tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post3435203902852710845..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: Fundamental Causation Mechanisms of LENR.Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-46167750651433180172014-08-30T13:20:00.849-07:002014-08-30T13:20:00.849-07:00Liar and supporter of DGT bluff is better.Liar and supporter of DGT bluff is better.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-58703489843259318612014-08-30T00:52:39.096-07:002014-08-30T00:52:39.096-07:00Who is "a false"? The opposite of what y...Who is "a false"? The opposite of what you say is true.<br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-38292447783204299362014-08-29T22:40:56.939-07:002014-08-29T22:40:56.939-07:00You are a false, DGT is a bluff, Hyperion doesn...You are a false, DGT is a bluff, Hyperion doesn't work at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-50967423134186893902014-08-25T18:43:42.018-07:002014-08-25T18:43:42.018-07:00It's not neutrinos, it's magnetism.
http:...It's not neutrinos, it's magnetism.<br /><br />http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/09 ... -Constancy<br /><br /><br />Quote:<br /><br />"Scientists at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and Purdue University have ruled out neutrino flux as a cause of previously observed fluctuations in nuclear decay rates. From the article: 'Researchers ... tested this by comparing radioactive gold-198 in two shapes, spheres and thin foils, with the same mass and activity. Gold-198 releases neutrinos as it decays. The team reasoned that if neutrinos are affecting the decay rate, the atoms in the spheres should decay more slowly than the atoms in the foil because the neutrinos emitted by the atoms in the spheres would have a greater chance of interacting with their neighboring atoms. The maximum neutrino flux in the sample in their experiments was several times greater than the flux of neutrinos from the sun. The researchers followed the gamma-ray emission rate of each source for several weeks and found no difference between the decay rate of the spheres and the corresponding foils.' The paper can be found here on arXiv. Slashdot has previously covered the original announcement and followed up with the skepticism of other scientists."<br /><br /><br /><br />The paper can be found here on arXiv<br /><br />http://arxiv.org/pdf/1006.5071v1.pdfAxilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-73691076857762566462014-08-25T18:41:50.946-07:002014-08-25T18:41:50.946-07:00On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial...On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.<br /><br /><br />Read more at: http://phys.org/news201795438.html#jCp<br /><br />The unknown force from the sun must not only increase nuclear decay rates but reduce them. This is an important clue to the nature of this unknown factor. Radioactive decay rates must be embedded in an environment that defines its nature. That environment can be increased or decreased based on solar activity and in fact is defined by solar activity.<br /><br />The sun must provide an average background flux that directly affects the rates of decay. Various parts of the sun contribute to this background. This background comes from the core of the sun, but it can also be effected by localized regions on the sun’s surface.<br /><br /><br />It must be magnetism. Here is why…<br /><br /><br />The high magnetic fields in the sunspot-producing active regions also give rise to explosions known as solar flares. When the twisted field lines cross and reconnect, energy explodes outward with a force exceeding that of millions of hydrogen bombs. <br /><br />Temperatures in the outer layer of the sun, known as the corona, typically fall around a few million kelvins. As solar flares push through the corona, they heat its gas to anywhere from 10 to 20 million K, occasionally reaching as high as a hundred million.<br /><br />Because solar flares form in the same active regions as sunspots, they are connected to these smaller, less violent events. Flares tend to follow the same 11-year cycle. At the peak of the cycle, several flares may occur each day, with an average lifetime of only 10 minutes.<br /><br />Solar flares vary in size and power. The largest, X-class flares have the most significant effect on Earth. They can cause long-lasting radiation storms in the upper atmosphere, and trigger radio blackouts. Medium-size M-class flares can cause brief radio blackouts in the Polar Regions and the occasional minor radiation storms. C-class flares have few noticeable consequences.<br /><br />Absorbing X-rays affects the atmosphere. The increase in heat and energy result in an expansion of the Earth's ionosphere. Man-made radio waves travel through this portion of the upper atmosphere, so radio communications can be disturbed by its sudden unpredictable growth. Similarly, satellites previously circling through vacuum-free space can find themselves caught in the expanded sphere. The resulting friction slows down their orbit, and can bring them back to Earth sooner than intended.<br /><br />Despite their size and high energy, solar flares are almost never visible optically. The bright emission of the surrounding photosphere, where the sun's light originates, tends to overshadow even these explosive phenomena. Radio and optical emissions can be observed on Earth. <br /><br />I am saying in so many words is that solar flares are very powerful.<br /><br />Clearly, a tremendous amount of magnetic energy is converted in an instant to all the aforementioned energetic phenomena at the expense of the magnetic output of the sun. The sun stores vast amounts of energy in its magnetic fields. A sudden release and conversion of that energy will reduce that magnetic energy storehouse and consequentially reduce the magnetic background around earth that defines the rate of radioactive decay.