tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post3355403009676172819..comments2024-03-14T01:12:33.881-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: LENR REALISM AND INFO FOR AUG 21, 2015Georgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-12671538951990620372015-08-21T10:54:40.709-07:002015-08-21T10:54:40.709-07:00The Miley progress report is interesting since it ...The Miley progress report is interesting since it reports a number of experimental details. On the other hand, he still hasn't solved the sintering problem as far as I can tell, which makes it impossible to sustain energy release over a period of time sufficient to definitively prove the existence of non-chemical reactions, and of course makes it impractical as an energy source. This report also doesn't provide any kind of isotopic or radiation analysis which might demonstrate the existence of LENR. LENUCO has been around for 4-5 years and so this is not new. It might be interesting to look at Miley's contribution to ICCF19 if he has one and also compare with his ICCF18 poster in which there was an isotopic analysis. On another note, what about Piantelli, and also Piantelli and MFMP? Is Piantelli's approach a dead-end? A few years ago Piantelli was claiming 100 W cells. He was also claiming that he had seen 1 MeV protons in a cloud chamber. What happened to the collaboration between Piantelli and MFMP? Was this stillborn due to NDA requirements? My impression is that Piantelli is and was far ahead of Miley (one uses nanostructure thin-films, the other use nanoparticles) and yet both appear to be "stuck" in some way. I hope I'm wrong about this. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com