tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post2942974587763310813..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: SEP 9, 2016 LENR, A BIT ABOUT ITS BASIC PREMISESGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-44047028465720884612016-09-11T16:56:52.963-07:002016-09-11T16:56:52.963-07:00Peter
I will forward any materials that might
help...Peter<br />I will forward any materials that might<br />help.<br />I have to admit I am still trying to figure<br />out LENR for dummies.<br />https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VkSMT8Q35Yk<br />Samsam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-15795737777413120982016-09-10T12:58:13.695-07:002016-09-10T12:58:13.695-07:00One more point. Vysotskii wrote that no later than...One more point. Vysotskii wrote that no later than May. At that point, there was little information from the IH side, except for some discussion from Dewey Weaver on blogs, easily discounted. It was not until IH Answered, August 6, amended the 11th, and provided 26 exhibits, showing some real evidence, that the Rossi Reality became largely untenable. Before then, it was merely weaker, because the support of IH had obviously vanished and IH had said that they had been unable to verify Rossi claims.Abd ulRahman Lomaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14566271926809161923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-60770183652305591322016-09-10T12:46:48.205-07:002016-09-10T12:46:48.205-07:00Peter, you did not show specific attribution. So n...Peter, you did not show specific attribution. So now you say that it was in email to you in Russian. Great! When? It matters. If this was recent, I will write Vladimir, with whom I have had nothing but excellent communication.<br /><br />It appears that the 1 year test was not a GPT. The GPT required certain preconditions which were not met, as far as what can be seen so far. Rossi alleges things that can seem to have authorized a GPT, but that is all, so far, Rossi Says. IH denies it, and Rossi has not asserted actual evidence, only implications. I.e., Darden approves a measurement procedure, for what was sold as a power installation and demonstration for investors, and then -- later? -- Rossi calls this approving the GPT test.<br /><br />Rossi has his own reality. He also inspires others to believe in it. Helium is a relative certainty, and I called this Plan B, back when I thought there was a good possibility that Rossi would come through, because, after all, IH was supporting him with big money. That disappeared. And then the truth about Rossi -- as seen in his own emails and communications and comparing with the accounts of Mats Lewan and then Rossi's complaint -- started to come out. It's gone, Peter, and I certainly did not kill it, and if the Rossi Effect is real, and if Rossi's behavior does not land him in jail, as it could, once again, he could still develop it. QuarkX, great. Remember, Rossi says the market is his judge.<br /><br />Well? He claimed to have a 1 MW power plant ready for sale in 2011. When he finally delivered the "1 MW E-cat plant" to IH in 2013, it was obviously not ready, but IH allowed the test to be postponed to a time agreed upon in writing. That never happened, Peter. If IH was improperly dragging their heels, it could have been legally forced. But that also was not done. Rossi attempted to do it by deception, with a claim that the move to Florida was for sale of power and demonstration. No mention of Test, and we don't know when Rossi first started claiming it was a GPT. It was not before the plant was delivered, that's for sure.Abd ulRahman Lomaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14566271926809161923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-85939825155002080662016-09-10T06:43:23.863-07:002016-09-10T06:43:23.863-07:00perhaps little enforced schooling/education
the pr...perhaps little enforced schooling/education<br />the problem of geniuses is to survive our education system.<br />However dear Sam you inspired me to write about LENR and Genius- not immediately please help, gather materials ideas be my co-author.<br />cheers<br />PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-25900429691329240732016-09-10T06:38:57.039-07:002016-09-10T06:38:57.039-07:00Peter
I like the geniuses that had little schoolin...Peter<br />I like the geniuses that had little schooling.<br />http://acepilots.com/wwi/us_rickenback<br />Samsam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-12182874046695506612016-09-10T06:27:53.997-07:002016-09-10T06:27:53.997-07:00Dear Abd,
You think I imgined this quote? The sour...Dear Abd,<br />You think I imgined this quote? The source is Prof Vladimir Vysotskii himself and actually he made- his initiative a similar declaration a few moths earlier.<br />He writes me in Russian, do you want the original text or what? Should I ask him now if he has changed his mind due to what events, arguments?<br />Nothing easier, I have to ask him to send me his very interesting ICCF20 paper, anyway?<br />Do you imagine a new phase in the Rosi-Darden conflict - was the 1 year tets not the true GPT?<br />Slowly you and your pals have to accept that the Rossi Effect is real and powerful and are you search for alternative solutions?<br /> Legal but imoral?<br />If the technology is working well you are an enemy of progress and of Cold Fusion/LENR trying to kill it by any means. To go back happily to your Helium certainty plan, making LENR an issue for the 22d Century.<br />So, what should I ask our colleague Vysotskii?<br /><br />peter<br /><br />In your answer (if) take careto not think in my place!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-49434715757303676982016-09-10T05:26:44.045-07:002016-09-10T05:26:44.045-07:00There was a new document added to Rossi v. Darden ...There was a new document added to Rossi v. Darden yesterday. It is not on pacermonitor because of the delay there. It is a Rossi response to the Motion for Judgment. It is available on newvortex, as are nearly all the case documents, in the filespace for that group. To see the documents, one must have a yahoo account, be a member of the newvortex yahoogroup, and be logged in.<br />https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/newvortex/info<br />https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/newvortex/files/Rossi_v_Darden/ (members only).<br />The filing is document 44.Abd ulRahman Lomaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14566271926809161923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-35820879498300999252016-09-10T05:20:15.049-07:002016-09-10T05:20:15.049-07:00Peter, you presented that Vysotskii quote back in ...Peter, you presented that Vysotskii quote back in May. I attempted to find a source for it, you have not stated any. The critical issue would be when Vysotskii said that. If it was during the period when it appeared that IH was supporting Rossi, it would be a relatively ordinary opinion. It is about bullying in media and blogs. The affair has entered a new phase. There is now a lawsuit with the claims of the parties, and some objective evidence. I would be astonished if Vysotskii would say that if he knew the currently-available evidence.Abd ulRahman Lomaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14566271926809161923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-47221457665942498352016-09-10T02:28:59.989-07:002016-09-10T02:28:59.989-07:00thanks!
peterthanks!<br />peterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-31821048547177754832016-09-09T15:02:30.969-07:002016-09-09T15:02:30.969-07:00Peter
Talk about a whiz kid.
http://www.mydomaine....Peter<br />Talk about a whiz kid.<br />http://www.mydomaine.com/next-einstein-physics-girl<br />Samsam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.com