<br /><br />As the article indicates, there are also indicators of variable radioactive decay rates according to the season on Earth that they are measure, summer or winter(and that means, hemispherical differences, since winter in the northern hemisphere is summer in the south. The decay rate was ever so slightly faster in winter than in summer). It is the same sun as source of the mystery factor. Neutrinos should not be effected by the seasons of the year, Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-51115730124782035882014-08-25T18:21:56.449-07:002014-08-25T18:21:56.449-07:00Nanoplasmonic experiments can be performed that ev...Nanoplasmonic experiments can be performed that evoke nuclear reactions through the use of laser irradiation of metallic nanoparticles. The nanoparticles amplify, concentrate, focus and convert the photons from the lasers into magnetic energy as described in my previous posts, for example see this experiment:<br /><br />http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0830.pdf<br /><br /> Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water.<br /><br />In this nanoplasmonic experiment, tritium can be increased or reduced or both simultaneously based on the parameters manipulated by the experimenter.<br /><br />The metal used is sensitive to the degree of reflection of the laser light. More reflection produces more reactivity.<br /><br />The duration of the laser pulse also is a factor. I believe that tritium production in Deuterium systems is a matter of timing related to an incomplete reaction cycle.<br /><br />In a system that flickers magnetically, and/or does not sustain a state of Bose Einstein condensation will produce nuclear products. A good example of this is the cavitation system that Mark LeClair has developed. <br /><br />The experimenter in the referenced paper remarks as follows:<br /><br />“The efficiency of nuclear processes occurring during the course of heavy water electrolysis can depend on the character of roughness of the electrode surfaces on a nanometer scale, the “spikiness” parameters [17, 18] in particular. Indeed, it is precisely in the regions of the sharpest surface relief alterations that high electric field strengths making for the acceleration of electrons and high mechanical stresses depressing the activation barriers for electrochemical processes can both get realized. This parameter is out of control in most experiments with electrolysis of heavy water. On the contrary, laser ablation of metallic targets by sub-nanosecond laser pulses leads to formation of self-organized nanostructures (NS) on the target. The average size and density of NS depends on laser fluence on the target and target material. Typical view of such NS on Ti and Au target ablated in water with 10 ps laser pulses are presented in Fig. 1.”<br /><br /><br />The paper is reflecting the rationale I gave for the formation of static and dynamic nuclear active environments.<br /><br />Clearly, uncontrolled creation of NAE is consistent with what happens in many uncontrolled LENR systems using electrolysis. By the way to avoid chance in NAE formation, in recent Misuno reactor experiments, Mizuno preconditions his electrodes to form metal spikes to enable the static NAE in the nanoplasmonic LENR process.<br /><br />The authors of this paper has their own theory of what is going on, my agreement will the author will vary on certain issues.<br /><br />At the end of the day, uncontrolled random effects can increase and/or decrease the creation and/or destruction of tritium. Tritium is not an indicator of a hot fusion like reaction but instead shows that a marginal system is flickering in terms of sustaining a nanoplasmonic LENR reaction. <br /><br />Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-31159995439832249322014-08-25T12:11:26.006-07:002014-08-25T12:11:26.006-07:00i personally believe that both lenr and nuclear de...i personally believe that both lenr and nuclear decay rate variations are cause by neutrino absorption. in lenr, we use condensed matter with non-localization of pseudo-particles (similair to bec in superconductors) to greatly increase neutrino absorption cross-section. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17842128500886824786noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-87110542208120831552014-08-25T12:07:19.236-07:002014-08-25T12:07:19.236-07:00you say that The fact that no radioactive isotopes...you say that The fact that no radioactive isotopes are found in the ash of the cold fusion is proof of your claim, but tritium is a radioactive isotope and has been observed in many lenr experiments. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17842128500886824786noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-55446270318080411222014-08-16T00:02:19.630-07:002014-08-16T00:02:19.630-07:00I also think so: slowly people will understand tha...I also think so: slowly people will understand that "LENR is an opera, not a song" <br /><br />peterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-79660446986043780532014-08-16T00:00:22.648-07:002014-08-16T00:00:22.648-07:00thanks, dear Doug I hope now it works
Peterthanks, dear Doug I hope now it works<br /><br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-71998067149942018482014-08-15T17:47:10.723-07:002014-08-15T17:47:10.723-07:00Just wanted to add this link to the Dennis Cravens...Just wanted to add this link to the Dennis Cravens Golden Ball experiment as the original link in the published article got truncated.<br /><br />Doug M<br /><br />http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf<br />dsjm1https://www.blogger.com/profile/07779323885237127015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-87499767041171552392014-08-15T15:13:59.512-07:002014-08-15T15:13:59.512-07:00A very interesting article and an insightful POV. ...A very interesting article and an insightful POV. Thanks !.<br /><br />Doug Mdsjm1https://www.blogger.com/profile/07779323885237127015noreply@blogger.com