br /><br />Doug Markerdsjm1https://www.blogger.com/profile/07779323885237127015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-62659274215255504112015-11-16T11:15:07.027-08:002015-11-16T11:15:07.027-08:00Is it possible to interpret Rossi's e-cat pate...Is it possible to interpret Rossi's e-cat patent claims to allowing deuterium instead of hydrogen being the species used? It seems that this most simple of all substitutions by Rossi in his secret as opposed to apparent method would easily send most replicators down a blind alley. When Rossi's describes 'hydrogen' in his patent claims he uses the name in a generic sense as opposed to the pure isotope of light hydrogen. This of course leaves deuterium enriched 'hydrogen' as being well within the scope of his claims. In law it is always only in court where an inventors true intentions are revealed and narrowly defined. Patent courts have almost always sided with the broadest possible interpretations of intention.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com